From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 13:09:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 08:09:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240924] iptables forward rules for kvm networking not saved In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011309.n01D9vXn010151@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240924 Edouard Bourguignon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |edouard.bourguignon at oxalya. | |com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 18:12:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:12:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246481] Remove asciidoc build requirement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901011812.n01IClkA011818@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246481 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-01 13:12:45 EDT --- mercurial-1.1.2-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mercurial-1.1.2-2.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 1 21:06:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:06:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242386] Xorg burns CPU cycles, making desktop sluggish In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901012106.n01L6ZQ6024146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242386 Brian Mury changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |brianmury at alumni.uvic.ca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 12:09:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 07:09:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021209.n02C9Rk3004123@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #22 from Stefan Richter 2009-01-02 07:09:26 EDT --- Re comment 17: See http://marc.info/?l=linux1394-devel&m=123089504900333 --- David Moore pointed out that libraw1394 accesses the local node(s) in order to determine how many controllers are present. Furthermore, the local node is used as the default node for several operations which many libraw1394 clients need, even though a different node (e.g. camcorder) could be used for their purposes. We should be able to fix most of these issues by modifications to libraw1394. Remaining issues require kernel driver changes, but these don't affect dvgrab, kino, and similar high-level applications. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 13:43:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 08:43:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 162774] strace ignores int3 SIGTRAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021343.n02DhP92004002@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774 --- Comment #12 from Denys Vlasenko 2009-01-02 08:43:22 EDT --- The fix is in upstream CVS now. Taking into account that this isn't a hot potato (strace users were coping with inability to handle SIGTRAPs for many years), I am contemplating just waiting till upstream code will trickle into Fedora updates / new Fedora release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 19:58:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:58:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 162774] strace ignores int3 SIGTRAP In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901021958.n02JwhrC005830@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162774 --- Comment #13 from Roland McGrath 2009-01-02 14:58:42 EDT --- Since we are upstream maintainers, for Fedora strace I have always used fresh upstream releases. Neither this nor other bugs are so urgent they can't wait for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 2 21:57:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:57:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901022157.n02LvhNj013284@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 --- Comment #39 from Andre Robatino 2009-01-02 16:57:36 EDT --- This has been seen by someone else in bug #448291. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 19:55:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:55:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031955.n03Jt5nr021116@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #17 from Mike 2009-01-03 14:55:04 EDT --- Please can this be re-assigned to F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 19:53:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:53:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901031953.n03JrkSk020708@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #16 from Mike 2009-01-03 14:53:41 EDT --- Tested in F10 The mount works as per #13, but the suggestion from #14 does not as the command line does not recognise mount.crypt The file browser in gnome sees the encrypted volume and clicking it requests a passphrase but then fails to mount anything. Places in gnome again sees the encrypted drive and requests a passphrase but again fails to mount saying there is no mount point specified. There are no messages in /var/log/messages indicating any connection to the mount for the CDROM. This needs to be remedied for F10/F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 20:45:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:45:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032045.n03KjexS014396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #18 from Till Maas 2009-01-03 15:45:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #16) > The mount works as per #13, but the suggestion from #14 does not as the command > line does not recognise mount.crypt You need to install pam_mount to get mount.crypt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 3 22:02:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:02:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901032202.n03M2iNN008596@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #19 from Mike 2009-01-03 17:02:41 EDT --- Ahh OK - with pam_mount installed then mount.crypt and umount.crypt do work as per #14 - however I get a request for the passphrase when the CD is loaded into the drive and again another request for the passphrase when I issue the mount.crypt command. Also going to the device list in the "computer" gui browser, and right clicking to eject the disk fails, but doing "eject /dev/cdrom" in the CLI does work. It would be nice if this could be cleaned up so it works in a smoother fashion. I know I could make a small script to mount and umount/eject but it would be nice to have this available by default, and it would also be nice to have this work such that on loading the CD, that the passphrase is requested, then at the same time a mount point entered so that the pam_mount is then executed "under the hood" - or is this a difficult facility to get working? I guess it would fail if an inappropriate mount point was specified but there could be a default such as /media/cdrom_crypt or somesuch? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 00:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:15:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040015.n040FkI7014752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 David Tonhofer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |d.tonhofer at m-plify.com --- Comment #40 from David Tonhofer 2009-01-03 19:15:39 EDT --- I seem to have hit this bug on Fedora 10. I thought the SCSI/SATA drivers had a bug until I found this report. Here we go: With an LG GDRH20N SATA DVD-ROM: -- Media Check fails 100% (tested DVDs, (live) CDs, several burns...) -- "Independent Media Check" using another system works (dump the ISO image, see below, then check the SHA1 sum against the official sum) -- Installation fails in a totally weird manner (e.g. at the very end, anaconda says "no kernel images installed" or arbitrary packages are not found) -- Starting the same system from a PATA drive found in the attic with the same media works nicely (installation not yet tried, will try) -- Media check passes if "ide=nodma" kernel option is given. Yowza! Additionally: -- Booting the system to Fedora 10 Live CD using aforementioned PATA drive, then dumping an ISO image (in this case, F10-x86_64-Live.iso) off the DVD-ROM if "ide=nodma" has NOT been set results in a: -- correctly-sized -- but slightly corrupted image The dump was done with "dd if=/dev/sr0 of=/tmp/corrupted.iso" It is probably not of big interest to know the exact differences, but a little perl program to cut the dump into 10K blocks and hash these, applied tp both original ISO and dumped ISO reveals 61 10K blocks with differences, *spread throughout the image* (not only the end affected). Now going to have drink or two. How to hash 10K blocks: #!/usr/bin/perl use Digest::MD5 qw(md5 md5_hex md5_base64); $file = $ARGV[0]; open(FILE,$file) or die "Could not open $file: $!\n"; binmode FILE; my $buffer; my $size = 1024*10; my $read; my $pos = 0; while (($read = read(FILE, $buffer, $size)) > 0) { my $digest = md5_hex($buffer); my $end = $pos + $size - 1; print "$digest [$pos,$end] $size\n"; $pos += $size; } close(FILE); -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 00:51:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 19:51:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901040051.n040pMEc020089@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 --- Comment #41 from Andre Robatino 2009-01-03 19:51:21 EDT --- The readahead bug should only affect reading the last few dozen KB of the disc image. You also need to be careful not to use dd to attempt to read off more than the actual size of the ISO. The rawread script at http://www.troubleshooters.com/linux/coasterless.htm reads off the correct amount automatically. It's very handy; I make it executable and put it in ~/bin so it's always available in my path. Using "ide=nodma" may or may not work, depending on your hardware (it usually didn't work for me). Doing the burning as recommended in the link above seems to be the only foolproof way to avoid the readahead bug. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 15:18:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 10:18:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186512] kernel prevents proper CD checking (mediacheck/install fails) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041518.n04FIiJ9024964@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186512 --- Comment #42 from David Tonhofer 2009-01-04 10:18:40 EDT --- Thanks Andre, After retesting, any consistent explanation fell apart, and I am now pretty sure that it is just my DVD-ROM drive which does not work or which has some problem with the motherboard. Time burnt on a stupid problem, damn you non-self-checking hardware! Okay, out goes the drive... I'm not sure whether "ide=nodma" still has any effect whatsoever in F10, especially with SATA drives? The last time it was mentioned was in the Fedora Core 4 release notes at http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/fc4/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 17:05:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 12:05:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901041705.n04H5WTP027728@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dan at danny.cz -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 21:50:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:50:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042150.n04LobHC025084@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Jayson King changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzilla2 at jaysonking.org --- Comment #14 from Jayson King 2009-01-04 16:50:34 EDT --- I recently ran into this as well. IMO nash should be able to handle relatime just as it handles the other flags (it does noatime, nodiratime, etc already). I adapted the patch here for F10, and it Just Works. Here are some thoughts that I have about this, though: 1) nash.c should include linux/fs.h, instead of defining its own MS_* constants. 2) mkinitrd should know about the flags that nash understands, and reject any that won't work, or at least warn the user. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:06:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:06:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042206.n04M6fPU027728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #15 from Jayson King 2009-01-04 17:06:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328155) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328155) adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd I don't know if there is a compelling reason to define the MS_* constants explicitly, but here's a patch for F10 mkinitrd that is an adaptation of the earlier patch with the change that it replaces #define MS_* with #include . Tested on x86_64. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 22:34:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:34:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 453036] Build php-pecl-apc for EPEL 4 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042234.n04MYnrG016227@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453036 Tim Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Tim Jackson 2009-01-04 17:34:47 EDT --- I have checked my latest changes into CVS which I believe should be all that is needed to run successfully; however since the initial branch, I no longer have a need for this package on EL-4 so I won't be maintaining it. Anyone else wants it, hopefully they can pick it up from CVS. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 4 23:36:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:36:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901042336.n04Navpv009724@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Jayson King changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #328155|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Jayson King 2009-01-04 18:36:55 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=328162) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=328162) adapt earlier patch for F10 mkinitrd As long as we're including linux/fs.h we can get rid of the other MS_* defines also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 02:24:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:24:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050224.n052Oh5N019882@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | Summary|nash mount should support |[PATCH] nash mount should |relatime |support relatime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 09:06:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:06:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050906.n0596GcW010205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 09:43:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 04:43:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901050943.n059hLgb017746@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Till Maas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource at till.name -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 10:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 05:11:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051011.n05ABLue009407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |haanjdj at gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Warren Togami 2009-01-05 05:11:17 EDT --- *** Bug 430280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 10:13:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 05:13:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051013.n05ADBdZ009884@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Warren Togami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|235704 |446452 --- Comment #18 from Warren Togami 2009-01-05 05:13:10 EDT --- While it is true that it is meant to be default, a valid option in fstab should NOT break nash's ability to boot the system. This should be fixed in nash. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 13:02:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:02:08 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248180] Xorg ~100% CPU upon resume from hibernation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051302.n05D28Lj028340@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mlichvar at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:57:17 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 14:27:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:27:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901051427.n05ERWei002866@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 David Dillow changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dave at thedillows.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 5 22:08:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:08:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901052208.n05M80kL000983@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Matthew Woehlke changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mw_triad at users.sourceforge. | |net -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 03:07:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:07:27 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060307.n0637RmA007121@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 --- Comment #8 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim 2009-01-05 22:07:25 EDT --- This bug should be easy to fix. Try the following: - in the source tree, the file gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas.in change the key name /schemas/apps/gnome-terminal/profiles/Default/cursor_blink_mode string (type) system (default value) to /schemas/desktop/gnome/interface/cursor_blink bool (type) false (default value) (I thought cursor_blink_mode is now obsolete, so it's safe to replace it with cursor_blink.) (you may need to change owner translation, etc.) Here is how I think it would work: - during rpmbuild the file gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas.in (#1) becomes ./BUILD/gnome-terminal-2.24.2/src/gnome-terminal.schemas (#2) - during "rpm -i" #2 becomes /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas (#3) - "rpm -q --scripts gnome-terminal" shows the following postinstall scriplet: gconftool-2 ... /etc/gconf/schemas/gnome-terminal.schemas (#4) which reads the value from #3 and store it in /etc/gconf/gconf.xml.defaults/%gconf-tree.xml (#5) - during run-time, gnome-terminal reads value from gconfd-2, which reads default values from #5. I tried this in my private build, and it did the trick when I tried it on my F10. The same issue (cursor default to blinking) is still in F10 official release. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 04:49:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:49:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901060449.n064nOAV006374@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 10:12:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 05:12:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061012.n06AC0Ho001346@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Hans de Goede changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |elanthis at awesomeplay.com --- Comment #19 from Hans de Goede 2009-01-06 05:11:56 EDT --- *** Bug 475495 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 6 15:32:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:32:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901061532.n06FWJwp007474@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Andrew McNabb changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |amcnabb at mcnabbs.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208375] keyboard type keeps changing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8ojp015095@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208375 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191893] system-config-keyboard don't open in graphical mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8nF2015066@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191893 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:51 -0500 Subject: [Bug 216132] No possible to cancel cahnges in the TUI in non-English locale In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8pBU015115@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=216132 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 7 18:08:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:08:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 177301] system-config-keyboard is missing dependencies on newt and kudzu In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901071808.n07I8mUY015040@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177301 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|lkundrak at redhat.com |lkundrak at v3.sk -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 8 17:01:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:01:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901081701.n08H1ivA011152@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Nicola Soranzo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |nsoranzo at tiscali.it -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 05:12:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:12:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 349151] rename pkgconfig to pkg-config or add provides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090512.n095Ca1K012885@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349151 Rahul Sundaram changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:00:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:00:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090800.n0980K2a004149@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |9 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #13 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-01-09 03:00:19 EDT --- This still happens with 9, I'll test 10 when I get a chance to upgrade -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:16:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:16:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229518] Add support for selinux samba_share_t file context In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090816.n098Geu2007285@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518 Christian Nolte changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #6 from Christian Nolte 2009-01-09 03:16:38 EDT --- What is the current status? It is currently a hassle for an unexperienced user to use this UI, because the shares won't wor "out-of-the-box" (tm). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:17:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:17:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229518] Add support for selinux samba_share_t file context In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090817.n098H76o031049@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518 Christian Nolte changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:30:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:30:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244520] system-config-display does not allow full range of resolution for monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090830.n098UP8r009751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244520 --- Comment #15 from Otto J. Makela 2009-01-09 03:30:23 EDT --- Still, the same problem seen on a fresh installation of Fedora 10: Resolutions available to choose in system-config-display are not updated to reflect new monitor selection in hardware settings. Workaround is to manually edit the xorg.conf file, but if one does this, why bother with system-config-display in the first place? For example, I have an (automatically correctly detected) 1920?1080 monitor, for which "system-config-display --reconfig" suggests 1400?1050 as the best available resolution. This problem is complicated a bit by bug #477993 (system-config-display crashes while reading xorg.conf), a workaround is to use the --reconfig option. I can't change the status of this bug as I am not its owner, can someone else reopen it once again for Fedora 10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 08:44:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 03:44:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244992] signames.h may conserve obsolete information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090844.n098iciL003320@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244992 Roman Rakus changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:01:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:01:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 304261] autofs fails to mount cifs share In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090901.n0991C2U006404@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=304261 Ian Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 09:00:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:00:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 287411] Kernel loses track of CWD of process In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901090900.n0990QMC006244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=287411 Ian Kent changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:31:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:31:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246873] Initscript Review - autodir In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091231.n09CVBoA017108@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246873 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Summary|Initscript Review |Initscript Review - autodir Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:31:10 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:33:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:33:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247006] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091233.n09CXiLT017538@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247006 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:33:43 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:35:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:35:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247082] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091235.n09CZMMY026232@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247082 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:35:20 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:34:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:34:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247063] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091234.n09CYYSQ025761@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247063 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:34:33 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:34:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247027] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091234.n09CY9uD025663@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247027 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:34:08 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:33:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246881] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091233.n09CX9xV025463@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246881 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:33:08 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 12:34:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:34:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247073] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091234.n09CYvF4025844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247073 Matthias Saou changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | --- Comment #4 from Matthias Saou 2009-01-09 07:34:55 EDT --- Reopening, as I'll still need to take care of this. Note that the LSB init stuff still isn't as well explained and detailed as I'd like... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:41:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:41:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212869] udev inconsistant naming In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091341.n09DfY2Z001237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212869 Harald Hoyer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:46:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:46:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221152] GFS2: Clean up of glock code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091346.n09DkSFK010795@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221152 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Steve Whitehouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #19 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:52:02 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:49:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:49:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229518] Add support for selinux samba_share_t file context In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091349.n09DnQPJ002914@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229518 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened |FutureFeature Version|10 |rawhide Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:52:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:52:28 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242607] Build with festival error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091352.n09DqSdU003847@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-09 08:52:27 EDT --- festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/festival-1.96-7.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 13:54:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:54:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 221152] GFS2: Clean up of glock code In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091354.n09DsgKP012655@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221152 Steve Whitehouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:40:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:40:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 206650] installation produces an error message when updating icon cache In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091540.n09Fe5Os029885@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206650 Radek B?ba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Radek B?ba 2009-01-09 10:40:03 EDT --- This was apparently fixed silently at some point. Installation of krusader doesn't produce the error message anymore in F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:55:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:55:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232437] Cannot browse a SMB server with 2000+ shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091555.n09Ftb0C001249@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437 --- Comment #6 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-09 10:55:36 EDT --- Tomas, Can you move this to F10 since it is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:57:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:57:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091557.n09Fv4Ph001515@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 --- Comment #18 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-09 10:57:03 EDT --- Kristian, Can you move this to F10 since it is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:57:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:57:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091557.n09Fvo79001610@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #14 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-09 10:57:49 EDT --- Petr, Can you pls move this to F10 since it is still a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 15:58:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:58:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 325251] [NetApp 5.2 bug] New Prio Patch required for NetApp In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091558.n09FwkBJ010864@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=325251 Andrius Benokraitis changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:08:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:08:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232437] Cannot browse a SMB server with 2000+ shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091608.n09G8O5k004112@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437 --- Comment #7 from Tom?? B?atek 2009-01-09 11:08:23 EDT --- Hi Bryan, your setup is quite unusual, so I was wondering if you can provide smb.conf from the server where that large number of shares resides. It would help us with debugging. Otherwise I will try to create dumb 2000 shares on some Samba server here. Also, starting with F9 we've switched to gvfs which has quite different implementation of smb browsing. There are further samba browsing fixes in F10 updates repository: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2008-11611 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:34:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:34:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232437] Cannot browse a SMB server with 2000+ shares In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091634.n09GY3P9009794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232437 --- Comment #8 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-09 11:34:02 EDT --- Tomas, The server is a Windows server so there is no smb.conf. Also, the server is the property of our corporate IT department and I have no authority over it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 16:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:45:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 244520] system-config-display does not allow full range of resolution for monitor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091645.n09Gjl52022609@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244520 --- Comment #16 from Chris Caudle 2009-01-09 11:45:45 EDT --- While someone else reported this problem existing on an F10 installation, I no longer see this issue on a fresh install of F10 on the same hardware that had a problem with F7 and F8. Strictly from my experience I cannot support re-opening this under F10. I'm not familiar with the administration features of bugzilla, so I don't know if someone else can re-open under F10, or if this will have to be re-entered as a new bug if someone else is having problems under F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:07:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:07:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091707.n09H712N026908@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:06:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:06:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091706.n09H6Wea026844@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #15 from Petr Machata 2009-01-09 12:06:31 EDT --- "It is still a problem" means what? That fedora consistently fails to switch DST as it should, or that libc consistently fails to update /etc/localtime according to tzdata updates? In both cases the bug could still be in either one of glibc, glibc trigger script, rpm, or tzdata, but at least it's something concrete. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:13:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:13:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091713.n09HDC1G018528@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #16 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-09 12:13:11 EDT --- Petr, I'm really not sure what the root cause is, all I can say for certain is that with F8, F9, and now with F10, the system time does not changed in accordance with U.S. DST. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:14:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:14:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 204800] perl.prov script misparses some version information In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091714.n09HEQ0g018666@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204800 Nigel Metheringham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Nigel Metheringham 2009-01-09 12:14:24 EDT --- Looked at current F10 release. The perldeps.pl prog is now a much later version and should resolve the major issues. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:41:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:41:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448758] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091741.n09Hf2Sl001593@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758 Eric Moret changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 17:42:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:42:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] F8 changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091742.n09HgE4i001913@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #17 from Petr Machata 2009-01-09 12:42:13 EDT --- First, check that your tzdata package is sound, and just for completeness sake, show me which version do you have: $ rpm -q tzdata $ rpm -V tzdata Next we need to determine where does /etc/localtime come from: $ find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1` The above may turn up a couple zones that all have the same md5sum, in which case use diff to check that the files are actually the same: $ diff /etc/localtime /usr/share/zoneinfo/The/Zone/ItFound If they are not the same (which is unlikely), or grep didn't find anything (which is quite possible), we know that /etc/localtime doesn't come from tzdata package. We can work from here to figure out why is glibc trigger failing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:07:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:07:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091807.n09I7gP2029614@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Bryan Christ changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|F8 changed daylight time on |System changed daylight |October 28 based on old |time on October 28 based on |U.S. rules |old U.S. rules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:16:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:16:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091816.n09IGfWv031451@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #18 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-09 13:16:40 EDT --- rpm -q tzdata tzdata-2008i-1.fc10.noarch rpm -V tzdata (no output) maybe check the syntax of the this command you provide me: find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \; | grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1` -bash: /etc/localtime: Permission denied -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 18:33:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:33:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091833.n09IX4Zg002409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #19 from Petr Machata 2009-01-09 13:33:03 EDT --- They syntax is correct, but bugzilla split it into two lines. The following is cut'n'paste friendly: find /usr/share/zoneinfo/ -type f -exec md5sum {} \;\ | grep `md5sum /etc/localtime | cut -d' ' -f1` If it still tells the same, that's interesting. Can you try to run the command as root? Also, could you give me the output of the following? $ ls --lcontext /etc/localtime -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 19:06:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:06:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247007] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091906.n09J6m4r020524@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247007 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 19:33:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:33:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448758] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901091933.n09JXNSU026327@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758 Eric Moret changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|low |high Severity|medium |high -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 20:23:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:23:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247017] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092023.n09KN2qG028585@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247017 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #5 from Bob Relyea 2009-01-09 15:23:00 EDT --- reopenning until I actually review the initscripts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 20:25:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:25:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250738] build patches for coolkey In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092025.n09KPJhZ029229@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250738 Bob Relyea changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #9 from Bob Relyea 2009-01-09 15:25:17 EDT --- These patches may apply to the current coolkey, reopenning. bob -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 23:52:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:52:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092352.n09Nq1kt023823@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 9 23:52:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:52:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901092352.n09Nq2cs023827@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | Attachment mime|application/octet-stream |text/plain type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:01:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:01:33 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901100301.n0A31XHX006173@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #21 from Michael Cronenworth 2009-01-09 22:01:30 EDT --- *** Bug 478330 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 03:01:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:01:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901100301.n0A31NRt006020@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Michael Cronenworth changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mike at cchtml.com --- Comment #20 from Michael Cronenworth 2009-01-09 22:01:15 EDT --- XFS does not default to "relatime" so this breaks on people using XFS, such as myself, who want to use "relatime" in their fstab. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 04:16:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:16:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901100416.n0A4GOJJ019794@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #22 from Curtis Doty 2009-01-09 23:16:22 EDT --- Zing! Pop. Peter, have we convinced you yet? Is there anything else we can do to help push a fix through? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 11:57:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:57:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 215369] pppd doest not fill default gateway address In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101157.n0ABvlEv007427@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=215369 Marek Gre??ko changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #7 from Marek Gre??ko 2009-01-10 06:57:43 EDT --- The previous state remains unchanged in Fedora 10 also. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 12:30:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:30:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250030] ethernet+modem pcmcia card not recognised In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101230.n0ACULru014134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250030 Philip Ashmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |WORKSFORME --- Comment #28 from Philip Ashmore 2009-01-10 07:30:14 EDT --- I've changed the resolution of this bug to CLOSED - WORKSFORME. I'm the original reporter of this bug - if it wasn't for me you wouldn't have known about the problem. I also reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250030#c25 that I had resolved the problem. You've got to accept both together or neither. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:15:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:15:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176790] Incorrect completion when quoting last component of path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101415.n0AEFHD0005568@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|8 |10 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Wakely 2009-01-10 09:15:13 EDT --- still present in F10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 14:16:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:16:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176790] Incorrect completion when quoting last component of path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101416.n0AEGhJu005904@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790 Jonathan Wakely changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely 2009-01-10 09:16:42 EDT --- how do i re-open this? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:35:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:35:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101835.n0AIZDUl026006@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #23 from Stefan Richter 2009-01-10 13:35:07 EDT --- proposed patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.firewire.devel/12941 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:31:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:31:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187328] KMid KPart does not load due to no exported symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101831.n0AIVvTT025284@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187328 --- Comment #13 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-01-10 13:31:54 EDT --- Its now 2009, F10 is in the wild. Do you still plan on doing anything with this or should it be closed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 10 18:55:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:55:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 187328] KMid KPart does not load due to no exported symbols In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901101855.n0AIt1To029920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187328 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|fedora at deadbabylon.de |kevin at tigcc.ticalc.org --- Comment #14 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-10 13:54:59 EDT --- I'm planning to fix it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 13:04:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:04:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248180] Xorg ~100% CPU upon resume from hibernation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111304.n0BD4MuA019572@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180 --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-01-11 08:04:17 EDT --- Disabling dri in xorg.conf and using the vbestate-restore quirk fixes resume for me. The only problem seems to be xvideo, which requires restarting Xorg to actually show a picture. The card is (--) R128(0): Chipset: "ATI Rage 128 Pro GL PF (AGP)" (ChipID = 0x5046) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:34:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:34:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111634.n0BGYLcu027944@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 --- Comment #16 from John Griffiths 2009-01-11 11:34:20 EDT --- Amazing that this has been zapped in light of my comment #13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 16:32:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:32:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901111632.n0BGWig9027794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 --- Comment #15 from John Griffiths 2009-01-11 11:32:41 EDT --- Amazing that this has been zapped in light of my commnet #13. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 11 22:37:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:37:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250299] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901112237.n0BMbjbS027052@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250299 --- Comment #14 from Vadym Chepkov 2009-01-11 17:37:41 EDT --- Still an issue in Fedora-10, the proposed patch doesn't fix the issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:04:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:04:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120404.n0C441dj021415@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #20 from Eugene Teo (Security Response Team) 2009-01-11 23:03:57 EDT --- Hmm, while F8 is already EOL, this doesn't seem to be fixed in F9 and F10 because there is no fix in upstream yet. Dave/Chuck, take note. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 04:03:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:03:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120403.n0C43Dvo021321@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 Eugene Teo (Security Response Team) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cebbert at redhat.com, | |davej at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 05:07:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:07:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 277621] in dialog window moving focus from Button to text causes text to be highlighted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901120507.n0C57Pc5029631@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277621 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |MoveUpstream Version|8 |rawhide --- Comment #7 from Jens Petersen 2009-01-12 00:07:23 EDT --- Still happens with current rawhide. Any comment on the behaviour before I attempt to file upstream? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 10:02:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:02:50 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448758] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121002.n0CA2ohp021695@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|high |low Severity|high |low --- Comment #5 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-01-12 05:02:47 EDT --- This shouldn't be set to high - hardly anyone has the problem and we have no way to reproduce it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 11:22:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 06:22:17 -0500 Subject: [Bug 248180] Xorg ~100% CPU upon resume from hibernation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121122.n0CBMHBg007419@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248180 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|xgl-maint at redhat.com |airlied at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 15:16:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 10:16:09 -0500 Subject: [Bug 277621] in dialog window moving focus from Button to text causes text to be highlighted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121516.n0CFG9Om024835@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=277621 --- Comment #8 from Ray Strode 2009-01-12 10:16:07 EDT --- it's a gtk feature. Labels can be marked selectable. Moving upstream is probably right if you want to see the behavior changed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 17:06:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:06:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121706.n0CH6CIY016753@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #20 from Bryan Christ 2009-01-12 12:06:09 EDT --- It was set to Americas/Montery. I think I need to eat more healthy--I must be running low on the common sense vitamin. What would be the best city to choose for Houston, TX which observes Central DST? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 17:11:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:11:57 -0500 Subject: [Bug 436632] xorg locks up, no io, usually using firefox In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121711.n0CHBvnG017815@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436632 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 17:17:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:17:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242999] On mga G400/G450, desktop-effects hangs on enabling effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121717.n0CHHi0S019045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242999 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 18:15:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:15:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448758] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121815.n0CIFO5K028133@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758 --- Comment #6 from Eric Moret 2009-01-12 13:15:22 EDT --- Having no way to reproduce, should not mean not to address this issue. The proposed patch works for some people. Others might have a different problem. What is the next step to get this resolved? http://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=12491&forum=38 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 19:32:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:32:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901121932.n0CJW6dD014561@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #21 from Martin Cracauer 2009-01-12 14:32:01 EDT --- This is definitely not fixed. Here is a summary of the issue. From memory, some details might be out of focus. 1) when using a chroot for any kind of non-trivial application, including web browsers and seti-at-home type applications you need a /proc, let's say you mount it to /chroot/proc. 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. So people like me want two procfs mounts: - /proc read-write - /chroot/proc read-only This is b0rked. 3) the Linux kernel, stock or Redhat, does not support multiple mounts of procfs with different permissions 4) in the mainline kernel, if you have an existing read-write mount to /proc and make a mount request to a read-only /chroot/proc, it will ignore the readonly flag silently and give you a read-write mounted /chroot/proc instead. 5) in redhat/fedora kernels around the time of my initial bug report, and presumably today: given an existing read-write mount to /proc and a mount request to a read-only /chroot/proc, it will downgrade /proc to read-only, effectively disabling the base system. I think the solution for this must be some kind of "wrapper" filesystem that can put a read-only layer on top of an existing filesystem. In any case, both behaviors as described in 4) and 5) are unacceptable. Silently giving read-write permissions on a read-only mount request is as wrong as silently downgrading an existing mount. %% I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. I had cut'n'pasteable reproducing commands in my original bug report and can supply them again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 12 20:36:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:36:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 448758] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901122036.n0CKagJ5028603@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448758 --- Comment #7 from Akemi Yagi 2009-01-12 15:36:40 EDT --- As referenced in the CentOS forum thread (see Comment #6), I have made patched grub available for both i386 and x86_64: http://centos.toracat.org/grub-0.97/CentOS-5/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 07:43:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 02:43:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 226329] Merge Review: pycairo (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130743.n0D7hlRo029277@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226329 Roozbeh Pournader changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|roozbeh at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:03:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:03:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130803.n0D834rN028546@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #22 from Tomas Hoger 2009-01-13 03:03:00 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence that much. > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect? # uname -r 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 # mkdir -p /chroot/proc # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/ # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc' /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0 # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 08:55:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:55:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901130855.n0D8tCRi011770@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #23 from Tomas Mraz 2009-01-13 03:55:10 EDT --- Yes, it seems to be fixed in current kernels. I've tested it with the 2.6.29-0.18.rc0.git9.fc11.x86_64 kernel and it is fixed there too. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:28:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:28:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213135] CVE-2008-2544 mounting proc readonly on a different mount point silently mounts it rw if the /proc mount is rw In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131628.n0DGSuZ1012536@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213135 --- Comment #24 from Martin Cracauer 2009-01-13 11:28:54 EDT --- (In reply to comment #22) > (In reply to comment #21) > > 2) of course a read-write mounted /chroot/proc will instantly turn security > > into a joke (as all processes, files and devices are accessible by anybody > > becoming root in the chroot). But most of these applications, while requiring > > a /proc, can live with a readonly /proc. > > If anybody in the chroot becomes root, she can escape chroot trivially without > /proc mounted at all. Read-only vs. read-write /proc mount does not influence > that much. > > > I strongly urge somebody who is running a recent Fedora to re-open this bug > > report after confirming which behavior it is showing now. > > Has this been fixed, or is this test incorrect? > > # uname -r > 2.6.27.9-159.fc10.x86_64 > > # mkdir -p /chroot/proc > > # mount -o ro -t proc proc /chroot/proc/ > > # cat /proc/mounts | grep '/proc proc' > /proc /proc proc rw 0 0 > proc /chroot/proc proc ro 0 0 > > # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > > # echo 1 > /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward > bash: /chroot/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward: Read-only file system This looks good. I don't have FC anymore. My mainline 2.6.26.3 is still broken: mount -o -ro -t proc proc /mnt/tmp echo 1 > /mnt/tmp/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward # no complaints Any idea whether this is a 2.6.27 or a Redhat/Fedora fix? Thanks Martin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 16:46:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:46:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 270381] Ice doesn't support ppc64 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131646.n0DGkCAx021499@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=270381 Mary Ellen Foster changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 17:13:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:13:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 238044] /etc/udev/rules.d/90-alsa.rules calls /sbin/salsa without parameter In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131713.n0DHDLC4028134@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238044 Piergiorgio Sartor changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME --- Comment #21 from Piergiorgio Sartor 2009-01-13 12:13:16 EDT --- Since I upgraded all the PCs to F10 and the issue does not seem to exist anymore, I close it. pg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:52:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:52:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131952.n0DJqhSd022835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 --- Comment #21 from Petr Machata 2009-01-13 14:52:40 EDT --- Seems to me that America/Chicago is the right zone. It's central time (-6:00) and scheduled to U.S. rules. (For future reference, Monterrey is -6:00 CDT/CST just like Chicago, but is scheduled to Mexico rules.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 19:54:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 14:54:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 356771] System changed daylight time on October 28 based on old U.S. rules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901131954.n0DJsY5S030068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356771 Petr Machata changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #22 from Petr Machata 2009-01-13 14:54:33 EDT --- Hmm, so I think I can close this one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 13 21:44:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:44:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 219922] Internal "USR 3CP5610" modem not detected by "system-config-network" In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901132144.n0DLi2l5020351@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219922 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:51:47 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from Joachim Frieben 2009-01-13 16:43:59 EDT --- Hardware modem "USR 3CP5610" still not detected for current F10 w/updates but usable after manual selection of device /dev/ttyS2 read off from /var/log/dmesg. Relevant installed packages: - kernel-2.6.28-1.fc10.x86_64 - kudzu-1.2.85-1.x86_64 - system-config-network-1.5.95-1.fc10.noarch -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:22:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:22:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418251] Packages in RPM Groups are only shown for level 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141422.n0EEMh91031407@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251 Tim Lauridsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 14:21:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:21:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 418251] Packages in RPM Groups are only shown for level 2 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141421.n0EELhMm031068@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=418251 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 21:03:47 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 19:23:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:23:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901141923.n0EJNP3c025509@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #24 from Piergiorgio Sartor 2009-01-14 14:23:21 EDT --- I just noticed that F11 (Rawhide) got a new libraw1394 with, if I understood correctly, the proposed patch. Jarod, any chance to get a similar update to F10? Thanks, pg -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 14 22:08:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:08:45 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901142208.n0EM8jEd009182@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 17:08:44 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 00:02:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 19:02:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150002.n0F02btf012929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 Jerry James changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |loganjerry at gmail.com AssignedTo|gemi at bluewin.ch |loganjerry at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 02:52:31 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 21:52:31 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242607] Build with festival error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901150252.n0F2qVCS023191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-14 21:52:28 EDT --- festival-1.96-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update festival'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 15 15:33:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:33:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901151533.n0FFXBuB009070@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-15 10:33:09 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:40:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:40:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162340.n0GNegn5006754@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ON_QA --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:40:39 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libraw1394'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0574 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 16 23:41:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 18:41:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901162341.n0GNfNqH024198@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-16 18:41:22 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update libraw1394'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0590 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 02:30:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:30:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 349151] rename pkgconfig to pkg-config or add provides In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170230.n0H2U5B6022311@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=349151 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #7 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-16 21:30:03 EDT --- Lets try this again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 02:42:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:42:55 -0500 Subject: [Bug 168074] Double-clicking printer should work In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170242.n0H2gtqp006615@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168074 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Component|gnome-print |gtk2 CC| |mclasen at redhat.com AssignedTo|davidz at redhat.com |mclasen at redhat.com Resolution| |RAWHIDE QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #3 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-16 21:42:53 EDT --- Works in gtk 2.15.0 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 17 03:56:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:56:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 443953] djvudigital requires ghostscript driver In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901170356.n0H3u4T1020752@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443953 --- Comment #2 from Rakesh Pandit 2009-01-16 22:56:02 EDT --- Will check in a while -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 06:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901180608.n0I68nFw011318@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-18 01:08:48 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 06:09:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 01:09:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901180609.n0I6911N011402@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-18 01:09:00 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 19:59:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:59:11 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901181959.n0IJxBuo027828@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #29 from Paul Jenner 2009-01-18 14:59:08 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10 works for me. I am able to use dvgrab to capture as non-root user with default permissions on the firewire devices: [psj at localhost ~]$ rpm -q libraw1394 libraw1394-2.0.0-6.fc10.i386 [psj at localhost ~]$ ls -ld /dev/fw* crw-rw---- 1 root root 248, 0 2009-01-18 08:43 /dev/fw0 crw-rw----+ 1 root root 248, 1 2009-01-18 19:46 /dev/fw1 [psj at localhost ~]$ getfacl /dev/fw* getfacl: Removing leading '/' from absolute path names # file: dev/fw0 # owner: root # group: root user::rw- group::rw- other::--- # file: dev/fw1 # owner: root # group: root user::rw- user:psj:rw- group::rw- mask::rw- other::--- [psj at localhost ~]$ id uid=500(psj) gid=500(psj) groups=500(psj),503(music),504(photos),505(videos),506(shareddocs) context=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:unconfined_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 [psj at localhost ~]$ dvgrab Found AV/C device with GUID 0x0080880307303c63 Warning: Cannot set RR-scheduler Warning: Cannot disable swapping Capture Started ^C"dvgrab-002.dv": 6.73 MiB 49 frames timecode 00:01:18.23 date 2009.01.18 09:18:59 Capture Stopped -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:46:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:46:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182146.n0ILkWaq015230@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 Jim Meyering changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Keywords| |Reopened Component|glibc |gdb CC| |dvlasenk at redhat.com, | |jan.kratochvil at redhat.com AssignedTo|jakub at redhat.com |jan.kratochvil at redhat.com Resolution|WORKSFORME | Summary|failed allocation in output |gdb's "return VAL" command |stream initialization |appears to misbehave |causes segfault | --- Comment #7 from Jim Meyering 2009-01-18 16:46:28 EDT --- Thanks. However, gdb's "return" ought to work. Having to simulate it with arch-specific register manipulations is not an option. reassigning to gdb and reopening. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 21:47:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:47:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182147.n0ILleZt015382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 --- Comment #8 from Jim Meyering 2009-01-18 16:47:39 EDT --- P.S. I've just confirmed that this still afflicts F10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:23:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:23:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182223.n0IMNEnI008263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 --- Comment #9 from Jan Kratochvil 2009-01-18 17:23:13 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329309) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329309) Fix (w/o a testcase so far). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 18 22:48:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:48:34 -0500 Subject: [Bug 176790] Incorrect completion when quoting last component of path In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901182248.n0IMmY7D012956@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=176790 --- Comment #20 from Ville Skytt? 2009-01-18 17:48:32 EDT --- Still present in Rawhide's 20080705-2.20090115bzr1252 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 00:04:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:04:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 292231] Green tiles in OpenGL on Radeon 9800 SE In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190004.n0J04IXr007624@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292231 Callum Lerwick changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #12 from Callum Lerwick 2009-01-18 19:04:15 EDT --- Hmmm. This machine has been out of use for a while. It appears as of xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.8.0-14.fc9.i386 / kernel-2.6.25.14-108.fc9.i686 this seems to have been fixed. But it wasn't updated for a while so I don't know that these were the first versions to fix it. I'm going to consider this fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 01:19:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:19:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190119.n0J1J4RV007794@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-18 20:19:03 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 01:19:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:19:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190119.n0J1J1bE021211@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-18 20:19:00 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 05:45:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 00:45:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901190545.n0J5jEnF017712@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 --- Comment #21 from David Woodhouse 2009-01-19 00:45:11 EDT --- Still happening in Fedora 10... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 11:00:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 06:00:01 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191100.n0JB01dR013116@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Peter Vrabec changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pvrabec at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:38:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:38:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266061] Volume manager window is not the right size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191738.n0JHcOKS032152@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Bastien Nocera 2009-01-19 12:38:21 EDT --- This bug should be fixed with the new gnome-volume-control and gnome-volume-control-applet in rawhide, available in the gnome-media package. Please reopen if the problem persists with those versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 17:39:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:39:07 -0500 Subject: [Bug 322651] Volume control with ALSA mixer puts both input and output devices under playback In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901191739.n0JHd7tC032212@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322651 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Bastien Nocera 2009-01-19 12:39:05 EDT --- This bug should be fixed with the new gnome-volume-control and gnome-volume-control-applet in rawhide, available in the gnome-media package. Please reopen if the problem persists with those versions. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 19 22:22:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:22:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 178998] isapnp probing not working correctly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901192222.n0JMMnxJ010189@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=178998 antonio montagnani changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|antonio.montagnani at alice.it | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 15:53:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:53:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 456393] RFE: version of pgf in texlive is old In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201553.n0KFrFe2021986@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456393 Ben Boeckel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mathstuf at gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel 2009-01-20 10:53:12 EDT --- *** Bug 475015 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 309281] RFE: add libmilter shared library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201854.n0KIss4j011929@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309281 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |stuart at gathman.org --- Comment #8 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-01-20 13:54:52 EDT --- *** Bug 479325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 20 18:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:56:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 309281] RFE: add libmilter shared library In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901201856.n0KIuPfD027246@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=309281 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #9 from Miroslav Lichvar 2009-01-20 13:56:22 EDT --- sendmail-8.14.3-4.fc11 now has shared libmilter. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 01:29:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:29:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 134638] Add striping to lvm creation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210129.n0L1Tdlj008238@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=134638 --- Comment #19 from Marc Bejarano 2009-01-20 20:29:35 EDT --- (In reply to comment #18) > If someone > can make a compelling case as to why we should do this, we'll consider changing > our minds hi, andy. the best reason that comes to mind for me is consistency. why allow some RAID levels and not others? since we already have a patch to enhance functionality, why not include it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 06:39:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 01:39:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210639.n0L6dqR5005617@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|6 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard| bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 07:55:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 02:55:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901210755.n0L7twS8029343@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 Jindrich Novy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #5 from Jindrich Novy 2009-01-21 02:55:56 EDT --- pnmtofiasco, jpegtopnm and couple of others are now fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 12:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:58:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186759] No feedback at errors, meaningless '--help' screen, no documentation In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211258.n0LCws7F030304@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186759 Patrice Dumas changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|pertusus at free.fr | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 16:00:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:00:39 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212066] Anaconda tries to format my iPod In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901211600.n0LG0dkE002012@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212066 --- Comment #13 from Joel Andres Granados 2009-01-21 11:00:37 EDT --- Can't really use this in fedora devel as the code there is from parted 1.8.8 (latest upstream release), not master. discussion is ongoing in upstream, not a lot of attention though. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:16 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLTGjV011175@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:13 EDT --- yum-cron-0.8.3-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLTJBv011211@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLTiZZ022149@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:43 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update tomoe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0770 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:29:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:29:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212129.n0LLT6uw022008@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:29:04 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update tomoe'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0760 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:34:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:34:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212134.n0LLYPKx013498@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:34:25 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXLvh013067@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:33:18 EDT --- gcl-2.6.8-0.1.20080902cvs.1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:33:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:33:29 -0500 Subject: [Bug 167952] gcl doesn't build on ppc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212133.n0LLXTat013137@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167952 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:32:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:32:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212132.n0LLWMq3023766@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:32:19 EDT --- libraw1394-2.0.1-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:32:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:32:26 -0500 Subject: [Bug 441073] user firewire permissions and dvgrab In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212132.n0LLWQb3023838@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441073 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 21 21:37:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:37:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 431588] selinux denial messages from yum-cron updates In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901212137.n0LLbNpn026015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431588 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-21 16:37:21 EDT --- yum-cron-0.8.3-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:05:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:05:41 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481147] New: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text Product: Fedora Version: 10 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: cpan2rpm AssignedTo: gavin.henry at gmail.com ReportedBy: gavin.brown at uk.com QAContact: extras-qa at fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-perl-devel-list at redhat.com, fedora-triage-list at redhat.com, gavin.henry at gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 279251 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #279251 +++ Description of problem: The latest version of Pod::Text from CPAN is from RRA/podlators-2.2.2.tar.gz Pod::Text no longer derives from Pod::Parser so the method 'interpolate' does not exist. As near as I can tell, this is the only method used in cpan2rpm, so Pod::Text can be changed to Pod::Parser in the two places it appears. This is what I did locally and it now works for me. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc8.1.noarch How reproducible: update Pod::Text via cpan. Run cpan2rpm for some module (any will do...) Actual results: [...] -- module: /var/cache/cpan/build/libwww-perl-5.808-baHtIL -- Metadata retrieval Can't locate object method "interpolate" via package "Pod::Text" at /usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 522. -- Done -- Expected results: No failure from above. Additional info: --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list at redhat.com on 2008-05-14 10:14:55 EDT --- This message is a reminder that Fedora 7 is nearing the end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 7. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '7'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 7's end of life. Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 7 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. If possible, it is recommended that you try the newest available Fedora distribution to see if your bug still exists. Please read the Release Notes for the newest Fedora distribution to make sure it will meet your needs: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/release-notes/ The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list at redhat.com on 2008-06-16 22:19:58 EDT --- Fedora 7 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on June 13, 2008. Fedora 7 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:10:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:10:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221310.n0MDAqkv031796@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 --- Comment #1 from Gavin Brown 2009-01-22 08:10:50 EDT --- According to http://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=27309, this can be fixed by switching from Pod::Text to Pod::PlainText. This seems like something that could be done with a trivial patch: "perl -pi -e 's/Pod::Text/Pod::PlainText/' /usr/bin/cpan2rpm" worked for me. However, the upstream project seems dead, as the CPAN bug dates to 2007. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 13:07:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:07:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 240233] Can't set display for In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221307.n0MD7b2T030710@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240233 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |berrange at redhat.com Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #6 from Daniel Berrange 2009-01-22 08:07:34 EDT --- This was fixed in release 0.5.1 of libvirt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 22 16:53:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:53:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242607] Build with festival error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901221653.n0MGrbvP027503@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #26 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-01-22 11:53:33 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=329721) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=329721) undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10.x86_64.log There are lot of undefined-non-weak-symbol_festival in the festival-lib-1.96-7.fc10 package (running rpmlint fastival-lib on installed package). Theses symbols should be added at link time and could be the reason of runtime failures when the needed libraries aren't present at runtime. It will also prevents the linker to preload suches libraries which will degrade performances when loading. (since every symbol will be revolved at runtime). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 17:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:20:25 -0500 Subject: [Bug 218905] [ta_IN] Some conjunct characters not appearing with proper shape In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231720.n0NHKPpV021294@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=218905 Padmanabhan V. K. changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |bugzillas+padREMOVETHISdu at g | |mail.com --- Comment #4 from Padmanabhan V. K. 2009-01-23 12:20:22 EDT --- Please reopen this bug. The bleeding edge version of Pango still has U+0BB6's type as _xx instead of _ct: http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/pango/trunk/modules/indic/indic-ot-class-tables.c?revision=2684&view=markup and http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=481203 is still open. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 18:02:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 13:02:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231802.n0NI2khs030440@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen at redhat.com --- Comment #27 from Eric Sandeen 2009-01-23 13:02:42 EDT --- This hits btrfs too, now. I may just bail on the fancy solutions and go ahead & build crc32c into the kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:50:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:50:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231950.n0NJoaEo023268@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 --- Comment #28 from Eric Sandeen 2009-01-23 14:50:34 EDT --- I've committed the config change to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 23 19:52:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:52:52 -0500 Subject: [Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901231952.n0NJqqwb023733@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 --- Comment #29 from Eric Sandeen 2009-01-23 14:52:51 EDT --- (BTW: Despite the protestations above, I went ahead & built it in both as a quick fix, and because we seem to be on a track to build in more anyway, for fast-boot reasons. Still, this should be fixed in general! So apologies for hiding the problem, again.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 00:13:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:13:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 225684] Merge Review: devhelp (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240013.n0O0D3hO029139@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225684 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mclasen at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Matthias Clasen 2009-01-23 19:13:01 EDT --- This can be approved, I think. The things listed in comment #1 have all been taken care of. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:32:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:32:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246481] Remove asciidoc build requirement In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240232.n0O2Wsd6008216@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246481 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-23 21:32:53 EDT --- mercurial-1.1.2-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:35:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:35:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240235.n0O2ZmnP023477@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-23 21:35:46 EDT --- postfix-2.5.6-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing update postfix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F10/FEDORA-2009-0892 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 02:40:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:40:48 -0500 Subject: [Bug 327651] improve daemon startup speed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240240.n0O2emtX011916@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327651 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-23 21:40:47 EDT --- postfix-2.5.6-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with su -c 'yum --enablerepo=updates-testing-newkey update postfix'. You can provide feedback for this update here: http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F9/FEDORA-2009-0926 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 08:52:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 03:52:59 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901240852.n0O8qxSj013354@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.e | |u -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 13:07:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 08:07:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 327601] Make hid2hci only start for selected systems In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241307.n0OD7WkE028926@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=327601 --- Comment #8 from Alex Kanavin 2009-01-24 08:07:30 EDT --- Another option is to make the switch only if there's another keyboard/mouse already connected - probably a small helper app should make that check. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 17:39:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 12:39:03 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901241739.n0OHd3fP008750@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 --- Comment #10 from Jim Meyering 2009-01-24 12:39:00 EDT --- Thanks! I've applied it to the latest archer sources, built, and confirmed that the example above now works as expected. i.e., no segfault. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 171510] mkisofs doesn't preserve directory permissions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242238.n0OMcZf5029038@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171510 J?rg Schilling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling at fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #11 from J?rg Schilling 2009-01-24 17:38:31 EDT --- genisoimage is based on a very old and outdated mkisofs version. You most likely did not use the original software. As the original software is well maintained software, there have been many bug fixes for mkisofs during the past 3 years and the patch mentioned above is just one of many bugfixes needed in order to support correct file/directory permissions in the resulting filesystem tree. As the original mkisofs replaced ~30% of the source code for bug fixes and feature enhencements, it does not make sense to use the outdated close shipped by RedHat. I recommend you to upgrade to recent original software from ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecprd/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:43:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:43:46 -0500 Subject: [Bug 212281] kernel 2.6.18 breaks setuid cdrecord In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242243.n0OMhkjQ029903@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212281 J?rg Schilling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling at fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #7 from J?rg Schilling 2009-01-24 17:43:43 EDT --- There is a workaround for this idiosyncratic behavior of the Linux Kernel. This workaround is available since January 2006 in the original software. Please note that you _definitely_ need root privileges in order to be able to correctly send all needed SCSI commands through Linux anyway. For a fiy, just uograde to recent original software from: ftp:/ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:50:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246176] wodim returns random supported modes with sata drive and fails to burn In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242250.n0OMoAxf011942@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246176 J?rg Schilling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling at fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #5 from J?rg Schilling 2009-01-24 17:50:08 EDT --- Wodim is known to have no proper DVD sopport, I recommend you to check recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 24 22:56:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:56:00 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249197] It's not possible to set speed with wodim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901242256.n0OMu0Mp032169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197 J?rg Schilling changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joerg.schilling at fokus.fraun | |hofer.de --- Comment #6 from J?rg Schilling 2009-01-24 17:55:57 EDT --- Wodim os known to have no peoper DVD sopport. Please just upgrade to recent original software from: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ cdrecord supports DVD writing since February 1998 and for this reason is mature and knows how to work around formware bugs from various drives. A workaround for the formware bug in your PIONEER drive has been introduced in April 2007 in the original software. ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jan 25 18:00:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 13:00:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213111] upgrade fails because of RAID1 setup In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901251800.n0PI0IPX009490@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213111 Chris Spencer changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |chrisspen at gmail.com --- Comment #11 from Chris Spencer 2009-01-25 13:00:16 EDT --- This bug is still present in F10. I tried upgrading from F8 to F10, and I received this same error. It's a show-stopper. Please re-open this ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 09:00:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:00:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 254126] ghdl does not build on ppc64 due to missing gcc-gnat In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901260900.n0Q9028W002169@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=254126 Bug 254126 depends on bug 241098, which changed state. Bug 241098 Summary: No gcc-gnat for ppc64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241098 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 09:54:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 04:54:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249197] It's not possible to set speed with wodim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901260954.n0Q9ssO8014729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197 --- Comment #7 from Harald Hoyer 2009-01-26 04:54:51 EDT --- Am I allowd to extract the patch from the CDDL version and apply it to the GPL version? I don't think so. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 13:47:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 08:47:05 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186527] Startup hangs at "starting system message bus" if ldaps authentication enabled in firstboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261347.n0QDl5Uk031863@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186527 Dennis Wagelaar changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis.wagelaar at vub.ac.be -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 18:46:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:46:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 243172] APIC-Error "timer not connected to IO-APIC In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901261846.n0QIkA62004645@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243172 Brian Maly changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #7 from Brian Maly 2009-01-26 13:46:07 EDT --- The most common cause of this problem is a misconfigured APIC and most often the APIC is misconfigured before boot (by the BIOS). Can we verify the BIOS is not the culprit? Please verify the BIOS with Linux Firmware Kit. Download the latest ISO and boot off CD. Download from -> http://linuxfirmwarekit.org/download.php Also, can you attach a /var/log/dmesg from the affected hardware? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jan 26 23:22:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:22:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 249197] It's not possible to set speed with wodim In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901262322.n0QNMeVF031237@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249197 --- Comment #8 from J?rg Schilling 2009-01-26 18:22:37 EDT --- You are of course not allowed to do that, but why do you like to put parts of the official free software into your fork that cannot be legally distributed because your fork is in conflict with GPL and Copyright? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jan 27 17:32:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 27 Jan 2009 12:32:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901271732.n0RHWnBN009792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |michel.sylvan at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 06:38:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:38:18 -0500 Subject: [Bug 251062] auto-mounted for root file systems are left unmounted after log-out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901280638.n0S6cIAR003495@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251062 Tony Fu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|alan at redhat.com |peterm at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 15:42:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:42:47 -0500 Subject: [Bug 263241] NTLM library needed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281542.n0SFglar024889@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263241 Robert Townley changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rob.townley at gmail.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 16:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:02:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 263241] NTLM library needed In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281602.n0SG2DsF029191@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=263241 --- Comment #8 from Kevin Kofler 2009-01-28 11:02:11 EDT --- Indeed, unfortunately, libntlm doesn't export the MD4 functions. Maybe we could get the author to change that? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 18:27:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:27:10 -0500 Subject: [Bug 202823] cp -a doesn't copy user/root xattrs In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281827.n0SIRANF028795@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202823 Kamil Dudka changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |ovasik at redhat.com Fixed In Version| |coreutils-7.0-7.fc11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE AssignedTo|ovasik at redhat.com |kdudka at redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Kamil Dudka 2009-01-28 13:27:08 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide. Note that cp -a still doesn't copy user/root xattrs. The appropriate cp option is --preserve=xattr. mv always preserves xattrs, install never preserves xattrs. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 19:11:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:11:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229141] initscript does not allow customizations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901281911.n0SJBc1P016311@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229141 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |itamar at ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #5 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-01-28 14:11:36 EDT --- I will try to fix this in this next weekend. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jan 28 22:29:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:29:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 213042] gnome-terminal cursor defaults to blinking In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901282229.n0SMTcBs031630@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213042 --- Comment #9 from Tim "Taiwanese" Liim 2009-01-28 17:29:36 EDT --- Does the proposal in Comment #8 make sense to you? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 07:37:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 02:37:15 -0500 Subject: [Bug 266061] Volume manager window is not the right size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901290737.n0T7bFDT003469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266061 --- Comment #8 from Christopher Beland 2009-01-29 02:37:13 EDT --- Confirmed; in gnome-media-2.25.5-1.fc11.x86_64, for example, the interface has gotten a radical overhaul and the slider layout is now simpler. Thanks for the update! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:04:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:04:20 -0500 Subject: [Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292304.n0TN4Kb4007729@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:04:06 -0500 Subject: [Bug 324721] Left-handed mouse orientation also changes touchpad touch click In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292304.n0TN46NB032445@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=324721 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:04:03 EDT --- gnome-settings-daemon-2.24.1-7.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:11:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:11:36 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292311.n0TNBaNp003449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:11:35 EDT --- netpbm-10.35.58-1.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN8nvP002177@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System 2009-01-29 18:08:47 EDT --- netpbm-10.35.58-1.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jan 29 23:08:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:08:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 227283] pnmtofiasco can't read valid PNM files created by netpbm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901292308.n0TN8uKN002208@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=227283 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 08:53:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 03:53:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250299] Grub sometimes does not detect entire memory map In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300853.n0U8rs84022203@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250299 Petri T. Koistinen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petri.koistinen at iki.fi -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 09:02:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:02:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 190209] Raise file conflicts always, not just on additional transactions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901300902.n0U92WKv024671@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=190209 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #19 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:49:19 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #20 from Panu Matilainen 2009-01-30 04:02:28 EDT --- Hmm actually this is fixed in F10 (since last July): the conflict behavior is consistent, which is what the original request was - colored files are allowed to overlap whether in same transaction or not, and for everything else conflicts are always raised. Eliminating the "sharing" of colored files is another issue. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 12:23:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:23:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 196151] Kscreensaver fails to unlock In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301223.n0UCNbna004694@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=196151 --- Comment #18 from Mary Ellen Foster 2009-01-30 07:23:33 EDT --- Oddly, this remains an issue on my work desktop machine -- which was originally installed with Fedora $whatever-was-current in January 2006 and upgraded ever since -- but is not an issue on my laptop or netbook, both of which have fresh Fedora 10 installs. What's the difference? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 13:50:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:50:24 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301350.n0UDoOr0027538@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 Jiri Skala changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jskala at redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #20 from Jiri Skala 2009-01-30 08:50:20 EDT --- Hi, I re-based F-9 to 1.1.36 and applied your patches. The build is http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=80916 Please, let me know if the build mgetty-1.1.36-1.fc9 is ok. Then I'll apply it to F10 and rawhide and I'll send it to upstream. Cheers, Jiri -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 15:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:22:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901301522.n0UFMsmq010433@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Eric Paris changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |eparis at redhat.com Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #26 from Eric Paris 2009-01-30 10:22:48 EDT --- Moving to rawhide as I just got this error on an F11 pre alpha install and then tried to use yum to update my kernel. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jan 30 23:24:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:24:32 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901302324.n0UNOWLg004669@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 --- Comment #21 from Don Russell 2009-01-30 18:24:29 EDT --- It will take me a few days (perhaps a week) to get to this. So I expect to be able to give you a definitive answer NLT Mon 9 Feb. Will this (your rebased version with my patches) be available on F9 via yum, or do I need to d/l the rpm file directly? Thanks, I appreciate your work taking my changes forward. Don Russell -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 08:21:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:21:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310821.n0V8L4A4018359@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 --- Comment #22 from Jiri Skala 2009-01-31 03:21:03 EDT --- Please, use rpm file directly. Jiri -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 09:56:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:56:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901310956.n0V9ueMK004654@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #27 from Felipe Contreras 2009-01-31 04:56:36 EDT --- I don't see what's do difficult about this. Just don't use the old grub conf, have a separate template file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jan 31 12:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 07:01:30 -0500 Subject: [Bug 185862] %_sharedstatedir violates the FHS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200901311201.n0VC1U8T029319@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=185862 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #19 from Panu Matilainen 2009-01-31 07:01:27 EDT --- Fixed in rpm-4.6.0-0.rc4.2.fc11, %_sharedstatedir gets set to /var/lib in the linux-platform macros now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.