further get-fedora progress

[Jonathan Roberts]

2008/5/4 Craig Thomas <bicycle.nutz at gmail.com>:
>
> On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:52 AM, Craig Thomas <bicycle.nutz at gmail.com> wrote:
>  >
>  > On Sun, May 4, 2008 at 11:41 AM, Jonathan Roberts
>  >  <jonrob at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>  >  > >  Do you mean if a user selects 32 bit, 64bit and ppc disappear
>  >  >  >  altogether? same with the other sections?  I thought of this and
>  >  >  >  played with it a bit.   (If that was not your comment, please ignore
>  >  >  >  me and also please clarify?)
>  >  >
>  >  >  Urm...what I meant was that once the user had selected the
>  >  >  architecture they want, is there any need for that section to remain
>  >  >  visible? It could discretely slide away, and then the next section
>  >  >  slide out. But reading below, it sounds like that's what you were
>  >  >  thinking and you have questions about! I'd like to see how it looks in
>  >  >  practice, but it sounds like you have doubts about this approach...
>  >
>  >  Ah, got it, and I like it!  One section at a time...that could be
>  >  great, I'll  play with this and post results.
>
>  Something like this ?
>
>  http://craigt.fedorapeople.org/get-fedora-2/get-fedora

OK, wow :) I'd love to know how you've done that, the work both of you
have done has been awesome!

In response to Juan's concerns in an e-mail later than this though, I
see what he means and it's definitely something that needs to be
considered. What about a stackable style thing? So each retracts back
into a tiered set of tabs which can be clicked to reveal past options?
I have no idea if this is even possible!

Best wishes,

Jon