tidy up

[Karsten Wade]

On Tue, 2006-02-28 at 11:34 -0600, Patrick Barnes wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 February 2006 03:07, Bela Pesics wrote:
> > This is not intended to criticize anyones work but what is desirable in
> > future?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Bela
> 
> Part of the reason there are so many different sites is that most of them are 
> community sites, not maintained by the Fedora Project.  At the moment, the 
> two official sites are fedoraproject.org and fedora.redhat.com.

And let's be honest about this.

Those sites are providing a service that we cannot provide.  They are
more valuable to the user community as community run projects.

If we ran them or more formally sanctioned them by redirecting from our
domain, Fedora could be seen/held responsible for the content of those
sites.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20060228/903c48dc/attachment.sig>