legal pages moved [qa]

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2007-06-25 at 14:57 -0700, Thomas Chung wrote:

> Now, are we waiting for approval by Red Hat Legal?

Good question.  I made zero substantive changes to the pages.  IMO, we
should link in the new pages and drop a note to legal that we've moved
the pages to a canonical URL.  The rest is styling, which doesn't count.
Uh, I think.

Maybe this is a f-a-b question?

- Karsten
-- 
   Karsten Wade, 108 Editor       ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20070626/323a4e36/attachment.sig>