Remove specspo statistics?

Ani Peter apeter at redhat.com
Wed Mar 19 04:44:57 UTC 2008


Ani Peter wrote:
> Asgeir Frimannsson wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:39 AM, Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel
>> <ankit at redhat.com> wrote:
>>  
>>> Alexander Todorov wrote:
>>>  > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>  > Hash: SHA512
>>>  >
>>>  > Ankitkumar Rameshchandra Patel wrote:
>>>  > | Hi,
>>>  > |
>>>  > | Can we remove specspo/desc, specspo/summary statistics from the
>>>  > | individual language statistics page? I am not sure about other 
>>> teams, I
>>>  > | personally don't like to see it on Gujarati Statistics page. So, I
>>>  > would
>>>  > | like to remove specspo statistics from
>>>  > | http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/gu/fedora-9 page.
>>>  > |
>>>  > | I would like other teams to opt-in, if you also prefer to do 
>>> the same.
>>>  > | May be, we could request the infrastructure team or Dimitris to 
>>> remove
>>>  > | the specspo statistics from the individual language statistics 
>>> page.
>>>  > |
>>>  >
>>>  > Before other teams can opt for this can you share your reasoning? Do
>>>  > you simply
>>>  > don't like these particular two because they are extremely large? I
>>>  > guess users
>>>  > who don't speak English will be happy to see package descriptions in
>>>  > their
>>>  > native language. Why removing them from the stats page then?
>>>  >
>>>  Hi,
>>>
>>>  Just look at the statistics of the module "specspo".
>>>  http://translate.fedoraproject.org/module/specspo Do you see any
>>>  language completed more than even 50%? No...
>>>
>>>  The reason is obvious, it's too huge to translate and another reason
>>>  would be I think, it's not really important for the "end users" 
>>> too, who
>>>  actually use "Localized Desktops". For them package summary or
>>>  description doesn't make much difference as they understand the use of
>>>  packages through help files/manuals only. They don't go by RPM specs -
>>>  summary or descriptions I think. So, most of the language coordinators
>>>  are not translating this package.
>>>
>>>  So, I would like it to be removed from the *individual language
>>>  statistics page only*, Not from the "individual module translation
>>>  statistics page".
>>>
>>>  It will help me to track the progress of translation of my 
>>> language, for
>>>  the important/core packages only.
>>>
>>>  Still, I am not so keen on getting this removed from the statistics
>>>  page, but thought may be other language coordinators too thinking the
>>>  same thing, so expressed my idea.
>>>
>>>  Thread is open for the inputs I think...
>>>     
>>
>> What about moving specspo to the "Various Fedora resources" release
>> set, rather than having it under F8, F9 etc..? In this way, it will
>> show up on (using pt_BR as example):
>>
>> http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/pt_BR/various
>>
>> but it will not show up on:
>>
>> http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/pt_BR/fedora-9
>> http://translate.fedoraproject.org/languages/pt_BR/fedora-8
>>
>> cheers,
>> asgeir
>>   
> +1 for moving specspo as another set and gaving it under F9 etc.
>
> Regards
> Ani
oops mistake :-(

+1 for moving specspo as another set and not having it under F9 etc. :-)

Ani




More information about the Fedora-trans-list mailing list