which bug to bug?

[Karsten Wade]

Which bugzilla component should receive bugs for formal Fedora websites?

FDP created the 'fedora-websites' component in response to a need to
receive and channel such bugs.

However, the Fedora Infrastructure group already existed.  Should that
have the component that receives website bug traffic?

My main desire is to reduce confusion.[1]  We've had some good
beginnings using the FDP-based component, but I'm happy to move our
group of bug responders over to the FI-based component.

Thoughts?

- Karsten

[1] Speaking of which, anyone know how to remove or deprecate the
'fedora-docs' component in the 'Fedora Core' category?
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20051127/17a9107c/attachment.sig>