Documentation & Translation schedule review
poelstra at redhat.com
Tue Dec 15 23:05:09 UTC 2009
I'll try to see what I can do with this, but it doesn't address my
original request below.
We really need to meet in real time on this. I'll start another thread
On 12/11/2009 02:55 PM, John J. McDonough wrote:
> Looking at it with my Release Notes blinders on, I think we need to
> first focus on the major tasks, AND THEIR RELATIONSHIPS. I'm sort of
> ignoring docs.fp.o at this point because that happens almost
> automatically as a result of having the RPM.
> Starting from the end ...
> We need to have the RPM built BEFORE the RC Compose. Somehow we managed
> to miss this little detail for F12. There are always hiccups so I think
> we should leave 3 days for this. We *might* end up with another RPM for
> the "Bug Complete" compose, but since we will have addressed the issues
> already, we can probably get by with a day for that.
> Backing up from the RC RPM, it looks as if we don't gain a lot by trying
> to get all the translation done for beta like we did for F12. The time
> for GA is about the same as the time for Beta. So let's assume we have
> 10 days for translation (which must be finished before we make the RPM),
> and another 10 days for post-beta edits, that brings us back about to
> the Beta compose, so basically, it is the maximum amount of time we
> So the basics are:
> - We need to have the RPM **before** RelEng's compose
> - We need the translation before the RPM
> - We need the text before we can translate it
> The only difference between Beta and GA is that for Beta we probably
> should take an extra few days for unclaimed beats.
> Alpha is kind of a minor event since we don't translate it, and in the
> past we haven't made an RPM (although I think we should).
> Take a look at
> there are lots of other things we need to do for Release Notes, but
> these are the things that essentially set the schedule. Unfortunately,
> the html export doesn't show the dependencies, which are the main thing.
> But all of the other tasks are mostly noise. It is this business of
> write, translate, make the RPM that sets the schedule, and we need to
> give Jesse the RPM before he composes, so RelEng's composes are major
> milestones as far as we are concerned.
> Also, there is an assumption here that the new Transifex is in place.
> We have also had discussions about sending POTs much more frequently.
> The way we have been handling it L10N gets the MINIMUM amount of time to
> do the translations. Often we have plenty of changes backed up before
> we can reveal them to L10N. This doesn't seem like the best plan. We
> have an accounting problem trying to keep all the partial and un-done
> translations straight, and L10N is as rushed as possible.
> On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 12:22 -0800, John Poelstra wrote:
>> In anticipation of the meeting suggested by Sparks on logistics list,
>> I've created a text version of the schedule that should work well for
>> customizing or using in gobby.
>> This version is a combination of:
>> 1) key milestones for the release as a whole (to provide context)
>> 2) Documentation tasks
>> 3) Translation tasks
>> The most helpful feedback you can give me (at the meeting or elsewhere)
>> is to provide corrections, additions, or deletions based on the version
>> I've created. It does not help me if you create your own version from
>> scratch and refer to it because then I have to start all over which is a
>> big investment of time. A patch or diff against the original file works
> Fedora-trans-list mailing list
> Fedora-trans-list at redhat.com
More information about the Fedora-trans-list