[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: Steering Committee formation



On Tue, 2008-03-04 at 09:54 +1000, Noriko Mizumoto wrote:
> Runa Bhattacharjee wrote:
> > Paul W. Frields wrote:
> >> On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 20:55 +0100, Bart Couvreur wrote:
> >>> The only drawback I have here is that the L10N project is pretty much
> >>> divided into dozens of small parts (the teams), and that the SCo would
> >>> mostly be handling infrastructural things. But then again this could
> >>> that the different teams start to communicate more in the project, which
> >>> is always good. (just my $0.02)
> >>
> >> Actually, this is not too different from any other subproject -- for
> >> instance, there are small pockets of individuals or groups in Docs
> >> working on, say, the Get Involved Guide, or the Desktop User Guide.  The
> >> Steering Committee ties everything together and makes sure everyone is
> >> working toward overall goals in a consistent and logical fashion.
> > 
> > Can we perhaps have this as a discussion item for the meeting tomorrow 
> > (in case we are having one)?
> +1 meeting.
> I will be there at usual time.

I'll be logging because of the Fedora Board meeting occurring during
that time.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]