??? (was Re: Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 34, Issue 9)

[Karsten 'quaid' Wade]

On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 14:04 -0400, Adam Humphreys wrote:
> I would definitely encourage Fedora Websites to avoid using pictures
> in replacement of pure code (text) on the grounds of SEO. The sites
> need to remain simple on the premise of load time, meta-crawling, and
> browser compliance. if linx can't see the point we're trying to make
> (text) then we're probably not doing our job. I also noted that jquery
> didn't meet w3 markup compliance standards on their site so are they
> really credible? There's lots of ways to get the site to a 2.0 level
> with out risking too much issues of browser compliance. As long as we
> stick to suckerfish style menu's with pure code Google etc should be
> able to see the links.

Sorry, it's not clear which of the emails included in your message you
were replying to.  When replying to a digest, please edit the Subject
and the message body to make that clear.

Thanks!

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20080818/42f18873/attachment.sig>