[fedora-virt] I/O load distribution
Richard W.M. Jones
rjones at redhat.com
Mon Jul 27 16:47:08 UTC 2009
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 03:15:05PM +0200, Dennis J. wrote:
> What is the best way to deal with I/O load when running several VMs on a
> physical machine with local or remote storage?
> What I'm primarily worried about is the case when several VMs cause disk
> I/O at the same time. One example would be the "updatedb" cronjob of the
> mlocate package. If you have say 5 VMs running on a physical System with
> a local software raid-1 as storage and the all run updatedb at the same
> time that causes all of them to run really slowly because the starve each
> other fighting over the disk.
> What is the best way to soften the impact of such a situation? Does it
> make sense to use a hardware raid instead? How would the raid type affect
> the performance in this case? Would the fact that the I/O load gets
> distributed across multiple spindles in, say, a 4 disk hardware raid-5
> have a big impact on this?
> I'm currently facing the problem where I fear that random disk I/O by too
> many VMs on a physical system could cripple their performance even though
> I have plenty of CPU cores/RAM left to run them.
> Has anyone experience with this problem and maybe some data to shed some
> light on this potential bottleneck for virtualization?
For KVM, each VM isn't really any different from a host process, so
you have to deal with them the same way that you'd deal with having
lots of host processes doing I/O. So: lots of spindles, expensive I/O
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows
programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd
More information about the Fedora-virt