The great content migration

[Karsten Wade]

On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 14:28 +0400, Laith Juwaidah wrote:

> I think that the documentations, i.e.: Guidelines (Packaging, Translation, 
> Installation (yes, installation guide, like the one here[1])),

We already have an installation guide and it doesn't benefit from being
worked on the wiki.  The one you link to here couldn't be used, it's
pretty scary.

>  Release Notes, 
> etc... Should be edited on the wiki, and when they reach their final form, 
> they are transferred from the wiki to docs.fedoraproject.org.

Some content benefits from the wiki for drafting.  Anything the length
of a guide or long tutorial suffers on the wiki.

> This may sound crazy but, why don't you move the contributors' pages to some 
> static pages? Say, on their fedorapeople spaces, that way, they can customize 
> them ;) and it'll be easier for whoever wants to view them, since it'll be 
> just username.fedorapeople.org, for those who can't design their own pages, 
> fedora-websites can be asked to create a template for them, not to mention 
> that they can create a tiny webpage there, where they can have links to 
> whatever they have in their space...

True, we could do that.  The wiki pages were used initially because that
was all we had.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20071201/93288170/attachment.sig>