FLSCo and elections post-release

[Mostafa Daneshvar]

On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 17:28 +0530, Runa Bhattacharjee wrote:
> Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> > The current FLSCo team has been on board for quite a while now. The
> > topic of elections has been raised in the past, but not many
> > nominations have been posted. So the question is:
> > 
> > Do we want to have an election for FLSCo after this release?
> > 
> > One idea is to open up the nomination process, and if more than eg. 6
> > people get nominated, then we could elect a 5-person FLSCo team.
> > 
> 
> I was wondering that it may be a good idea to go ahead and have an election.
> 
> Thoughts?
I think it's a good idea, specially we didn't have any election after
Fedora 9.But do we have enough Candidates to run such an election? 

Mostafa Daneshvar 
http://mostafadaneshvar.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/attachments/20091210/6a6c5445/attachment.sig>