which bug to bug?

[seth vidal]

On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 12:34 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:45 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> > Which bugzilla component should receive bugs for formal Fedora websites?
> > 
> > FDP created the 'fedora-websites' component in response to a need to
> > receive and channel such bugs.
> > 
> > However, the Fedora Infrastructure group already existed.  Should that
> > have the component that receives website bug traffic?
> 
> Thanks for bringing this to the list where it belonged... I pinged
> Karsten in a Bugzilla entry earlier today about this issue.  My feeling
> is that we don't want to make it harder for users to tell us about
> website problems, but we also want to help them put bugs in the right
> place when possible.
> 
> > My main desire is to reduce confusion.[1]  We've had some good
> > beginnings using the FDP-based component, but I'm happy to move our
> > group of bug responders over to the FI-based component.
> > [1] Speaking of which, anyone know how to remove or deprecate the
> > 'fedora-docs' component in the 'Fedora Core' category?
> 
> I cc'd this to Dan Williams because I think I remember somebody saying
> he was the King of All Bugzilla.  Certainly that odd component needs to
> vanish now that we have our own product category.

not dcbw

dkl == bugzilla master.

Dave Lawrence

-sv