[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

[Bug 230856] autogen package is misconfigured



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: autogen package is misconfigured


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230856


fedora-triage-list redhat com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|rawhide                     |9




------- Additional Comments From fedora-triage-list redhat com  2008-05-13 22:39 EST -------
Changing version to '9' as part of upcoming Fedora 9 GA.
More information and reason for this action is here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping

------- Additional Comments From debarshi ray gmail com  2008-07-22 21:24 EST -------
Currently Autogen is split into 3 parts in Fedora:
+ autogen (Requires: autogen-libopts)
+ autogen-libopts
+ autogen-libopts-devel (Requires: autogen-libopts)

The reason for the split is mentioned here
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432542#c1 and it looks like Debian
(http://packages.debian.org/sid/autogen) also has a similar division.

Bruce is probably suggesting that we merge autogen-libopts and
autogen-libopts-devel into a single autogen-libopts. Lets take the example of
Anjuta (http://anjuta.org/), which uses Autogen while building and at run-time.
It only needs autogen and autogen-libopts, and not autogen-libopts-devel, for
its needs.

So should we still perform the merge or let autogen-libopts-devel be a separate
identity?

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]