[Bug 203642] some .so should be in -devel, or not shipped?

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: some .so should be in -devel, or not shipped?


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=203642


pertusus at free.fr changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
  Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup                  |bzcl34nup




------- Additional Comments From pertusus at free.fr  2008-04-03 16:35 EST -------
The binaries seems not to be linked anymore, according to my tests,
they are dlopened, but uses the numbered symlink, so I think that
the .so should still be removed.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.