From stickster at gmail.com Tue Dec 1 15:36:50 2009 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 10:36:50 -0500 Subject: New sponsor!! In-Reply-To: <20091127002936.GH4509@inocybe.localdomain> References: <20091127002936.GH4509@inocybe.localdomain> Message-ID: <20091201153650.GF2803@victoria.internal.frields.org> On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 07:29:36PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > We've got a new sponsor, bodhost.com! > > Cool! > > > Also can we add them to the new site specific sponsors that we've > > been working on? Should I send requests like this to > > webmaster at fp.o or should I be using the new websites ticketing > > system? > > IMO, it doesn't hurt to send a request here (or ping us on IRC). Then > if no one picks it up quickly, file a ticket. > > I've added the bodhost.com sponsor stuff for fp.o already. I think > they just need an entry in puppet now so they'll show up in the > sidebar sponsor listing. :) Thanks to everyone who put some time into bringing on this new sponsor. And of course, thanks to BODhost for their gracious hosting of Fedora! -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug From vanuysboy at gmail.com Wed Dec 2 14:24:55 2009 From: vanuysboy at gmail.com (didi didi) Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 17:24:55 +0300 Subject: Self-introduction Message-ID: Hi, I'm Dmitry from Moscow, Russia. I've just joined the project and want to introduce myself a bit. I have a strong experience in Red Hat (Fedora) servers administration: writing shell scripts, system software installation and update, Linux servers remote administration and support; IT documentation translation from English to Russian and vice versa. I'd like to make a contribution to translate Fedora documentation to Russian and localize Fedora OS. Hoping for effective cooperation, -- Dmitry Melnikov -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Dec 2 17:35:35 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:35:35 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1849: permanent place for FEL's gallery Message-ID: <064.52487d39228accb8332b992e32c51a2c@fedorahosted.org> #1849: permanent place for FEL's gallery -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: webmaster Type: RFR | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 13 Component: Web Content | Version: Production Severity: Normal | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Hello there, I wish to request a permanent place for FEL's gallery. http://publictest6.fedoraproject.org/gallery2/main.php. Administrators (FAS username) : chitlesh shakthimaan This gallery is used to show non-electronic engineers what opensource EDA tools can achieve and it will help the marketing team pull materials for their presentations. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From poelstra at redhat.com Fri Dec 4 01:09:43 2009 From: poelstra at redhat.com (John Poelstra) Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 17:09:43 -0800 Subject: Fedora 13 Draft Schedule Message-ID: <4B186157.1000309@redhat.com> Greetings, Below are some links to the schedule I've drafted for Fedora 13. Most of it is automatically generated based on how we built the Fedora 12 schedule. http://poelstra.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-13-draft/f-13-web-tasks.html In some cases the tasks may not line up correctly for Fedora 13 which I'll need to know about. In others you may want to make adjustments based on how things went during Fedora 12. That is perfectly fine too :) I would like to review this in person at FUDCon on Sunday (2009-12-06) during one of the hackfest sessions. In the meantime feel free to reply with obvious errors or changes you'd like me to make before we meet. Look forward to talking soon. John From ricky at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 6 03:21:19 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 22:21:19 -0500 Subject: Add translations to start.fp.o In-Reply-To: <747290270911252159w2e1dfc22jf41bd2336f2ba1c9@mail.gmail.com> References: <747290270911252159w2e1dfc22jf41bd2336f2ba1c9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091206032119.GB12141@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-25 11:59:37 PM, Sijis Aviles wrote: > I'm setting up translations for start.fp.o website > (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/537). > > I've already have start.fp.o on the fedora-web repo configured and > working for using genshi so that translations can be setup. Before i > commit those changes I want to make sure I have puppet setup > accordingly for the new setup. This is what i have setup on puppet: Hey, sorry for the slow response. The changes look fine to me, and we can test them out on staging first if we want to be sure. I'll probably be pretty swamped for the next 1.5 weeks of so, but can we talk sometime after then to get this all setup? Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sijis at fedoraproject.org Sun Dec 6 05:55:39 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 23:55:39 -0600 Subject: Add translations to start.fp.o In-Reply-To: <20091206032119.GB12141@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <747290270911252159w2e1dfc22jf41bd2336f2ba1c9@mail.gmail.com> <20091206032119.GB12141@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <747290270912052155x3ba370b5oc974c57c76f35267@mail.gmail.com> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2009-11-25 11:59:37 PM, Sijis Aviles wrote: >> I'm setting up translations for start.fp.o website >> (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/537). >> >> I've already have start.fp.o on the fedora-web repo configured and >> working for using genshi so that translations can be setup. Before i >> commit those changes I want to make sure I have puppet setup >> accordingly for the new setup. This is what i have setup on puppet: > Hey, sorry for the slow response. ?The changes look fine to me, and we > can test them out on staging first if we want to be sure. ?I'll probably > be pretty swamped for the next 1.5 weeks of so, but can we talk sometime > after then to get this all setup? > > Thanks, > Ricky > Yeah, we can go over this after you are done. That's fine by me. Sijis From steve.wray at cwa.co.nz Wed Dec 9 22:26:52 2009 From: steve.wray at cwa.co.nz (Steve Wray) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:26:52 +1300 Subject: fedora server edition? Message-ID: <4B20242C.90600@cwa.co.nz> Hi there I am noticing that the link http://www.fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora is instructing me how to download the Fedora 12 Desktop Edition. I'm wondering where the link to the Server Edition might be? Thanks. -- Please remember that an email is just like a postcard; it is not confidential nor private nor secure and can be read by many other people than the intended recipient. A postcard can be read by anyone at the mail sorting office and expecting what is written on it to be private and secret is not realistic. Please hold no higher expectation of email. If you need to send confidential information in an email you need to use encryption. PGP is Pretty good for this. From tmz at pobox.com Thu Dec 10 02:31:08 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Wed, 9 Dec 2009 21:31:08 -0500 Subject: fedora server edition? In-Reply-To: <4B20242C.90600@cwa.co.nz> References: <4B20242C.90600@cwa.co.nz> Message-ID: <20091210023108.GA5004@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Steve, On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 11:26:52AM +1300, Steve Wray wrote: > I am noticing that the link > > http://www.fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora > > is instructing me how to download the Fedora 12 Desktop Edition. > > I'm wondering where the link to the Server Edition might be? There isn't any particular "Server Edition" to download. If you're setting up Fedora on a server, using the network install image or a custom kickstart install is usually what folks do. There is a Server SIG (Special Interest Group) that is comprised of people interested in improving Fedora for server use: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Server The network install images are available from: http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-fedora-all -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Let us think the unthinkable, let us do the undoable. Let us prepare to grapple with the ineffable itself, and see if we may not eff it after all. -- Douglas Adams -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From cjyxiaodi1 at gmail.com Thu Dec 10 11:05:30 2009 From: cjyxiaodi1 at gmail.com (Chia Jing Yi) Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:05:30 +0800 Subject: Perl script to run multi-fasta sequence by using fgenesh Message-ID: <80e0440c0912100305j50a16bc3k19cafa8b7750dafb@mail.gmail.com> I got a multi-fasta sequence file and by using the fgenesh, I would like to write a script to able the multi-fasta sequence run the fgenesh one by one. I got try to split the sequence one by one and that run each of them to the fgenesh and append all the output result in one file at the end. Although it can archieve my desired output, it seem like ineffective for long term :( Hope can get all of your advice to give me some hit to write a script that allow fgenesh to run multi-fasta sequence. Thanks a lot for all advice and suggestion. best regards Patrick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ascotcher at gmx.com Sat Dec 12 12:00:51 2009 From: ascotcher at gmx.com (Arthur Scotcher) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:00:51 +0100 Subject: Captcha problems Message-ID: <20091212120051.151070@gmx.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kondo8 at hotmail.com Sat Dec 12 18:03:39 2009 From: kondo8 at hotmail.com (Daniel Hendrycks) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:03:39 -0600 Subject: Wiki Feature Dashboard Additional Category Message-ID: Hi, my name is Daniel Hendrycks. I have a suggestion for the Fedora Wiki Feature Request Dashboard: The wiki page explaining how to properly request a feature had a link to another wiki article telling you what to do if you cannot implement a feature yourself. Within this article it never did state you need a developer willing to implement but in actuality you do. It is a requirement in your feature request to have someone willing to implement your request. My request is have a section in the feature process dashboard for features without a developer. Features would be placed in that category after being approved by the Feature Wrangler (poelcat). The feature request must specify that the feature does not have a developer for it to be put in that category (obviously). This would be more convenient for the person wanting that feature. Feature request owners would not have to hunt down developers and ask them to implement the feature for them (this would annoy some community developers at the same and worsen the Fedora Community). Instead developers could just look at what requests have no developer and contact the owner of the feature and include their name in the request, they would then be re-checked by the Feature Wrangler and hopefully transfered to FESCo for further evaluation. I am suggesting the request would be placed in the "Feature has no developer" (possible name of the category) section after being approved by the Feature Wrangler because this will indicate that the request meets all requirements except that it does not have a developer. Since it meets all requirements possible developers will not have to read a broken (incomplete) request, this would make developers more likely to check. Summary: Have a section in the Feature Request Dashboard for features without a developer. From there developers can volunteer there skills to implement this feature if later on approved by FESCo. Thank you for your time, Daniel Hendrycks :) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mmcgrath at redhat.com Sat Dec 12 19:46:00 2009 From: mmcgrath at redhat.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2009 13:46:00 -0600 (CST) Subject: Captcha problems In-Reply-To: <20091212120051.151070@gmx.com> References: <20091212120051.151070@gmx.com> Message-ID: On Sat, 12 Dec 2009, Arthur Scotcher wrote: > > I keep getting captcha: incorrect value. I can't have keyed the letters wrongly 20 times! > > > When you clicked the back button, did you get a different captcha every time or the same one? -Mike From b3timmons at speedymail.org Mon Dec 14 05:37:25 2009 From: b3timmons at speedymail.org (Bake Timmons) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:37:25 -0500 Subject: broken links on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing page Message-ID: <87d42inmju.fsf@goof.localdomain> Hi, 1. The following link is on the EMC2 license is broken: http://www-c.inria.fr/gamma/cdrom/www/emc2/copyright.htm It seems that a replacement is: http://pauillac.inria.fr/cdrom_a_graver/www/emc2/copyright.htm 2. Also this is broken for Scilab: http://www.scilab.org/legal/license.html Current versions of Scilab now use a free license (CeCILL) and now link to that. One page containing the old Scilab license text is: http://www.worldlii.org/int/other/PubRL/2009/51.html 3. This is broken for the GLX Public License: http://www.sgi.com/products/software/opensource/glx/license.html One page that contains this license text (along with text of some other licenses) is: http://www.x.org/archive/X11R6.8.0/doc/LICENSE3.html Of course, another way to deal with the broken links is use as you have before old URLS stored by archive.org Thanks, Bake From phil.ingram at internode.on.net Mon Dec 14 05:43:33 2009 From: phil.ingram at internode.on.net (Phil Ingram) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 16:13:33 +1030 Subject: password reset? Message-ID: <1260769413.3430.32.camel@localhost> hi, I'm trying to get a password reset for https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/login and despite entering a correct username and password and being told an email has been sent I am getting nothing coming through... I have checked my ISP's spam blocker and there is nothing being held Thanks, Phil -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From oriesner at timetoprint.de Mon Dec 14 12:41:50 2009 From: oriesner at timetoprint.de (Oxana Riesner) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 13:41:50 +0100 Subject: Presseanfrage: Fedora Message-ID: <001201ca7cba$cf5fbe00$6e1f3a00$@de> Sehr geehrter Herr Affolter, F?r das bekannte Magazin ?OpenSource? (www.pcpraxis.de) aus dem Data Becker Verlag erstellen wir derzeit einen umfangreichen Artikel ?ber interessante Projekte in diesem Bereich. Dabei w?rden wir gerne unseren Lesern auch das Projekt Fedora vorstellen. Daf?r ben?tigen wir ein paar Informationen von Ihnen. Ich m?chte Sie bitten die untenstehenden Fragen zu beantworten und an uns sp?testens bis zum 21.Dezember zur?ckzusenden. Ebenfalls ben?tigen wir auch eine schriftliche Zusammenfassung, was das Projekt ist, was es kann usw. (Bitte nicht in Stichpunkten). Ziel des Artikels ist es, unsere Leser von Ihrem Projekt zu begeistern und sie vielleicht als neue Mitglieder der Community zu gewinnen. Bitte lassen Sie uns ein paar Screenshots rund um das Projekt selbst und ein Foto von sich zukommen. Hier die Interview-Fragen: -Wie ist es zu dem Projekt gekommen? -Wer waren die Initiatoren? -Wo lagen die Schwierigkeiten bei der Entwicklung? -Wie k?nnen sich User beteiligen? Was m?ssen die k?nnen? -Wo sehen Sie noch Erweiterungsm?glichkeiten bei Ihrem Projekt? -Ist das Projekt kommerzieller Software ?berlegen? (warum/ warum nicht?) -Wer setzt Ihre Software haupts?chlich ein? -Gibt es Zahlen ?ber die derzeitige weltweite Verbreitung? Und hier bitte die Rahmendaten eintragen: Anzahl Projekt-Admins: Entwickler derzeit beteiligt: Anfangsdatum der Entwicklung: Lizenzmodell: Programmiersprache: Betriebssystem Unterst?tzung: Es w?re gut, wenn ich alle Informationen und das Interview allersp?testens bis zum 21. Dezember bekommen w?rden. Leider eilt es dieses Mal sehr. ?ber ein kurzes Feedback, ob Interesse von Ihrer Seite besteht, w?rde ich mich sehr freuen. Beste Gr??e, Oxana Riesner TimeToPrint Publishing GmbH & Co KG Oxana Riesner, M.A. | Redaktionsassistentin Prinz-Georg-Str. 47 | 40477 D?sseldorf | Germany Telefon +49.211 82 84 757 | Fax +49 211 82 84 609 E-Mail oriesner at timetoprint.de | web www.timetoprint.de TimeToPrint GmbH & Co. KG (HRA 18325 AG D?sseldorf) Komplement?r: TimeToPrint Beteiligungs GmbH (HRB 52744 AG D?sseldorf) Gesch?ftsf?hrender Gesellschafter: Ren? Gelin, M.A. Prinz-Georg-Str. 47 | 40477 D?sseldorf 4_de_btn.gif experten1 ttplogogross1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.gif Type: image/gif Size: 2477 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1280 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image003.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 1949 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sijis at fedoraproject.org Mon Dec 14 23:46:32 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:46:32 -0600 Subject: password reset? In-Reply-To: <1260769413.3430.32.camel@localhost> References: <1260769413.3430.32.camel@localhost> Message-ID: <747290270912141546u64b23768k422defe8a6f877f9@mail.gmail.com> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 11:43 PM, Phil Ingram wrote: > > hi, > > I'm trying to get a password reset for > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/login and despite entering a > correct username and password and being told an email has been sent I am > getting nothing coming through... I have checked my ISP's spam blocker and > there is nothing being held > > > Thanks, > > > Phil > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > Phil, There was maintenance going on this weekend and during that period emails were not being sent out as anticipated. If you try again, you should get it. Please let us know otherwise. Sijis From poelstra at redhat.com Tue Dec 15 04:45:36 2009 From: poelstra at redhat.com (John Poelstra) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:45:36 -0800 Subject: Wiki Feature Dashboard Additional Category In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B271470.9040004@redhat.com> Daniel Hendrycks said the following on 12/12/2009 10:03 AM Pacific Time: > Hi, my name is Daniel Hendrycks . > > I have a suggestion for the Fedora Wiki Feature Request Dashboard: > > The wiki page explaining how to properly request a feature had a link to > another wiki article telling you what to do if you cannot implement a > feature yourself. Within this article it never did state you need a > developer willing to implement but in actuality you do. It is a > requirement in your feature request to have someone willing to implement > your request. Which wiki page is talks about not being able to implement a feature yourself? I'll try to make it clearer. > My request is have a section in the feature process dashboard for > features without a developer. Features would be placed in that category > after being approved by the Feature Wrangler (poelcat). The feature > request must specify that the feature does not have a developer for it > to be put in that category (obviously). This would be more convenient > for the person wanting that feature. Feature request owners would not > have to hunt down developers and ask them to implement the feature for > them (this would annoy some community developers at the same and worsen > the Fedora Community). Instead developers could just look at what > requests have no developer and contact the owner of the feature and > include their name in the request, they would then be re-checked by the > Feature Wrangler and hopefully transfered to FESCo for further evaluation. > > I am suggesting the request would be placed in the "Feature has no > developer" (possible name of the category) section after being approved > by the Feature Wrangler because this will indicate that the request > meets all requirements except that it does not have a developer. Since > it meets all requirements possible developers will not have to read a > broken (incomplete) request, this would make developers more likely to > check. This is an interesting idea. I'm not sure how it would work in reality. Chances are someone deciding to work on a feature will add or make changes to the design proposed by someone else. > Summary: Have a section in the Feature Request Dashboard for features > without a developer. From there developers can volunteer there skills to > implement this feature if later on approved by FESCo. > > Thank you for your time, > Daniel Hendrycks :) > Topics of this nature are best discussed on fedora-devel-list which is where I'm moving this post The websites list has nothing to do with the features process. You have an interesting idea about tagging feature pages needing an owner. In reality that pretty much represents all the pages in 'Category:FeaturePageIncomplete' If they had an active owner or developer working on the feature they wouldn't be there. John From guignot.patrick at gmail.com Tue Dec 15 14:14:34 2009 From: guignot.patrick at gmail.com (patrick guignot) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:14:34 +0100 Subject: GCC and OLS Message-ID: <179fba0c0912150614l30193127i1bf70aee2b5993bb@mail.gmail.com> Hello, I browsed the Fedora site in order to find the proceedings of the last kernel summit and the last GCC summit but I cannot find them :-( For the previous years there were http://ols.fedoraproject.org/GCC/ and http://ols.fedoraproject.org/OLS/ but for 2009 there is nothing. Will you publish the proceedings for the year 2009 ? Thanks in advance for your answer. Patrick -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From timothyjphunt at googlemail.com Tue Dec 15 14:18:22 2009 From: timothyjphunt at googlemail.com (Timothy Hunt) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:18:22 +0000 Subject: timothyhunt Message-ID: <3dd01bc0912150618rc954ea9lc4411876132c2aa4@mail.gmail.com> Hi there My name is Timothy Hunt I believe you own the co.uk website of my name, I would like to get that for myself, how would I go about this? Tim -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Tue Dec 15 14:27:30 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:27:30 -0500 Subject: timothyhunt In-Reply-To: <3dd01bc0912150618rc954ea9lc4411876132c2aa4@mail.gmail.com> References: <3dd01bc0912150618rc954ea9lc4411876132c2aa4@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091215142729.GS5004@inocybe.localdomain> Hello, Timothy Hunt wrote: > My name is Timothy Hunt > > I believe you own the co.uk website of my name, I would like to get > that for myself, how would I go about this? You may be seeing a test page that is installed as part of the Fedora Operating System. That is a test page included with our operating system; we don't actually control the site in question. Please refer to http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ServerTestPage -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ What it means to take rights seriously is that one will honor them even when there is a significant social cost in doing so. -- Ronald Dworkin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tdfischer at fedoraproject.org Tue Dec 15 20:48:23 2009 From: tdfischer at fedoraproject.org (Trever Fischer) Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 15:48:23 -0500 (EST) Subject: FAS bug Message-ID: <2524.130.101.181.95.1260910103.squirrel@webmail.tuffmail.net> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I was about to send an invite to a friend with the 'invite' link next to the Ambassador group block on the My Account page, but then I noticed that it is sending it from my wm161 at wm161.net account. Shouldn't it be sending it from my fedoraproject.org email? Looks more professional that way I think. - -- Trever Fischer (tdfischer) Fedora Ambassador, KDE Hacker http://wm161.net GPG: C40F2998 hkp://wwwkeys.pgp.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAksn9hcACgkQNg53/sQPKZiNCACghcFQ+ugFQD51if4rPZHio1Z3 TbYAnjmL4TVC1ZDGq6I8Vu1VtQ7QXoIG =vY1x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Dec 16 11:20:56 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (fedora-websites) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:20:56 -0000 Subject: [fedora-websites] #8: New CSS for FEL Trac Message-ID: <062.d0e2dab9f468efba6824e817d5eaf254@fedorahosted.org> #8: New CSS for FEL Trac ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Reporter: shakthimaan | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Version: Keywords: FEL, Trac, CSS | ----------------------------+----------------------------------------------- Need CSS enhancements for Fedora Electronic Lab Trac. Here are some of my changes that I tried: https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-electronic-lab- list/2009-December/msg00086.html Please try that, or, if you can enhance it better, please do so and deploy it for Fedora Electronic Lab Trac. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: fedora-websites Fedora Website Team's Trac instance From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Dec 16 11:51:46 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (fedora-websites) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 11:51:46 -0000 Subject: [fedora-websites] #8: New CSS for FEL Trac In-Reply-To: <062.d0e2dab9f468efba6824e817d5eaf254@fedorahosted.org> References: <062.d0e2dab9f468efba6824e817d5eaf254@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <071.27e89ae4c111efd83ad0e701da87c95e@fedorahosted.org> #8: New CSS for FEL Trac --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Reporter: shakthimaan | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: General | Version: Resolution: | Keywords: FEL, Trac, CSS --------------------------+------------------------------------------------- Changes (by chitlesh): * cc: chitlesh (added) -- Ticket URL: fedora-websites Fedora Website Team's Trac instance From trac at fedorahosted.org Wed Dec 16 18:15:48 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2009 18:15:48 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1883: Enable trac wiki notifications for v7 pages Message-ID: <063.e215fdb19400c2f1e649f3071609fef7@fedorahosted.org> #1883: Enable trac wiki notifications for v7 pages -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: rlandry | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: new Priority: minor | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- = phenomenon = v7 wiki changes don't seem to generate any notification and I haven't figured out where or what setting would change that. = background analysis = It looks like either a setting, configuration or plug-in is required to enable this feature. = implementation recommendation = Can someone let me know where to configure this so I might receive these notifications and inform others who may want the same? Thanks in advance. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From ramesh.ubuntu at gmail.com Thu Dec 17 14:14:03 2009 From: ramesh.ubuntu at gmail.com (ramesh gandhi) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 19:44:03 +0530 Subject: hi Message-ID: -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ab8kr at wideopenwest.com Thu Dec 17 22:46:15 2009 From: ab8kr at wideopenwest.com (chris maresco) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 14:46:15 -0800 Subject: disc Message-ID: how do i get the program on disc -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sijis at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 18 05:36:49 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:36:49 -0600 Subject: Websites Meeting Time In-Reply-To: <20090902153716.GA26774@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <20090821183343.GC3112@alpha.rzhou.org> <20090902153716.GA26774@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <747290270912172136i2e243d54j24018d0f367f00d0@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:37 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2009-08-21 02:33:43 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: >> Hey, as I mentioned in the meeting, this is the last week where I will >> be able to make websites meetings at the current time. ?Here's a >> whenisgood with my tentative good times starting from next week: >> >> http://whenisgood.net/zqfnad >> >> Please fill it in and hopefully we can find an alternative time that's >> good for everybody. > Hey, I took a look at the results page here, and 4:00 PM EDT (20:00 UTC) > on Fridays look like a good time - how does this sound for everybody? > > Thanks, > Ricky > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > I know i'm bringing this up from the grave but we should try to meet this Friday or next week. I believe we should meet at our previous schedule Fridays at 2 or 3 PM, right? Sijis From ricky at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 18 12:55:54 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 07:55:54 -0500 Subject: Websites Meeting Time In-Reply-To: <747290270912172136i2e243d54j24018d0f367f00d0@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090821183343.GC3112@alpha.rzhou.org> <20090902153716.GA26774@alpha.rzhou.org> <747290270912172136i2e243d54j24018d0f367f00d0@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091218125554.GB30413@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-12-17 11:36:49 PM, Sijis Aviles wrote: > I know i'm bringing this up from the grave but we should try to meet > this Friday or next week. > I believe we should meet at our previous schedule Fridays at 2 or 3 PM, right? Sounds good to me, I'll be around. See you then, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sijis at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 18 17:33:48 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 11:33:48 -0600 Subject: Websites Meeting Reminder Message-ID: <747290270912180933i203db340r428d4c9ac47989de@mail.gmail.com> REMINDER: There will be a Websites Meeting today at 20:00 UTC. It will be held in #fedora-websites on Freenode. To convert UTC to your local timezone, use this: date -d '2009-12-18 20:00 UTC' Sijis From ricky at fedoraproject.org Fri Dec 18 21:12:40 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:12:40 -0500 Subject: Meeting Log - 2009-12-18 Message-ID: <20091218211240.GC30413@alpha.rzhou.org> 20:00 < hiemanshu> #startmeeting Fedora Websites 20:00 < zodbot> Meeting started Fri Dec 18 20:00:24 2009 UTC. The chair is hiemanshu. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. 20:00 < zodbot> Useful Commands: #action #agreed #halp #info #idea #link #topic. 20:00 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:00 < hiemanshu> #topic Who's here 20:00 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: Who's here (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:00 * sijis is partially here 20:00 < hiemanshu> ricky: ping 20:00 < hiemanshu> tatica, mchua: ping 20:00 * ricky is here 20:01 < tatica> hiemanshu, pong 20:02 < hiemanshu> So Lets move on 20:02 < hiemanshu> #topic get.fp.o 20:02 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: get.fp.o (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:02 * mchua here 20:02 < hiemanshu> sijis: around? 20:02 < sijis> somewhat... 20:03 < sijis> want me to talk about get.fp.o? 20:03 < hiemanshu> yup 20:03 * tatica : maria leandro :D 20:03 * digvijay here but for first time hence looking around 20:03 < ricky> Welcome 20:03 * mchua not usually around, but here for Fedora Insight questions 20:03 < hiemanshu> digvijay: Welcome 20:03 < sijis> so, i have to get started with get.fp.o project. 20:03 < digvijay> hiemanshu, ricky : thanks 20:04 < sijis> the idea it to be done with it before the next release. 20:04 < hiemanshu> sijis: Aim for F13-Alpha? 20:04 -!- RodrigoPadula [n=rodrigop at 189.106.133.239] has quit "Ex-Chat" 20:04 < sijis> currently on the repo, there is a specific branch for the work going on. you will see me start making changes to that in the next couple of days. 20:05 < sijis> hiemanshu: i don't know when the date for that is.. however, that would be a good time to do it. ideally, it should be before 20:05 < sijis> as initially it was proposed to do it by f12 release. 20:05 < hiemanshu> sijis: I think it about 20 weeks or so 20:05 < sijis> i would say.. lets target that.. but the sooner the better would work as well. 20:06 < hiemanshu> sijis: I ll update the trac with F13 Alpha as target 20:06 < hiemanshu> sijis: Anything else? 20:06 < sijis> nope. that's it on that. 20:06 < hiemanshu> #topic start.fp.o 20:06 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: start.fp.o (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:06 < hiemanshu> sijis: you are up again 20:07 < sijis> so, there was a ticket requested a while back to make start.fp.o translatable. 20:07 < sijis> i currently have all the changes done on my repo locally 20:08 < sijis> ricky said he'll work with me to get that done on the infra side too when he's done with school. 20:08 < sijis> (which is in a week or so) 20:08 < ricky> It started yesterday, actually :_) 20:08 < ricky> **:-) 20:08 < sijis> i know there's a bunch of infra stuff going on.. so it may be a tad longer. 20:09 * giarc_ shows up late... 20:09 < sijis> however, i expect it to be done relatively short (next week or so).. 20:09 < sijis> this is more of an FYI.. as its currently just a static html page 20:10 < sijis> any questions/concerns on this? 20:10 * hiemanshu has nothing 20:11 < hiemanshu> Lets move ahead 20:11 < hiemanshu> #topic spins.fp.o 20:11 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: spins.fp.o (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:11 * mchua requests ping when Fedora Insight comes up, needs to finish a blog post 20:11 < hiemanshu> So spins was done intime for F12 release 20:11 < hiemanshu> mchua: sure 20:11 < mchua> thanks. 20:11 < hiemanshu> and sijis and mizmo did a really good job with it 20:11 < ricky> Biiig thanks to sijis :-) 20:11 < ricky> (And mizmo) 20:12 < hiemanshu> But we still have a few tickets for it pending 20:13 < sijis> thanks all. 20:13 < sijis> i'm slowly going through those tickets. 20:13 < hiemanshu> .webticket 6 20:13 < zodbot> #6 (implement sub-nav feature) - fedora-websites - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/6 20:13 < hiemanshu> .webticket 7 20:13 < zodbot> #7 (spins.fp.o needs to document language support) - fedora-websites - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/7 20:14 < hiemanshu> .webticket 3 20:14 < zodbot> timed out - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/3 20:14 < hiemanshu> These are the 3 tickets that are currently pending 20:14 < hiemanshu> and have to be worked on 20:14 < sijis> the big one is the #6 ticket 20:15 < hiemanshu> sijis, ricky: ANything you want to add? 20:15 < sijis> nope 20:15 < ricky> Nope 20:16 < hiemanshu> #topic blogs.fp.o 20:16 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: blogs.fp.o (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:16 < hiemanshu> nb_: ping 20:16 < hiemanshu> I am not too sure if nb is around 20:16 < hiemanshu> but we still need to get documentation of the blogs, and I think the redirection issue is still unfixed 20:16 -!- mbroyles [n=mbroyles at nat/redhat/x-pjbswkvqruzdepms] has quit "Leaving." 20:17 < hiemanshu> ricky: do you think pinging the docs team could help? 20:17 < ricky> Is there a specific description of what documentation is needed? 20:17 < sijis> i think it was just 'how to setup a blog' 20:17 < hiemanshu> its on the list, its mainly how to setup a log 20:17 < hiemanshu> blog** 20:18 * hiemanshu will pester nb to send an update to the list 20:18 < sijis> we should know specifically under what circumstances that redirect breaks 20:19 < hiemanshu> sijis: its looks more after logging in 20:19 < hiemanshu> It seems to be an SSL issue 20:20 < sijis> ok. 20:20 * hiemanshu moves ahead 20:20 < hiemanshu> #topic Fedora Insight 20:20 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: Fedora Insight (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:20 < hiemanshu> mchua: ping 20:21 * hiemanshu wonders where mchua is 20:22 * hiemanshu moves on and will be back later 20:22 < hiemanshu> #topic User Gallery 20:22 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: User Gallery (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:23 < hiemanshu> so mizmo had a plan with the user gallery, and nothing really has been implemented 20:23 -!- Cheshirc [n=donno at unaffiliated/cheshirc] has quit Read error: 113 (No route to host) 20:23 < hiemanshu> we need to work on mockups and a few ideas 20:23 < hiemanshu> But Well right I am thinking of more like a Photo Gallery 20:23 < hiemanshu> right now** 20:23 -!- Cheshirc [n=e at unaffiliated/cheshirc] has joined #fedora-websites 20:24 < hiemanshu> Where people who have been to different events, etc can upload their pics 20:24 < hiemanshu> sijis, ricky, tatica : Comments ? 20:24 < tatica> ok, give me just a second, I'm slow with english 20:24 * mchua looks up 20:25 < tatica> I have 3 links for this 20:25 < hiemanshu> mchua: wait for your turn 20:25 * mchua is here once this is done, yep 20:25 < ricky> You might get a little resistance from infrastructure on a photo gallery type thing unless there's a very good reason that none of our existing hosting services are sufficient 20:25 < hiemanshu> ricky: privacy 20:25 < tatica> 1.- http://tatica.org/meet-fedora/ 20:26 < tatica> 2.- http://www.flickr.com/groups/fedora-latam/ 20:26 < tatica> 3.- http://www.flickr.com/groups/fedora_people/ 20:26 < ricky> What about privacy? 20:26 < ricky> I don't think we really want to serve any private content 20:26 < tatica> I took this photos, I can get full release on cc-by-sa of the people in those photos 20:27 < tatica> I can get permissions to jan 2nd week for all photos in there 20:27 < tatica> we could do something like link 1 but instead show people, we could use a group photo for the event-link 20:28 < hiemanshu> tatica: that more like what I was planning 20:28 < tatica> hiemanshu, jeje well, you got more support now 20:28 < hiemanshu> ricky: Chitlesh too needed a gallery 20:29 < hiemanshu> ricky: we can have it fedorapeople.org accounts 20:29 < hiemanshu> but a place with one album 20:29 < tatica> if we use photos to a website 20:29 < hiemanshu> and where anyone can upload 20:29 < ricky> Yeah, and infrastructure gave a little resistance for that too 20:29 < tatica> with a simple cc-by-sa / cc-*** / gpl works 20:30 < hiemanshu> I ll hit the list with an email soon 20:31 < hiemanshu> and see what others think as well 20:31 < hiemanshu> Lets move for now 20:31 < hiemanshu> #topic Fedora Insight 20:31 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: Fedora Insight (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:31 < hiemanshu> mchua: ping 20:31 < mchua> coolness. 20:31 < mchua> Well, there were two things I had. 20:31 < tatica> hiemanshu, you can use my links to support your idea 20:31 < hiemanshu> tatica: sure 20:31 < mchua> The first is that we need CSS help, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight#Design, but it looks like we've got that now (thanks tatica and hiemanshu!) so we're set, and I'm learning that we need to ask both Websites and Design for help with CSS stuff. :) 20:32 < mchua> So that leaves just one other question from me - I'm not sure what the arrangement is in terms of who's responsible for websites that start out as another team's project. 20:32 < mchua> And I'd like to get a notion on which team 'owns' Fedora Insight once it's launched (I'm happy to hand it off if Websites wants it, I'm happy to split infrastructure/content between Websites/Marketing, happy to keep it all in Marketing... just want to know where we should be aiming ;) 20:33 < mchua> So - is there any precedent? what would you like to do with this? 20:33 < hiemanshu> mchua: Lets keep the websites stuff (backend) stuff to -websites and the content to -mktg? 20:35 < mchua> hiemanshu: That's what I was thinking. 20:35 < mchua> It's going to be kinda fuzzy for a while until we get it up, I think. 20:35 < hiemanshu> mchua: from what I see know, I havent really seen anyone from -websites for FI 20:36 < hiemanshu> s/know/now 20:36 < mchua> But once we launch, and start thinking about "well, we could add these new features from the back-end side," I'd like to do that within Websites instead of within... well... the 5 or 6 different places we have that conversation going now. 20:36 < hiemanshu> mchua: so we might have to push them in telling "Hey, its a part of websites, see if you can help" 20:36 < sijis> is there a repo/location where the files are located? 20:36 < mchua> Yeah, we don't really have a websites <--> Fedora Insight ambassador. 20:36 < mchua> sijis: It's on publictest6 right now. 20:37 < mchua> sijis: That's probably the first thing we'd need help with - getting it into websites's "look, you can check out files and help" infrastructure 20:38 < mchua> right now it's still unstable enough (we're just trying to get everything packaged right now) that this may not yet make sense for most of it 20:38 < mchua> but for instance, the css for the theme really *should* be in a repo 20:38 < giarc_> mchua, u can use people space for that... 20:38 < mchua> mizmo: I think we tried to do that earlier but couldn't figure out how to easily check in/out from within pt6 20:39 < hiemanshu> mchua: scp workds 20:39 < hiemanshu> works** 20:39 < sijis> giarc_: that's a good idea 20:39 < giarc_> mchua, which 5-6 places are having conversations about insight? 20:39 < sijis> the other idea we can ask to create a seperate repo for FI 20:40 < hiemanshu> sijis: why not just the infra repo 20:40 < hiemanshu> use** 20:40 < mchua> giarc_: I know - we actually have a fedorahosted repo that's empty because mizmo had to edit in pt6 to be able to see changes, but we lacked the vcs-fu to figure out how to push from pt6 to the repo 20:40 < mchua> I think it had something to do with folder permissions 20:40 < mchua> which may actually be easy to sort out 20:41 < giarc_> ah 20:41 * hiemanshu would be happy to take a look at the ealier tomorrow 20:41 < mchua> but iirc it was something like "well, I'm not putting my ssh key into a box that everyone has sudo on" 20:41 < hiemanshu> mchua: I could well scp it to my machine from within pt6 20:41 < hiemanshu> and then push it to a repo 20:41 < mchua> and you can't do anonymous push into our repos, so. 20:41 -!- daMaestro [n=jon at fedora/damaestro] has quit Read error: 110 (Connection timed out) 20:42 < mchua> hiemanshu: oh, that would work 20:42 < mchua> hiemanshu: I think if you can figure out that workflow when you and tatica work on CSS that would be *awesome* 20:42 < mchua> we just didn't know how to do it properly 20:42 < hiemanshu> mchua: I can do that 20:42 < giarc_> i think there is a way to use acls on people spaces to control who can push. but at any rate, getting it into a repo seems important 20:42 -!- daMaestro [n=jon at fedora/damaestro] has joined #fedora-websites 20:42 < mchua> but then everyone working on design stuff could then use that workflow, and things would be all happy and version-controlled, and such. 20:42 < sijis> if this is permanent.. it should just have a seperate repo 20:42 < tatica> o/ 20:42 < hiemanshu> mchua: I could even make an account on my machine, so you can scp directly from pt6 to my machine 20:42 < mchua> giarc_: Yeah, I agree. It's been something that's bugged me for a long time. 20:43 * mchua looks for name of current repo 20:43 < mchua> .fasinfo mchua 20:43 < zodbot> mchua: User: mchua, Name: Mel Chua, email: mel at redhat.com, Creation: 2008-09-26, IRC Nick: mchua, Timezone: US/Eastern, Locale: en, Extension: 5115368, GPG key ID: , Status: active 20:43 < zodbot> mchua: Approved Groups: cla_done web fedorabugs packager ambassadors marketing cla_fedora sysadmin-test designteam gitfedora-zikula giteducation svnfedora-zikula-theme 20:43 < zodbot> mchua: Unapproved Groups: None 20:43 < mchua> There we go. It's FAS group gitfedora-zikula. 20:43 < mchua> whoops. 20:43 < mchua> svnfedora-zikula-theme, I mean. 20:44 < mchua> mizmo, myself, and itbegins have sponsorship, we'd be happy to add people. 20:44 < mchua> And, uh, migrating to git is *totally* cool. 20:44 < mchua> And a better repo name is also totally cool. 20:44 < hiemanshu> mchua: Um, i hate svn 20:44 < mchua> Y'all are the experts in how to set this sort of thing up. 20:45 < mchua> hiemanshu: then make a git repo. :) it's svn right now because Mo pointed out that SVN was much more designers-who-may-not-use-the-command-line-yet friendly. 20:45 < mchua> And we needed to get CSS up *now* (back then). 20:45 < hiemanshu> mchua: so um, make a git group and add 20:46 < hiemanshu> me** 20:46 < giarc_> mchua, is this the list of things that need work? 20:46 < giarc_> https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&keywords=~insight&order=priority 20:47 < mchua> giarc_: from the CSS/design/websites side, yes. 20:47 < hiemanshu> giarc_: yup 20:47 -!- r0000t [n=floyd at pool-98-117-2-184.hrbgpa.fios.verizon.net] has joined #fedora-websites 20:47 < mchua> giarc_: there's plenty more that needs work for Fedora Insight overall, but the rest is stuff like packaging, content workflow, etc. 20:47 < r0000t> afternoon all 20:47 < r0000t> is there any interest in brining in additional members to the website team? 20:48 < hiemanshu> r0000t: very much 20:48 < ricky> Yes, always :-) 20:48 < mchua> hiemanshu: I'll put in a request for that git repo right after this topic closes. 20:48 < hiemanshu> mchua: great 20:48 < hiemanshu> mchua: I could teach all the designers-who-may-not-use-the-command-line-yet how to use git :) 20:48 < r0000t> I do freelance web design on the side, from my 9-5 job 20:49 < r0000t> would be interested in helping out if there's any area's to work on 20:49 < hiemanshu> r0000t: sure, we have a few things on the list, and just going through a meeting, how about you send your intro to the list 20:50 < hiemanshu> mchua: Is there anything else from you? 20:50 < giarc_> mchua, sorry to be dense, but how do we get at that code base? 20:50 < mchua> nope, I'm good. 20:51 < ricky> r0000t: I think there's a ton of CSS work to be done if you're good with that. 20:51 < mchua> giarc_: You need sysadmin-test membership - it's on publictest6. 20:51 < giarc_> ah 20:51 < mchua> giarc_: It's basically a bunch of packages installed (I'll pull up the list) 20:51 < hiemanshu> giarc_: whats your fas? 20:51 < giarc_> .fas craigt 20:51 < zodbot> giarc_: craigt 'Craig Thomas' 20:51 < mchua> with some CSS for the theme that isn't versioned. 20:51 < hiemanshu> .fasinfo craigt 20:51 < zodbot> hiemanshu: User: craigt, Name: Craig Thomas, email: bicycle.nutz at gmail.com, Creation: 2007-02-22, IRC Nick: giarc, Timezone: US/Eastern, Locale: en, Extension: 5101292, GPG key ID: A7CC7A51, Status: active 20:51 < zodbot> hiemanshu: Approved Groups: cla_done web cla_fedora 20:52 < zodbot> hiemanshu: Unapproved Groups: None 20:52 < mchua> giarc_: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_set_up_a_Zikula_sandbox has the setup instructions, that would give you a local copy of everything except the theme. 20:52 < hiemanshu> giarc_: if you can find something to work on, I think ricky can sponsor you to sysadmin-test 20:52 < hiemanshu> .sponsors sysadmin-test 20:52 < zodbot> hiemanshu: Sponsors for sysadmin-test: jkeating lmacken mdomsch @mmcgrath ricky @skvidal toshio 20:52 < hiemanshu> .sponsors web 20:52 < zodbot> hiemanshu: Sponsors for web: duffy ivazquez mchua @nman64 @quaid ricky sijis @skvidal 20:53 < hiemanshu> sijis: you can sponsor too, nice :) 20:53 < mchua> r0000t: we were just talking about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight, btw, for context. 20:53 < giarc_> ok, i'll see whats a good fit and can send patches 20:54 < sijis> :) 20:54 < mchua> r0000t: if you see something interesting, the way to do it is just raise your hand and say "hey, I would like to help with that." 20:54 * sijis suggests updating the Websites wiki page 20:54 < mchua> then pretty much start doing it. 20:55 -!- Cheshirc [n=e at unaffiliated/cheshirc] has quit Read error: 113 (No route to host) 20:55 < hiemanshu> mchua: put up FI on Websites Projects section 20:55 < hiemanshu> wiki i.e. 20:56 < hiemanshu> If there is nothing else, I ll change topic in 30 20:56 < mchua> hiemanshu: sounds like r0000t wants to help you and tatica with the FI CSS 20:56 < mchua> so you might want to touch base on that later 20:56 < tatica> o/ 20:56 -!- Cheshirc [n=p at unaffiliated/cheshirc] has joined #fedora-websites 20:56 < mchua> hiemanshu: yeah, I'll go edit the wiki and get you that git repo now 20:56 < mchua> thanks! 20:56 < hiemanshu> mchua: so that makes us 4 20:57 * mchua has nothing further on FI 20:57 < hiemanshu> the Fantastic 4 :) 20:57 * hiemanshu hi-fies tatica and r0000t 20:57 < hiemanshu> #topic Wiki Search Engine 20:57 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: Wiki Search Engine (Meeting topic: Fedora Websites) 20:57 < hiemanshu> This has been one big problem for quite a while now 20:57 < hiemanshu> the search engine in wiki has not been very effective 20:58 < hiemanshu> ricky: ^^ 20:58 < tatica> hiemanshu, I'm under your orders o/ 20:58 < r0000t> I apologize, a lot going on to try and jump in the middle and figure things out 20:58 < hiemanshu> r0000t: I ll help you out after the meeting, if you need help 20:58 < sijis> r0000t: a meeting summary link is provided at the end of the meeting 20:59 < hiemanshu> looks like ricky is out 20:59 < hiemanshu> #Open Floor 20:59 * ricky is still around and listening 21:00 < sijis> there are 2 folks in infra working on the site-wide search feature. 21:00 < ricky> I know two people in infra are looking at search engine stuff, I don't remember who though. 21:00 < hiemanshu> ricky: Do you think we need to ping infra on the websites stuff? 21:00 < hiemanshu> s/websites/wiki 21:00 < ricky> I think they're on it already :-) 21:00 < hiemanshu> I see 21:00 < sijis> yeah, they have a wiki page on ti 21:00 < hiemanshu> I have quite a bit of whining in -social 21:00 < hiemanshu> seen** 21:01 < r0000t> I'll wait until the meeting is over and attempt to catch up 21:02 < r0000t> is getfedora on the redesign list? 21:02 < hiemanshu> r0000t: yes 21:02 < r0000t> I would certainly be up for some mockups 21:02 < sijis> .ticket 1055 21:02 < hiemanshu> r0000t: they are on the wiki 21:02 < zodbot> sijis: #1055 (Fedora Search Engine) - Fedora Infrastructure - Trac - https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1055 21:02 < sijis> i thought it was a wiki, but its a ticket ^^ 21:03 < sijis> whoops, the wiki is actually here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Search 21:04 * sijis has no more comments 21:04 < hiemanshu> If nothing comes up in a few, I ll close the meeting 21:04 < hiemanshu> mchua, tatica, ricky : Anything? 21:05 < ricky> Thanks for holding it :-) 21:05 < hiemanshu> np 21:05 < hiemanshu> Yeah since people are here, I think we should have a bi-monthly meeting atleast 21:06 < sijis> weekly. even if its only 5 minutes 21:06 < hiemanshu> Weekly is perfectly fine with me 21:07 < hiemanshu> Ok, So i ll close the meeting now 21:07 < hiemanshu> ..... 21:07 < hiemanshu> .... 21:07 < hiemanshu> ... 21:07 < hiemanshu> .. 21:07 < hiemanshu> . 21:07 < hiemanshu> #endmeeting 21:07 -!- zodbot changed the topic of #fedora-websites to: Meeting in ~10 mins | The Fedora Websites team maintains the official Fedora Project websites (http://fedoraproject.org/) | Want to help us? Contact the respective leaders listed here : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Projects | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites || Any changes pushed after midnight on December 11 (Friday) CST may not take effect on the live site prior to the move 21:07 < zodbot> Meeting ended Fri Dec 18 21:07:49 2009 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot . 21:07 < zodbot> Minutes: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-websites/2009-12-18/fedora-websites.2009-12-18-20.00.html 21:07 < zodbot> Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-websites/2009-12-18/fedora-websites.2009-12-18-20.00.txt 21:07 < zodbot> Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-websites/2009-12-18/fedora-websites.2009-12-18-20.00.log.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From beland at alum.mit.edu Fri Dec 18 18:19:57 2009 From: beland at alum.mit.edu (Christopher Beland) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:19:57 -0500 Subject: Package bug lists Message-ID: <1261160397.2238.137.camel@diet-anarchy.localdomain> I use lists such as: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/bugs/gdm to do bug triage, and they are much handier than doing searches in Bugzilla. Since we have switched to using the Triaged keyword instead of the ASSIGNED status to indicate triage has been completed for a particular bug, would it be possible to update this table to show triage status? It would also be tremendously useful to show if NEEDINFO is set, because when triaging I skip those bugs. Thanks! From ab8kr at wideopenwest.com Fri Dec 18 22:24:29 2009 From: ab8kr at wideopenwest.com (chris maresco) Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:24:29 -0500 Subject: program disc Message-ID: <76.F5.14929.3110C2B4@smtp01.wow.synacor.com> Can I get a disc for the program -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ramesh.ubuntu at gmail.com Sat Dec 19 13:22:52 2009 From: ramesh.ubuntu at gmail.com (ramesh gandhi) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:52:52 +0530 Subject: Hi Message-ID: I want to add in your list. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mel at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:28:02 2009 From: mel at redhat.com (Mel Chua) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:28:02 -0500 Subject: Fedora Insight update: the Websites team rocketh / will be taking back-end after launch. Message-ID: <4B2CFF12.9070501@redhat.com> Went to the Websites meeting yesterday to talk about Fedora Insight. Short version: We've got us some CSS help from Websites to finish up theming, and they'll be taking on maintenance of the back-end (FWN and Marketing will continue to own workflow and content) once we do the initial launch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Fedora_Insight What this means immediately: CSS design tickets are getting worked on. (https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&keywords=~insight&order=priority) I've cc'd everyone with FAS access to the theme group and everyone who owns a Fedora Insight CSS/Design ticket to make sure they're informed, know who the others working on the theme are, and can (possibly) make arrangements to sprint on IRC together; I'd suggest making sure that both the Websites and Design teams know when and where that work will be happening. We'll also have proper versioning for theme stuff, finally - thanks to Hiemanshu for getting us into git! (Hosting ticket = https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1886, but it's just been taken care of.) Hiemanshu should be posting "here's the repo / how to use it" instructions shortly, I believe. --Mel From mel at redhat.com Sat Dec 19 16:45:03 2009 From: mel at redhat.com (Mel Chua) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 11:45:03 -0500 Subject: Fedora Insight update: the Websites team rocketh / will be taking back-end after launch. In-Reply-To: <4B2D02AB.4010703@gmail.com> References: <4B2CFF12.9070501@redhat.com> <4B2D02AB.4010703@gmail.com> Message-ID: <4B2D030F.6000203@redhat.com> On 12/19/2009 11:43 AM, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote: > Anyways the repo is located at > git://git.fedorproject.org/git/fedora-insight-theme.git Wow. Thanks, Hiemanshu! I've also copied these instructions over to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight#Design, and am happy to move them somewhere else if there's a better spot on the wiki. I suspect that eventually we'll want to move this to the Websites space, perhaps after launch when we update the documentation as part of the backend handoff. --Mel From hiemanshu at gmail.com Sat Dec 19 16:43:23 2009 From: hiemanshu at gmail.com (Hiemanshu Sharma) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:13:23 +0530 Subject: Fedora Insight update: the Websites team rocketh / will be taking back-end after launch. In-Reply-To: <4B2CFF12.9070501@redhat.com> References: <4B2CFF12.9070501@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B2D02AB.4010703@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/19/2009 09:58 PM, Mel Chua wrote: > Went to the Websites meeting yesterday to talk about Fedora Insight. > > Short version: We've got us some CSS help from Websites to finish up > theming, and they'll be taking on maintenance of the back-end (FWN and > Marketing will continue to own workflow and content) once we do the > initial launch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Fedora_Insight > > What this means immediately: > > CSS design tickets are getting worked on. > (https://fedorahosted.org/design-team/query?status=new&status=assigned&status=reopened&keywords=~insight&order=priority) > > > I've cc'd everyone with FAS access to the theme group and everyone who > owns a Fedora Insight CSS/Design ticket to make sure they're informed, > know who the others working on the theme are, and can (possibly) make > arrangements to sprint on IRC together; I'd suggest making sure that > both the Websites and Design teams know when and where that work will be > happening. > > We'll also have proper versioning for theme stuff, finally - thanks to > Hiemanshu for getting us into git! (Hosting ticket = > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1886, but it's > just been taken care of.) > > Hiemanshu should be posting "here's the repo / how to use it" > instructions shortly, I believe. > > --Mel Mel when you say something consider it done :) Anyways the repo is located at git://git.fedorproject.org/git/fedora-insight-theme.git, Right now the git is empty, I will soon be uploading the files for the theme. You can checkout the theme anonymously using git clone git://git.fedoraproject.org/git/fedora-insight-theme.git, People who are a part of the group gitfedora-insight-theme (FAS Group) can check out using git clone ssh://git.fedoraproject.org/git/fedora-insight-theme.git (Commit Access). To use the theme just copy over the fedora folder inside the git repo and paste in the /path/to/zikula/theme folder and change the settings in the Admin Panel. If you want to help with the theme ping me or mchua. For People with access: If you make any change in the theme directly on the server (pt6) make sure that you copy over the changes you made to the theme and to keep the git repo updated always. If you need any help just ping me in #fedora-{websites,mktg} I go by the nick hiemanshu. Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLLQKrAAoJEDQGoO+CeKfyyVAH/jKPdlnZDwyYp0nq43kzWwwm zBFw7qZ4bViVQzFUmMOGzEyeBlBhLujamJabOuQK7UAiY77MXq7coq8Q0AVQOPA2 yfnAX43YKx5PVv7eoUzGJDNQCxC5XbS/nh/W6fnMpGE320vECvrfWUP01V/Kuwp2 h0FOA+vdMWdHZ1U92plXKVxZ1CwMOWHaahRGHI4mGVcVd9oEXCRmp5lc4+yX8HZZ csKAUdRsLqvt0bEirKzErFrE21Ifu0KTcfrqSaiZ5mMrTknTDdxvuiBNmDEnBShR cbI2ewvGFcfx14VACNKK4Aybz3qABOhN91RQkPptIw20l/HmxBw4ZlP8d0wq6zw= =RG+k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From hiemanshu at gmail.com Sat Dec 19 17:05:15 2009 From: hiemanshu at gmail.com (Hiemanshu Sharma) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:35:15 +0530 Subject: Fedora Insight update: the Websites team rocketh / will be taking back-end after launch. In-Reply-To: <4B2D030F.6000203@redhat.com> References: <4B2CFF12.9070501@redhat.com> <4B2D02AB.4010703@gmail.com> <4B2D030F.6000203@redhat.com> Message-ID: <4B2D07CB.9010207@gmail.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/19/2009 10:15 PM, Mel Chua wrote: > On 12/19/2009 11:43 AM, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote: >> Anyways the repo is located at >> git://git.fedorproject.org/git/fedora-insight-theme.git > > Wow. Thanks, Hiemanshu! > > I've also copied these instructions over to > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight#Design, and am happy to > move them somewhere else if there's a better spot on the wiki. I suspect > that eventually we'll want to move this to the Websites space, perhaps > after launch when we update the documentation as part of the backend > handoff. > > --Mel Just filled up the git repo. Regards, Hiemanshu Sharma. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLLQfLAAoJEDQGoO+CeKfyTyAIAJtoDx2J2ms5jSpx0Rz6imCM tFE1loCZtPEIUOSd+JFo8AWHucaXdF8dgUqw6MkmAwtB1QMNcJDPYyRpNdxGtx7k meEaEsyaEMMEc9eUToEVeH1cLD1YSlWHdxnSaiaKMoQwUBRbg44OgGTBoBvs1W3W 7G2WfeytqliKsrLUvz8/XybyH+xY/Qf7RYJh/IvLEkP0l1vWYAVkmQdFQXEXgsWc ACr1oohxg0dwL6k9t60N4jxtvLFF5mnHnmTZfuWTSF2yK6ShaStjlwpNKOG4tTXT TJeJXU7DhVxa59w6P/Lt15Ly4fR2BO4IF05wH7u1F5OOkyHIZrJnC1cHQuhCjtM= =ORuP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From fred at ridersite.org Sat Dec 19 17:58:17 2009 From: fred at ridersite.org (Fred Yontz) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:58:17 -0500 Subject: Fedora 12 download problems Message-ID: <4B2D1439.9060401@ridersite.org> Dear Fedora Webmaster First off, I'm not sure whether you are the appropriate person to contact about the problem I'm having, and if I'm in the wrong place, please excuse me. I've looked at the lists of other places --- mailing lists, forums, IRC, community websites --- and I have no idea where in that collection I should turn. So let me describe the problems I've had, and please help me if you can, or point me to where I should have gone. I downloaded the Fedora 12 Desktop Edition installable Live CDs for both the standard (Gnome) and KDE versions, and the Live Media checksum files for each. To verify my downloads, I first used the SHA1 checksum calculator in my EF Commander file manager, but the SHA1 checksums didn't match those I downloaded. So I followed your advice to download and install HashCalc, and then used it to calculate the SHA1 hashes. These results matched what I got from EF Commander, but not the checksums on your Verify your ISO download web page. For the standard (Gnome) Live CD download my computed SHA1 hash was 96b1e47a06f207aab3279731124a76c15810556a *Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso while the downloaded Live Media i386 checksum file showed: Hash: SHA1 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001 Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso I tried a second download of the standard Live CD, and that gave me yet another SHA1 hash: daf4b3ea2322dfee9a473099557ac9ed7c6d3159 *Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso For the KDE Live CD download my computed SHA1 hash was 8e22652cb697ee6f7ec9e77c1073749434a78e73 *Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE.iso while the downloaded Live Media i386 (KDE) checksum file showed Hash: SHA1 1bb64a4eedecf4730b47fcbb6c17b49d6deaccf7b00b17dd7b1091af57cf1c1e Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE.iso These SHA1 hashes, my computed and from your web site, aren't even the same length, so I don't know what to think, whether I have bad downloads, or there is some other problem about the verification process. I opened each in IsoBuster 2.6 to see if it reported any errors, though I'm not sure whether IsoBuster has that ability. Do you have any suggestions, can you offer any advice? Thank you. Fred Yontz Reston, VA -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Sat Dec 19 19:04:14 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:04:14 -0500 Subject: Fedora 12 download problems In-Reply-To: <4B2D1439.9060401@ridersite.org> References: <4B2D1439.9060401@ridersite.org> Message-ID: <20091219190414.GX5004@inocybe.localdomain> Fred Yontz wrote: > Dear Fedora Webmaster > > First off, I'm not sure whether you are the appropriate person to > contact about the problem I'm having, and if I'm in the wrong place, > please excuse me. I've looked at the lists of other places --- > mailing lists, forums, IRC, community websites --- and I have no > idea where in that collection I should turn. So let me describe the > problems I've had, and please help me if you can, or point me to > where I should have gone. Usually, the fedora-list is the place to go for general support. But this address is alright for issues that are (or may be) problems with the website. :) > I downloaded the Fedora 12 Desktop Edition installable Live CDs for > both the standard (Gnome) and KDE versions, and the Live Media > checksum files for each. To verify my downloads, I first used the > SHA1 checksum calculator in my EF Commander file manager, but the > SHA1 checksums didn't match those I downloaded. So I followed your > advice to download and install HashCalc, and then used it to > calculate the SHA1 hashes. These results matched what I got from EF > Commander, but not the checksums on your Verify your ISO download > web page. I think you must have missed the large red warning at the top of https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify which says: Please note that the Hash: SHA1 line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does not specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files. The checksums themselves use SHA256 as the hash algorithm. We've got an open bug to improve the instructions for Windows users, as they still refer to sha1sum, incorrectly?. I'm not certain what Windows tools can verify SHA256 checksums. Our hope is to be able to provide a sha256sum.exe for Windows users, but that process is not complete yet. ? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527060 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Many people lose their tempers merely by seeing you keep yours. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mtsqph at gmail.com Mon Dec 21 14:09:09 2009 From: mtsqph at gmail.com (Yhumusta Ben DaNutts) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:09:09 -0600 Subject: DVD install downloads by torrent Message-ID: <14d6b4ae0912210609t65abdd22ge6006de800d64067@mail.gmail.com> For the past TWO distributions of FC (11 and 12) the only information I was able to get from the disks after 8 hours of torrent download from your source site, was SIX DISKS OF THE SAME THING - disk one, This has happened TWICE in a row. I wind up installing from the .net install disk ONLY. This is not right. The Net install disk does not allow one to remain idependent. I do not like having to go online all the time for updates. Linux may need to evolve, but I think there should be some kind of halt to just a ship-load of updates and 'critical updates'... I am seriously questioning the viability of this distibution and am thinking it is time I bid your distro Adieu.... I just wanted to let you know in case no one else had that the net install REALLY SUCKS! Respectfully submitted Manuel Colunga-Hernandez sunfightercomix.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Mon Dec 21 15:17:27 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 10:17:27 -0500 Subject: DVD install downloads by torrent In-Reply-To: <14d6b4ae0912210609t65abdd22ge6006de800d64067@mail.gmail.com> References: <14d6b4ae0912210609t65abdd22ge6006de800d64067@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091221151727.GG5004@inocybe.localdomain> Manuel, You wrote: > For the past TWO distributions of FC (11 and 12) the only > information I was able to get from the disks after 8 hours of > torrent download from your source site, was SIX DISKS OF THE SAME > THING - disk one, > > This has happened TWICE in a row. I wind up installing from the > .net install disk ONLY. This is not right. The Net install disk > does not allow one to remain idependent. I do not like having to go > online all the time for updates. The DVD torrents are working fine for myself and many, many other folks. You would need to provide us with more details for us to be able to help diagnose the problem. > I just wanted to let you know in case no one else had that the net > install REALLY SUCKS! The net install is fine for many uses. I've used it to test server installs and minimal desktop installs. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three. -- Alice Kahn, writer -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ramesh.ubuntu at gmail.com Thu Dec 24 10:42:58 2009 From: ramesh.ubuntu at gmail.com (ramesh gandhi) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:12:58 +0530 Subject: Hi Message-ID: As a beginner in the linux i want to know more.Please add me in your list......your ramesh......... -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From sijis at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 24 18:17:45 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 12:17:45 -0600 Subject: Hi In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <747290270912241017k22c35edcr34c75016e2eab63e@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 4:42 AM, ramesh gandhi wrote: > As a beginner in the linux i want to know more.Please add me in your > list......your ramesh......... > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > Ramesh, We welcome anyone who has interest in Fedora or linux in general. This list is primarily for requests/concerns/issues with Fedora websites. If you are looking for an introduction you should look at the Fedora Classroom https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/IRC/Classroom. There is an Archives section which you may find extremely useful and helpful. You should also look at joining the fedora-list: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list. There are many topics discussed there and should be informative. Lastly, take a look at this page http://fedoraproject.org/en/get-help to find other alternatives in getting assistance with Fedora. Sijis From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Dec 25 17:22:27 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 17:22:27 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1894: RSS feed for Fedora People broken Message-ID: <063.44f326e7badb9951b70f5f1812dce0fa@fedorahosted.org> #1894: RSS feed for Fedora People broken -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: sharkcz | Owner: webmaster Type: bug | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- I am using http://planet.fedoraproject.org/rss20.xml as the source for Fedora People feed in evolution-rss plugin. I did not get any update since cca UTC 1:00 Dec 24 and the Evo plugin return an error - "Invalid feed: EntityRef: expecting ';'" -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Dec 25 18:46:59 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:46:59 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1894: RSS feed for Fedora People broken In-Reply-To: <063.44f326e7badb9951b70f5f1812dce0fa@fedorahosted.org> References: <063.44f326e7badb9951b70f5f1812dce0fa@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <072.3f7d8c5f8552e62a34bbbda0b854f595@fedorahosted.org> #1894: RSS feed for Fedora People broken -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: sharkcz | Owner: webmaster Type: bug | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Changes (by ricky): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: Thanks for the report, this was caused by a variable that we forgot to escape in our template, which should be fixed now. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From dhillonv10 at gmail.com Sun Dec 27 20:37:13 2009 From: dhillonv10 at gmail.com (Vikram Dhillon) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 15:37:13 -0500 Subject: new member introduction Message-ID: Hi all, How are you guys doing? I have been working over at Ubuntu, and currently I am one of the moderators of edubuntu (a deritive of Ubuntu) and of Ubuntu start page. So I would like to get started with fedora websites, how can I help out here. Thanks for your help on getting started :D Regards, Vikram Dhillon ~~~ There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is. -- Linus Torvalds From gw_jasu at yahoo.com Mon Dec 28 03:13:24 2009 From: gw_jasu at yahoo.com (shoeb ahmed) Date: Sun, 27 Dec 2009 19:13:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: No subject Message-ID: <803382.47691.qm@web112517.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mel at redhat.com Mon Dec 28 07:28:46 2009 From: mel at redhat.com (Mel Chua) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 02:28:46 -0500 Subject: new member introduction In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B385E2E.70203@redhat.com> On 12/27/2009 03:37 PM, Vikram Dhillon wrote: > Hi all, > How are you guys doing? I have been working over at Ubuntu, > and currently I am one of the moderators of edubuntu (a deritive of > Ubuntu) and of Ubuntu start page. So I would like to get started with > fedora websites, how can I help out here. Thanks for your help on > getting started :D > > Regards, > Vikram Dhillon Hi, Vikram - things are a bit slow right now because of the holidays, but here are a few resources for getting started. If you're an IRC user, we hang out in #fedora-websites in irc.freenode.net. If you're new to IRC, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/IRC may be of help. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Join_the_Fedora_Websites_Project points to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Join - if you've already seen this and the email you sent was part of working through step #4, that's great! Knowing more about your skills (do you do graphics, html, css, programming with web frameworks, webmastering, etc?) and interests will help people point you in the direction of a specific project to get started with. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Meetings may also be helpful; I'm not sure if we're having one this week because of the New Year, but hopefully someone else on this list can chime in on when the next meeting is going to be. I might also take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Projects and see if any of these catch your eye; some projects are more active/recent than others. The one I'm most involved with is Fedora Insight, but depending on your background there may be others you might want to lend a hand with. In summary, I'd suggest: * telling us a little more about your skills and interests so we can help you find a better match * finding out when the next (IRC) meeting will be and whether you can attend it - they're a great chance to ask questions. * checking out the list of current projects to see if there's anything you're particularly interested in helping with - some already have a ticket queue set up, so you can just go in and grab a task if you'd like to start with that. Welcome! --Mel From dhillonv10 at gmail.com Mon Dec 28 18:22:42 2009 From: dhillonv10 at gmail.com (Vikram Dhillon) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:22:42 -0500 Subject: new member introduction In-Reply-To: <4B385E2E.70203@redhat.com> References: <4B385E2E.70203@redhat.com> Message-ID: Thanks a lot for getting back to me. I am a solid web-programmer so over time I have learned: PHP, mySQL, html, css, django, couch-db (in the process of learning) and javascript. I will definitely look again at the link you provided to pick something up and work on it and also try my best to attend the next meeting (I am a student, so I might be at school at that time). Regards, Vikram Dhillon ~~~ There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is. -- Linus Torvalds On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 2:28 AM, Mel Chua wrote: > On 12/27/2009 03:37 PM, Vikram Dhillon wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> ? ? ? ? ?How are you guys doing? I have been working over at Ubuntu, >> and currently I am one of the moderators of edubuntu (a deritive of >> Ubuntu) and of Ubuntu start page. So I would like to get started with >> fedora websites, how can I help out here. Thanks for your help on >> getting started :D >> >> Regards, >> Vikram Dhillon > > Hi, Vikram - things are a bit slow right now because of the holidays, but > here are a few resources for getting started. > > If you're an IRC user, we hang out in #fedora-websites in irc.freenode.net. > If you're new to IRC, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/IRC may be of help. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Join_the_Fedora_Websites_Project > points to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Join - if you've already > seen this and the email you sent was part of working through step #4, that's > great! Knowing more about your skills (do you do graphics, html, css, > programming with web frameworks, webmastering, etc?) and interests will help > people point you in the direction of a specific project to get started with. > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites/Meetings may also be helpful; I'm > not sure if we're having one this week because of the New Year, but > hopefully someone else on this list can chime in on when the next meeting is > going to be. > > I might also take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites#Projects > and see if any of these catch your eye; some projects are more active/recent > than others. The one I'm most involved with is Fedora Insight, but depending > on your background there may be others you might want to lend a hand with. > > In summary, I'd suggest: > > * telling us a little more about your skills and interests so we can help > you find a better match > * finding out when the next (IRC) meeting will be and whether you can attend > it - they're a great chance to ask questions. > * checking out the list of current projects to see if there's anything > you're particularly interested in helping with - some already have a ticket > queue set up, so you can just go in and grab a task if you'd like to start > with that. > > Welcome! > > --Mel > From robert_mcintyre at sbcglobal.net Tue Dec 29 03:35:19 2009 From: robert_mcintyre at sbcglobal.net (Robert McIntyre) Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:35:19 -0600 Subject: Web Page Download verification for windows Message-ID: <12649BEA-CA10-43C0-8D2F-ABE4B73EBFF8@sbcglobal.net> I am using HasCalc and I believe that your web page: https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Provides invalid information. The hash below is a SHA256 Vice a SHA1 as stated in the quote below from your https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM web page Pleas advise if I am correct. Quote -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 f0ad929cd259957e160ea442eb80986b5f01daaffdbcc7e5a1840a666c4447c7 *Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso ... Unquote Respectfuly: Robert 214-732-9094 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Tue Dec 29 05:07:32 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 00:07:32 -0500 Subject: Web Page Download verification for windows In-Reply-To: <12649BEA-CA10-43C0-8D2F-ABE4B73EBFF8@sbcglobal.net> References: <12649BEA-CA10-43C0-8D2F-ABE4B73EBFF8@sbcglobal.net> Message-ID: <20091229050732.GR5004@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Robert, Robert McIntyre wrote: > I am using HasCalc and I believe that your web page: > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > > Provides invalid information. The hash below is a SHA256 Vice a SHA1 > as stated in the quote below from your > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > web page Pleas advise if I am correct. The Hash: SHA1 line in the checksum file is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation to the data that is signed (which is indeed a SHA-256 checksum of the Fedora ISO images). This is a very common misconception. The main verification page at https://fedoraproject.org/verify even contains a very bold note at the top: "Please note that the Hash: SHA1 line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does not specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files." For future releases, the plan is to add further instructions directly to the checksum files to try and minimize such confusion. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Don't take life seriously, you'll never get out alive. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From uwe at kubosch.no Thu Dec 31 00:22:01 2009 From: uwe at kubosch.no (Uwe Kubosch) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 01:22:01 +0100 Subject: 500 Internal error Message-ID: <433C6FA8-DCA5-4332-8A24-15724FED0911@kubosch.no> Hi! First let me say that the build and package web sites are getting really good. Keep it up! I am the package maintainer for zfs-fuse. On the package page https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/zfs-fuse I get a 500 Internal error when I follow the "Package Stats" link to https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/stats/ I would love to see some stats about the zfs-fuse package. Is this available anywhere? I am especially interested in download numbers. -- With kind regards Uwe Kubosch Kubosch Consulting uwe at kubosch.no http://kubosch.no/ From sijis at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 31 03:06:19 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 21:06:19 -0600 Subject: 500 Internal error In-Reply-To: <433C6FA8-DCA5-4332-8A24-15724FED0911@kubosch.no> References: <433C6FA8-DCA5-4332-8A24-15724FED0911@kubosch.no> Message-ID: <747290270912301906m3c77f62cj504d9cb106767502@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Uwe Kubosch wrote: > Hi! > > First let me say that the build and package web sites are getting really good. ?Keep it up! > > I am the package maintainer for zfs-fuse. > > On the package page > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packages/name/zfs-fuse > > I get a 500 Internal error when I follow the "Package Stats" link to > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/stats/ > > I would love to see some stats about the zfs-fuse package. ?Is this available anywhere? ?I am especially interested in download numbers. > > -- > With kind regards > Uwe Kubosch > Kubosch Consulting > uwe at kubosch.no > http://kubosch.no/ > > > > > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > Uwe, Thank you for reporting this issue. I've created a support ticket (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1897) regarding it as it appears an application issue or misconfiguration with pkgdb. Sijis From rz at linux-m68k.org Thu Dec 31 21:24:53 2009 From: rz at linux-m68k.org (Richard Zidlicky) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 22:24:53 +0100 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify Message-ID: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> Hi, sorry to use this contact address, was not sure where else to direct this. The procedure in this page has one significant stumbling point - the *-CHECKSUM file is a gzipped file - at least when it is downloaded using wget. ( I have tested it with https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM ) Obviously it needs to unzipped - which is not quickly obvious for a bunch of reasons, eg it has no ".gz" suffix and many editors/viewers will unzip it automatically so the unsuspecting user is left scratching his head why it doesnt work when the file looks perfectly ok when viewed with "less" The result are rather cryptic error messages like # gpg --verify *-CHECKSUM gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. gpg: the signature could not be verified. Please remember that the signature file (.sig or .asc) should be the first file given on the command line. Regards Richard From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 31 21:35:21 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 16:35:21 -0500 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify In-Reply-To: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> References: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> Message-ID: <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-12-31 10:24:53 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > sorry to use this contact address, was not sure where else to direct > this. No problem at all, this is the right place to report website issues like this. > The procedure in this page has one significant stumbling point - the *-CHECKSUM > file is a gzipped file - at least when it is downloaded using wget. > ( I have tested it with https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM ) That definitely shouldn't be a gzipped file - does the file command say that it is one? This is what the file should look like: [ricky at gamma ~]$ wget https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM --2009-12-31 16:34:26-- https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Resolving fedoraproject.org... 152.46.7.221, 66.35.62.162, 80.239.156.214, ... Connecting to fedoraproject.org|152.46.7.221|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 1511 (1.5K) [text/plain] Saving to: ?Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM? 100%[======================================================>] 1,511 --.-K/s in 0s 2009-12-31 16:34:27 (5.54 MB/s) - ?Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM? saved [1511/1511] [ricky at gamma ~]$ cat Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 f0ad929cd259957e160ea442eb80986b5f01daaffdbcc7e5a1840a666c4447c7 *Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso 2f548ce50c459a0270e85a7d63b2383c55239bf6aead9314a0f887f3623ddace *Fedora-12-i386-disc1.iso ce77d16d1b3362859aaa856f1f29c7197db69264d8ce6b9f8111dcee4d5e9ef7 *Fedora-12-i386-disc2.iso 8c39cb9e3c1583948dcad21f9fdbe48a3ff6a8d1b536462188d47747c2640b36 *Fedora-12-i386-disc3.iso 07f03f67d23331e8c7a37ad19e9a99062a4584a3e028beb40c49923bb5c70c6b *Fedora-12-i386-disc4.iso dff8c478fb73452a8799016deeecccde3097d40a0b756d681bfe6be2e56bb9eb *Fedora-12-i386-disc5.iso 128112527bdd4036ec82d678b5d5362aa7a11ac15a73647afd743d7a325f7df9 *Fedora-12-i386-netinst.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBSvurkZ0cw0hXu8y6AQIdQw//WuT1eE5LUzN3tBnBJzMsvD90/gz1kM0A 4qtM+SSRjrx0MwkVkP5spO/xfkk7sncTE51Bl88lDAvpC/00b+u3MQEya9aApZyT CmggKB/bmozQyX3C7HbXwUIMrCRmNVkYCkgQKLQd/MK+r73dXCuHNpyfeBSuZGsy iCpX003Wu6U92jlwljBkgU+FrgJwAmr6b7hEurQaf2fqmN1d4Nh+llwqOEIykd5A Ci1ApI05NBEX/z9KG+WR+YtCuRqUwD6U5SrjBSQD86NGLcsJ49gBrbu1um3cUvlC YRvCjT4zDBn32au+pBKXjlQf4TrCt3SooYnmf0D+1iefrN0Sijpft+bQ26poSjkp pj+wnVkUg2shfm+0imiPIGos6cJRmj0o4w3CzyDs6sOIcIcYB4ohyFasczsjYT40 LSCcKBFZXNEw8OogcoPZpp79Yr7iX0C0JQ45xgzPrDegKSLVkTvpXyHCbmd21Zkz oPu2kFoR+tEVPfESVFqSqnYJC/TtwokEHbaVCUEpP44L3PpGiVTqK/uZnReQRbLM ZuMtXRa2j3i0iSlEKfAS0L+9mvWzGzp8UOQzH7UyZgb0RKfVRYcHW0oXpfMqFD9C IA/0pgDQNnQRq3OPxnjHfNKAtezfNBaaU45xA9gA2olzzVrhzgXKjn3MRK2tyrlA XpaHoVKUVFU= =HttN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 31 22:07:30 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:07:30 -0500 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify In-Reply-To: <20091231220102.GA19460@linux-m68k.org> References: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> <20091231220102.GA19460@linux-m68k.org> Message-ID: <20091231220730.GD5857@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-12-31 11:01:02 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > thats what happens here: > > [rz at rz rai]$ wget -c --proxy=off https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > --2009-12-31 22:58:03-- https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > Resolving fedoraproject.org... 80.239.156.214, 152.46.7.221, 66.35.62.162, ... > Connecting to fedoraproject.org|80.239.156.214|:443... connected. > HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK > Length: 1078 (1.1K) [text/plain] > Saving to: ?Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM? > > 100%[======================================>] 1,078 --.-K/s in 0.1s > > 2009-12-31 22:58:10 (8.79 KB/s) - ?Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM? saved [1078/1078] > > > [rz at rz rai]$ file Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM: gzip compressed data, from Unix Is there anything between you and th eserver that could be affecting this? Also, does this happen as well when you view it in a browser? Just out of curiosity, what does this file decompress to, if anything? Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rz at linux-m68k.org Thu Dec 31 22:01:02 2009 From: rz at linux-m68k.org (Richard Zidlicky) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:01:02 +0100 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify In-Reply-To: <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <20091231220102.GA19460@linux-m68k.org> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 04:35:21PM -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote: > On 2009-12-31 10:24:53 PM, Richard Zidlicky wrote: > > sorry to use this contact address, was not sure where else to direct > > this. > No problem at all, this is the right place to report website issues like > this. > > > The procedure in this page has one significant stumbling point - the *-CHECKSUM > > file is a gzipped file - at least when it is downloaded using wget. > > ( I have tested it with https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM ) > That definitely shouldn't be a gzipped file - does the file command say > that it is one? This is what the file should look like: thats what happens here: [rz at rz rai]$ wget -c --proxy=off https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM --2009-12-31 22:58:03-- https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Resolving fedoraproject.org... 80.239.156.214, 152.46.7.221, 66.35.62.162, ... Connecting to fedoraproject.org|80.239.156.214|:443... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK Length: 1078 (1.1K) [text/plain] Saving to: ?Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM? 100%[======================================>] 1,078 --.-K/s in 0.1s 2009-12-31 22:58:10 (8.79 KB/s) - ?Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM? saved [1078/1078] [rz at rz rai]$ file Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM: gzip compressed data, from Unix [rz at rz rai]$ od -c Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM |head 0000000 037 213 \b \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 \0 003 m 223 K 227 252 8 0000020 024 F 347 374 \n 207 335 355 252 k H B 036 w 255 ; 0000040 \0 304 G 251 224 210 X 352 , 344 a ! * \b 242 % 0000060 277 276 271 325 = 253 233 i 262 366 9 337 316 9 / / 0000100 335 361 202 361 4 354 - 307 313 ^ < 035 207 301 260 267 0000120 \b 342 330 035 \a 277 357 ^ 254 211 250 ? ~ 366 342 211 0000140 k [ 226 001 B q 310 245 202 016 347 016 325 6 001 Z 0000160 ` \f u 312 \0 g $ u \f 260 225 020 306 250 T J 0000200 252 035 a 3 \f 004 ! D b 214 251 244 275 177 F Z 0000220 025 225 x 261 341 K 206 030 y 031 n 206 ? 262 272 260 Richard -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 31 23:25:05 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:25:05 -0500 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify In-Reply-To: <20091231225158.GA19789@linux-m68k.org> References: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> <20091231220102.GA19460@linux-m68k.org> <20091231220730.GD5857@alpha.rzhou.org> <20091231225158.GA19789@linux-m68k.org> Message-ID: <20091231232505.GF5857@alpha.rzhou.org> > Just checked curl with the same URL and it gives the cleartext content > to stdout. Wget the compressed stuff again.. > > Can you look into your logs for 82.113.121.184, should be firefox, curl and wget > accesses. Its a NAT so you may get many more. I couldn't find anything useful in the logs, but I was able to reproduce the issue using: wget --header="Accept-Encoding: gzip" https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM I'll try to look more into why wget isn't decompressing the result properly. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Dec 31 23:30:05 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:30:05 -0500 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify In-Reply-To: <20091231232505.GF5857@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> <20091231220102.GA19460@linux-m68k.org> <20091231220730.GD5857@alpha.rzhou.org> <20091231225158.GA19789@linux-m68k.org> <20091231232505.GF5857@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <20091231233005.GG5857@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-12-31 06:25:05 PM, Ricky Zhou wrote: > wget --header="Accept-Encoding: gzip" > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Looking a bit more into this, I found http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=150766, which says that wget does not support Content-Encoding: gzip, which is an HTTP 1.1 feature. Can you give me the output of: wget -d https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM I'm curious to see if Accept-Encoding: gzip is being sent or Content-Encoding: gzip is coming back. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From rz at linux-m68k.org Thu Dec 31 22:51:58 2009 From: rz at linux-m68k.org (Richard Zidlicky) Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 23:51:58 +0100 Subject: problem with https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify In-Reply-To: <20091231220730.GD5857@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <20091231212453.GC18632@linux-m68k.org> <20091231213521.GC5857@alpha.rzhou.org> <20091231220102.GA19460@linux-m68k.org> <20091231220730.GD5857@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <20091231225158.GA19789@linux-m68k.org> On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 05:07:30PM -0500, Ricky Zhou wrote: > > [rz at rz rai]$ file Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > > Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM: gzip compressed data, from Unix > Is there anything between you and th eserver that could be affecting > this? Also, does this happen as well when you view it in a browser? there is the NAT firewall of my umts provider (O2-Germany). Actually one of the less intrusive providers, even allows VoIP and everything else. The browser displays the expected content in cleartext. Size 1078 bytes, quirks mode rendering, verified by equifax "site does not provide ownership information" AES-256, CN=fedoraproject.org. > Just out of curiosity, what does this file decompress to, if anything? it does decompress to the exact same as the browser displays and gpg-verify as well as sha256sum give the expected results. So I do not think O2 would be running MIM attacks, it could be something in wget-1.12-2.fc10 headers that causes a misunderstanding with the server regarding to compression? Just checked curl with the same URL and it gives the cleartext content to stdout. Wget the compressed stuff again.. Can you look into your logs for 82.113.121.184, should be firefox, curl and wget accesses. Its a NAT so you may get many more. Richard -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: