From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 11:11:00 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 07:11:00 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183338] adding a domain to search: lost by dhcp when network restarts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011111.n61BB0uY028920@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183338 J?n Fairbairn changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |harald at redhat.com, | |jmoskovc at redhat.com Component|dhcp |system-config-network Flag|needinfo?(jon.fairbairn at cl. | |cam.ac.uk) | --- Comment #11 from J?n Fairbairn 2009-07-01 07:10:54 EDT --- Re 1: It's headless, so the network service Re 2: I've investigated this extensively this morning (and I don't think it's worthwhile attaching any of the versions of the files). Contrary to Comment #5, system-config-network does NOT set SEARCH in any /etc/sysconfig/network* file, nor does it read SEARCH from any of them. It currently (system-config-network-1.5.97-1.fc11.noarch) simply changes /etc/resolv.conf (this seems to be a regression). If SEARCH is not set in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 but there is a search line in /etc/resolv.conf, dhclient ignores this latter and creates a search line from what it gets from the dhcp server. This seems like reasonable behaviour. Whether it's correct I'll leave up to you... If SEARCH is set in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 dhclient uses this when creating the new /etc/resolv.conf This also seems reasonable (etc). It seems clear to me that system-config-network should read and write SEARCH in /etc/sysconfig.*/ifcfg-$device. So I reckon the bug really is in system-config-network. Assuming that you'll agree with that contention (David), I've changed the component back to system-config-network This bug hat been hanging around since before Fedora 8, and it bites me every time I upgrade to another version of Fedora, so I'd be grateful if it were resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:42:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:42:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187382] Possible security issue In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011642.n61GgfSk019259@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187382 Bug 187382 depends on bug 187353, which changed state. Bug 187353 Summary: CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 16:42:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 12:42:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187353] CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907011642.n61GgeTa019234@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 Luke Macken changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #17 from Luke Macken 2009-07-01 12:42:35 EDT --- Closing per mutual agreement. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 1 23:01:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2009 19:01:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 175347] grubby doesnt preserve comments in grub.conf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907012301.n61N1Ulq013060@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=175347 Karsten Weiss changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |knweiss at gmx.de --- Comment #7 from Karsten Weiss 2009-07-01 19:01:17 EDT --- The problem with grubby's parser is that it bundles the title entries from 'title' line to 'title' line. Here's an example: 1 # header skipped 2 title kernelfoobar 3 .... 4 .... 5 6 # comment for memtest 7 title memtest 8 .... 9 .... The parser will read the two titles and put them into two data structures: The first will contain lines 2-6 and the second lines 7-9. Now, if we remove the kernelfoobar package, grubby will be called to remove the kernel entry in grub.conf and consequently it'll remove lines 2-6 from grub.conf and thereby remove the comment above the memtest title because it associates it with the kernelfoobar package and not with the memtest title. This can be easily tested without destroying the local grub.conf: 1. cp /boot/grub/grub.conf ~/grub.conf 2. Append lines 6-9 at the end of ~/grub.conf 3. Execute grubby -c ~/grub.conf --remove-kernel= -o ~/grub.conf2 4. Verify that the comment line "# comment for memtest" is gone. So this bug is real. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 2 17:40:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 13:40:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 221418] lx5000 driver gets stuck in write loop In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907021740.n62He4Eo018734@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221418 --- Comment #6 from Tim Waugh 2009-07-02 13:40:00 EDT --- This has never worked in the lx5000 driver since it was introduced into the ghostscript SVN repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 3 23:37:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 19:37:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242468] Wrong init script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907032337.n63NbI3d005130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242468 Nicola Soranzo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Nicola Soranzo 2009-07-03 19:37:16 EDT --- Current Fedora guidelines for SysV-style Initscripts can be found at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 09:44:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 05:44:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247329] Keyboard conflict message gets shown immediately after login - multiple login related In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050944.n659iHG0031868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247329 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Version|9 |10 Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #8 from David Timms 2009-07-05 05:44:13 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Unfortunately, a lot of things won't work right, right now if the same user is > logged in more than once. I'm not sure which version exactly resolved the issue, as I had not tested since last year. Someone has been working hard, since this keyboard error is no longer given when you log in to gnome twice (eg vnc & console), with the following versions: gnome-desktop-2.24.3-1.fc10.x86_64 gnome-session-2.24.3-1.fc10.x86_64 kbd-1.12-31.fc9.x86_64 libgnomekbd-2.24.0-1.fc10.x86_64 libxkbfile-1.0.4-5.fc9.x86_64 system-config-keyboard-1.2.15-5.fc10.noarch xkeyboard-config-1.4-8.fc10.noarch xorg-x11-drv-keyboard-1.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64 xorg-x11-xkb-utils-7.2-7.fc10.x86_64 As you might expect: - having the same user start firefox in each session doesn't work (firefox says profile is in use). - if logged into console gui when the vncserver is started, se-troubleshooter gives a warning regarding consolekit. This doesn't seem to disrupt basic desktop functionality. - if test is logged in at the console when the vncserver is started at the same time by test, then the login sound for the vnc log in is played through the console machines speakers. Anyway, closing since the original issue is resolved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 09:50:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 05:50:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243933] setting vnc for gui login clobbers gnome task bar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907050950.n659opEo000768@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243933 David Timms changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dtimms at iinet.net.au --- Comment #10 from David Timms 2009-07-05 05:50:45 EDT --- (In reply to comment #0) > information task bar is hosed. that is the one that holds the active app icon > when minimized. also holds the desktops. > anytime you min an app, it seems to go to the lower right of the window and vanish. > also, during the bootup a message pops up that X windows found a different > keyboard setting than expected. john, I had a similar issue when I logged into the gnome gui twice (once via vnc and the other via the console). This is resolved in F10 with current updates. If you are still interested in this bug, perhaps you could perform your original test with a current Fedora release. If it is resolved, IMHO, it would be worth updating the closed|wontfix status to closed|current release, and updating the version to the Fedora release you tested with. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 5 14:06:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 10:06:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907051406.n65E6r9c025783@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 sangu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sangu.fedora at gmail.com --- Comment #39 from sangu 2009-07-05 10:06:46 EDT --- in rawhide < mkinitrd-6.0.90-1.fc12.x86_64 > $ yum update kernel [...] get_netlink_msg returned Success WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template [...] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 01:43:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:43:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060143.n661h3Tj009751@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|illogical mapping for |illogical mapping for |non-QWERTY keyboard with |non-QWERTY keyboard with |scim-m17n |m17n -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 01:43:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 21:43:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907060143.n661hG4g022199@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|x86_64 |All -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 6 12:50:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 08:50:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235961] default network doesn't take into account the host network In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907061250.n66CoMEl029968@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235961 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|Reopened | Version|9 |rawhide Blocks|150225(FC7Target) | Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | --- Comment #9 from Mark McLoughlin 2009-07-06 08:50:18 EDT --- Nothing has changed on this front, still applies to Fedora 12 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:58:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:58:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071158.n67BwsgD025602@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pknirsch at redhat.com AssignedTo|pknirsch at redhat.com |ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 11:58:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 07:58:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173854] Bring media mountpoints up to date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071158.n67BwqEZ025556@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173854 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pknirsch at redhat.com AssignedTo|pknirsch at redhat.com |ovasik at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 12:37:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 08:37:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 173854] Bring media mountpoints up to date In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071237.n67Cbrwb014071@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=173854 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #9 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-07 08:37:51 EDT --- Changing to rawhide again to prevent autoclosing again, I'll take a look if something really depends on those ghosted dirs later. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 13:16:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 09:16:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228953] Unable to use gpg-agent + input methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071316.n67DG5ng013784@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228953 --- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter 2009-07-07 09:16:01 EDT --- Looks like upstream has worked to make this better, http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2009-July/025222.html -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 7 15:02:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 11:02:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907071502.n67F2G7u022375@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ondrej Vasik changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ovasik at redhat.com, | |varekova at redhat.com Component|filesystem |man-pages AssignedTo|ovasik at redhat.com |varekova at redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-07 11:02:13 EDT --- Good to have up2date list. As written in Comment #10, lang related manpages dir should be owned by those packages. Maybe that bugzilla could be used as tracker bug and separate bugzillas against those man-pages-lang components could be created. Anyway, reassigning to man-pages, they could decide how to handle this - I don't think it should be done by filesystem package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 10:58:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 06:58:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081058.n68AwI61004596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Ivana Varekova changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(dgregor at redhat.co | |m) --- Comment #19 from Ivana Varekova 2009-07-08 06:58:15 EDT --- Hello, man-pages package does not have any file from these subdirectories - so it has no sense to reassign the bug to this package. Dennis: please could you look which packages owns a file in unowned directories and create a bug directly on these component? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:36:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:36:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081936.n68JaYul009384@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510357 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:41:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:41:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081941.n68JfEgi002833@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510360 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:39:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:39:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081939.n68Jd5rM002045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510359 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:43:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:43:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 366081] Hardcoded icons In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081943.n68JhCCk011035@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366081 Adam Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|kreilly at redhat.com |harald at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081945.n68JjlFj004023@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510362 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:43:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:43:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081943.n68JhW76003363@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510361 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:47:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:47:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081947.n68Jlkup004452@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510363 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:50:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:50:58 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081950.n68Jow36013283@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510366 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:48:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:48:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081948.n68JmaWV012382@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510364 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:50:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:50:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081950.n68JoAYl012931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |510365 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 19:58:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 15:58:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907081958.n68JwOhJ008335@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Dennis Gregorovic changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dgregor at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #20 from Dennis Gregorovic 2009-07-08 15:58:22 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > Dennis: please could you look which packages owns a file in unowned directories > and create a bug directly on these component? Done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 20:38:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 16:38:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082038.n68KcPVB017382@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #21 from Robert Scheck 2009-07-08 16:38:24 EDT --- I'm not really sure whether jwhois really should own /usr/share/man/sv/man1 and I'm not sure, whether this is conform to the packaging guidelines as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 21:05:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:05:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231162] Small leak in kadm5_get_init_creds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082105.n68L5dFd024473@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231162 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide --- Comment #6 from Nalin Dahyabhai 2009-07-08 17:05:37 EDT --- Looks like 'client' is still leaked in 1.7, moving to Raw Hide so that we don't lose this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 8 21:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 17:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 231162] Small leak in kadm5_get_init_creds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907082122.n68LMsSE028283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=231162 Nalin Dahyabhai changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- URL| |http://krbdev.mit.edu/rt/Ti | |cket/Display.html?id=5475 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 00:20:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 20:20:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239414] illogical mapping for non-QWERTY keyboard with m17n In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090020.n690KPKk009385@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239414 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pnemade at redhat.com Component|ibus |ibus-m17n AssignedTo|phuang at redhat.com |pnemade at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 06:06:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:06:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090606.n6966Ttt007549@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #22 from Ondrej Vasik 2009-07-09 02:06:27 EDT --- Robert: Packaging guideline is to: "Own all directories you create but none of the directories of packages you depend on. Additionally no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the files owned by the filesystem or man package." As filesystem and man-pages are not going to own those dirs, packages which do create those directories(and use them for their files) should own them. Dennis: Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 9 06:28:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 02:28:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907090628.n696STZP019022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #23 from Ivana Varekova 2009-07-09 02:28:28 EDT --- Thanks Dennis. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:45:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:45:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100945.n6A9jXo4029339@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 --- Comment #22 from David Woodhouse 2009-07-10 05:45:29 EDT --- And in Fedora 11... 5 years now... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 09:45:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 05:45:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 123335] xchat reconnects channels in wrong tabs after network outage. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907100945.n6A9jkjt008779@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=123335 David Woodhouse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 10 22:50:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:50:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907102250.n6AMot2H010486@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 BJ Dierkes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |wdierkes at 5dollarwhitebox.or | |g --- Comment #8 from BJ Dierkes 2009-07-10 18:50:53 EDT --- Would be nice if we could get some attention on this bug primarily due to its age. There are similar requests downstream for the EPEL packages, though the EPEL maintainer is waiting for Fedora to make this change first. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:27:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:27:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111627.n6BGRHNU027333@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #9 from BJ Dierkes 2009-07-11 12:27:15 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=351351) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=351351) Simple patch to remove the unnecessary requirement of shorewall -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 11 16:28:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:28:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907111628.n6BGShqn027480@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #10 from BJ Dierkes 2009-07-11 12:28:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=351352) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=351352) Patch to add a subpackage for shorewall config and dependency This is an alternative to patch 351351... depending on how the maintainer wishes to proceed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 07:12:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:12:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907140712.n6E7CTSP005361@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #11 from Axel Thimm 2009-07-14 03:12:26 EDT --- I think this is just an EPEL bug, why not fix it in the EPEL cvs? I'd go with something like BJ's patch in comment #10. For anecdotal reference just comparing the use of fail2ban with iptables and shorewall by google hits it comes up with something like 1:4 (15,500:69,800), which means that a large portion of fail2ban users will expect shorewall support out of the bix and will be surprised to have to look for further subpackages, or to have to manually install some dependencies of fail2ban. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 15:03:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:03:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141503.n6EF32Pv012330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #12 from Matthew Miller 2009-07-14 11:02:59 EDT --- Re: EPEL ? the Fedora package also has a hard-requirement of shorewall. Re: anecdotal reference ? In that case, patch #351351 (don't split the package, but don't have a hard requirement) seems like the way to go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 15:56:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 11:56:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141556.n6EFuIXd006536@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 --- Comment #13 from BJ Dierkes 2009-07-14 11:56:16 EDT --- Honestly, my only concern is with EPEL... but the changes make sense for both. If you consider that EPEL was created for *Enterprise Linux... it would be safe to assume that a SysAdmin installing fail2ban would know very well what they want and how they want to implement. Forcing the install of shorewall on a SysAdmin in the enterprise just seems rude. ;) For Fedora I can see your point as the audience would more than likely have less SysAdmins and more Users/Power Users. Either way... if you are installing fail2ban you probably also know how to do something like 'yum search shorewall'. If you go with something like my initial patch in comment #9, you can just throw in a few lines of comment into %{_sysconfdir}/fail2ban/action.d/shorewall.conf that let you know "hey, you probably need to install x, y, z packages via yum to enable shorewall support". Or the patch in comment #10, is obvious or understood that you need to install fail2ban-shorewall to enable shorewall support. Either way, thank you for giving this tracker some attention. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 17:00:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:00:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198395] Package openhpi lacks IPv6 support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141700.n6EH0MlO002619@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198395 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature, Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 17:14:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:14:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206629] Add South African keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141714.n6EHEiTk008665@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206629 Lubomir Rintel changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 17:16:34 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:16:34 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180020] unsupported tags should be filtered out In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141716.n6EHGYlL031699@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180020 Sander Hoentjen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 17:23:41 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:23:41 -0400 Subject: [Bug 165460] Issues when auto-create maildir folders in /var/mail In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141723.n6EHNf1M001497@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=165460 Dmitry Butskoy changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #12 from Dmitry Butskoy 2009-07-14 13:23:40 EDT --- Reopen -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 17:41:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:41:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 235955] Rhythmbox Column resizing does not follow cursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141741.n6EHfPIJ019963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=235955 --- Comment #11 from Charles R. Anderson 2009-07-14 13:41:24 EDT --- This is fixed in Fedora 11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 17:43:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 13:43:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 211882] /etc/xinetd.d/rsync is installed, but rsync does not require xinetd In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141743.n6EHhrdU020994@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=211882 --- Comment #7 from Charles R. Anderson 2009-07-14 13:43:52 EDT --- Still exists in Fedora 11, but I'm not sure now whether having a hard dependency on xinetd is a good idea. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 18:01:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:01:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222180] resizing gnome-terminal doesn't display size tooltip under compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141801.n6EI18U8028244@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222180 --- Comment #10 from Joachim Namislow 2009-07-14 14:01:07 EDT --- Issue still present for current "rawhide". Plugin "resizeinfo" should be enabled by default. Somebody please reopen the bug and set the version to "rawhide". Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 18:32:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:32:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301861] File playback seeking using the slider does not work for FLAC files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141832.n6EIW33H006963@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301861 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #13 from Ville Skytt? 2009-07-14 14:32:01 EDT --- I just tested a flac that has seek tables on F-10 x86_64, xine-lib-1.1.16.3-2.fc10: - Works fine with amarok-2.1.1-1.fc10.x86_64 - kaffeine-0.8.7-3.fc10.x86_64 and xine-ui-0.99.5-11.fc10.x86_64 have same issues as in comment 6. So, reopening, but the fact it works fine in amarok (xine is the only phonon backend I have installed), I suppose it might not be a xine-lib problem after all, but maybe one in both kaffeine and xine-ui. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 18:41:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:41:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192952] suphp selinux policy should be simular to suexec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141841.n6EIfpms030065@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192952 Chris Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Platform|x86_64 |All Version|9 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 18:42:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:42:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 192952] suphp selinux policy should be simular to suexec In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141842.n6EIgBMa030122@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=192952 Chris Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 18:43:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:43:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222180] resizing gnome-terminal doesn't display size tooltip under compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907141843.n6EIhZwx030306@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222180 John Poelstra changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 21:36:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:36:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246363] (nautilus:29798): WARNING **: Can not caclulate _NET_NUMBER_OF_DESKTOPS In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907142136.n6ELaR8G010022@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246363 --- Comment #9 from Nivag 2009-07-14 17:36:26 EDT --- We are now using Fedora 10 & 11 - no sign of this problem on these versions of Fedora. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 14 21:55:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:55:38 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199256] exim unconditionally requires postgres and mysql libraries In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907142155.n6ELtcIE025212@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199256 Tim Jackson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #13 from Tim Jackson 2009-07-14 17:55:36 EDT --- This was actually implemented a while ago in F-10. Thanks David! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 05:45:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:45:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168776] server-generated directory listing contains bomb icon for directory named 'core' In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150545.n6F5jlMb026205@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168776 Radek B?ba changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #8 from Radek B?ba 2009-07-15 01:45:46 EDT --- httpd-2.2.11-8 (F11) is still affected. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 07:28:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:28:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237631] TreeView with TreeModelSort highlight problem. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150728.n6F7SD8a005528@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237631 Thomas Woerner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |11 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #15 from Thomas Woerner 2009-07-15 03:28:12 EDT --- Still a problem in F-11. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 07:40:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 03:40:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 167827] after xrandr, vnc.so informs client of old screen size, but image matches new size In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150740.n6F7ergu008338@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=167827 Adam Tkac changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Keywords| |Reopened Component|vnc |tigervnc CC| |atkac at redhat.com Resolution|WONTFIX | QAContact|dkl at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org Status Whiteboard|bzcl34nup | --- Comment #11 from Adam Tkac 2009-07-15 03:40:51 EDT --- This bug is still present, moving back to rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 08:19:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:19:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198395] Package openhpi lacks IPv6 support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150819.n6F8JPAC019146@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198395 Dan Hor?k changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 09:05:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:05:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 457252] =?utf-8?q?_The_B=C3=89PO_keyboard_is_AZERTY_with_GDM?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150905.n6F95M91007387@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457252 Noura El hawary changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #2 from Noura El hawary 2009-07-15 05:05:20 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 09:04:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:04:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 467745] Wrong rendering of cyrillic letter tse ( =?utf-8?b?0YY=?= ) at 8pt and 10pt In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150904.n6F94qEN006729@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467745 Noura El hawary changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Noura El hawary 2009-07-15 05:04:49 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 09:05:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:05:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 461559] SELinux is preventing gnome-power-man (xdm_t) "execstack" to < =?utf-8?b?TmV6bsOhbcOp?= > (xdm_t). In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150905.n6F95q7J007554@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461559 Noura El hawary changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #14 from Noura El hawary 2009-07-15 05:05:48 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 09:05:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:05:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 480564] =?utf-8?q?_the_Offline_=EF=BC=86_Disk_Space_settings?= =?utf-8?q?_doesn?= 't do any effort on the folder properties In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150905.n6F95bfv031320@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=480564 Noura El hawary changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED CC| |nelhawar at redhat.com Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(vbian at redhat.com) | --- Comment #5 from Noura El hawary 2009-07-15 05:05:34 EDT --- Fedora 9 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2009-07-10. Fedora 9 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 09:35:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 05:35:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 246325] need LANGUAGE settings for translation fallbacks In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907150935.n6F9ZNpk014643@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246325 --- Comment #8 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-07-15 05:35:21 EDT --- @petersen: The gettext/glibc/gdm solution does seem like the correct long term approach for the correct behaviour. We're still faced however with the immediate that a user can't set this at all unless they know something about LANGUAGES, most localisers don't even know anything about that :). We'd still need the ability for a admin or user to override such a setting if it emerges in the future. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 10:37:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 06:37:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189473] bonding: xenbr after boot broken, after xend restart networking gone altogether In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907151037.n6FAb2Bh019044@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189473 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution|WONTFIX | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 15 14:15:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 10:15:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907151415.n6FEFPaI005861@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 npajkovs at redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |npajkovs at redhat.com AssignedTo|rrakus at redhat.com |npajkovs at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 07:05:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:05:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 206629] Add South African keyboard In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907160705.n6G75CKO009574@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=206629 Dwayne Bailey changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |11 --- Comment #9 from Dwayne Bailey 2009-07-16 03:05:10 EDT --- Still present in F11 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 07:25:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:25:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204446] Xclients.d files not sourced by Xclients script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907160725.n6G7P1Af017001@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204446 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System 2009-07-16 03:24:58 EDT --- xorg-x11-xinit-1.0.9-9.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 07:25:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:25:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204446] Xclients.d files not sourced by Xclients script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907160725.n6G7PBYk017324@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204446 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |1.0.9-9.fc11 Resolution| |ERRATA -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 14:18:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:18:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907161418.n6GEIrlA021017@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 leigh scott changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |leigh123linux at googlemail.co | |m --- Comment #40 from leigh scott 2009-07-16 10:18:46 EDT --- Well with the attention this bug has received :-( I might as well get used to editing grub.conf by hand every kernel update. Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.67.rc2.git9.fc12.x86_64 295/826 get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned Success WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template Updating : python-2.6-10.fc12.x86_64 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 15:22:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:22:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907161522.n6GFMseo006677@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Perry Myers changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|jparsons at redhat.com |rmccabe at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 18:04:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:04:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 332781] No sound for non-root users In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907161804.n6GI4ZOE001276@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=332781 dann at ics.uci.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dann at ics.uci.edu -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 18:42:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:42:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907161842.n6GIgU9x011050@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Thomas M?ller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |thomas at mathtm.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 21:13:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:13:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907162113.n6GLDMYv017668@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Eric Sandeen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |esandeen at redhat.com, | |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #41 from Eric Sandeen 2009-07-16 17:13:16 EDT --- I'm hitting this in rawhide. It looks like getpathbyspec() is fubar. (disclaimer: despite owning blkid for 3 years I managed to never -really- look at it until it was dispatched to util-linux-ng \o/ !) Anyway, getpathbyspec() is doing: if (!strncmp(device, "LABEL=", 6)) return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "LABEL", device+6); else if (!strncmp(device, "UUID=", 5)) return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "UUID", device+5); but blkid_get_tag_value() returns the value of the tag specified in the 2nd arg for the device in the 3rd arg. But we're passing in the UUID or the LABEL value itself in the 3rd arg. So then blkid is going off trying to access "899c0289-ec5b-4143-8856-fc9eb0b8f798" and read it. Replacing the above with: Index: grubby-7.0/grubby.c =================================================================== --- grubby-7.0.orig/grubby.c +++ grubby-7.0/grubby.c @@ -427,11 +427,7 @@ static char * getpathbyspec(char *device if (!blkid) blkid_get_cache(&blkid, NULL); - if (!strncmp(device, "LABEL=", 6)) - return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "LABEL", device+6); - else if (!strncmp(device, "UUID=", 5)) - return blkid_get_tag_value(blkid, "UUID", device+5); - return device; + return blkid_get_devname(blkid, device, NULL); } static enum lineType_e getTypeByKeyword(char * keyword, seems to work for me; blkid_get_devname(cache, token, ) returns the name of the device matching the token TOKEN=value string, or the device itself if "token" isn't a name, value pair. Probably requires more testing, etc etc. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 16 23:35:32 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 19:35:32 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907162335.n6GNZWmB025441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #42 from leigh scott 2009-07-16 19:35:30 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > seems to work for me; blkid_get_devname(cache, token, ) returns the name > of the device matching the token TOKEN=value string, or the device itself if > "token" isn't a name, value pair. > > Probably requires more testing, etc etc. Thanks, I will give it a go and report back. Here are some grubby rpm's with the patch. http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/rpm/devel/ http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1480779 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 11:37:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:37:42 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907171137.n6HBbgCv023518@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Paul Bolle changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pebolle at tiscali.nl -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 11:59:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 07:59:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907171159.n6HBxG9M018033@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #43 from leigh scott 2009-07-17 07:59:14 EDT --- (In reply to comment #41) > Probably requires more testing, etc etc. It fixes the problem here. Transaction Test Succeeded Running Transaction Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 1/1 get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory get_netlink_msg returned Success WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping get_netlink_msg returned No such file or directory Running DKMS auto installation service for kernel 2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 nvidia (185.18.14-2.1.fc12): Installing module. ...... Installed: kernel.x86_64 0:2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12 Complete! Thanks Leigh -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 14:03:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:03:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907171403.n6HE3EPg027886@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #44 from Jeremy Katz 2009-07-17 10:03:12 EDT --- Thanks for the patch Eric -- applied and built -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 15:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907171501.n6HF1nVV013478@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #45 from Eric Sandeen 2009-07-17 11:01:47 EDT --- (In reply to comment #43) ... > It fixes the problem here. ... > Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 1/1 ... > WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping ^^^ hmm is that new? -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 15:45:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:45:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 124246] grubby fatal error: unable to find a suitable template In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907171545.n6HFjRKi013895@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=124246 --- Comment #46 from leigh scott 2009-07-17 11:45:25 EDT --- (In reply to comment #45) > (In reply to comment #43) > > ... > > > It fixes the problem here. > > ... > > > Installing : kernel-2.6.31-0.69.rc3.fc12.x86_64 1/1 > ... > > WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping > > ^^^ hmm is that new? > > -Eric No, I was getting the "WARNING: is a not a block device, skipping" before the grubby patch as well. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 22:57:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:57:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179759] Ant should provide $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907172257.n6HMvKDP018397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179759 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #5 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:48:27 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski 2009-07-17 18:57:18 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=354235) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=354235) Patch to ant.spec to provide symbolic links to jar files in $ANT_HOME Ping, hello? Still an issue with F-11. I have an updated spec file ready to go for this. Successful koji test build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1483273 I can check it in and build if that is okay. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 17 22:58:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:58:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179759] Ant should provide $ANT_HOME/lib/ant.jar In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907172258.n6HMw3J5000931@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179759 Orion Poplawski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(pcheung at redhat.co | |m) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 18 14:12:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 10:12:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228427] reenable apt-get mirror-select? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907181412.n6IEC33Y006267@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228427 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |512518 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 19 02:36:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 22:36:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 222180] resizing gnome-terminal doesn't display size tooltip under compiz In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907190236.n6J2a4dC017332@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222180 Matthias Clasen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |krh at redhat.com, | |mclasen at redhat.com Component|gnome-terminal |compiz AssignedTo|besfahbo at redhat.com |krh at redhat.com QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 19 08:05:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:05:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907190805.n6J85rkb025333@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 Martin F changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |martinrssf at gmail.com --- Comment #20 from Martin F 2009-07-19 04:05:46 EDT --- I myself had this problem and haven't paid attention until I saw this bug report referred from bug#122241 in bugs.launchpad.net (https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122241) recently. Here is my result in Fedora 11: 1. Insert DVD 2. gnome-mount asks for passphrase; enter one 3. DVD volume appears in the desktop (yeah!) 4. Double-click to open it 5. nautilus launches, the icon disappears from desktop, and the icon is shown in nautilus 6. clicking the icon from nautilus asks for passphrase again, then complains that it's already given the passphrase, but nothing is mounted in /media. 7. 'mount /dev/mapper/devkit-disks/luks-* /mnt/cdrom' from command line works 8. umount and eject works from command line 9. ejecting from nautilus gets complaint that /dev/sr0 is busy used by another module, and eject fails. 10. Subsequent insertion of dvd gets request for passphrase but complains about /dev/sr0 busy. Nautilus shows the icon but no desktop icon. Eject gives the same complaint as above with failure. 11. command line mount/umount/eject all still works. For now, that's the workaround: Insert dvd, enter passphrase, then simply mount, umount, and eject from command line. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 19 08:33:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 04:33:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907190833.n6J8Xhf1017678@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 --- Comment #21 from Martin F 2009-07-19 04:33:42 EDT --- I guess I spoke too soon. Here are more details: Fedora 11: 1. Insert DVD, enter passphrase when requested 2. icon of the unencrypted volume appears in the desktop, but it disappears as nautilus is launched, and nautilus shows the encrypted volume icon 3. Mount and umount from command line works 4. eject from nautilus works, as long as I don't do eject from command line So the workaround is: Insert dvd, enter passphrase; mount and umount from command line; eject from gnome/nautilus. Subsequent closing of DVD drive causes button press eject to not work. The only way to eject is command line eject. once this is done, re-inserting DVD causes the same problem as before: asks for passphrase, then complains that org.freedesktop.DeviceKit.Disks.Error.Busy: One or more block devices are holding /dev/sr0. The same error when trying to eject from nautilus, until the next reboot. But mount/umount/eject from command line works as usual. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 20 01:49:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2009 21:49:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243790] Cannot delete LVM snapshot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907200149.n6K1nHd6028771@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243790 Tony Fu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- QAContact|jparsons at redhat.com |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 20 06:20:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:20:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 194249] CDs/DVDs encrypted with LUKS are not correctly mounted In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907200620.n6K6KSZb003029@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194249 Riumin Oleksii changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |contact_info at r75a7.org --- Comment #22 from Riumin Oleksii 2009-07-20 02:20:26 EDT --- I have the same problem - icon appears and immediately disappears in the desktop. After this the same error occured. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 20 09:59:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 05:59:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 251106] Unable to load kdump in FC6 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907200959.n6K9xELw002387@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251106 Chris Ward changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|CustomerVerified | Verified| |Customer -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 20 19:13:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:13:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 198359] Package dictd lacks IPv6 support In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907201913.n6KJDQQL018766@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=198359 Tore Anderson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tore at fud.no --- Comment #7 from Tore Anderson 2009-07-20 15:13:23 EDT --- This bug should be re-opened as it is present in F11: tore at wrath:~$ getent hosts lust.v6.fud.no 2001:16d8:ee47:0:210:a7ff:fe04:b403 lust.v6.fud.no tore at wrath:~$ strace -ff -econnect dict -v -h lust.v6.fud.no test No configuration connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.1")}, 28) = 0 connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(53), sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.1")}, 28) = 0 Cannot connect to any servers tore at wrath:~$ strace -ff -econnect dict -v -h 2001:16d8:ee47:0:210:a7ff:fe04:b403 test No configuration connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) connect(3, {sa_family=AF_FILE, path="/var/run/nscd/socket"...}, 110) = -1 ENOENT (No such file or directory) Cannot connect to any servers The strace reveals that it does not even attempt to open the connection to the v6-only address. Tore -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 21 00:06:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2009 20:06:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 207571] Fix the dictionary proliferation problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907210006.n6L06u0w024956@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207571 Bug 207571 depends on bug 219777, which changed state. Bug 219777 Summary: Have vim use hunspell and hunspell dicts directly https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219777 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Resolution|WONTFIX | Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 21 15:52:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:52:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 393631] krdc: missing menu icon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907211552.n6LFqPYg013833@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393631 Steven M. Parrish changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(than at redhat.com) --- Comment #15 from Steven M. Parrish 2009-07-21 11:52:21 EDT --- You have an update on this Than? -- Steven M. Parrish - KDE Triage Master - PackageKit Triager Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 21 16:02:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:02:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 393631] krdc: missing menu icon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907211602.n6LG2nb3016682@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393631 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(than at redhat.com) | --- Comment #16 from Ngo Than 2009-07-21 12:02:48 EDT --- It's good that you remind me. I will take a look at this. thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 23 13:28:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:28:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 320681] Midnight Commander default installation please In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907231328.n6NDS1Be006561@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=320681 Matej Cepl changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcepl at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 23 16:35:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 12:35:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 162686] /dev/root permissions should be 0640 (root.disk) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907231635.n6NGZC64014045@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=162686 Gilbert E. Detillieux changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |11 --- Comment #20 from Gilbert E. Detillieux 2009-07-23 12:35:08 EDT --- This is still a problem under Fedora 11... brw-------. 1 root root 8, 2 2009-07-23 11:23 /dev/root Is anyone ever going to fix this simple bug, or should I just give up on attempting to reopen it for future Fedora releases? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 23 19:38:55 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 15:38:55 -0400 Subject: [Bug 204170] elfutils don't pass testsuite on alpha In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907231938.n6NJct8R017142@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=204170 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Roland McGrath changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Flag|needinfo?(qboosh at pld-linux. | |org) | --- Comment #51 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:50:05 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #52 from Roland McGrath 2009-07-23 15:38:51 EDT --- These bugs are fixed in current Fedora 10/11 updates of elfutils. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 24 11:07:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 07:07:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242011] pydev plugin should have a pre-configured python environment In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907241107.n6OB7ekP001120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242011 Felix Schwarz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |felix.schwarz at oss.schwarz.e | |u -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 24 12:47:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 08:47:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 393631] krdc: missing menu icon In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907241247.n6OCll1p012441@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=393631 Ngo Than changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #17 from Ngo Than 2009-07-24 08:47:45 EDT --- It's fixed in kdenetwork-4_2_98-1_fc12. IMO it's not worth doing update for this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 24 16:26:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:26:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 179072] _dl_debug_state() RT_CONSISTENT called too early In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907241626.n6OGQOaU031058@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179072 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jakub at redhat.com AssignedTo|jakub at redhat.com |schwab at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 24 23:47:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 19:47:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239244] attempt to use kdump just freezes the box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907242347.n6ONlXWI021263@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239244 Matt Castelein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |matt.castelein at rocsoft.com --- Comment #4 from Matt Castelein 2009-07-24 19:47:31 EDT --- I have encountered this problem on Fedora 11. I am following the instructions at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel/kdump.. When I get to the point where I do "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" the box just freezes and no dump kernel is loaded. It just sits there until I reset it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 25 12:45:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 08:45:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907251245.n6PCjHNQ020950@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Johan Kok changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|11 |rawhide Flag| |needinfo?(steve at silug.org) --- Comment #24 from Johan Kok 2009-07-25 08:45:14 EDT --- Changing version back to rawhide and ping. Steven, how close are we to finishing this one? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Jul 25 23:20:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 19:20:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228953] Unable to use gpg-agent + input methods In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907252320.n6PNKp0D026401@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228953 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|axel.thimm at atrpms.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 26 00:32:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:32:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 513800] New: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box Message-ID: Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=513800 Summary: attempt to use kdump just freezes the box Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: kexec-kdump AssignedTo: vgoyal at redhat.com ReportedBy: matt.castelein at rocsoft.com QAContact: lwang at redhat.com CC: matt.castelein at rocsoft.com, fedora-triage-list at redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora Clone Of: 239244 +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #239244 +++ Description of problem: After getting some kernel problems, I finally decided to give kdump a try, but to my surprise, it does not work. Any attempt to use kdump (with sysrq-c or echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger) leads to instant system crash. sysrq does not work anymore at this point and the only solution is hard poweroff. I see that FC7 does not ship kernel-kdump package anymore, but since FC7 kernel is built with CONFIG_RELOCATABLE, it should be fine as kdump kernel I presume. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): kernel-2.6.21-1.3116.fc7 How reproducible: 100% reproducible. Steps to Reproduce: boot kernel with crashkernel=128M at 16M option run service kdump start run sysctl kernel.sysrq=1 press sysrq-t or echo c >/proc/sysrq-trigger Additional info: The system is DELL Latitude D620 laptop with Intel Core2 Duo T7200 CPU, 2G RAM, i686 arch. Latest FC7 stuff from development repo. --- Additional comment from green at linuxhacker.ru on 2007-05-14 15:24:47 EDT --- I upgraded to 2.6.21-1.3142.fc7 and the problem is still present. --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list at redhat.com on 2008-04-03 20:33:50 EDT --- Based on the date this bug was created, it appears to have been reported against rawhide during the development of a Fedora release that is no longer maintained. In order to refocus our efforts as a project we are flagging all of the open bugs for releases which are no longer maintained. If this bug remains in NEEDINFO thirty (30) days from now, we will automatically close it. If you can reproduce this bug in a maintained Fedora version (7, 8, or rawhide), please change this bug to the respective version and change the status to ASSIGNED. (If you're unable to change the bug's version or status, add a comment to the bug and someone will change it for you.) Thanks for your help, and we apologize again that we haven't handled these issues to this point. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp We will be following the process here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping to ensure this doesn't happen again. --- Additional comment from fedora-triage-list at redhat.com on 2008-05-06 21:41:26 EDT --- This bug has been in NEEDINFO for more than 30 days since feedback was first requested. As a result we are closing it. If you can reproduce this bug in the future against a maintained Fedora version please feel free to reopen it against that version. The process we're following is outlined here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/F9CleanUp --- Additional comment from matt.castelein at rocsoft.com on 2009-07-24 19:47:31 EDT --- I have encountered this problem on Fedora 11. I am following the instructions at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel/kdump.. When I get to the point where I do "echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger" the box just freezes and no dump kernel is loaded. It just sits there until I reset it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Jul 26 00:35:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2009 20:35:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239244] attempt to use kdump just freezes the box In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907260035.n6Q0Zq5Q006141@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239244 Matt Castelein changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|matt.castelein at rocsoft.com | --- Comment #5 from Matt Castelein 2009-07-25 20:35:50 EDT --- Reopened as bug 513800 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 27 00:34:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:34:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459530] Security: Mailman private archives are available to all local users In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907270034.n6R0YFaI007037@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459530 H. Peter Anvin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 27 00:34:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 20:34:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 459530] Security: Mailman private archives are available to all local users In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907270034.n6R0Y9oO007019@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459530 H. Peter Anvin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #9 from H. Peter Anvin 2009-07-26 20:34:07 EDT --- Confirmed in Fedora 10. Doubt Fedora 11 is any different. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 27 13:13:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 09:13:54 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907271313.n6RDDsLr002755@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 --- Comment #11 from Nikola Pajkovsky 2009-07-27 09:13:51 EDT --- Did you try isoinfo -R -l -i foo.iso or isoinfo -J -l -i foo.iso? Maybe it will help read utf-8. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 27 19:33:05 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:33:05 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907271933.n6RJX5nX022255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Bug 220265 depends on bug 510359, which changed state. Bug 510359 Summary: Man pages under /usr/share/man/sv: Add directories to man package or is "sv" a broken locale? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510359 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #25 from Axel Thimm 2009-07-27 15:33:03 EDT --- *** Bug 510359 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 27 19:31:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:31:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907271931.n6RJVXvj021910@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm at atrpms.net Bug 220265 depends on bug 510360, which changed state. Bug 510360 Summary: Unowned directories in hunspell-1.2.8-4.fc11 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=510360 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED --- Comment #24 from Axel Thimm 2009-07-27 15:31:29 EDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I'm not really sure whether jwhois really should own /usr/share/man/sv/man1 I agree, the same would need to be owned by fakeroot, dcraw and even shadow-utils as well. > and I'm not sure, whether this is conform to the packaging guidelines as well. (In reply to comment #22) > Robert: Packaging guideline is to: "Own all directories you create but none of > the directories of packages you depend on. Additionally no package in Fedora > should ever share ownership with any of the files owned by the filesystem or > man package." > As filesystem and man-pages are not going to own those dirs, packages which do > create those directories(and use them for their files) should own them. So a packager that encounters a man path that is unowned by man/filesystem asks repoquery as to --whatprovides this path and ends up with jwhois, fakeroot or some other package. If he reads the guidelines to the letter instead of coowning this man path he might as well just depend on one of these packages ... What I'm trying to say is that the guidelines are there to explain how to package up things and not how to create strange scenarios. The next packager with /usr/share/man/sv/man1 will also not know what to do and will probably do the wrong thing (whatever the right thing is). I think either a locale is broken, so it is the packager's responsibility to remove or adjust the locale of the man page, or it needs to be owned by man. Ownership of directories means that the contents are related to the owner, and the man pages of say dcraw-8.91-1.fc11.x86_64 fakeroot-1.12.2-21.fc11.x86_64 jwhois-4.0-13.fc11.x86_64 shadow-utils-4.1.2-13.fc11.x86_64 that suddenly are required to own all subdirs from /usr/share/man/sv/ are completely unrelated to each other. Ivana, please reconsider, I understand that you feel like this "pollutes" your package with folders you don't directly need, but the other solution is to pollute many more packages with he same, and if feels much uncleaner to do so in not man related packages. And the above example shows that the same stray ownership is being multiplied by four (dcraw, fakeroot, jwhois and shadow-utils now need to own the dirs of the subtree below /usr/share/man/sv/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Jul 27 19:57:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:57:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220265] Many unowned directories in /usr/share/man In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907271957.n6RJvE6R028769@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220265 --- Comment #26 from Axel Thimm 2009-07-27 15:57:12 EDT --- (In reply to bug #510360 comment #1) > Fixed, until there are stock Hungarian man pages in which case it'll become a > bug to own the dir I hadn't thought of that, which makes it even more important to stick to one place for the directory ownership. Should one of the 19 locale above, be it Hungarian, Portuguese, Danish or Chinese etc. be supported by a future man or man-pages package it will suddenly make the client packages' current fix a bug to remove. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 28 15:09:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:09:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 168038] isoinfo doesn't support UTF-8 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907281509.n6SF9XtV024449@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=168038 --- Comment #12 from J?rg Schilling 2009-07-28 11:09:30 EDT --- As mentioned before, the illegal fork that is distributed by redhat does not support UTF-8. If you like to get working UTF-8 support, you need to upgrade to the original software at: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/cdrecord/alpha/ http://cdrecord.berlios.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 28 15:15:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 11:15:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907281515.n6SFFko9002038@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CANTFIX --- Comment #10 from Matthew Barnes 2009-07-28 11:15:44 EDT --- This review is too outdated to continue. Closing as CANTFIX. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 28 16:55:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 12:55:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907281655.n6SGtSwh019663@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Jason Tibbitts changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs at math.uh.edu --- Comment #11 from Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-28 12:55:27 EDT --- I still see gtkhtml3 in rawhide; is it your intention to remove it from the distribution? It not, it still needs to pass a merge review at some point. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 28 17:20:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:20:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907281720.n6SHKCLc025172@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review- | --- Comment #12 from Matthew Barnes 2009-07-28 13:20:11 EDT --- Why? I thought we merged already. In any case, the review comments are over two years old and no longer apply. If Fedora is still insisting on these reviews, then this one needs to be restarted from scratch. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 28 19:21:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:21:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907281921.n6SJLFJu002785@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Toshio Ernie Kuratomi changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |a.badger at gmail.com Resolution|CANTFIX | --- Comment #13 from Toshio Ernie Kuratomi 2009-07-28 15:21:13 EDT --- Sure. But the usual proceedure is to continue in the same bug report. If you'd like to start with a fresh bug report, fell free to open one and then close this one with a pointer to that one so everyone understands what's going on. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Jul 28 19:38:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 15:38:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225872] Merge Review: gtkhtml3 (stalled) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907281938.n6SJcBvG030255@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225872 Matthew Barnes changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|mbarnes at redhat.com |nobody at fedoraproject.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 29 01:39:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:39:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 199812] ACPI: Unable to turn cooling device [ffff81007ffa6810] 'on' is spewed repeatedly on the console In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907290139.n6T1dukK007283@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199812 --- Comment #36 from Andrew Ziem 2009-07-28 21:39:50 EDT --- The issue still exists in 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 (no special boot options tested). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Jul 29 18:08:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:08:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 183338] adding a domain to search: lost by dhcp when network restarts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907291808.n6TI815r020996@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=183338 Penelope Fudd changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kernel at pkts.ca --- Comment #12 from Penelope Fudd 2009-07-29 14:07:57 EDT --- I'm also tinkering with SEARCH in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0. More precisely, I need to add two domains to the search list, and override the dhcp-provided dns server, like so: SEARCH="domain1.com domain2.com" DNS1=1.1.1.1 DNS2=2.2.2.2 To test it, I do this: # ifdown eth0 # rm /etc/resolv.conf* # killall dhclient # ifup eth0 As a result, I get this: # cat /etc/resolv.conf ; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script nameserver 1.1.1.1 nameserver 2.2.2.2 search domain1.com # cat /etc/resolv.conf.save ; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script search domain1.com domain2.com nameserver 192.168.217.2 As you can see, typing 'ifup' creates resolv.conf and resolv.conf.save. The resolv.conf has the correct (overridden) dns servers and only one search domain, while the resolv.conf.save has the wrong (dhcp) dns server and the correct search path. What's crazy is that the correct information is all coming from the same file (/etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0). I even tried extra quotes: SEARCH="'domain1.com domain2.com'", the quotes show up in resolv.conf.save but not in resolv.conf, which is unaffected. I wonder if this bug is why someone decided to start over with NetworkManager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 30 03:37:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:37:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907300337.n6U3blAU003332@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ajax at redhat.com, | |xgl-maint at redhat.com Component|xorg-x11-drv-i810 |xorg-x11-drv-intel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 30 03:44:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:44:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907300344.n6U3ihVe004551@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #229401|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #229411|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #234871|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #16 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-07-29 23:44:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355636) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355636) Xorg.0.log over DVI with BenQ LCD on Fedora 11 Live CD Booting the Fedora 11 x86_64 live CD, with default options This is the Xorg.0.log (without an xorg.conf, as it is a live CD). This is also with a new monitor (BenQ FP91G+), attached over DVI only (VGA port unplugged) The displayed resolution should be 1280x1024, not the the 800x600 it chose. This means it isn't the fault of the screen, but the way Fedora probes the video modes on the outboard DVI connector. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 30 03:58:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 23:58:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907300358.n6U3wC9h007704@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 Andrew Bartlett changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #355636|application/octet-stream |text/plain mime type| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 30 04:01:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:01:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907300401.n6U412qF013447@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 --- Comment #17 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-07-30 00:01:01 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=355637) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=355637) Xorg.0.log over DVI with BenQ LCD on Fedora 11 Live CD with *nomodeset* This time, I booted the live CD with nomodeset The Resolution chosen (1024x768) was still less than the resolution of the display, but is the same resolution that Fedora 10 allows on this DVI connection. This is the same monitor (BenQ FP91G+) as in the previous test. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Jul 30 04:36:50 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2009 00:36:50 -0400 Subject: [Bug 335501] Cannot get native resolution on attached LCD (particularly over DVI) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907300436.n6U4aoKJ019907@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=335501 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Bartlett 2009-07-30 00:36:49 EDT --- BTW, I'm more than happy to try Live CDs of Fedora 12 Rawhide, but I can't find any at the moment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 31 13:56:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:56:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189660] Emblems have no localized name In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907311356.n6VDuBul025425@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189660 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature Version|11 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 31 13:58:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:58:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907311358.n6VDwmN9025792@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 Piotr Dr?g changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature, Translation Version|10 |rawhide -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 31 14:55:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 10:55:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237254] bittorrent-gui missing translations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907311455.n6VEthKX005396@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237254 --- Comment #8 from Paul Howarth 2009-07-31 10:55:41 EDT --- Just to clarify, the package does include translations but due to a bug I haven't identified yet, has not been able to use those translations since the days of python 2.4. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Jul 31 17:42:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2009 13:42:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 250992] ExcludeArch: ppc64 - Missing ocaml blocks f7 builds In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200907311742.n6VHg4tU021887@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250992 Axel Thimm changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|axel.thimm at atrpms.net | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.