deprecating content

[Karsten Wade]

On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 14:36 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
> I'm curious as to how many visits we actually *get* for outdated docs,
> which would be a good litmus test for whether we really need to maintain
> them.

This just came up because of two separate bug reports filed about the
defunct Stateless Linux tutorial.  It was linked from the /docs page but
someone (*cough*notting*cough*) had vaporized the content
in /web/html/docs/stateless.  So I was trying to figure out how to
respond.

If you look at http://docs.fedoraproject.org today, you'll see some FC3
content in a separate section.  I guess you are right; just thinking
about how to save it all is wasting valuable brain time.  We'll work on
moving it out and leaving, "Go get it from CVS," pages in its place.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor    ^     Fedora Documentation Project 
 Sr. Developer Relations Mgr.     |  fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject
   quaid.108.redhat.com           |          gpg key: AD0E0C41
////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20070320/8896cc5c/attachment.sig>