Moin question

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2007-04-09 at 10:34 +0200, Thomas Canniot wrote:
> Le Sun, 8 Apr 2007 23:33:38 -0500,
> "Patrick W. Barnes" <nman64 at n-man.com> a écrit :
> 
> > On Saturday 07 April 2007, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > Karsten Wade schrieb:
> > > > On Thu, 2007-04-05 at 17:05 +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > > >> Maybe simply sending the
> > > >> stuff to a mailing list and placing a link to the archive in the
> > > >> wiki would be more then enough?
> > > >
> > ,,,
> > >
> > > +1 -- how has the authority to issue such a policy?
> > >
> > 
> > If nobody has any big reason against it, we can call it policy right
> > now.  We just have to make sure that the people posting the meeting
> > minutes are aware of it.  :-)
> > 
> 
> 
> Ok then a new mailing list will be created I guess.
> 
> However, please reconsider sending a personal mail to every inactive
> users. Sending a massive personal mail to people that did not checked a
> box saying that they agree receiving mails from someone is considered as
> spam. You could be reproached for this action.

Not if the privacy policy[1] gets out of the draft state.  The policy
explicitly states that we can use account information to contact the
account holder regarding their account.  Was this held up in legal?  If
not, what's the status?

= = = = =
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/PrivacyPolicy 

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
      Fedora Project:  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PaulWFrields
  irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20070409/fdc39570/attachment.sig>