Art Gallery and Plone Issues

Dimitris Glezos dimitris at glezos.com
Fri Sep 1 15:09:36 UTC 2006


O/H Paul W. Frields έγραψε:
> On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 01:09 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
>> On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:30 -0400, Warren Togami wrote:
>>
>>>  From what I can gather, Plone is installed and running, but it is
>>> currently not widely used by Fedora for several big reasons:
>>>
>>> - It is questioned whether Plone is needed at all.
>> What is the question here?  This is the first I've heard about this.
>> AFAIC, the issue of "do we need a CMS" is long ago settled.
> 
> Yeah, that's news to me too.  We on Docs team definitely need it, we
> just don't have anyone in our subproject who can make it do the things
> we want.  A glance at the archives will show up several instances where
> I asked for help with this, but I'm sure it's not as high a priority as
> other things like the buildsystem.  I even tried to get some personnel
> resources from outside the Red Hat walls -- a contributor who I met at
> the Summit who said he had a person with the requisite skills.  No word
> back, so I suppose I should try him again.
> 
> It's one thing to simply install a CMS and put it on a web server.  We
> have lots of people who can do that.  It's quite another to actually USE
> one effectively to build a workflow and deploy the tools contributors
> need.

+1. The CMS installation's priority should definitely be increased. As Paul
said, we on docs team definitely need it.

It may require a considerable amount of work, but it's a "do it once, enjoy it's
fruits for a long time" work.

-dim



-- 
Dimitris Glezos
Jabber ID: glezos at jabber.org, GPG: 0xA5A04C3B
http://dimitris.glezos.com/


"He who gives up functionality for ease of use
loses both and deserves neither." (Anonymous)
--




More information about the Fedora-websites-list mailing list