From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 1 18:17:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:17:14 -0500 Subject: [Bug 189070] gFTP has outdated localization files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903011817.n21IHEXn016086@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189070 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Itamar Reis Peixoto 2009-03-01 13:17:11 EDT --- please check if it's fixed in 2.0.19 / rawhide if the problem persists please let us know. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 09:59:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 04:59:04 -0500 Subject: [Bug 207470] Need ability to handle duplicate VG names for Xen In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903020959.n229x4jP004266@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=207470 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rjones at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 14:59:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:59:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 242607] Build with festival error. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903021459.n22ExZC4028290@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242607 --- Comment #31 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-03-02 09:59:32 EDT --- Since this bug have been addressed and the package is available in the stable updates, I think this bug can be closed. Please report #483777 upstream for advices...(usually some library flags could be added at link time). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 2 22:14:38 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:14:38 -0500 Subject: [Bug 281671] Usability of enable/disable toggle for desktop effects In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903022214.n22MEck6032330@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=281671 Fran?ois Cami changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED CC| |fcami at fedoraproject.org Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Fran?ois Cami 2009-03-02 17:14:36 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 214946 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 18:26:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:26:21 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182464] dbus-daemon hangs while starting on a system with ldap authorisation enabled. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903041826.n24IQLWm028010@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464 Daniel Qarras changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dqarras at yahoo.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 4 20:42:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:42:44 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186527] Startup hangs at "starting system message bus" if ldaps authentication enabled in firstboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903042042.n24KgiQ3031161@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186527 --- Comment #56 from Daniel Qarras 2009-03-04 15:42:36 EDT --- > Until nss-ldapd replaces nss_ldap, this problem won't go away. > Everything else is just a temporary workaround. As stated in another case, it seems that SSSD comes to rescue: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SSSD -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 00:30:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:30:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 300321] gnome screensaver does not detect input when fullscreen sdl game is running In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050030.n250Ug3f023714@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=300321 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |katzj at redhat.com --- Comment #8 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:59:38 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #9 from Jeremy Katz 2009-03-04 19:30:39 EDT --- *** Bug 452433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 00:45:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:45:56 -0500 Subject: [Bug 293861] totem.desktop: include app name in Name= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050045.n250judP009424@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293861 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 01:06:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:06:43 -0500 Subject: [Bug 293861] totem.desktop: include app name in Name= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050106.n2516ho8011091@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=293861 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter 2009-03-04 20:06:42 EDT --- Upstream is better I guess, having applications not identifying themselves clearly via it's .desktop file is unfortunate. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 01:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:12:40 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250767] ghc-gtk2hs won't install with only 256MB RAM In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050112.n251Ce8s026703@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250767 Jens Petersen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 07:57:42 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:57:42 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182498] Unnecessary byte-compilation of python scripts in /usr/bin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050757.n257vgKN028221@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182498 Parag AN(????) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |panemade at gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(????) 2009-03-05 02:57:40 EDT --- I thought this is fixed but koji as well as local rawhide build failed and still generating .pyo and .pyc in /usr/bin -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 09:31:58 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 04:31:58 -0500 Subject: [Bug 246918] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903050931.n259Vw2r026608@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=246918 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 2009-03-05 04:31:57 EDT --- kdbd along with the initscripts is now disabled starting with 0.7.0. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 13:58:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:58:02 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182498] Unnecessary byte-compilation of python scripts in /usr/bin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051358.n25Dw2m1027736@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182498 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pingou at pingoured.fr -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 16:31:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:31:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229141] initscript does not allow customizations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051631.n25GVNQ7003025@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229141 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |3.6.4-3.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 16:31:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:31:13 -0500 Subject: [Bug 229141] initscript does not allow customizations In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903051631.n25GVDDZ020378@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229141 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-05 11:31:12 EDT --- ss5-3.6.4-3.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 20:04:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:04:37 -0500 Subject: [Bug 247065] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052004.n25K4blt030711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247065 Jon Ciesla changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla 2009-03-05 15:04:36 EDT --- Fixed in rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 5 21:31:54 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:31:54 -0500 Subject: [Bug 186527] Startup hangs at "starting system message bus" if ldaps authentication enabled in firstboot In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903052131.n25LVsSx017519@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=186527 --- Comment #57 from Kostas Georgiou 2009-03-05 16:31:49 EDT --- SSSD looks like is tied to FreeIPA from a brief look that I had so I don't see how it's going to help with people using a different ldap server. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 01:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 20:03:23 -0500 Subject: [Bug 322271] nano: localized man pages not marked with %lang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903060103.n2613NO2023548@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322271 lexual changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |floss at lex.hider.name --- Comment #5 from lexual 2009-03-05 20:03:23 EDT --- Has Ville's fix hit any repos? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 14:23:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:23:22 -0500 Subject: [Bug 250078] Referenced sha1pass not included in rpm In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903061423.n26ENMK9001841@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250078 Mads Kiilerich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Version|9 |rawhide Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #7 from Mads Kiilerich 2009-03-06 09:23:21 EDT --- The primary problem is solved with syslinux-3.73-2.fc11.i586 The missing dependencies from comment #6 is tracked in Bug 465299 Closing -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 15:15:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:15:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182464] dbus-daemon hangs while starting on a system with ldap authorisation enabled. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903061515.n26FFZWT014289@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464 Shawn Somers changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |shawn.somers at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo? --- Comment #32 from Shawn Somers 2009-03-06 10:15:30 EDT --- Have had this problem with multiple Fedora releases, including 10. A reasonable fix that has worked for Me so far it to modify /etc/ldap.conf add `bind_policy soft' to the end of the file. after adding that line, the system no longer goes into long delay loops while booting, and I am still able to use all functionality. My question, to add to this bug, is, Why does this relatively minor policy change seem to fix it for Me?? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 6 22:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 6 Mar 2009 17:21:12 -0500 Subject: [Bug 322271] nano: localized man pages not marked with %lang In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903062221.n26MLCWV004863@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=322271 Ville Skytt? changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |2.0.6-5 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Ville Skytt? 2009-03-06 17:21:11 EDT --- Yes, it's in current Rawhide, closing. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 08:37:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:37:19 -0500 Subject: [Bug 182498] Unnecessary byte-compilation of python scripts in /usr/bin In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903070837.n278bJPK029868@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182498 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #10 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-07 03:37:18 EDT --- Upstream != rawhide, but it is in rawhide too now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 08:38:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:38:35 -0500 Subject: [Bug 191348] performance problem due to unneeded stat64() calls In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903070838.n278cZDW018976@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191348 Panu Matilainen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #12 from Panu Matilainen 2009-03-07 03:38:32 EDT --- This is fixed in rawhide now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 7 20:30:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2009 15:30:49 -0500 Subject: [Bug 365691] Radeon driver locks up machine hard on a regular basis Radeon 9200 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903072030.n27KUnvo016270@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365691 --- Comment #20 from Matej Cepl 2009-03-07 15:30:47 EDT --- Reporter, could you please reply to the previous question? If you won't reply in one month, I will have to close this bug as INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Thank you. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 00:27:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:27:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247100] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903090027.n290R4kB000691@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247100 Paul Wouters changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Version|9 |10 --- Comment #3 from Paul Wouters 2009-03-08 20:27:02 EDT --- I made the fixes to the initscript in 1.2.4-2 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 11:07:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:07:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 365691] Radeon driver locks up machine hard on a regular basis Radeon 9200 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091107.n29B740l007361@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365691 --- Comment #21 from David Tonhofer 2009-03-09 07:07:01 EDT --- Hi. Interested in getting the dmesg/Xorg.0 for the Mobility Radeon X300 under F10? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 14:12:02 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 10:12:02 -0400 Subject: [Bug 238491] no autoloads in place for psvn.el In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903091412.n29EC2F3016298@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=238491 Joe Orton changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #6 from Joe Orton 2009-03-09 10:12:00 EDT --- Sorry for ignoring this for forever and a day... fixed in Raw Hide, finally. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 23:10:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:10:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903092310.n29NAxSB005120@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |6.0.71-4.fc10 Resolution|RAWHIDE |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 9 23:10:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:10:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 296361] [PATCH] nash mount should support relatime In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903092310.n29NAdah011365@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=296361 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-09 19:10:37 EDT --- mkinitrd-6.0.71-4.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 01:30:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:30:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 351681] [RFE] deleting machine should remove diskfile In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903100130.n2A1U6FW027716@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=351681 Cole Robinson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |POST --- Comment #12 from Cole Robinson 2009-03-09 21:30:03 EDT --- Upstream now has a robust 'Delete VM' dialog which allows removing storage, providing enough info for the user to make a reasonable decision about what to remove. Moving to POST. http://hg.et.redhat.com/cgi-bin/hg-virt.cgi/applications/virt-manager--devel/rev/f8ad3d826039 The pending new virt-manager version will probably end up in F10, but likely not for a good while (maybe F11 release time frame.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 09:20:48 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:20:48 -0400 Subject: [Bug 356451] allow ssh to easily load nss modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903100920.n2A9Kmj0010409@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356451 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-03-10 05:20:47 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 10:17:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:17:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 356451] allow ssh to easily load nss modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101017.n2AAHr8b021906@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356451 Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|tmraz at redhat.com |jchadima at redhat.com --- Comment #6 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-03-10 06:17:52 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 10:19:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:19:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 356451] allow ssh to easily load nss modules In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101019.n2AAJkJJ026775@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=356451 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client 2009-03-10 06:19:46 EDT --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 10 12:10:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:10:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225406] split out libcom_err and libuuid? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903101210.n2ACAiTA012758@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225406 Richard W.M. Jones changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #332736|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #8 from Richard W.M. Jones 2009-03-10 08:10:40 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=334626) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=334626) Proposed patch to e2fsprogs.spec Rebased the patch to latest Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 05:11:29 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 01:11:29 -0400 Subject: [Bug 225406] split out libcom_err and libuuid? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110511.n2B5BTYI002911@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225406 --- Comment #9 from Eric Sandeen 2009-03-11 01:11:27 EDT --- Thanks. I think that at this point in the F11 cycle I am not going to try to split this up (sorry) ... but perhaps once F11 is cloned we can give it a go in Rawhide. I hope that's acceptable... Thanks, -Eric -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 08:58:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 04:58:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 133913] System default paper settings (A4 / U.S. Letter) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110858.n2B8wpAb008616@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133913 Mike A. Harris changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mharris at mharris.ca | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 11 09:47:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 05:47:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 170250] Viewing pdf document opened via Firefox; all pages go blank shortly after beginning to read. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903110947.n2B9l8as017835@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=170250 Mike A. Harris changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|mharris at mharris.ca | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 07:41:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 03:41:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 440580] no gpm mouse support in mc In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903120741.n2C7fRUb029516@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440580 nucleo changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |alekcejk at googlemail.com --- Comment #2 from nucleo 2009-03-12 03:41:27 EDT --- There is in mc.spec (in F8, F9, F10, F11) configure --with-gpm-mouse but BuildRequires gpm-devel is absent. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 12 22:49:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:49:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 135381] The "Alt Gr" key on int'l keyboards is not working from a windows vnc client In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903122249.n2CMnemW017155@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135381 Julian Sikorski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |belegdol at gmail.com --- Comment #21 from Julian Sikorski 2009-03-12 18:49:38 EDT --- I'm not sure if the bug has been cloned already, but the alt gr key definitely does not work when trying to use a Polish keyboard layout in a Fedora rawhide kvm guest and Fedora 10 host. The default console is via vnc, I believe. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 00:19:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:19:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242494] kdmrc: FaceSource=PreferUser, potentially takes a long time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130019.n2D0Jdfe030375@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242494 Charlie Wyse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwyse at redhat.com --- Comment #15 from Charlie Wyse 2009-03-12 20:19:36 EDT --- Hrm, still seeing this in Fedora 10. As far as I know, after 2.22 gdm got rid of gdmsetup and really any kind of useful customization, which is probably why more and more people are switching to kdm. Regardless, gdm does not search home directories for faces, rather /usr/share/pixmap/faces for .png, or so say the documents from gnome.org. Anyone can resolve the issue with the AdminOnly option in kdmrc, I'm sure there are craftier ways. But this is just how KDM runs as far as I know. Which is great for personal systems but a total fail for larger environments. I would recommend to the all mighty KDM upstream maintainers to possibly set the default to AdminOnly or set a default faces directory similar to GDM so that users have to actually enable the face files in there home directories. That way they will notice that things only break when it's enabled and will hopefully spend less time troubleshooting. Putting this warning in release notes is also good, per comment #8 :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 05:06:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 01:06:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180616] large cursor themes don't have an animated wait cursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130506.n2D56X1n021525@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180616 Mike A. Harris changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mharris at mharris.ca -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 06:16:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 02:16:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242494] kdmrc: FaceSource=PreferUser, potentially takes a long time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130616.n2D6GFIe001253@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242494 --- Comment #16 from Tomasz Kepczynski 2009-03-13 02:16:15 EDT --- I would bet that not looking for all photos but only for that needed currently for display would make HUGE difference. And then probably no changes to defaults are needed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 07:04:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 03:04:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242494] kdmrc: FaceSource=PreferUser, potentially takes a long time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903130704.n2D74RlR009407@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242494 --- Comment #17 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-13 03:04:27 EDT --- That would probably need KDM to get ported from QListWidget to the model-view-controller QListView. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 12:05:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:05:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180616] large cursor themes don't have an animated wait cursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131205.n2DC5pE1006678@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180616 --- Comment #7 from Mike A. Harris 2009-03-13 08:05:44 EDT --- I'm currently looking into how to create the missing cursors, but think it'd be easier to chat with whoever designed the original ones, either to use the same process they used to create them, or perhaps even to bribe them into whipping up the missing ones. ;o) Does anyone know who originally created the animated Bluecurve cursors? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 14:00:28 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 10:00:28 -0400 Subject: [Bug 180616] large cursor themes don't have an animated wait cursor In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131400.n2DE0Sw6003478@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=180616 --- Comment #8 from Matthias Clasen 2009-03-13 10:00:27 EDT --- Garret LeSage did -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 16:19:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:19:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131619.n2DGJLnr006640@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 --- Comment #30 from Jon Masters 2009-03-13 12:19:18 EDT --- MENTAL NOTE: still a need for additional module dependency tracking -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 18:57:46 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:57:46 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242494] kdmrc: FaceSource=PreferUser, potentially takes a long time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131857.n2DIvkOh013179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242494 --- Comment #18 from Charlie Wyse 2009-03-13 14:57:44 EDT --- Actually when I was creating a fix patch for our enterprise deployment I realized something. This issue is probably in the fedora package itself and can very easily be fixed. Here is the current section in the kdmrc file that is causing the problem. # Allow users to set their own user images. # If UserList is enabled, this specifies where kdm gets the images from: # AdminOnly (default): from /$USER.face[.icon] # UserOnly: from the user's $HOME/.face[.icon] # PreferAdmin: prefer , fallback on $HOME # PreferUser: ... and the other way round FaceSource=PreferUser As you can see AdminOnly is the default. So if we just put a comment in front of FaceSource=PreferUser (#FaceSource=PreferUser), it defaults to AdminOnly and works for large NFS home dir based deployments. In other words, the fedora package is not sticking with the defaults but forcing this on the user. We should probably change this back to a commented variable so everything works at an enterprise level by default, especially if this package is going to wind up in RHEL. Oh a comment #16 makes a lot of sense to, but is something the KDM upstream maintainers would probably need to code in. In other words, won't be fixed in the immediate future. Making the "#" change to the fedora package would at least stop people from running into this and make KDM a sexier option. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 19:07:44 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:07:44 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242494] kdmrc: FaceSource=PreferUser, potentially takes a long time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131907.n2DJ7imC015990@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242494 --- Comment #19 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-13 15:07:44 EDT --- We know AdminOnly is the upstream default. The problem is that this prevents users from setting their own image, so it's definitely not the ideal solution. And it especially breaks things for those least likely to be able to fix it (home/family installations), whereas setting it to AdminOnly shouldn't be hard for a sysadmin of an enterprise deployment. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 13 19:16:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2009 15:16:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242494] kdmrc: FaceSource=PreferUser, potentially takes a long time In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903131916.n2DJGC8Y015371@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242494 Charlie Wyse changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|cwyse at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 14 15:12:51 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:12:51 -0400 Subject: [Bug 295061] Remote desktop of dual-monitor system shows half In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903141512.n2EFCpJ6005961@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=295061 josef radinger changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jhmail at oobleck.astro.cornel | |l.edu --- Comment #5 from josef radinger 2009-03-14 11:12:49 EDT --- *** Bug 164922 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 01:39:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:39:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346261] halt initscript not responding to halt/poweroff instructions from shutdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903150139.n2F1dOD1017474@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346261 iarly selbir | ski0s changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |iarlyy at gmail.com Flag| |needinfo?(dshaw at jabberwocky | |.com) --- Comment #4 from iarly selbir | ski0s 2009-03-14 21:39:23 EDT --- is this problem happening yet? Give us a feedback. Thanks. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 01:55:17 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:55:17 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346261] halt initscript not responding to halt/poweroff instructions from shutdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903150155.n2F1tHes020246@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346261 David Shaw changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(dshaw at jabberwocky | |.com) | --- Comment #5 from David Shaw 2009-03-14 21:55:17 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > is this problem happening yet? > > Give us a feedback. I'm afraid I don't understand what you are asking me. Are you asking if the problem still exists in F10? If so, yes, it does. The halt from initscripts-8.86-1.i386 still does a poweroff instead of a halt. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 02:02:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:02:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346261] halt initscript not responding to halt/poweroff instructions from shutdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903150202.n2F22EQT021496@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346261 iarly selbir | ski0s changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #6 from iarly selbir | ski0s 2009-03-14 22:02:15 EDT --- I just want keep your report alive. Thanks for your reply. -- Fedora Bugzappers volunteer triage team https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 12:44:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:44:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 245349] Compiz doesn't honor "switch to workspace " keyboard shortcuts In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903151244.n2FCiJ59029631@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=245349 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 --- Comment #7 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:55:41 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping --- Comment #8 from JanS 2009-03-15 08:44:17 EDT --- Ping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 15 20:42:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:42:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187353] CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903152042.n2FKgMxh006849@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 --- Comment #15 from Luke Macken 2009-03-15 16:42:19 EDT --- Reply from nethack upstream about this issue, and the potential rumour that it has been fixed upstream. """ > Someone in the Gentoo community mentioned a while back that the > dev team had patched the buffer overflow. We could probably extract the relevant changes, but I don't think that you actually need them. The real security bug is being caused by gentoo's policy of giving users full access to the same group as nethack's setgid setting. They shot themselves in the foot here, by allowing users to modify the score file outside of nethack. The lax buffer handling has been (or will be, from a 3.4.3 perspective...) fixed, but it is not exploitable in a standard installation where nethack runs in a group whose files can't be manipulated by arbitrary users. I assume that redhat/fedora doesn't have the same config issue as gentoo. If I'm wrong, then you should change nethack to run in a distinct group rather than--or in addition to-- patching its score file parsing code. """ +1 for closing this bug :) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 09:30:57 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:30:57 -0400 Subject: [Bug 182464] dbus-daemon hangs while starting on a system with ldap authorisation enabled. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903160930.n2G9UvSr030393@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182464 Herbert Gasiorowski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |gasi at mathematik.uni-marburg | |.de Flag|needinfo? | --- Comment #33 from Herbert Gasiorowski 2009-03-16 05:30:53 EDT --- Seems to exist here on every Fedora 10 system with LDAP too! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 09:46:07 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 05:46:07 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187353] CVE-2006-1390 nethack: Local privilege escalation via crafted score file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903160946.n2G9k7F7031871@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187353 --- Comment #16 from Hans de Goede 2009-03-16 05:46:03 EDT --- As explained in Comment #3, we could still be (indirectly) vulnerable, with that said since clearly no-one seems to have the time to work on this and it is very minor I'm fine with closing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 16 17:10:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:10:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 346261] halt initscript not responding to halt/poweroff instructions from shutdown In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903161710.n2GHALqY001728@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=346261 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham 2009-03-16 13:10:19 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 475227 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 00:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170001.n2H01arr021492@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rvandolson at esri.com --- Comment #8 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-16 20:01:34 EDT --- Have started some initial work on getting this to compile for EL5 with one .spec file. Patch to configure.in is attached. http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng-2.0.10-2.el5.src.rpm Some notes: * EL4 issues still need addressed (glib2 needs to be statically linked) * Assuming this is a branch agnostic patch, it should probably be modified to only patch configure.in if we're on EL4 or EL5. * There is an rpmlint complaint about the Provides: syslog-ng.src:44: W: unversioned-explicit-provides syslog rsyslog provides syslog in exactly the same way though. Comments? I'm not sure if this is the cleanest way to do a static patch short of getting upstream to make some changes to the autoconf files before packaging up their tarball. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 00:03:43 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:03:43 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170003.n2H03htd020181@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #9 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-16 20:03:42 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335459) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335459) Patch against configure.in to statically link against libwrap -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 00:04:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:04:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170004.n2H0430g020222@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|rvandolson at esri.com |rayvd at bludgeon.org -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 05:01:49 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:01:49 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170501.n2H51nac004215@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(silfreed at silfreed | |.net) --- Comment #10 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-17 01:01:47 EDT --- http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng-2.0.10-3.el5.src.rpm The above should build on EL4, EL5 as well as the Fedora's. The complaint about the syslog version is still there. I don't know if this is a big deal to anyone. I also added the new log rotation script as well. Doug, could you take a look when you get a chance? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 05:03:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:03:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170503.n2H53ZYQ006602@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Ray Van Dolson changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #335459|0 |1 is obsolete| | --- Comment #11 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-17 01:03:35 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335478) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335478) Patch to be applied on EL4 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 05:04:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:04:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170504.n2H546SP004442@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #12 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-17 01:04:05 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=335479) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=335479) Patch to be applied on EL5 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 05:29:59 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 01:29:59 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170529.n2H5TxaA008718@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #13 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-17 01:29:58 EDT --- Hmm, for some reason, under mock, it seems like configure gets run twice (gets called by make?). The second time through it doesn't pass --enable-dynamic-linking and as a result we don't get the static linking we want. Grr. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 06:00:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 02:00:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903170600.n2H608nd013781@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #14 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-17 02:00:06 EDT --- >From looking at the mock build logs, there were errors trying to call automake as a result of the configure.in file being patched. Added a BuildRequires of automake17 and now mock seems to produce a correctly statically linked binary. http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng.spec http://rayvd.fedorapeople.org/syslog-ng/syslog-ng-2.0.10-4.el5.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 17 20:30:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 16:30:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 187485] Doesn't seem to renew TGT after it has expired In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903172030.n2HKUF0i020567@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=187485 Michael J. Carter changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |mcarter at lanl.gov -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 18 20:49:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:49:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 334811] Future Feature: Better crash reports with bug-buddy In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903182049.n2IKnIe9031759@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=334811 Will Woods changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |490778, 487587 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 05:54:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:54:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 239038] No power off when attempting shutdown on Toshiba Satellite A105 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903190554.n2J5s1pN028431@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=239038 Andrey V. Henneberg changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|andrey.henneberg at gmail.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 19:45:30 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:45:30 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191945.n2JJjUIk018941@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Bug Zapper changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|rawhide |10 Dennis Gilmore changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|dennis at ausil.us | --- Comment #20 from Bug Zapper 2008-11-25 20:57:50 EDT --- This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 10 development cycle. Changing version to '10'. More information and reason for this action is here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 19:48:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:48:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903191948.n2JJmrsJ014475@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 Robert Scheck changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide --- Comment #21 from Robert Scheck 2009-03-19 15:48:45 EDT --- Working against bug zapper once more...Rawhide. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 19 20:40:45 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:40:45 -0400 Subject: [Bug 228073] No device created for firewire harddisk (hotplugging) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903192040.n2JKejSZ026711@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=228073 --- Comment #28 from Jarod Wilson 2009-03-19 16:40:34 EDT --- Sadly, my Pismo appears to have up and died, so I'm now without a realistic way to debug this. :( -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 20 21:11:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:11:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 243582] ifcfg does not support /32 peers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903202111.n2KLBLrV027845@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=243582 Bill Nottingham changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Bill Nottingham 2009-03-20 17:11:10 EDT --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 488389 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 21 21:06:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:06:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 247007] Initscript Review In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903212106.n2LL6KZw002187@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247007 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski 2009-03-21 17:06:08 EDT --- Package retired. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 15:01:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:01:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252193] Missing uevents from the kernel when the adi joystick module is loaded In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903221501.n2MF1aKS029456@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252193 --- Comment #26 from Bjoern Rasmussen 2009-03-22 11:01:17 EDT --- Make it version 10 please. I've just tested it. Same behavior. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 22:49:39 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:49:39 -0400 Subject: [Bug 301861] File playback seeking using the slider does not work for FLAC files In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903222249.n2MMndD4014202@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=301861 Edgar Hoch changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |edgar.hoch at ims.uni-stuttgar | |t.de -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sun Mar 22 23:23:47 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:23:47 -0400 Subject: [Bug 252193] Missing uevents from the kernel when the adi joystick module is loaded In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903222323.n2MNNlRk019925@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252193 Christopher Brown changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 08:30:33 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:30:33 -0400 Subject: [Bug 249079] Please build latest amavisd-new for EPEL 4 and 5 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903230830.n2N8UXpj011581@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=249079 --- Comment #22 from Johan Kok 2009-03-23 04:30:15 EDT --- (In reply to comment #19) > I'm going to work on updating rawhide to the latest version (see bug 454442), so > while I'm at it, I'll try to figure out what it will take to get that into EL-5 > at least. The amavisd-new package in rawhide was updated to version 2.6.2. A local mock rebuild of that SRPM from rawhide completes without a problem for EL-5 and EL-4. Please let me know if I there is something I can assist with to get amavisd-new updated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 23 18:46:22 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:46:22 -0400 Subject: [Bug 220983] Evince (and xpdf) bad rendering of PDF file generated by ps2pdf In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903231846.n2NIkMUC002469@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=220983 Kevin Kofler changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jnovy at redhat.com, | |krh at redhat.com, | |rdieter at math.unl.edu Component|evince |poppler QAContact| |extras-qa at fedoraproject.org --- Comment #9 from Kevin Kofler 2009-03-23 14:46:01 EDT --- This also looks wrong in Okular. Reassigning to poppler, which is the library which handles PDF in both Evince and Okular (and is based on xpdf, so it's not surprising they share the same bugs). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 13:19:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:19:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 212066] Anaconda tries to format my iPod In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241319.n2ODJ316022740@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=212066 Bastien Nocera changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |WORKSFORME Flag|needinfo?(bnocera at redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #14 from Bastien Nocera 2009-03-24 09:18:41 EDT --- Seems to work as expected now. $ sudo parted /dev/sdc (parted) print Model: Apple iPod (scsi) Disk /dev/sdc: 30.0GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 2 82.3MB 30.0GB 29.9GB primary fat32 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 14:24:01 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:24:01 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241424.n2OEO1Aj008417@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Douglas E. Warner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(silfreed at silfreed | |.net) | --- Comment #15 from Douglas E. Warner 2009-03-24 10:23:40 EDT --- rayvd, if you apply for co-maintainer on any branches in pkgdb I'll approve you as co-maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 15:12:40 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:12:40 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241512.n2OFCeqX022291@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #16 from Douglas E. Warner 2009-03-24 11:12:20 EDT --- Updating eventlog package to include the -static package needed for RHEL builds since I was stupid and removed this in the previous version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 15:41:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:41:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241541.n2OFfLl4001207@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #17 from Ray Van Dolson 2009-03-24 11:41:00 EDT --- FYI, at least on my CentOS 5 box, libevtlog.so and friends are in /lib so I think it's ok to dynamically link against them. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 15:45:26 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:45:26 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241545.n2OFjQs4031300@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 --- Comment #18 from Douglas E. Warner 2009-03-24 11:45:07 EDT --- Yep, but that's not what the --mixed-linking option does and I don't feel like patching it at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 17:28:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:28:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240421] Please branch/build syslog-ng for EPEL (EL-5) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241728.n2OHSZJm029015@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240421 Douglas E. Warner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #19 from Douglas E. Warner 2009-03-24 13:28:14 EDT --- Built; should be going into EPEL shortly. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:13:20 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:13:20 -0400 Subject: [Bug 189473] bonding: xenbr after boot broken, after xend restart networking gone altogether In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241813.n2OIDKKw003130@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189473 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:21:12 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:21:12 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241821.n2OILCN5005601@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |446452(F11Blocker) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:20:53 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:20:53 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208383] mkinitrd/iSCSI - only probe for network device if not already specified In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241820.n2OIKrtR005447@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208383 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:25:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:25:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230690] s-c-d: timezone selection need polishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241825.n2OIPR1d006596@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230690 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 18:27:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:27:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 240465] xen domains in dying state, not actually dying In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903241827.n2OIRuMJ016946@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=240465 Jeremy Katz changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|katzj at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 24 20:04:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:04:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 244275] Unecessary Requires - shorewall and tcpwrappers In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903242004.n2OK48m3010397@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244275 Matthew Miller changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|10 |rawhide Estimated Hours|0.0 |0.25 --- Comment #6 from Matthew Miller 2009-03-24 16:03:46 EDT --- I'm putting this back to "rawhide". -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 09:35:27 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:35:27 -0400 Subject: [Bug 208607] mkinitrd: iSCSI root requires crc32c module In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903250935.n2P9ZRIG030844@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=208607 Mark McLoughlin changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|9 |rawhide Fixed In Version|kernel-1.2744.fc6 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 10:15:37 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:15:37 -0400 Subject: [Bug 230690] s-c-d: timezone selection need polishing In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251015.n2PAFbte028190@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=230690 Nils Philippsen changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE --- Comment #14 from Nils Philippsen 2009-03-25 06:15:13 EDT --- I'll close this now, as item 2 of the original report is fixed since quite a while and items 1 and 3 are a minor things and a matter of taste really. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 16:03:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:03:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251603.n2PG3NUv015386@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |0.6.0-10.fc10 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 16:03:19 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:03:19 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251603.n2PG3Juk027600@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-25 12:02:55 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 16:14:06 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:14:06 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251614.n2PGE6Yb000329@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-25 12:13:44 EDT --- tomoe-0.6.0-10.fc9 has been pushed to the Fedora 9 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 16:14:11 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:14:11 -0400 Subject: [Bug 343321] multiarch conflicts in tomoe In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903251614.n2PGEBOq000365@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=343321 Fedora Update System changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|0.6.0-10.fc10 |0.6.0-10.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Wed Mar 25 21:02:13 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:02:13 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219750] Hotplug script not working in gpsd package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903252102.n2PL2DWR030460@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219750 Douglas E. Warner changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RELEASE_PENDING Depends on| |491018 --- Comment #33 from Douglas E. Warner 2009-03-25 17:01:46 EDT --- gpsd 2.39 should have improved udev/hotplug support; I'm not sure if it works in all situations yet, so let me know how things are. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Thu Mar 26 13:21:21 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:21:21 -0400 Subject: [Bug 202956] wget fails to retry DNS resolution when temporary link failure In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903261321.n2QDLL6v029443@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202956 Karsten Hopp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG --- Comment #9 from Karsten Hopp 2009-03-26 09:20:53 EDT --- I'll close this as the upstream maintainer already expressed his opinion in comment #6 that a retry isn't wget's responsibility. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 14:49:36 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 10:49:36 -0400 Subject: [Bug 205910] gnome-settings-daemon wakes up for every keypress In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271449.n2REna8g018624@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=205910 Adam Goode changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |adam at spicenitz.org Version|9 |10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Fri Mar 27 18:57:18 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:57:18 -0400 Subject: [Bug 232522] mgetty does not collect caller name from modem properly In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903271857.n2RIvIB2028608@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=232522 --- Comment #24 from Don Russell 2009-03-27 14:56:47 EDT --- I upgraded to Fedora 10 last night and mgetty-1.1.36-2.fc10.i386 was installed, but it does not work properly. It's retrograded back to the original problem. This was unexpected based on comment #20 . Since this has been closed.... is there a new bug number for the F10 version? In the mean time, I've gone back to my version of the code. Thanks, Don -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 28 00:11:24 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:11:24 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237421] Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903280011.n2S0BOst025126@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 Daniel Berrange changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Version|8 |10 Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #8 from Daniel Berrange 2009-03-27 20:10:52 EDT --- Re-opening as this bug is still valid, and a fix is now available in upstream 0.2.0 release of Sys-Virt -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Sat Mar 28 01:04:14 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2009 21:04:14 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903280104.n2S14EUU013117@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Charlie Brady changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |charlieb-fedora-bugzilla at bu | |dge.apana.org.au --- Comment #2 from Charlie Brady 2009-03-27 21:03:46 EDT --- > However, the upstream project seems dead, as the CPAN bug dates to 2007. Is that any reason not to apply this simple fix? [Fix worked for me, BTW. Thanks.] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 13:54:04 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:54:04 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301354.n2UDs4ad001948@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|gavin.henry at gmail.com |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 14:05:16 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:05:16 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301405.n2UE5GNS015069@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|skasal at redhat.com | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 14:17:23 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:17:23 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301417.n2UEHNCs018072@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 --- Comment #3 from Gavin Brown 2009-03-30 10:17:21 EDT --- > > However, the upstream project seems dead, as the CPAN bug dates to 2007. > > Is that any reason not to apply this simple fix? Not at all! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 14:30:52 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:30:52 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301430.n2UEUqCx021235@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-30 10:30:51 EDT --- cpan2rpm-2.028-6.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpan2rpm-2.028-6.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 14:35:35 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:35:35 -0400 Subject: [Bug 481147] cpan2rpm doesn't work with latest Pod::Text In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301435.n2UEZZAi012128@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481147 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System 2009-03-30 10:35:34 EDT --- cpan2rpm-2.028-6.fc9 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 9. http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cpan2rpm-2.028-6.fc9 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 14:49:10 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:49:10 -0400 Subject: [Bug 242912] Wrong init script In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301449.n2UEnAqW014945@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242912 Bug 242912 depends on bug 242910, which changed state. Bug 242910 Summary: Wrong init script https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=242910 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 15:01:03 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:01:03 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237421] Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301501.n2UF138a028179@bz-web2.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 Stepan Kasal changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |skasal at redhat.com AssignedTo|steve at silug.org |skasal at redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 15:57:08 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 11:57:08 -0400 Subject: [Bug 237421] Bad cpuTime retrieved from Sys::Virt::Domain->get_info In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301557.n2UFv8Is031943@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=237421 --- Comment #9 from Stepan Kasal 2009-03-30 11:57:05 EDT --- perl-Sys-Virt-0.2.0-2.fc11 should appear in rawhide tomorrow. Still working on a fix for Fedora 10. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:42:56 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:42:56 -0400 Subject: [Bug 365111] gdb's "return VAL" command appears to misbehave In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301942.n2UJguVP014929@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=365111 Jan Kratochvil changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |6.8.50.20090302-13.fc11 Resolution| |RAWHIDE --- Comment #11 from Jan Kratochvil 2009-03-30 15:42:54 EDT --- In FSF GDB HEAD and in Rawhide: http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-cvs/2009-03/msg00093.html gdb/ * stack.c (return_command ): New variables retval_expr and old_chain. Inline parse_and_eval to initialize retval_expr. Check RETVAL_EXPR for UNOP_CAST and set RETURN_TYPE to the RETURN_VALUE type if RETURN_TYPE is NULL. gdb/doc/ * gdb.texinfo (Returning): New description for missing debug info. gdb/testsuite/ * gdb.base/return-nodebug.exp, gdb.base/return-nodebug.c: New. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Mon Mar 30 19:54:15 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:54:15 -0400 Subject: [Bug 219750] Hotplug script not working in gpsd package. In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903301954.n2UJsFXc017366@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=219750 Bug 219750 depends on bug 491018, which changed state. Bug 491018 Summary: gpsd 2.39 is now released https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=491018 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 19:33:09 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:33:09 -0400 Subject: [Bug 233833] esc: unowned directories In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903311933.n2VJX9Wo007623@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=233833 Michael Schwendt changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |RAWHIDE -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. From bugzilla at redhat.com Tue Mar 31 19:56:25 2009 From: bugzilla at redhat.com (bugzilla at redhat.com) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:56:25 -0400 Subject: [Bug 213882] Not calculating space for partitions properly when reusing existing partitions In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <200903311956.n2VJuPWO012793@bz-web1.app.phx.redhat.com> Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=213882 Chris Lumens changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |needinfo?(orion at cora.nwra.c | |om) --- Comment #10 from Chris Lumens 2009-03-31 15:56:22 EDT --- As you know, we've now gotten the massive storage rewrite in for F11 beta. Is this any better with that release? If not, we probably stand a much better chance of getting it fixed there. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.