[fedora-virt] qemu user emulation test package, and is GUEST_BASE broken?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Thu Apr 9 17:17:07 UTC 2009
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 08:50 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > moving on, i'm continuing to document QEMU on f11 here:
> > http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/QEMU_on_Fedora_11
> > and i have (unsurprisingly) a couple of questions.
> Interestingly, a lot of what you're documenting here is quite the
> opposite to what we want "Fedora virtualization experience" to be e.g.:
> - Users shouldn't necessarily need to know what QEMU is - using
> virt-manager and virsh more or less makes what hypervisor is
> underneath not terribly important
> - We'd recommend people do "yum install Virtualization" rather than
> manually installing individual RPMs
> - We don't see "user emulation mode" as being very important - I'd
> really be very surprised if many people use it
> - We think virt-manager is a much more useful tool for most people
> than qemu-launcher
i actually think you're right, i'm using my wiki as a scratchpad and
will almost certainly rethink things and toss stuff as i realize i'm
going in the wrong direction.
on the other hand, while it's nice to have a graphical front-end for
things like this to hide the underlying complexity, there have been a
number of times where i've wanted to see what was going on "under the
hood," as it were. particularly when i'm debugging.
i may very well end up deciding that this wasn't the right way to
approach this and toss the whole thing. i just like to have at least
a minimal understanding of how things work behind the scenes. but
your point is well taken.
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Linked In: http://www.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
More information about the Fedora-virt