[Bug 206410] [as_IN][Glyphs] Some Rarely used Codepoints Glyphs missing Priority - C

[bugzilla at redhat.com]

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: [as_IN][Glyphs] Some Rarely used Codepoints Glyphs missing Priority - C


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206410


runab at redhat.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |runab at redhat.com
  Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup                  |bzcl34nup




------- Additional Comments From runab at redhat.com  2008-04-04 02:42 EST -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> Ok after having discussion with as_IN LM, 
> Codepoints – Various Signs
> U+09F2
> U+09F3
> U+09F4
> U+09F5
> U+09F6
> U+09F8
> U+09F9
>  are rarely used so we can skip above codepoints from including in font file.
> 
> Codepoints – Additional Vowels
> U+09E2
> U+09E3
> Can be included in font file but they are also rarely used.
> 
> So do we need to really include those codepoints in font file?

Having these in the font file would be helpful as these would definitely be used
while digitizing old manuscripts. 

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.