Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 13

Mohammed Safwat mail.msafwat at gmail.com
Fri Jul 10 16:38:49 UTC 2009


I have applied to websites group , but I'm still " unapproved".Is there any
other things to do I may be missing?

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 7:00 PM, <fedora-websites-list-request at redhat.com>wrote:

> Send Fedora-websites-list mailing list submissions to
>        fedora-websites-list at redhat.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        fedora-websites-list-request at redhat.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        fedora-websites-list-owner at redhat.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Fedora-websites-list digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: Websites Meeting - 2009-07-10 at 17:00 UTC (Ricky Zhou)
>   2. Re: Checksum validation instructions for Windows
>      (Hiemanshu Sharma)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 10:47:31 -0400
> From: Ricky Zhou <ricky at fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: Websites Meeting - 2009-07-10 at 17:00 UTC
> To: fedora-websites-list at redhat.com
> Message-ID: <20090710144731.GE3196 at alpha.rzhou.org>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> On 2009-07-10 10:40:46 AM, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > I can't make it this week because of a business meeting. :( I have been
> > working on a mockup/redesign for get-fedora based on user feedback but
> > it's not quite complete yet.
> Awesome!  We look forward to seeing how some of the x86_64/KDE issues
> can be solved.  I guess you can Hiemanshu can find each other on IRC to
> talk about the user gallery sometime.
>
> Thanks,
> Ricky
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 197 bytes
> Desc: not available
> Url :
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20090710/8424d282/attachment.bin
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 14:54:45 +0000
> From: Hiemanshu Sharma <hiemanshu at fedoraproject.org>
> Subject: Re: Checksum validation instructions for Windows
> To: Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com>
> Cc: webmaster at fedoraproject.org, Micha? Pecio <michal.pecio at gmail.com>
> Message-ID:
>        <5efedeb10907100754p542e2d71ye0c99c80b448fb88 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> You can link and use HashCalc. Its a trusted software and i have been
> using it for quite some while on my other computers.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hiemanshu sharma
>
> On 10/07/2009, Todd Zullinger <tmz at pobox.com> wrote:
> > Hi Michał,
> >
> > Michał Pecio wrote:
> >> There are instructions for ISO checksum validation on Windows
> >> available at
> >>
> >>
> http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html
> >>
> >> Maybe it would be a good idea to add link to Microsoft's own
> >> SHA1/MD5 calculator
> >> (
> http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyID=B3C93558-31B7-47E2-A663-7365C1686C08
> ).
> >> I've recently met a bit paranoid guy who complained on an Internet
> >> forum that he can't verify Fedora ISO checksum on his Windows system
> >> because your site doesn't provide any Windows utility for that and
> >> instead it only points to some 3rd party tools, which he doesn't
> >> trust.
> >
> > From a quick look, it doesn't appear that the MS tool can verify
> > SHA-256 checksums, which is what Fedora 11 and newer use (the burning
> > ISOs document needs to be updated, the documentation team is aware of
> > and working on that).
> >
> > It's rather unfortunate that there is such a lack of quality tools for
> > performing checksum verification available on the Windows platform.
> >
> > I can understand someone being averse to trusting a third party
> > verification tool, but at the same time, if that person is running
> > Windows they most certainly have much more to worry about. :)
> >
> > If you know of a reasonably trusted tool that can verify SHA-256
> > checksums on Windows, we'd be very interested to hear about it.
> >
> > --
> > Todd        OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp<http://www.pobox.com/%7Etmz/pgp>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > Reason obeys itself; and ignorance does whatever is dictated to it.
> >     -- Thomas Paine
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Hiemanshu Sharma.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> --
> Fedora-websites-list mailing list
> Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list
>
>
> End of Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 45, Issue 13
> ****************************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20090710/47e9f43e/attachment.htm>


More information about the Fedora-websites-list mailing list