F10 Schedule Revised
Paul W. Frields
stickster at gmail.com
Tue Oct 7 23:44:46 UTC 2008
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 00:06 -0400, Jon Stanley wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Paul W. Frields <stickster at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > even with only 3 people I think Fedora Talk held us back at times.
>
> Sorry for the tangent here - but in what way did it hold you back? I'm
> really interested,
Not for technical reasons -- it was more that conference calls that are
essentially, "Let's all do <XXXX>," suffer from everyone talking at once
too much. (And I point that finger *firmly* at myself first and
foremost.) IRC is lower bandwidth but when everyone is doing something
at once, communication is *easier* to interleave that way. For more
orderly meetings, IRC can be less effective -- not always, but
sometimes.
--
Paul W. Frields
gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
http://paul.frields.org/ - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/attachments/20081007/7e180ee6/attachment.sig>
More information about the Fedora-trans-list
mailing list