From susmit.shannigrahi at gmail.com Sun Nov 1 09:30:51 2009 From: susmit.shannigrahi at gmail.com (Susmit) Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 15:00:51 +0530 Subject: Adding "Subscribe to Twitter" link to planet fedora. Message-ID: Hi, We now have fedora planet channels both on twitter and identica.[1][2] It would be nice if we can add two buttons/links at the homepage for subscribing to those. Thanks. [1] http://twitter.com/planetfedora [2] http://identi.ca/planetfedora/all -- Regards, Susmit. ============================================= http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/user:susmit ============================================= Sent from Calcutta, WB, India From sijis at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 2 23:02:19 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 17:02:19 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Consolidate .gitignore files In-Reply-To: <20091030154230.GB4741@inocybe.localdomain> References: <20091030154230.GB4741@inocybe.localdomain> Message-ID: <747290270911021502n257bdf5dt8ed9327476d5de15@mail.gmail.com> On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Rather than have multiple .gitignore files throughout the repository > (many of which are identical across the various sites), use one > top-level .gitignore. > --- > > Does anyone mind using a top-level .gitignore instead of individual > .gitignore files? > > Also, I was thinkig I'd push this only to master. ?We're getting close > enough to the release that it shouldn't cause us any merge grief with > the f12-beta branch, right? > > ?.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? 15 +++++++++++++++ > ?fedorahosted.org/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?7 ------- > ?fedorahosted.org/data/templates/.gitignore ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 - > ?fedorahosted.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?3 --- > ?fedorahosted.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 - > ?fedorahosted.org/httpd/run/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?1 - > ?fedoraproject.org/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?7 ------- > ?fedoraproject.org/build/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 - > ?fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore ? ? ? | ? ?1 - > ?fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?3 --- > ?fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?1 - > ?fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?1 - > ?spins.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?| ? ?7 ------- > ?spins.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore | ? ?1 - > ?spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore ? ? | ? ?3 --- > ?spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore ? ? | ? ?1 - > ?spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore ? ? ?| ? ?1 - > ?talk.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? | ? ?7 ------- > ?talk.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore ?| ? ?1 - > ?talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore ? ? ?| ? ?3 --- > ?talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore ? ? ?| ? ?1 - > ?talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore ? ? ? | ? ?1 - > ?22 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) > ?create mode 100644 .gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedorahosted.org/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedorahosted.org/data/templates/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedorahosted.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedorahosted.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedorahosted.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedoraproject.org/build/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 spins.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 spins.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 talk.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 talk.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > ?delete mode 100644 talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > > diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..d8b285f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/.gitignore > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > +*.mo > +*.pyc > +*.pyo > +*.swp > +*~ > +en.po > + > +*/build/*.cache > +*/data/templates/translations.html > +*/httpd/conf/httpd.conf > +*/httpd/conf/languages.conf > +*/httpd/conf/languages.conf.in > +*/httpd/logs/*_log > +*/httpd/run/*.pid > +*/out/* > diff --git a/fedorahosted.org/.gitignore b/fedorahosted.org/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 6d38d27..0000000 > --- a/fedorahosted.org/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ > -/out/* > -*~ > -*.swp > -*.mo > -en.po > -*.pyc > -*.pyo > diff --git a/fedorahosted.org/data/templates/.gitignore b/fedorahosted.org/data/templates/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 4e587a4..0000000 > --- a/fedorahosted.org/data/templates/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -translations.html > diff --git a/fedorahosted.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore b/fedorahosted.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 23eece0..0000000 > --- a/fedorahosted.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ > -httpd.conf > -languages.conf > -languages.conf.in > diff --git a/fedorahosted.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore b/fedorahosted.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 940728a..0000000 > --- a/fedorahosted.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*_log > diff --git a/fedorahosted.org/httpd/run/.gitignore b/fedorahosted.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 9fd4f9b..0000000 > --- a/fedorahosted.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*.pid > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/.gitignore b/fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 6d38d27..0000000 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ > -/out/* > -*~ > -*.swp > -*.mo > -en.po > -*.pyc > -*.pyo > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/build/.gitignore b/fedoraproject.org/build/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index c3ed10e..0000000 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/build/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*.cache > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore b/fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 4e587a4..0000000 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -translations.html > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore b/fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 23eece0..0000000 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ > -httpd.conf > -languages.conf > -languages.conf.in > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore b/fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 940728a..0000000 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*_log > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore b/fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 9fd4f9b..0000000 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*.pid > diff --git a/spins.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore b/spins.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 6d38d27..0000000 > --- a/spins.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ > -/out/* > -*~ > -*.swp > -*.mo > -en.po > -*.pyc > -*.pyo > diff --git a/spins.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore b/spins.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 4e587a4..0000000 > --- a/spins.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -translations.html > diff --git a/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore b/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 23eece0..0000000 > --- a/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ > -httpd.conf > -languages.conf > -languages.conf.in > diff --git a/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore b/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 940728a..0000000 > --- a/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*_log > diff --git a/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore b/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 9fd4f9b..0000000 > --- a/spins.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*.pid > diff --git a/talk.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore b/talk.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 6d38d27..0000000 > --- a/talk.fedoraproject.org/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,7 +0,0 @@ > -/out/* > -*~ > -*.swp > -*.mo > -en.po > -*.pyc > -*.pyo > diff --git a/talk.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore b/talk.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 4e587a4..0000000 > --- a/talk.fedoraproject.org/data/templates/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -translations.html > diff --git a/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore b/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 23eece0..0000000 > --- a/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1,3 +0,0 @@ > -httpd.conf > -languages.conf > -languages.conf.in > diff --git a/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore b/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 940728a..0000000 > --- a/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/logs/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*_log > diff --git a/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore b/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > deleted file mode 100644 > index 9fd4f9b..0000000 > --- a/talk.fedoraproject.org/httpd/run/.gitignore > +++ /dev/null > @@ -1 +0,0 @@ > -*.pid > -- > 1.6.5.2 > > -- > Todd ? ? ? ?OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. > ? ?-- Tacitus, Roman senator and historian (A.D. c.56-c.115) > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > I can't see any negative in doing this. I assume there will be 1 file and it will be located in the root of the fedora-web repo. Sijis From stickster at gmail.com Mon Nov 2 23:07:23 2009 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:07:23 -0500 Subject: Fedora Talk changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091102230723.GB14878@victoria.internal.frields.org> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 02:35:52PM -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > I realize the web string freeze was a few days ago, but now that we > have a whole slew of changes ready for Fedora Talk on the 'fad-ftalk' > branch of the web site, as a result of our FAD, is there any way we > can get those rolled in for use in the F12 release? Re-ping --- anyone? -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug From sijis at fedoraproject.org Tue Nov 3 19:51:50 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 13:51:50 -0600 Subject: Fedora Talk changes In-Reply-To: <20091102230723.GB14878@victoria.internal.frields.org> References: <20091102230723.GB14878@victoria.internal.frields.org> Message-ID: <747290270911031151v6f341c08y62b8c65b529f4919@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 02:35:52PM -0400, Paul Frields wrote: >> I realize the web string freeze was a few days ago, but now that we >> have a whole slew of changes ready for Fedora Talk on the 'fad-ftalk' >> branch of the web site, as a result of our FAD, is there any way we >> can get those rolled in for use in the F12 release? > > Re-ping --- anyone? > > -- > Paul W. Frields ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://paul.frields.org/ > ?gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 ?5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 > ?http://redhat.com/ ? - ?- ?- ?- ? http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ > ?irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug > I would suggest merging your branch with master. I haven't seen any translations for talk.fp.o in a while, so i don't see a concern for merging it. I looked at https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/fedora-web/ and then checked talk and only 4 languages are complete. Anyone have an objection with merging fad-ftalk branch with master for talk.fp.o? Sijis From stickster at gmail.com Tue Nov 3 20:05:38 2009 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul W. Frields) Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 15:05:38 -0500 Subject: Fedora Talk changes In-Reply-To: <747290270911031151v6f341c08y62b8c65b529f4919@mail.gmail.com> References: <20091102230723.GB14878@victoria.internal.frields.org> <747290270911031151v6f341c08y62b8c65b529f4919@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091103200538.GU20139@victoria.internal.frields.org> On Tue, Nov 03, 2009 at 01:51:50PM -0600, Sijis Aviles wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 02:35:52PM -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > >> I realize the web string freeze was a few days ago, but now that we > >> have a whole slew of changes ready for Fedora Talk on the 'fad-ftalk' > >> branch of the web site, as a result of our FAD, is there any way we > >> can get those rolled in for use in the F12 release? > > > > Re-ping --- anyone? > > > I would suggest merging your branch with master. > I haven't seen any translations for talk.fp.o in a while, so i don't > see a concern for merging it. > I looked at https://translate.fedoraproject.org/projects/fedora-web/ > and then checked talk and only 4 languages are complete. > > Anyone have an objection with merging fad-ftalk branch with master for > talk.fp.o? Let's play it this way -- if we get dead silence by tomorrow morning I'll take that as a sign that it's OK to merge. -- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ irc.freenode.net: stickster @ #fedora-docs, #fedora-devel, #fredlug From sijis at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 4 20:52:50 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:52:50 -0600 Subject: HTML/CSS status for web redesign In-Reply-To: <747290270910272050t39912ad6mec176c7bbbdff3fc@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090930185320.GA17146@localhost.localdomain> <5efedeb10909301209s7bcf663fn37d5d1bea51d4f43@mail.gmail.com> <20091001124021.GE17320@localhost.localdomain> <5efedeb10910031031y30e8c10cx927131de9e734223@mail.gmail.com> <4AC78E8A.9050507@gmail.com> <747290270910132158r6ec9a2a8v87b4bc5c6c8a37ef@mail.gmail.com> <747290270910272050t39912ad6mec176c7bbbdff3fc@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <747290270911041252sf1caf17j4738af563343c80b@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:50 PM, Sijis Aviles wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is a quick progress on what's going on with the spins redesign. > > > Completed > ============================ > > Design > ====== > - complete right side column > ?+ updating fonts > > - update css to include correct font > > - complete header > ?+ replace text (support, about, directory) with images > > - clean up and complete images > ?+ check transparency > > > > Tasks left to do: > =========================== > > Design > ====== > - complete header > ?+ create rounded corners (working on next) > > - clean up and complete images > ?+ images are not correct color > ?+ create missing images for each spin header, etc <-- mizmo working on this > > Content > ======= > - update links to correct locations > > - create content for spins > ?+ spins content can be found here: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Website_redesign_2009/Mockups/Spins.fpo#Spins_Content > > - content changed to make translatable eg: ${_('Text')} (working on next) > > Testing > ======= > - verify site works with other OSes / browsers > ?+ partially tested with IE 7/8 on Windows XP > > Other > ======= > - creating torrent stats (skvidal working on it) > Hi all, We are getting closer to completing this. We need help with the following tasks below, especially with updating each spins' content. Tasks left to do: ================== Content ======= - update links to correct locations (work in progress) - create content for spins + content here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Website_redesign_2009/Mockups/Spins.fpo#Spins_Content Testing ======= - verify site works with other OSes / browsers + partially tested with IE 7/8 on Windows XP Sijis From sijis at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 4 20:58:03 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:58:03 -0600 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1774: Fedora Wiki's stylesheet is screwey on small screen high DPI devices In-Reply-To: References: <062.9e6aa87f3595b07e17c625cbcef7e871@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <747290270911041258s20d26bfewf8ac14f98b415e3a@mail.gmail.com> A thought would be to make the mobile device use the wiki's print stylesheet. It would be quite vanilla and primarily just text but it should be usable for a mobile user. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:46 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > So I personally have no idea how to fix this with style sheets but I'm > pretty sure that's how it gets fixed. ?Ian had mentioned something in > fedora-admin but I'm not sure if any among us has any experience with > making mobile style sheets. > > Anyone out there? > > - ? ? ? Mike > > On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Fedora Infrastructure wrote: > >> #1774: Fedora Wiki's stylesheet is screwey on small screen high DPI devices >> ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ >> ?Reporter: ?ynemoy ? | ? ? ? Owner: ?webmaster >> ? ? ?Type: ?bug ? ? ?| ? ? ?Status: ?new >> ?Priority: ?major ? ?| ? Milestone: >> Component: ?General ?| ? ? Version: >> ?Severity: ?Normal ? | ? ?Keywords: >> ---------------------+------------------------------------------------------ >> ?= phenomenon = >> >> ?Multiple issues here: Tables go beyond the page but the page isn't told >> ?about being wider than the screen, so horizontal scrolling is not >> ?possible. Embedded pictures and headers aren't formatted properly so text >> ?can flow around it, even in extreme situations. The sidebar takes up too >> ?much space at high DPIs leaving only half the page for the body. >> >> ?In the above order: >> ?http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/wikixofail/IMAG0016.jpg >> ?http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/wikixofail/IMAG0018.jpg >> >> ?http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/wikixofail/IMAG0013.jpg >> >> ?http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/wikixofail/IMAG0014.jpg >> ?http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/wikixofail/IMAG0015.jpg >> >> ?Resizing the text and page zoom fixes some problems, but my opinion is >> ?that this is non obvious to many people. >> >> ?http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/wikixofail/IMAG0017.jpg >> >> ?= reason = >> >> ?I'm not much of a CSS guy, but i have a few ideas. First of all, the >> ?sidebar is strictly set to a hard size in relation to the rest of the >> ?page. Second of all, horizontal scrolling is (and rightly so) disabled at >> ?all costs. Third of all, something is not set properly when formatting >> ?embedded inline pictures, so that the sidebar can wrap around it, or so >> ?that it's left justified instead of right justified so it runs off the >> ?page rather than running into the sidebar. >> >> ?= recommendation = >> >> ?Wikipedia has a pretty decent mobile interface that works very nicely on >> ?the Android devices, and presumably on others as well. It avoids using a >> ?sidebar and TOC by replacing it with expandable fields. I think that at >> ?least having that stylesheet available would be a start. The tricky part >> ?is detecting the actual dimensions *and* DPI of a screen and switching to >> ?the appropriate stylesheet. In this particular example, the screenshots >> ?were taken on an XO using mostly stock settings and Firefox. >> >> ?Another and more costly and time consuming solution is to redesign the >> ?page more comprehensively so that it is a general purpose page for both >> ?mobile, small screen, and normal devices. >> >> -- >> Ticket URL: >> Fedora Infrastructure >> Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. >> >> -- >> Fedora-websites-list mailing list >> Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list >> > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > From poelstra at redhat.com Wed Nov 4 22:21:15 2009 From: poelstra at redhat.com (John Poelstra) Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 14:21:15 -0800 Subject: Fedora Talk changes In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4AF1FE5B.1060706@redhat.com> Paul Frields said the following on 10/31/2009 11:35 AM Pacific Time: > I realize the web string freeze was a few days ago, but now that we > have a whole slew of changes ready for Fedora Talk on the 'fad-ftalk' > branch of the web site, as a result of our FAD, is there any way we > can get those rolled in for use in the F12 release? > > Paul > Yes, this would be highly desirable! John From shane at bodhost.com Fri Nov 6 22:04:49 2009 From: shane at bodhost.com (Shane - BODHost.com) Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2009 03:34:49 +0530 Subject: BODHost : Possible Partnership with FedoraCore Project Message-ID: <4AF49D81.505@bodhost.com> Hello Webmaster, Hope you are doing well! We are looking forward for possible partnership or sponsorship with FedoraCore Project and would like to know if there are any opportunities where we could partner with FedoraCore. Please do let us know. Regards, Shane Phillips Chief Operating Officer http://www.bodhost.com/ Email: shane at bodhost.com Ph. : +1.866-662-0909 From gauravmittal.skit at gmail.com Sun Nov 8 00:30:34 2009 From: gauravmittal.skit at gmail.com (Gaurav Mittal) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:30:34 -0800 Subject: About Fedora Server Edition Message-ID: <8567f64f0911071630w4615432eneffa967ce42792da@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I am Gaurav Mittal. I am software engineer. Still now I am doing MS in System Security in North America. I need your help. Actually I want to configure my laptop as a server to do my project. If I will successful in this project then it surely helps opensource community. So, for working in this project I need your Fedora Server Edition CD or DVD (32 bit) in which I'll get all server configuration rpm files. If you can then please send me a copy of CD or DVD at the below address. Eagerly waiting your reply. Thank you, -- With Warm Regards Gaurav Mittal 133 Hopkins Ave, Apartment Number - 4, Jersey City, NJ (07306) Ph. No. - 201-737-3056 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From onekopaka at gmail.com Sun Nov 8 04:15:09 2009 From: onekopaka at gmail.com (Darren VanBuren) Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 20:15:09 -0800 Subject: About Fedora Server Edition In-Reply-To: <407b25020911072012q78033051t1a2be4402e6b24a3@mail.gmail.com> References: <8567f64f0911071630w4615432eneffa967ce42792da@mail.gmail.com> <407b25020911072012q78033051t1a2be4402e6b24a3@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <407b25020911072015q15e1965drcea911521866317f@mail.gmail.com> I'm bad about not hitting reply all. Darren L. VanBuren ===================== http://theoks.net/ On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 20:12, Darren VanBuren wrote: > You can request a free CD set or DVD from the freemedia program (act > quickly before the form closes). > > https://fedoraproject.org/freemedia/FreeMedia-form.html > > > Darren L. VanBuren > ===================== > http://theoks.net/ > > > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2009 at 16:30, Gaurav Mittal wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I am Gaurav Mittal. I am software engineer. Still now I am doing MS in >> System Security in North America. I need your help. Actually I want to >> configure my laptop as a server to do my project. If I will successful in >> this project then it surely helps opensource community. So, for working in >> this project I need your Fedora Server Edition CD or DVD (32 bit) in which >> I'll get all server configuration rpm files. If you can then please send me >> a copy of CD or DVD at the below address. >> Eagerly waiting your reply. >> Thank you, >> >> -- >> With Warm Regards >> >> Gaurav Mittal >> 133 Hopkins Ave, Apartment Number - 4, >> Jersey City, NJ (07306) >> Ph. No. - 201-737-3056 >> -- >> Fedora-websites-list mailing list >> Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list >> >> > From mmcgrath at redhat.com Tue Nov 10 22:11:07 2009 From: mmcgrath at redhat.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:11:07 -0600 (CST) Subject: PEER 1 Link (fwd) Message-ID: Could someone update the website with their new logo below? -Mike ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:44:57 From: Robert Flynn To: mmcgrath at redhat.com, admin at fedoraproject.org Subject: PEER 1 Link Hello, ? I would like to take a quick moment to introduce myself as your Account Manager here at ServerBeach. ? If you have any questions regarding your account please feel free to call me directly. ? I attempted to give you a call to introduce myself today but the number on file is not accepting calls and does not ring to a voicemail.? Do you have any alternative number where I can give you a call in the future? ? ? Regarding the PEER 1 link located here; ? http://fedoraproject.org/sponsors ? We have a new logo and ask if you would kindly change the current badge on your site to the ?Hosting By PEER 1? badge located here: ? http://www.peer1.com/resources/badges.php ? ? ? Thanks again and I look forward to speaking with you. ? ? Regards, Robert Flynn Account Manager 1 (800) 741-9939 Option 2 Direct 1 (210) 798-4404 Fax 1 (210) 579-1527 Rflynn at ServerBeach.com ? sb_logo_2009_signature.jpg ? PEER1_logo_2009_signature.jpg ? www.serverbeach.com Blog: serverbeach.wordpress.com UNDISCLAIMER: We mean everything we write in our emails ?- that?s just part of Getting IT? ? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image001.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 3726 bytes Desc: URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: image002.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 3234 bytes Desc: URL: From tmz at pobox.com Wed Nov 11 00:06:25 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:06:25 -0500 Subject: PEER 1 Link (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091111000625.GN31109@inocybe.localdomain> Mike McGrath wrote: > Could someone update the website with their new logo below? Is it alright to just update this on the master branch, which will go live with the F-12 release next Tuesday? Or is it important enough to make the change on the f12-beta branch as well so that it goes live now? (I've got the change locally, just wondering before I push.) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Man has made use of his intelligence, he invented stupidity. -- Remy De Gourmant -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mmcgrath at redhat.com Wed Nov 11 00:57:38 2009 From: mmcgrath at redhat.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:57:38 -0600 (CST) Subject: PEER 1 Link (fwd) In-Reply-To: <20091111000625.GN31109@inocybe.localdomain> References: <20091111000625.GN31109@inocybe.localdomain> Message-ID: On Tue, 10 Nov 2009, Todd Zullinger wrote: > Mike McGrath wrote: > > Could someone update the website with their new logo below? > > Is it alright to just update this on the master branch, which will go > live with the F-12 release next Tuesday? Or is it important enough to > make the change on the f12-beta branch as well so that it goes live > now? > > (I've got the change locally, just wondering before I push.) > I'd prefer to push it sooner then later mostly because Peer 1 is an excellent sponsor to us. -Mike From tmz at pobox.com Wed Nov 11 00:59:55 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:59:55 -0500 Subject: PEER 1 Link (fwd) In-Reply-To: References: <20091111000625.GN31109@inocybe.localdomain> Message-ID: <20091111005955.GO31109@inocybe.localdomain> Mike McGrath wrote: > I'd prefer to push it sooner then later mostly because Peer 1 is an > excellent sponsor to us. Nigel said the same, and I've pushed the change to both master and f12-beta branches. So it should be live sometime soon I believe. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose I were a member of Congress, and suppose I were an idiot. But, I repeat myself. -- Mark Twain -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From kerry at wsr.com Wed Nov 11 10:09:17 2009 From: kerry at wsr.com (richard) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:09:17 -0700 Subject: broken link on home page Message-ID: <4AFA8D4D.4050909@wsr.com> Hello, On the Fedora Home Page (http://fedoraproject.org/index.html) there is a link to the release notes. What's new in Fedora 11? Read the release notes. >> where is this supposed to take me? I assume it is supposed to go to *http://docs.fedoraproject.org/* but it does not, it takes me to a blank page. Richard. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 12 04:28:50 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2009 23:28:50 -0500 Subject: broken link on home page In-Reply-To: <4AFA8D4D.4050909@wsr.com> References: <4AFA8D4D.4050909@wsr.com> Message-ID: <20091112042850.GH16826@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-11 03:09:17 AM, richard wrote: > On the Fedora Home Page (http://fedoraproject.org/index.html) there is a link > to the release notes. > What's new in Fedora 11? Read the release notes. >> > where is this supposed to take me? > I assume it is supposed to go to http://docs.fedoraproject.org/ but it does > not, it takes me to a blank page. Thanks a lot for the report! The documentation team has added a redirect to the correct page now, so the release notes link should work. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bbbush.yuan at gmail.com Sat Nov 14 03:51:31 2009 From: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com (Yuan Yijun) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:51:31 +0800 Subject: Fwd: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) In-Reply-To: <0016e648ae92ea584104784ca0b8@google.com> References: <76e72f800911131946l266bbc67i52b6c8b2916f453c@mail.gmail.com> <0016e648ae92ea584104784ca0b8@google.com> Message-ID: <76e72f800911131951ieb6b6e7g41f42167ebad201b@mail.gmail.com> Hi, Anybody please take after this: email cannot be sent to this guy, however he just re-activated his account yesterday. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/lood lood.rooliza at gmail.com Thanks! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Mail Delivery Subsystem Date: 2009/11/14 Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) To: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: ? ? lood at fedoraproject.org Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the recipient domain. We recommend contacting the other email provider for further information about the cause of this error. The error that the other server returned was: 550 550 5.1.1 ... : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table (state 17). ----- Original message ----- MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: bbbush.yuan at gmail.com Received: by 10.114.7.25 with SMTP id 25mr1928160wag.21.1258170418117; Fri, 13 ? ? ? ?Nov 2009 19:46:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Yuan Yijun Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 11:46:38 +0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: e09b63373a3f308d Message-ID: <76e72f800911131946l266bbc67i52b6c8b2916f453c at mail.gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: xielingyun_ambassador To: Joerg Simon Cc: xie yunpeng , lood at fedoraproject.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Joerg Here we have 2 contributors are applying for the ambassador group membership, their FAS accounts are "xielingyun" and "look" respectively. Sincerely speaking, I don't know what is the "next step" after they pressed the "join" button in FAS -- will you receive the request and answer them with a welcome email, telling them what to do, and create the ticket on trac? Thanks! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: xie yunpeng Date: 2009/11/14 Subject: xielingyun_ambassador To: bbbush at fedoraproject.org yuan: ?????? Hi.i want to be the fedora ambassador,i have done all the steps except this one.my wiki page is below: ?????? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Xielingyun ?????? i am the moderator of bbs.fedora-zh.org,and my nick name in #fedora-zh is xielingyun. ????? good luck xie -- bbbush ^_^ -- bbbush ^_^ From mangelisanti at acsp-computers.com Sat Nov 14 00:26:12 2009 From: mangelisanti at acsp-computers.com (Mark A. Angelisanti) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:26:12 -0500 Subject: (no subject) Message-ID: <1258158372.2704.6.camel@ACSP-Mobile> I was wondering if you could modify the listing that I have copied below. I have been re-designing my website. The new online Linux media store is www.acsp-computers.com/store USA - acsp-computers.com, Fedora Media Mark A. Angelisanti Owner/IT Service Technician Phone #: (610) 301-9187 Website: www.acsp-computers.com For Technical Support: support at acsp-computers.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: aplus_it_tech.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 39351 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: New Logo1.png Type: image/png Size: 98953 bytes Desc: not available URL: From manikanta420 at gmail.com Sat Nov 14 01:47:58 2009 From: manikanta420 at gmail.com (mani kanta) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 07:17:58 +0530 Subject: Request Fedora CD(or)DVD Message-ID: <7933034d0911131747o735d9308qe58c63a295b2674b@mail.gmail.com> Respected Sir, I am Student in "Andhra Loyola College" in "Vijayawada" at "Andhra Pradesh" of "India" .My name is "Kurakula Bala Manikanta".My Family is very poor to buy Linux CD (or) DVD, My friends told to me, request to Fedora organisation, they Send to You Free CD (or) DVD.So please,kindly Send Reply to my Request.I hope accepting my request. yours obediently, K.B.Manikanta. Address : Kurakula Alluraya, s/o:kurakula Bala manikanta, Do/no:-20-6/7-223/5, Ramalingeswara pet,7th lane, Ayodhyanagar,Near Lotus Landmark, Vijayawada,Krishana Dist.,A.P,India. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gsieranski at yahoo.com Sat Nov 14 03:20:51 2009 From: gsieranski at yahoo.com (Gregory Sieranski) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 19:20:51 -0800 (PST) Subject: Help with password Message-ID: <921575.4491.qm@web112802.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> I forgot my password for my Fedora account username gsieranski. The email that I believe I registered the account name with is no longer in use. What do I need to provide in order to be able to reset my password and have my email address changed? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mmcgrath at redhat.com Sun Nov 15 02:57:07 2009 From: mmcgrath at redhat.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:57:07 -0600 (CST) Subject: Help with password In-Reply-To: <921575.4491.qm@web112802.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <921575.4491.qm@web112802.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Do you have any way to access the old account or can even tell me what it was? If not let me know and there are a couple of alternatives we can do. -Mike On Fri, 13 Nov 2009, Gregory Sieranski wrote: > I forgot my password for my Fedora account username gsieranski. The email that I believe I registered the account name > with is no longer in use. What do I need to provide in order to be able to reset my password and have my email address > changed? > > From kumar.anoj1.itm at gmail.com Sun Nov 15 05:11:27 2009 From: kumar.anoj1.itm at gmail.com (anoj kumar) Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 10:41:27 +0530 Subject: Request Fedora CD(or)DVD In-Reply-To: <7933034d0911131747o735d9308qe58c63a295b2674b@mail.gmail.com> References: <7933034d0911131747o735d9308qe58c63a295b2674b@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <33da94140911142111l44a28888y729d097e22af20f8@mail.gmail.com> On 11/14/09, mani kanta wrote: > Respected Sir, > I am Student in "Andhra Loyola College" in > "Vijayawada" at "Andhra Pradesh" of "India" .My name is "Kurakula Bala > Manikanta".My Family is very poor to buy Linux CD (or) DVD, > > My friends told to me, request to Fedora > organisation, they Send to You Free CD (or) DVD.So please,kindly Send Reply > to my Request.I hope accepting my request. > > > > > yours obediently, > > > K.B.Manikanta. > Address : > Kurakula Alluraya, > s/o:kurakula Bala manikanta, > Do/no:-20-6/7-223/5, > Ramalingeswara pet,7th lane, > Ayodhyanagar,Near Lotus Landmark, > Vijayawada,Krishana Dist.,A.P,India. > From swiss.delicious at gmail.com Tue Nov 17 14:27:14 2009 From: swiss.delicious at gmail.com (swiss delicious) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:27:14 +0100 Subject: donation and link Message-ID: <4b02b2cd.0707d00a.4175.2708@mx.google.com> Hi, i like to donate 1500 USD. Is it possible to get a Link in footer of http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ for my torrent search engine zoozle.org for that? Regards, Tom -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From joen40 at hotmail.com Tue Nov 17 15:41:09 2009 From: joen40 at hotmail.com (JoeJoe N) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:41:09 -0500 Subject: Permission error try downloading Message-ID: Forbidden You don't have permission to access /pub/linux/fedora/linux/releases/12/Live/i686/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso on this server. Apache Server at fedora.fastsoft.net Port 80 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From wacrex at live.com Tue Nov 17 15:59:10 2009 From: wacrex at live.com (WaCrex Unknown) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:59:10 +0000 Subject: ISO Download - 403 Forbidden Message-ID: The download link for Fedora 12 on PowerPC is giving me a 403 Forbidden.. the file seems to have wrong permissions, so what the webserver can't access it properly. Forbidden You don't have permission to access /fedora/releases/12/Fedora/ppc/iso/Fedora-12-ppc-DVD.iso on this server. _________________________________________________________________ Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. http://www.bing.com/search?q=restaurants&form=MFESRP&publ=WLHMTAG&crea=TEXT_MFESRP_Local_MapsMenu_Resturants_1x1 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stuart.green at niab.com Tue Nov 17 16:02:39 2009 From: stuart.green at niab.com (Stuart Green) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 16:02:39 -0000 Subject: Checksum link problem Message-ID: The links for the latest checksums aren't working on this page: https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify Cheers, Stuart _____________________________________________________________________ This e-mail has been scanned for viruses by Verizon Business Internet Managed Scanning Services - powered by MessageLabs. For further information visit http://www.verizonbusiness.com/uk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bnorman at lanl.gov Tue Nov 17 17:36:24 2009 From: bnorman at lanl.gov (Ben Norman) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 10:36:24 -0700 Subject: Checksum links bad Message-ID: <4B02DF18.7020105@lanl.gov> Hi, Just an FYI, these links (on https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify) to checksum files take me to the error page (Sorry! We couldn't find that file): https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM -Ben From rbshanks at wisc.edu Tue Nov 17 17:57:04 2009 From: rbshanks at wisc.edu (Robert Shanks) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 11:57:04 -0600 Subject: Bad link to Fedora 12 checksums Message-ID: <003e01ca67af$5f612460$1e236d20$@edu> The link to the Fedora 12 checksum files is bad. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From james at xmas.demon.co.uk Tue Nov 17 17:58:41 2009 From: james at xmas.demon.co.uk (James Bridge) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:58:41 +0000 Subject: no checksums for f12 Message-ID: <1258480726.2613.0.camel@xmas.demon.co.uk> https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM doesn't work! -- James Bridge From andrew at paws4thought.demon.co.uk Tue Nov 17 18:01:56 2009 From: andrew at paws4thought.demon.co.uk (Andrew) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 18:01:56 +0000 Subject: fedora 12 ISO checksums page not found Message-ID: <1258480916.2398.4.camel@hp9b8225.lan> page: https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM linked behind the text [Upgrade to Fedora 12 from an older version: ]"Verify your download" in the page http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora displays a message: "Sorry! We couldn't find that file We apologize, but the file you requested could not be found. * Double-check the URL if you entered it manually. Did you copy it correctly? * ..." hope this helps, Mike Emmott From tmz at pobox.com Tue Nov 17 20:34:18 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:34:18 -0500 Subject: Checksum link problem In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091117203418.GO4509@inocybe.localdomain> Stuart Green wrote: > The links for the latest checksums aren't working on this page: > > https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify This has been fixed. Thanks for reporting it. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When governments fear the people there is liberty. When the people fear the government there is tyranny. -- Thomas Jefferson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Tue Nov 17 20:34:38 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:34:38 -0500 Subject: Checksum links bad In-Reply-To: <4B02DF18.7020105@lanl.gov> References: <4B02DF18.7020105@lanl.gov> Message-ID: <20091117203438.GP4509@inocybe.localdomain> Ben Norman wrote: > Just an FYI, these links (on https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify) to > checksum files take me to the error page (Sorry! We couldn't find > that file): > > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM This has been fixed. Thanks for reporting it. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Before I criticize a man, I walk a mile in his shoes. That way, if he gets angry, he's a mile away and barefoot. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Tue Nov 17 20:34:53 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:34:53 -0500 Subject: Bad link to Fedora 12 checksums In-Reply-To: <003e01ca67af$5f612460$1e236d20$@edu> References: <003e01ca67af$5f612460$1e236d20$@edu> Message-ID: <20091117203453.GQ4509@inocybe.localdomain> Robert Shanks wrote: > The link to the Fedora 12 checksum files is bad. This has been fixed. Thanks for reporting it. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Every actual state is corrupt. Good men must not obey the laws too well. -- Ralph Waldo Emerson -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Tue Nov 17 20:35:12 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:35:12 -0500 Subject: no checksums for f12 In-Reply-To: <1258480726.2613.0.camel@xmas.demon.co.uk> References: <1258480726.2613.0.camel@xmas.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20091117203511.GR4509@inocybe.localdomain> James Bridge wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM > doesn't work! This has been fixed. Thanks for reporting it. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Damn you, broccoli! -- Stewie Griffin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Tue Nov 17 20:35:46 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:35:46 -0500 Subject: fedora 12 ISO checksums page not found In-Reply-To: <1258480916.2398.4.camel@hp9b8225.lan> References: <1258480916.2398.4.camel@hp9b8225.lan> Message-ID: <20091117203546.GS4509@inocybe.localdomain> Andrew wrote: > page: > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > > linked behind the text > > [Upgrade to Fedora 12 from an older version: ]"Verify your download" in > the page > > http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora > > displays a message: > > "Sorry! We couldn't find that file > We apologize, but the file you requested could not be found. > > * Double-check the URL if you entered it manually. Did you copy it > correctly? > * ..." > > hope this helps, This has been fixed. Thanks for reporting it. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Until you spread your wings, you'll have no idea how far you can walk. -- Demotivators (www.despair.com) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From aquaglow at gmail.com Tue Nov 17 21:52:21 2009 From: aquaglow at gmail.com (aquaglow at gmail.com) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:52:21 +0000 Subject: Wrong type of checksum listed in the checksum file Message-ID: In the file Fedora-12-i686-Live-CHECKSUM (linked on https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify), it lists the Hash as being SHA1. Yet carrying out a "shasum -a 1" on the .iso gave me a checksum which looked too short. When I performed the checksum using SHA256 instead, it gave the correct value. Possibly the same mistake is in the other checksum files. From tmz at pobox.com Tue Nov 17 22:05:59 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 17:05:59 -0500 Subject: Wrong type of checksum listed in the checksum file In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091117220559.GT4509@inocybe.localdomain> aquaglow at gmail.com wrote: > In the file Fedora-12-i686-Live-CHECKSUM (linked on > https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify), it lists the Hash as being SHA1. > Yet carrying out a "shasum -a 1" on the .iso gave me a checksum which > looked too short. When I performed the checksum using SHA256 instead, > it gave the correct value. > > Possibly the same mistake is in the other checksum files. This is not a mistake. The 'Hash: SHA1' line is part of the GPG signature. It has nothing to do with the type of checksum used in the *-CHECKSUM files. Many people mistakenly assume that it does, unfortunately. Perhaps we need to make that clear on the /verify page so folks don't make the flawed assumption that these things are related? If you follow the documentation on https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify all is well, as the page explicitly states that the sha256sum command is what should be used. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I personally think we developed language because of our deep need to complain. -- Lily Tomlin -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From fadnix at gmail.com Wed Nov 18 01:19:02 2009 From: fadnix at gmail.com (FAD Linux) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:19:02 -0500 Subject: F12 checksum is sha256 not sha1 Message-ID: <4f7883650911171719n791d10d1webe74c62f0112194@mail.gmail.com> Hi, I just want to mention that the checksum file has the type of hash as SHA1 while it is actually SHA256. https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM ---------------------- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 f0ad929cd259957e160ea442eb80986b5f01daaffdbcc7e5a1840a666c4447c7 *Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso 2f548ce50c459a0270e85a7d63b23.......... ---------------------- Regards, Fahad -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Wed Nov 18 01:36:17 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:36:17 -0500 Subject: F12 checksum is sha256 not sha1 In-Reply-To: <4f7883650911171719n791d10d1webe74c62f0112194@mail.gmail.com> References: <4f7883650911171719n791d10d1webe74c62f0112194@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091118013617.GU4509@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Fahad, FAD Linux wrote: > I just want to mention that the checksum file has the type of hash > as SHA1 while it is actually SHA256. > > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > ---------------------- > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 The 'Hash: SHA1' line is part of the GPG signature. It has nothing to do with the type of checksum used in the *-CHECKSUM files. Many people mistakenly assume that it does, unfortunately. Perhaps we need to make that clear on the /verify page so folks don't make the flawed assumption that these things are related? If you follow the documentation on https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify all is well, as the page explicitly states that the sha256sum command is what should be used -- and those instructions are correct. Thanks for checking though. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The problem with politics isn't the money; it's the power. -- Harry Browne -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From mmcgrath at redhat.com Wed Nov 18 02:30:05 2009 From: mmcgrath at redhat.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:30:05 -0600 (CST) Subject: Fedora 12 live cd sha sum In-Reply-To: <99d6451f0911171635j33555923l755c6ddea5e7f217@mail.gmail.com> References: <99d6451f0911171635j33555923l755c6ddea5e7f217@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Forwarding to the web team. -Mike On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Cameron Cross wrote: > i downloaded the torrent for fedora 12 live cd and the sha sum thing is labeled as sha1 when it is actually sha256. That > could confuse people > > eg. > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001? Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > sha256sum ./Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso > 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001? > /home/cameron/Download/Fedora-12-i686-Live/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso > > sha1sum ./Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso > daf4b3ea2322dfee9a473099557ac9ed7c6d3159? /home/cameron/Download/Fedora-12-i686-Live/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso > > > > > > From Cameron Cross > > From tmz at pobox.com Wed Nov 18 02:40:04 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:40:04 -0500 Subject: Fedora 12 live cd sha sum In-Reply-To: References: <99d6451f0911171635j33555923l755c6ddea5e7f217@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091118024004.GV4509@inocybe.localdomain> > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009, Cameron Cross wrote: > >> i downloaded the torrent for fedora 12 live cd and the sha sum >> thing is labeled as sha1 when it is actually sha256. That could >> confuse people >> >> eg. >> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001? Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> sha256sum ./Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso >> 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001? >> /home/cameron/Download/Fedora-12-i686-Live/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso >> >> sha1sum ./Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso >> daf4b3ea2322dfee9a473099557ac9ed7c6d3159? /home/cameron/Download/Fedora-12-i686-Live/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso This is a common misconception. The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used. We're discussing ways to make this clearer in future releases so that folks don't mistake the PGP Hash header as the hash used for the .iso images. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It is easier to destroy an atomic nucleus than a prejudice. -- Albert Einstein (1879-1955) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From opensource at till.name Wed Nov 18 11:49:11 2009 From: opensource at till.name (Till Maas) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:49:11 +0100 Subject: F12 checksum is sha256 not sha1 In-Reply-To: <20091118013617.GU4509@inocybe.localdomain> References: <4f7883650911171719n791d10d1webe74c62f0112194@mail.gmail.com> <20091118013617.GU4509@inocybe.localdomain> Message-ID: <20091118114911.GA4598@genius.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 08:36:17PM -0500, Todd Zullinger wrote: > people mistakenly assume that it does, unfortunately. Perhaps we need > to make that clear on the /verify page so folks don't make the flawed > assumption that these things are related? It would also help to add an explanation about how to use the *-CHECKSUM files within the checksum file, e.g. above the list of sha256 checksums. Btw. for F11 there was also SHA256 used to gpg sign the files, but I do not know, why this was changed back to SHA1. I reopened a bug report about it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493126 Regards Till -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 835 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Wed Nov 18 13:18:37 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:18:37 -0500 Subject: F12 checksum is sha256 not sha1 In-Reply-To: <20091118114911.GA4598@genius.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> References: <4f7883650911171719n791d10d1webe74c62f0112194@mail.gmail.com> <20091118013617.GU4509@inocybe.localdomain> <20091118114911.GA4598@genius.kawo2.rwth-aachen.de> Message-ID: <20091118131837.GX4509@inocybe.localdomain> Till Maas wrote: > It would also help to add an explanation about how to use the > *-CHECKSUM files within the checksum file, e.g. above the list of > sha256 checksums. Agreed. I asked Jesse Keating about this yesterday and he said he had a ticket opened to do so. > Btw. for F11 there was also SHA256 used to gpg sign the files, but I > do not know, why this was changed back to SHA1. I reopened a bug > report about it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=493126 This has to do with moving to sigul. Apparently it's a pain to use gpg config files with sigul, and that's the only way to set the sha256 preference (at least, gpgme and therefore pygpgme cannot do this without a config file). It is interesting to find just how many people conflate the PGP Hash header with the checksum used for the data in the *CHECKSUM files. Clearly, far too few people know much about PGP. :( -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Liberty is always dangerous, but it is the safest thing we have. -- Harry Emerson Fosdick -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From richard.taylor at consultant.com Tue Nov 17 22:37:40 2009 From: richard.taylor at consultant.com (Richard Taylor) Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:37:40 -0000 Subject: Error on download instructions Message-ID: <8673C5A12D62473B933DD873AD10BD9B@RichardPC> Hello, If I have sent this to the wrong group, please will you forward it. I have recently downloaded a copy of Fedora 11 using a Windows PC (I know - go wash my mouth out) and I hit a problem when I tried to follow the instructions for verifying the download. The instructions were on the following page: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html In the instructions, it states that the SHA-1 algorithm should be used. At least for the DVD iso image I downloaded, this was wrong. The correct algorithm was SHA-256. When I selected the correct algorithm it confirmed that my download was valid. However, I wasted about 20 minutes computing the wrong algorithm and then checking to see what the problem was. This error should probably be corrected so that other people do not experience the same issue. Regards, Richard Taylor -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From apermuy at foremga.ccoo.es Wed Nov 18 08:44:13 2009 From: apermuy at foremga.ccoo.es (Alberto Permuy Leal) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:44:13 +0100 Subject: Broken Link Message-ID: <4B03B3DD.9010005@foremga.ccoo.es> Hi guys! Browsing the site http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora and I've found a broken link in spanish version: 3.5GB, formato ISO, 1 imagen de disco DVD para PC Intel-compatibles (32 bits) | *?C?mo uso este archivo? Target: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/f12/en-US/html/sn-making-media.html *Bye! * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: screen.png Type: image/png Size: 144876 bytes Desc: not available URL: From anoopok at in.com Wed Nov 18 10:02:46 2009 From: anoopok at in.com (anoop ok) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:32:46 +0530 Subject: Get Fedora 12 Desktop Edition Now Message-ID: <1258538566.980a875ff6ef9c2d75e74307cbf5d205@mail.in.com> sir, There is some problem with this link http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/12/Live/i686/Fedora12i686Live.isoDear webmaster! Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Wed Nov 18 13:25:20 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 08:25:20 -0500 Subject: Error on download instructions In-Reply-To: <8673C5A12D62473B933DD873AD10BD9B@RichardPC> References: <8673C5A12D62473B933DD873AD10BD9B@RichardPC> Message-ID: <20091118132520.GY4509@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Richard, Richard Taylor wrote: > I have recently downloaded a copy of Fedora 11 using a Windows PC (I > know - go wash my mouth out) and I hit a problem when I tried to > follow the instructions for verifying the download. > > The instructions were on the following page: > > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html > > In the instructions, it states that the SHA-1 algorithm should be > used. At least for the DVD iso image I downloaded, this was wrong. > The correct algorithm was SHA-256. > > When I selected the correct algorithm it confirmed that my download > was valid. However, I wasted about 20 minutes computing the wrong > algorithm and then checking to see what the problem was. > > This error should probably be corrected so that other people do not > experience the same issue. We're sorry you ran into this. We plan to update the information for verifying the downloads on Windows soon. The hold up has been that there were not many tools available for Windows that could verify SHA256 checksums. We were also not eager to point to yet more third-party download sites for such tools. We have done some work to build a sha256sum.exe for Windows from the Gnu Coreutils package (using MingW to cross-compile this on Fedora ;). This way, we can ask users to download the very small sha256sum.exe from our site, via SSL, which should be much better than asking anyone to use a tool that we have no source code for to verify their downloads. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It is an old habit with theologians to beat the living with the bones of the dead. -- Robert G. Ingersoll -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ankh at dtrclan.com Wed Nov 18 16:07:17 2009 From: ankh at dtrclan.com (Justin Wood) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:07:17 +0000 Subject: Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 Message-ID: <1404202839-1258560436-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1127288933-@bda421.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> ------Original Message------ From: fedora-websites-list-request at redhat.com Sender: fedora-websites-list-bounces at redhat.com To: fedora-websites-list at redhat.com ReplyTo: fedora-websites-list at redhat.com Subject: Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 Sent: Nov 18, 2009 08:20 Send Fedora-websites-list mailing list submissions to fedora-websites-list at redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-websites-list-request at redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-websites-list-owner at redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Fedora-websites-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Broken Link (Alberto Permuy Leal) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:44:13 +0100 From: Alberto Permuy Leal Subject: Broken Link To: webmaster at fedoraproject.org Message-ID: <4B03B3DD.9010005 at foremga.ccoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: screen.png Type: image/png Size: 144876 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20091118/0d8cec06/screen.png ------------------------------ -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list End of Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 **************************************************** Sent from my BlackBerry? wireless device From ankh at dtrclan.com Wed Nov 18 16:07:26 2009 From: ankh at dtrclan.com (Justin Wood) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 16:07:26 +0000 Subject: Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 Message-ID: <892704708-1258560452-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1947108466-@bda421.bisx.prod.on.blackberry> ------Original Message------ From: fedora-websites-list-request at redhat.com Sender: fedora-websites-list-bounces at redhat.com To: fedora-websites-list at redhat.com ReplyTo: fedora-websites-list at redhat.com Subject: Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 Sent: Nov 18, 2009 08:20 Send Fedora-websites-list mailing list submissions to fedora-websites-list at redhat.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to fedora-websites-list-request at redhat.com You can reach the person managing the list at fedora-websites-list-owner at redhat.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of Fedora-websites-list digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Broken Link (Alberto Permuy Leal) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 09:44:13 +0100 From: Alberto Permuy Leal Subject: Broken Link To: webmaster at fedoraproject.org Message-ID: <4B03B3DD.9010005 at foremga.ccoo.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Skipped content of type multipart/alternative-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: screen.png Type: image/png Size: 144876 bytes Desc: not available Url : https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-websites-list/attachments/20091118/0d8cec06/screen.png ------------------------------ -- Fedora-websites-list mailing list Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list End of Fedora-websites-list Digest, Vol 49, Issue 17 **************************************************** Sent from my BlackBerry? wireless device From astur at softastur.org Wed Nov 18 20:36:06 2009 From: astur at softastur.org (astur) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:36:06 +0100 Subject: website Message-ID: <1258576566.7022.29.camel@varela-laptop> Hi, I've finished the translation for fedora website in Asturian language (three letters code "ast") I would like to know if you can activate it for our language? Thanks From sijis at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 18 23:30:03 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:30:03 -0600 Subject: Broken Link In-Reply-To: <4B03B3DD.9010005@foremga.ccoo.es> References: <4B03B3DD.9010005@foremga.ccoo.es> Message-ID: <747290270911181530x212f1f7bxae4444d8e02e0d56@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Alberto Permuy Leal wrote: > Hi guys! > > Browsing the site http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora and I've found a > broken link in spanish version: > > 3.5GB, formato ISO, 1 imagen de disco DVD para PC Intel-compatibles (32 > bits) | ?C?mo uso este archivo? > > Target: > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/install-guide/f12/en-US/html/sn-making-media.html > > Bye! > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > Thank you for reporting this. We have updated the link to point to the correct location. The changes should reflect on the website shortly. Thanks, Sijis From sijis at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 18 23:52:02 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:52:02 -0600 Subject: Permission error try downloading In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <747290270911181552t3b4cc3dch354202afefa53390@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:41 AM, JoeJoe N wrote: > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access > /pub/linux/fedora/linux/releases/12/Live/i686/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso on > this server. > ________________________________ > Apache Server at fedora.fastsoft.net Port 80 > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > Thank you for reporting this issue. You got this error because the release files had not been propagated to this mirror but it was part of the 'rotation'. This does occur one some occasions and is fairly infrequent. This mirror should be up-to-date now. Sijis From sijis at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 18 23:53:50 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:53:50 -0600 Subject: Get Fedora 12 Desktop Edition Now In-Reply-To: <1258538566.980a875ff6ef9c2d75e74307cbf5d205@mail.in.com> References: <1258538566.980a875ff6ef9c2d75e74307cbf5d205@mail.in.com> Message-ID: <747290270911181553q105815c5w31e60f7d4348903b@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 4:02 AM, anoop ok wrote: > sir, > There is some problem with this link > http://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/12/Live/i686/Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso > > Dear webmaster! Get Yourself a cool, short @in.com Email ID now! > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > Thank you for reporting this issue. You got this error because the release files had not been propagated to this mirror but it was part of the 'rotation'. This does occur one some occasions and is fairly infrequent. If you click on the link again, it should take you to another mirror which should work. The original mirror should be up-to-date by now. Sijis From sijis at fedoraproject.org Wed Nov 18 23:57:33 2009 From: sijis at fedoraproject.org (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:57:33 -0600 Subject: ISO Download - 403 Forbidden In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <747290270911181557v3b033c53vbdcd595df298c6b0@mail.gmail.com> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 9:59 AM, WaCrex Unknown wrote: > The download link for Fedora 12 on PowerPC is giving me a 403 Forbidden.. > the file seems to have wrong permissions, so what the webserver can't access > it properly. > > > Forbidden > > You don't have permission to access > /fedora/releases/12/Fedora/ppc/iso/Fedora-12-ppc-DVD.iso on this server. > > > > > ________________________________ > Bing brings you maps, menus, and reviews organized in one place. Try it now. > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > Thank you for reporting this issue. You got this error because the release files had not been propagated to this mirror but it was part of the 'rotation'. This does occur one some occasions and is fairly infrequent. This mirror should be up-to-date now. Sijis From jeremy.kemp at mediadesign.school.nz Thu Nov 19 01:09:22 2009 From: jeremy.kemp at mediadesign.school.nz (Jeremy Kemp) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:09:22 +1300 Subject: Fedora 12 broken mirror Message-ID: <6362A652-9C9C-41A8-8E33-538FDA978EE4@mediadesign.school.nz> Hi there, The mirror at mirror.aarnet.edu.au is not accepting any connection requests, and I am repeatedly being redirected to it. I finally dug through the list of mirrors and found one in Oceania that worked, but you might consider removing this one from the list. :-) -- Jeremy ##################################################################################### Note: This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential, proprietary or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies of it and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Media Design School and any of its subsidiaries each reserve the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the views of any such entity. Thank You. ##################################################################################### From shahmir_karim at yahoo.com Thu Nov 19 01:29:11 2009 From: shahmir_karim at yahoo.com (shahmir karim) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:29:11 +0800 (SGT) Subject: Installation problem on fedora 12 Message-ID: <599032.11830.qm@web76312.mail.sg1.yahoo.com> Hi... Thanks for the latest fedora 12. After try the fedora 11 I wait for this fedora 12. Unfortunately after download and burn the iso image to usb (that work on fedora 11. I'm using unetbootin.exe to burn iso to usb) and reboot system...I choose the default from the menu. After a while it process it go to blank screen with message "No root device found" "Boot has failed, sleeping forever". So I tried to 3 pc and same message came out. I download the Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso by torrent at your site. Is there anything I should change. My system. Sis Motherboard. Graphics built in Sis Mirage 3 2gb Ram 260gb Hard disk with dual boot system 1. vista 2. Ubuntu 20" Benq LCD Monitor Thanks Shahmir __________________________________________________________________________________________ Surf faster. Internet Explorer 8 optmized for Yahoo! auto launches 2 of your favorite pages everytime you open your browser. Get IE8 here! http://downloads.yahoo.com/my/internetexplorer/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From onekopaka at gmail.com Thu Nov 19 01:45:27 2009 From: onekopaka at gmail.com (Darren VanBuren) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:45:27 -0800 Subject: Fedora 12 broken mirror In-Reply-To: <6362A652-9C9C-41A8-8E33-538FDA978EE4@mediadesign.school.nz> References: <6362A652-9C9C-41A8-8E33-538FDA978EE4@mediadesign.school.nz> Message-ID: <407b25020911181745k61273de6i198c8b70884d6c93@mail.gmail.com> The AARNet mirror is working for me right now, maybe the network was congested when you tried. Thanks for the report, we'll keep an eye on the problem. Darren L. VanBuren ===================== http://theoks.net/ On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 17:09, Jeremy Kemp wrote: > Hi there, > > The mirror at mirror.aarnet.edu.au is not accepting any connection requests, and I am repeatedly being redirected to it. I finally dug through the list of mirrors and found one in Oceania that worked, but you might consider removing this one from the list. :-) > > -- Jeremy > ##################################################################################### > Note: > This message is for the named person's use only. ?It may contain confidential, > proprietary or legally privileged information. ?No confidentiality or privilege > is waived or lost by any mistransmission. ?If you receive this message in error, > please immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any > hard copies of it and notify the sender. ?You must not, directly or indirectly, > use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not > the intended recipient. Media Design School and any of its subsidiaries each reserve > the right to monitor all e-mail communications through its networks. > > Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where > the message states otherwise and the sender is authorized to state them to be the > views of any such entity. > > Thank You. > ##################################################################################### > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 19 01:55:34 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:55:34 -0500 Subject: Installation problem on fedora 12 In-Reply-To: <599032.11830.qm@web76312.mail.sg1.yahoo.com> References: <599032.11830.qm@web76312.mail.sg1.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20091119015534.GD1676@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-19 09:29:11 AM, shahmir karim wrote: > Hi... > Thanks for the latest fedora 12. After try the fedora 11 I wait for this fedora > 12. Unfortunately > after download and burn the iso image to usb (that work on fedora 11. I'm using > unetbootin.exe Hi, we don't support unetbootin for creating live USBs, but we do have instructions for creating a live USB from windows or Fedora: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraLiveCD/USBHowTo#From_a_Downloaded_Image To do it from a non-Fedora distribution, you can also use dd to write the Live CD iso file directly to the usb device, and that will create a live USB. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 19 02:04:22 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:04:22 -0500 Subject: website In-Reply-To: <1258576566.7022.29.camel@varela-laptop> References: <1258576566.7022.29.camel@varela-laptop> Message-ID: <20091119020422.GE1676@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-18 09:36:06 PM, astur wrote: > I've finished the translation for fedora website in Asturian language > (three letters code "ast") > > I would like to know if you can activate it for our language? I've added it to the languages list, and it should show up in an hour or so. Thanks for the translations! Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From l.cecchi at eldes.it Thu Nov 19 10:43:21 2009 From: l.cecchi at eldes.it (Luca Cecchi - Eldes) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:43:21 +0100 Subject: Problem Message-ID: <000001ca6905$1fdf47c0$5f9dd740$@cecchi@eldes.it> Good morning, I'm very interested in your Fedora LAB live dvd but I haven't any torrent port opened. Can I download the distribution in a different way? Maybe http or fttp download. Thanks, Luac -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From anshu_com333 at yahoo.co.in Thu Nov 19 15:01:20 2009 From: anshu_com333 at yahoo.co.in (Anshu Sharma) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:31:20 +0530 (IST) Subject: I want a fedora 12 installation cd Message-ID: <146141.88021.qm@web94701.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Sir ?????? ?????????? Respectfully I want a fedora 12 installation cd I am doing RHCE cource from HCL CDC. I have three books of linux cource but no cd inside books so sir plz I want a Cd of fedora 12. I want fedora 12 plz replay! I am waiting your answer???? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????akhilesh sharma The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From danishka at gmail.com Thu Nov 19 16:22:42 2009 From: danishka at gmail.com (Danishka Navin) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:52:42 +0530 Subject: I want a fedora 12 installation cd In-Reply-To: <146141.88021.qm@web94701.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <146141.88021.qm@web94701.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Message-ID: Hi You must request via the FreeMedia request form [1]. To get more information on Fedora FreeMedia program visit [2] [1] https://fedoraproject.org/freemedia/FreeMedia-form.html [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Distribution/FreeMedia Danishka On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Anshu Sharma wrote: > > > Sir > > > > Respectfully I want a fedora 12 installation cd I am doing RHCE > cource from HCL CDC. I have three books of linux cource but no cd inside > books so sir plz I want a > > Cd of fedora 12. I want fedora 12 plz replay! I am waiting your answer???? > > akhilesh > sharma > > ------------------------------ > The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage > . > > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > -- Danishka Navin http://danishkanavin.blogspot.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 19 17:42:23 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:42:23 -0500 Subject: Problem In-Reply-To: <000001ca6905$1fdf47c0$5f9dd740$@cecchi@eldes.it> References: <000001ca6905$1fdf47c0$5f9dd740$@cecchi@eldes.it> Message-ID: <20091119174223.GB26461@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-19 11:43:21 AM, Luca Cecchi - Eldes wrote: > Good morning, I?m very interested in your Fedora LAB live dvd but I haven?t any > torrent port opened. Can I download the distribution in a different way? Maybe > http or fttp download. Hi, you can also download the Fedora Electronic Lab spin from http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/spins/FEL/. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From morgan_st at bellsouth.net Thu Nov 19 18:47:39 2009 From: morgan_st at bellsouth.net (Stewart Todd Morgan) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:47:39 -0500 Subject: Fedora 12 i386 DVD ISO Checksum File Message-ID: <4B0592CB.5060506@bellsouth.net> Hi, I am not sure if this is a developer issue or a website issue, so please forward it to the appropriate party. I downloaded the i386 Fedora 12 ISO and downloaded the https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM file from https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify. The hash in the checksum file is marked as SHA1, but the checksum actually appears to be an SHA256 checksum (according to the instructions on the web page and when I use sha256sum against the ISO). Some folks may be confused by the SHA1 marker in the checksum file, particularly if they don't both to read the instructions on the web page. Todd From VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu Thu Nov 19 19:24:00 2009 From: VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu (V Stuart Foote) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:24:00 -0600 Subject: New Fedora 12 checksum are listed as SHA1 but are SHA256 Hash Message-ID: <721204289DE2DD4891E891825D7D31A901180A26@jade1604.UTSARR.NET> Hi, The posted checksums to verify ISOs for at least the i386 ISOs suggests the Hash is SHA1, but the value is SHA256 for the Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso, suspect they may all be SHA256 https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM Probably should correct the mislabeled entry(s). =-=-= V Stuart Foote Systems Analyst Geological Sciences College of Sciences University of Texas at San Antonio One UTSA Circle San Antonio, TX 78249-0663 office? (210) 458-4962 fax???? (210) 458-4469 From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 19 19:37:50 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:37:50 -0500 Subject: Fedora 12 i386 DVD ISO Checksum File In-Reply-To: <4B0592CB.5060506@bellsouth.net> References: <4B0592CB.5060506@bellsouth.net> Message-ID: <20091119193750.GA10714@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-19 01:47:39 PM, Stewart Todd Morgan wrote: > I am not sure if this is a developer issue or a website issue, so > please forward it to the appropriate party. I downloaded the i386 > Fedora 12 ISO and downloaded the > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > file from https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify. The hash in the > checksum file is marked as SHA1, but the checksum actually appears to > be an SHA256 checksum (according to the instructions on the web page > and when I use sha256sum against the ISO). Some folks may be > confused by the SHA1 marker in the checksum file, particularly if > they don't both to read the instructions on the web page. This is a common misconception. The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used. We're discussing ways to make this clearer in future releases so that folks don't mistake the PGP Hash header as the hash used for the .iso images. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 19 19:39:35 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 14:39:35 -0500 Subject: New Fedora 12 checksum are listed as SHA1 but are SHA256 Hash In-Reply-To: <721204289DE2DD4891E891825D7D31A901180A26@jade1604.UTSARR.NET> References: <721204289DE2DD4891E891825D7D31A901180A26@jade1604.UTSARR.NET> Message-ID: <20091119193935.GB10714@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-19 01:24:00 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote: > The posted checksums to verify ISOs for at least the i386 ISOs > suggests the Hash is SHA1, but the value is SHA256 for the > Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso, suspect they may all be SHA256 > > https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify > > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > > Probably should correct the mislabeled entry(s). This is a common misconception. The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used. We're discussing ways to make this clearer in future releases so that folks don't mistake the PGP Hash header as the hash used for the .iso images. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu Thu Nov 19 19:54:33 2009 From: VStuart.Foote at utsa.edu (V Stuart Foote) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:54:33 -0600 Subject: New Fedora 12 checksum are listed as SHA1 but are SHA256 Hash In-Reply-To: <20091119193935.GB10714@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <721204289DE2DD4891E891825D7D31A901180A26@jade1604.UTSARR.NET> <20091119193935.GB10714@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <721204289DE2DD4891E891825D7D31A901180A27@jade1604.UTSARR.NET> OK Thanks! Yes that is not clear but makes sense about the PGP signature tag for the CHECKSUM file itself. It is just confusing to see it immediately above the hash values in the in the file. It suggests that they're SHA1 hashes. Most folks won't perform the gpg --verify against the signature file as we've downloaded it directly, and will read the hashes as provided against whatever hash utility they've got to verify a clean/complete download. Regards, Stuart Foote -----Original Message----- From: Ricky Zhou [mailto:ricky at fedoraproject.org] Sent: Thursday, November 19, 2009 1:40 PM To: V Stuart Foote Cc: webmaster at fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: New Fedora 12 checksum are listed as SHA1 but are SHA256 Hash On 2009-11-19 01:24:00 PM, V Stuart Foote wrote: > The posted checksums to verify ISOs for at least the i386 ISOs > suggests the Hash is SHA1, but the value is SHA256 for the > Fedora-12-i386-DVD.iso, suspect they may all be SHA256 > > https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify > > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-i386-CHECKSUM > > Probably should correct the mislabeled entry(s). This is a common misconception. The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used. We're discussing ways to make this clearer in future releases so that folks don't mistake the PGP Hash header as the hash used for the .iso images. Thanks, Ricky From tmz at pobox.com Thu Nov 19 22:19:58 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:19:58 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make it clear that 'Hash: SHA1' does not specify the checksum hash Message-ID: <20091119221958.GG4509@inocybe.localdomain> This should only be needed until the rel-eng adds some explanatory text directly to the *-CHECKSUM files. This is planned for F13 (by Oxf13 ;). --- Thoughts? Is 'warning' too strong? I wasn't sure if 'note' would stand out enough. Perhaps I'm just grumpy after seeing so much confusion about this. ;) I'm also torn about the placement. It might be better to move up to the top of the page, above the "Windows user?" note. fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html | 3 +++ 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html index f763b01..51a2402 100644 --- a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html +++ b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@
  • i386 (KDE)
  • x86_64 (KDE)
    • +

    + ${Markup(_('Please note that the <i>Hash: SHA1</i> line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does <b>not</b> specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files.'))} +

    ${Markup(_('Next, import Fedora\'s GPG key(s):'))}

    -- 1.6.5.2 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Eat drink and be merry, for tomorrow they may make it illegal. From ricky at fedoraproject.org Thu Nov 19 22:25:23 2009 From: ricky at fedoraproject.org (Ricky Zhou) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:25:23 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make it clear that 'Hash: SHA1' does not specify the checksum hash In-Reply-To: <20091119221958.GG4509@inocybe.localdomain> References: <20091119221958.GG4509@inocybe.localdomain> Message-ID: <20091119222523.GA17797@alpha.rzhou.org> On 2009-11-19 05:19:58 PM, Todd Zullinger wrote: > This should only be needed until the rel-eng adds some explanatory text > directly to the *-CHECKSUM files. This is planned for F13 (by Oxf13 ;). > --- > > Thoughts? Is 'warning' too strong? I wasn't sure if 'note' would > stand out enough. Perhaps I'm just grumpy after seeing so much > confusion about this. ;) > > I'm also torn about the placement. It might be better to move up to > the top of the page, above the "Windows user?" note. > > fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html | 3 +++ > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html > index f763b01..51a2402 100644 > --- a/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html > +++ b/fedoraproject.org/data/content/verify.html > @@ -27,6 +27,9 @@ >
  • i386 (KDE)
    • >
  • x86_64 (KDE)
    • > > +

    > + ${Markup(_('Please note that the <i>Hash: SHA1</i> line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does <b>not</b> specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files.'))} > +

    >

    > ${Markup(_('Next, import Fedora\'s GPG key(s):'))} >

    > -- > 1.6.5.2 Tiny thing, I'd use instead of for this. Also, it might be good to place this above the checksum links at least for those that just click the links immediately. While we're making changes to this page, there's also the issue that http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html is woefully out of date and still references SHA1 for those that click on the Windows user link :-( Not what can really be done abou that last bit though. Thanks, Ricky -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 197 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Thu Nov 19 22:37:25 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:37:25 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make it clear that 'Hash: SHA1' does not specify the checksum hash In-Reply-To: <20091119222523.GA17797@alpha.rzhou.org> References: <20091119221958.GG4509@inocybe.localdomain> <20091119222523.GA17797@alpha.rzhou.org> Message-ID: <20091119223725.GH4509@inocybe.localdomain> Ricky Zhou wrote: > Tiny thing, I'd use instead of for this. Sure, my HTML tag knowledge is so out of date. In the same vein, is preferable to these days? > Also, it might be good to place this above the checksum links at > least for those that just click the links immediately. I'll move it to the top then, where it ought to stand out. > While we're making changes to this page, there's also the issue that > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html > is woefully out of date and still references SHA1 for those that > click on the Windows user link :-( > > Not what can really be done abou that last bit though. Actually, if it weren't for the string freeze and me getting really busy the past few weeks, I'd have finished up adding the sha25sum.exe and we could have updated those instructions or the link. I believe Eric Christensen was ready to help from the docs side one I get the Windows binary uploaded. This is part of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/527060 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Money can't buy happiness, but it sure makes living in misery easier. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From youcanlinux at gmail.com Fri Nov 20 11:48:44 2009 From: youcanlinux at gmail.com (Daniel Villarreal) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:48:44 -0500 Subject: SHA256 checksums listed as SHA1 checksums Message-ID: re: Fedora 12 SHA256 checksums listed as SHA1 checksums > $ cat Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 1bb64a4eedecf4730b47fcbb6c17b49d6deaccf7b00b17dd7b1091af57cf1c1e Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) ... > Thanks Daniel Villarreal From youcanlinux at gmail.com Fri Nov 20 11:50:56 2009 From: youcanlinux at gmail.com (Daniel Villarreal) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 06:50:56 -0500 Subject: please disregard previous post Message-ID: Please disregard my previous post... Sorry. Just noticed the line in the red square... "Please note that the Hash: SHA1 line in the CHECKSUM file is part of the PGP signature. It does not specify the type of hash used to verify the .iso files." > $ cat Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE-CHECKSUM.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 1bb64a4eedecf4730b47fcbb6c17b49d6deaccf7b00b17dd7b1091af57cf1c1e Fedora-12-i686-Live-KDE.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) > From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Nov 20 17:51:23 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (fedora-websites) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:51:23 -0000 Subject: [fedora-websites] #5: Adding mirror links to support tab template In-Reply-To: <056.57611488f7d3be1dcf83c32b145b0ca9@fedorahosted.org> References: <056.57611488f7d3be1dcf83c32b145b0ca9@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <065.70b70238dab59a8abc6787272afa0170@fedorahosted.org> #5: Adding mirror links to support tab template ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Reporter: duffy | Owner: webmaster Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Component: General Version: | Resolution: Keywords: | ------------------------+--------------------------------------------------- Changes (by duffy): * type: defect => enhancement -- Ticket URL: fedora-websites Fedora Website Team's Trac instance From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Nov 20 17:51:17 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (fedora-websites) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:51:17 -0000 Subject: [fedora-websites] #5: Adding mirror links to support tab template Message-ID: <056.57611488f7d3be1dcf83c32b145b0ca9@fedorahosted.org> #5: Adding mirror links to support tab template -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Reporter: duffy | Owner: webmaster Type: defect | Status: new Priority: major | Component: General Version: | Keywords: -------------------+-------------------------------------------------------- Add 'torrent trouble? download link to download.fedora.redhat.com, using language similar to ticket 3, in the support tab template for all spins. This work should not be done until mmcgrath has set up the spins on download.fedora.redhat.com though, and the links should use the mirror round-robin links. -- Ticket URL: fedora-websites Fedora Website Team's Trac instance From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Nov 20 22:43:23 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:43:23 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1828: Update link in new footer Message-ID: <064.27e11b939cab335eb299dc96ea5cef2a@fedorahosted.org> #1828: Update link in new footer -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Keywords: -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- The new site-wide footer used by spins.fedoraproject.org (and other fp.o sites in the future) has a link for the text describing the relationship between Red Hat and Fedora. Red Hat has provided a more appropriate page here: http://www.redhat.com/rhel/fedora/ The link needs to be changed to point to this new URL. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From trac at fedorahosted.org Fri Nov 20 23:21:58 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:21:58 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1828: Update link in new footer In-Reply-To: <064.27e11b939cab335eb299dc96ea5cef2a@fedorahosted.org> References: <064.27e11b939cab335eb299dc96ea5cef2a@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <073.4fb945cc6ba04f1d30c10fe29d1c6553@fedorahosted.org> #1828: Update link in new footer -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment (by sijis): updated spins.fp.o with correct link I couldn't find any other locations of this reference on any other sites in the fedora-web repo. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From lee_clark_ftc at yahoo.com Fri Nov 20 22:57:57 2009 From: lee_clark_ftc at yahoo.com (Lee Clark) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:57:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Please help me with HASH results being wrong! Message-ID: <504283.64891.qm@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> I down loaded Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso and then downloaded both of the windows Hash programs I ran them both and found this for the SHA1 results. Seeing it was not the same as below from your web site I down loaded the file again changing the name to. Fedora-12-i686-Live_(2).iso Again I ran both hash programs got the same answer both match each other but do not match your web page info. DAF4B3EA2322DFEE9A473099557AC9ED7C6D3159 DAF4B3EA2322DFEE9A473099557AC9ED7C6D3159 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 5ad27455df004ee23fbc5a05dfa039a14e59956dccf4e767d493601e0bfa4001 Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBSvhuy50cw0hXu8y6AQKZphAAkz0b/jNTOcTUby/UmmGOAsPHcoPIqnSB TyGVDrdVew49xM9IBKxAfyt5Jmxjax8+/5keJMFrKFdXAWyjC3wsrMGnLpY8/3jJ Zf5DwILR8esBtTOS/7LTBeA1VAnaiPJbPlzlcLWO7C3lNgNQQFcnRYSB37a8ySvf tt02BW99GGwKSxy327yyVp7haZ43SFUDvq22CFFpGeWk8GibufgCRvveu/+K4MuI c0DAuS5aYPz+q/2Zzva+Q+X2CI3+DEm0pwvmP9WzCO4x6mMku0TfgxpDnVmdFw+H Yt/uulM+v9DOuhOaMnA82N9jlMRt0jhMbcE+R8oms9ZejIfCXf1vFLSzPttboksV xyanTuqngp3JvOydsRwiT0oqAPyXhqhBrlPlPe/MizRk4N0uE1+vOn7zrSMz6yUU 89mSiz3viSMaWww1mYpsE/LlrlAavVlVED2SmfscAtyyRmXbuR3VU981C9T4A9be LFpUuCCxmO9dZP+ObazfJJds4odO09oqKxexLpum6LbN1AUS6MzGr7pGzSBcZyQv +wIgyWG8tuOCjM65/hoDafQwUPV8mZQcBLLWnCgp4Wrpo+SlDgs8xzgtBxC1nijx GebP25HQ/ZCEyomNYcEhw7iaaL/JePLvSkPYw5o1y9Fy/jqrDnjJk9dYuurMD3Nd TGHTB0y2rJI= =ydAW ----- Lee Clark Lee_lvd at yahoo.com or lee_clark_ftc at yahoo.com 970-388-5623 ________________________________ My signature file! "Never discourage anyone who continually makes progress, no matter how slow." - Plato "In the middle of difficulty lies opportunity. " - Albert Einstein ________________________________ "IN GOD WE TRUST" AMEN! ________________________________ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Sat Nov 21 00:07:08 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:07:08 -0500 Subject: Please help me with HASH results being wrong! In-Reply-To: <504283.64891.qm@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <504283.64891.qm@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20091121000707.GQ4509@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Lee, Lee Clark wrote: > I down loaded Fedora-12-i686-Live.iso and then downloaded both of > the windows Hash programs I ran them both and found this for the > SHA1 results. Seeing it was not the same as below from your web > site I down loaded the file again changing the name to. > Fedora-12-i686-Live_(2).iso The hash algorithm used for the Fedora 12 *-CHECKSUM files is SHA-256, not SHA-1. You will need to use a program that can calculate a SHA-256 checksum. (The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used.) We are currently working on a build of sha256sum for Windows which we can provide for users on Windows. In the interim, you may be able to use the sha256sum.exe program linked at: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en-US-draft.html#sect-Burning_ISO_images_to_disc-Validating_the_Files Note that since we don't provide that binary, we cannot vouch for its authenticity. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Philosophy: A route of many roads leading from nowhere to nothing. -- Ambrose Bierce -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tmz at pobox.com Sat Nov 21 00:29:16 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:29:16 -0500 Subject: Please help me with HASH results being wrong! In-Reply-To: <534991.47376.qm@web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <504283.64891.qm@web32707.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20091121000707.GQ4509@inocybe.localdomain> <534991.47376.qm@web32706.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20091121002916.GS4509@inocybe.localdomain> Lee Clark wrote: > Thats odd > > your site says SHA1 You missed the large red notice on https://fedoraproject.org/verify as well as this paragraph in my previous reply: I wrote: > (The Hash: SHA1 line is part of the PGP signature. It has no relation > to the sha256 checksum data in the *-CHECKSUM files. > https://fedoraproject.org/verify has details on how to verify > downloads and does point out that sha256sum is what should be used.) This is a common misconception. We'll work on trying to make it clearer in future releases. Of course, there's only so much we can do. ;-) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When I think about all the crap I learned in high school ... it's a wonder I can think at all. -- Paul Simon -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From trac at fedorahosted.org Sat Nov 21 16:41:33 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:41:33 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1828: Update link in new footer In-Reply-To: <064.27e11b939cab335eb299dc96ea5cef2a@fedorahosted.org> References: <064.27e11b939cab335eb299dc96ea5cef2a@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <073.72dc4edaf92b11f896a4c3d4442cf688@fedorahosted.org> #1828: Update link in new footer -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: pfrields | Owner: webmaster Type: task | Status: closed Priority: major | Milestone: Component: Web Content | Version: Severity: Normal | Resolution: fixed Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Changes (by pfrields): * status: new => closed * resolution: => fixed Comment: I don't believe it occurs anywhere else. The new footer will be used for other sites as they're redesigned. Thanks for the quick fix! -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From simone.congiu at tiscali.it Sat Nov 21 20:53:56 2009 From: simone.congiu at tiscali.it (Simone Congiu) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:53:56 +0100 Subject: hash validation on Windows Message-ID: <4B085364.3050108@tiscali.it> Hi, on this page are used sha-1 instead of the new sha256: http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html iso files are validated by a sha256... have fun, Simone From tmz at pobox.com Sun Nov 22 02:56:24 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:56:24 -0500 Subject: hash validation on Windows In-Reply-To: <4B085364.3050108@tiscali.it> References: <4B085364.3050108@tiscali.it> Message-ID: <20091122025624.GY4509@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Simone, Simone Congiu wrote: > on this page are used sha-1 instead of the new sha256: > http://docs.fedoraproject.org/readme-burning-isos/en_US/sn-validating-files.html > iso files are validated by a sha256... Indeed. We're working on getting the documentation fixed and providing an sha256sum.exe for Windows users. There are a few bugs for tracking this process: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504228 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=527060 Thanks, -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I am not young enough to know everything. -- Oscar Wilde (1854-1900) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From gps at signbit.org Sun Nov 22 09:14:13 2009 From: gps at signbit.org (Gregory Sieranski) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:14:13 -0600 Subject: Introduction Message-ID: <6283a3900911220114s5c860ffdwdfbc285833238fd7@mail.gmail.com> Hi guys, I just wanted to introduce myself. I am a Programmer Analyst who works for a large fortune 500 company. I have been using Fedora for over 3 years and would love to give back in any way that I can. I absolutely love what Fedora and open source does and believe in both 100%. I am skilled in Java, J2EE, C, C++, Python, HTML, CSS and a bunch of other technologies. I am an avid programming language enthusiast and am working toward getting my Masters in Computer Science. I would love to contribute to the website project in any way that I can. I deal with website technology on a daily basis and feel that I would be able to provide a lot of help to the fedora website team. No task is to small. If you guys just need someone to enter text or change a CSS style I am willing to do it. Thank you for your time and I look forward to talking with all of you! Thank you, Gregory Sieraski -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From khilesh.c at gmail.com Mon Nov 23 06:28:30 2009 From: khilesh.c at gmail.com (KHILESH CHAUHAN) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2009 22:28:30 -0800 Subject: join fedora Message-ID: <8fb108e00911222228w6a2a884pc46c8f945da88f0d@mail.gmail.com> Best wishes sir, My self khilesh chauhan from bhilai (chhattisgarh), Curently doing B.E. in I.T. 3rd semester. I want to join fedora project as a website developer. My qualifications in this field is as under - 1. Completed Redhat linux RHCE couse. 2. Having a good knowledge of HTML , CSS , JAVA-SCRIPT , PHP AND MYSQL . I have already created an account in fedora project website on 1st of november.but still not approved as a member. May you please help me. Thank you sir. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dhruv-kamble at hotmail.com Mon Nov 23 14:59:06 2009 From: dhruv-kamble at hotmail.com (Dhruv Kamble) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 20:29:06 +0530 Subject: help about data card drivers. Message-ID: Hello sir/mam, I use ZTE PCMCIA data card of Reliance Communication, India. I hv fedora 11 on my laptop. I want the driver of that data card modem. And want to know how to install it. Next, I want the virtual PC (Like Microsoft Virtual PC) for fedora 11. Again, I hv laptop having followin configuration CPU - Intel Celeron RAM - 256 MB HDD - 40 GB Hence the Fedora 11 is running slower in my pc. Suggest me, which Older version of Fedora can run properly and faster on my pc. Plz reply. Thanks. _________________________________________________________________ New Windows 7: Find the right PC for you. Learn more. http://windows.microsoft.com/shop -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From a.badger at gmail.com Mon Nov 23 20:02:31 2009 From: a.badger at gmail.com (Toshio Kuratomi) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 12:02:31 -0800 Subject: Introduction In-Reply-To: <6283a3900911220114s5c860ffdwdfbc285833238fd7@mail.gmail.com> References: <6283a3900911220114s5c860ffdwdfbc285833238fd7@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20091123200231.GD3724@clingman.lan> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:14:13AM -0600, Gregory Sieranski wrote: > Hi guys, > I just wanted to introduce myself. I am a Programmer Analyst who works for a > large fortune 500 company. I have been using Fedora for over 3 years and > would love to give back in any way that I can. I absolutely love what Fedora > and open source does and believe in both 100%. I am skilled in Java, J2EE, > C, C++, Python, HTML, CSS and a bunch of other technologies. I am an avid > programming language enthusiast and am working toward getting my Masters in > Computer Science. I would love to contribute to the website project in any > way that I can. I deal with website technology on a daily basis and feel > that I would be able to provide a lot of help to the fedora website team. No > task is to small. If you guys just need someone to enter text or change a > CSS style I am willing to do it. Thank you for your time and I look forward > to talking with all of you! > Welcome! What would you be most interested in working on? If it's mostly python with a bit of html, css, and javascript thrown in the fedora I'd be happy to have you help out on some of the projects we're working on in Fedora Infrastructure. (Things like the account system, packagedb, updates tool, etc). If you're more interested in html and css, websites is the right place to start! -Toshio -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 23 20:09:24 2009 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:39:24 +0530 Subject: no checksums for f12 In-Reply-To: <1258480726.2613.0.camel@xmas.demon.co.uk> References: <1258480726.2613.0.camel@xmas.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <4B0AEBF4.1020008@fedoraproject.org> On 11/17/2009 11:28 PM, James Bridge wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM > doesn't work! Refer to https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify Rahul From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 23 20:13:02 2009 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:43:02 +0530 Subject: donation and link In-Reply-To: <4b02b2cd.0707d00a.4175.2708@mx.google.com> References: <4b02b2cd.0707d00a.4175.2708@mx.google.com> Message-ID: <4B0AECCE.7030300@fedoraproject.org> On 11/17/2009 07:57 PM, swiss delicious wrote: > Hi, > > > > i like to donate 1500 USD. Is it possible to get a Link in footer of > http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/ for my torrent search engine > zoozle.org for that? We don't do ads. Thank you for the offer however. Rahul From tmz at pobox.com Mon Nov 23 22:12:44 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 17:12:44 -0500 Subject: no checksums for f12 In-Reply-To: <4B0AEBF4.1020008@fedoraproject.org> References: <1258480726.2613.0.camel@xmas.demon.co.uk> <4B0AEBF4.1020008@fedoraproject.org> Message-ID: <20091123221244.GP4509@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Rahul, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 11/17/2009 11:28 PM, James Bridge wrote: >> https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM >> doesn't work! > > Refer to > > https://fedoraproject.org/en/verify The /static/checksums/Fedora-12-x86_64-CHECKSUM was broken when James sent his message. It got fixed quickly after the release. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The secret to success is knowing who to blame for your failures. -- Demotivators (www.despair.com) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From sundaram at fedoraproject.org Mon Nov 23 22:11:10 2009 From: sundaram at fedoraproject.org (Rahul Sundaram) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:41:10 +0530 Subject: upgrade_fedora10_11 In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <4B0B087E.4000707@fedoraproject.org> On 10/26/2009 07:54 PM, Eszenyi Gergely wrote: > Dear development team > > My question is the following: could and should i upgrade fedora 10 > system to 11th version, if i my computer has _radeon xpress 1100 video > card and intel celeron X51R processor_? Thank you for your answer. It should work fine. There is now a Fedora 12 release as well. You might want to try the Live CD to confirm that the hardware works good. For any future help, please post to fedora list or forums instead. This email address is just for feedback on the website itself. Rahul From trac at fedorahosted.org Mon Nov 23 23:27:15 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:27:15 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1227: Hosting footer In-Reply-To: <064.61ab88ab218f456167146dcdb72210cd@fedorahosted.org> References: <064.61ab88ab218f456167146dcdb72210cd@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <073.d4d9a1526f630ed30f1168be9f1b23b8@fedorahosted.org> #1227: Hosting footer -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmcgrath | Owner: webmaster at fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 Component: Web Content | Version: Production Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment (by sijis): tmz and I are looking at this. We currently have a working example and are waiting for a few images before we commit the changes. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From mel at redhat.com Wed Nov 25 04:39:56 2009 From: mel at redhat.com (Mel Chua) Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:39:56 -0600 Subject: Introduction In-Reply-To: <20091123200231.GD3724@clingman.lan> References: <6283a3900911220114s5c860ffdwdfbc285833238fd7@mail.gmail.com> <20091123200231.GD3724@clingman.lan> Message-ID: <4B0CB51C.4070602@redhat.com> On 11/23/2009 02:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 03:14:13AM -0600, Gregory Sieranski wrote: >> Hi guys, >> I just wanted to introduce myself. I am a Programmer Analyst who works for a >> large fortune 500 company. I have been using Fedora for over 3 years and >> would love to give back in any way that I can. I absolutely love what Fedora >> and open source does and believe in both 100%. I am skilled in Java, J2EE, >> C, C++, Python, HTML, CSS and a bunch of other technologies. I am an avid >> programming language enthusiast and am working toward getting my Masters in >> Computer Science. I would love to contribute to the website project in any >> way that I can. I deal with website technology on a daily basis and feel >> that I would be able to provide a lot of help to the fedora website team. No >> task is to small. If you guys just need someone to enter text or change a >> CSS style I am willing to do it. Thank you for your time and I look forward >> to talking with all of you! >> > Welcome! What would you be most interested in working on? If it's mostly > python with a bit of html, css, and javascript thrown in the fedora I'd be > happy to have you help out on some of the projects we're working on in > Fedora Infrastructure. (Things like the account system, packagedb, updates > tool, etc). If you're more interested in html and css, websites is the > right place to start! > > -Toshio > Gregory's already started helping us out with https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Insight - thanks, Gregory! --Mel From dearme at ncf.ca Wed Nov 25 06:26:55 2009 From: dearme at ncf.ca (Gary) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:26:55 -0500 Subject: Downloading p.d.f.s Message-ID: <71BF3E88D0C34B279887C21B3583E401@owner> Thanks for the site and your efforts. It would be very useful if one could right-click on a simple page to be able to download to a folder I choose on my hard drive the p.d.f.s about the new fedora 12. ... Gary -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From trac at fedorahosted.org Thu Nov 26 03:47:16 2009 From: trac at fedorahosted.org (Fedora Infrastructure) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 03:47:16 -0000 Subject: [Fedora Infrastructure] #1227: Hosting footer In-Reply-To: <064.61ab88ab218f456167146dcdb72210cd@fedorahosted.org> References: <064.61ab88ab218f456167146dcdb72210cd@fedorahosted.org> Message-ID: <073.e19ec1111e6c51df8c03ea3ecde9ca23@fedorahosted.org> #1227: Hosting footer -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Reporter: mmcgrath | Owner: webmaster at fedoraproject.org Type: enhancement | Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 Component: Web Content | Version: Production Severity: Normal | Resolution: Keywords: | -------------------------+-------------------------------------------------- Comment (by sijis): Our implementation is now available on http://www.fedoraproject.org. -- Ticket URL: Fedora Infrastructure Fedora Infrastructure Project for Bugs, feature requests and access to our source code. From sijis.aviles at gmail.com Thu Nov 26 05:59:37 2009 From: sijis.aviles at gmail.com (Sijis Aviles) Date: Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:59:37 -0600 Subject: Add translations to start.fp.o Message-ID: <747290270911252159w2e1dfc22jf41bd2336f2ba1c9@mail.gmail.com> I'm setting up translations for start.fp.o website (https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/537). I've already have start.fp.o on the fedora-web repo configured and working for using genshi so that translations can be setup. Before i commit those changes I want to make sure I have puppet setup accordingly for the new setup. This is what i have setup on puppet: --- diff --git a/modules/fedora-web/files/syncStatic.sh b/modules/fedora-web/files/syncStatic.sh index 17a773d..1ddc357 100755 --- a/modules/fedora-web/files/syncStatic.sh +++ b/modules/fedora-web/files/syncStatic.sh @@ -52,8 +52,10 @@ fi /bin/cp -ad out/* /var/lib/puppet/application/talk.fedoraproject.org/ cd .. +cd start.fedoraproject.org +/bin/rm -rf /var/lib/puppet/application/start.fedoraproject.org/* +make > /dev/null 2>&1 if [ ! -f /var/lib/puppet/application/start.fedoraproject.org ]; then mkdir -p /var/lib/puppet/application/start.fedoraproject.org fi -/bin/cp -ad start.fedoraproject.org/* \ - /var/lib/puppet/application/start.fedoraproject.org/ +/bin/cp -ad out/* /var/lib/puppet/application/start.fedoraproject.org/ diff --git a/modules/fedora-web/manifests/init.pp b/modules/fedora-web/manifests/init.pp index 6dd0e47..bc3ebae 100644 --- a/modules/fedora-web/manifests/init.pp +++ b/modules/fedora-web/manifests/init.pp @@ -133,6 +133,16 @@ define fedora-web::start::proxy($website) { notify => Service["httpd"], require => Httpd::Website[$website], } + + file { "/etc/httpd/conf.d/$website/languages.conf": + owner => "root", + group => "root", + mode => 0644, + source => "puppet:///fedora-web/start-languages.conf", + notify => Service["httpd"], + require => Httpd::Website[$website], + } + } define fedora-web::talk::proxy($website) { --- I've also copied start.fedoraproject.org/httpd/conf/languages.conf.in into the modules/fedora-web/files/ directory and change the DOCUMENTROOT path Does all this look correct or am i missing something? Thanks, Sijis From azyaka at hotmail.com Thu Nov 26 12:58:01 2009 From: azyaka at hotmail.com (azyaka azyaka) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:58:01 +0400 Subject: =?windows-1254?q?fedore_ps3_=FDnstall?= Message-ID: hi. please help me fedore core 12 ppc ?nstalling ps3 Somehow I can not be successful ve done everything. I made the choice I would choose the keyboard clock and then install the repo file and install the system restarts I do not do please help _________________________________________________________________ Live.com'u deneyin - h?zl? ve ki?iselle?tirilmi? giri? sayfan?zla istedi?iniz her ?ey tek bir yerde. http://www.live.com/getstarted -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tmz at pobox.com Thu Nov 26 13:34:53 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 08:34:53 -0500 Subject: fedore ps3 =?utf-8?q?=C4=B1nstall?= In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091126133453.GG4509@inocybe.localdomain> Hi Azyaka, azyaka azyaka wrote: > hi. please help me fedore core 12 ppc ?nstalling ps3 Somehow I can > not be successful ve done everything. I made the choice I would > choose the keyboard clock and then install the repo file and install > the system restarts I do not do please help The webmaster at fedoraproject.org address is only for issues related to Fedora's websites. For general Fedora support, please refer to the help resources described at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate. -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A cynic is a man who, when he smells flowers, looks around for a coffin. -- H. L. Mencken -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From juanp1982 at gmail.com Thu Nov 26 15:44:07 2009 From: juanp1982 at gmail.com (Juan Pablo Molina Matute) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:44:07 -0500 Subject: I modified the FUDCon talk:Toronto 2009 web page by mistake Message-ID: <9f9f914b0911260744j341a27f9qf1e098b806bfb39f@mail.gmail.com> hi there, the following web page is a wiki web page I modified by mistake, i deleted a note about the registration and added my full name instead and I'm not able to change it back could you fix it in order to avoid any trouble? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_talk:Toronto_2009 thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From stickster at gmail.com Thu Nov 26 16:35:42 2009 From: stickster at gmail.com (Paul Frields) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 10:35:42 -0600 Subject: I modified the FUDCon talk:Toronto 2009 web page by mistake In-Reply-To: <9f9f914b0911260744j341a27f9qf1e098b806bfb39f@mail.gmail.com> References: <9f9f914b0911260744j341a27f9qf1e098b806bfb39f@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 9:44 AM, Juan Pablo Molina Matute wrote: > hi there, > the following web page is a wiki web page I modified by mistake, i deleted a > note about the registration and added my full name instead and I'm not able > to change it back could you fix it in order to avoid any trouble? > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FUDCon_talk:Toronto_2009 > > thanks I reverted this edit, thanks for the notice. Paul From mmcgrath at redhat.com Thu Nov 26 21:43:55 2009 From: mmcgrath at redhat.com (Mike McGrath) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 15:43:55 -0600 (CST) Subject: New sponsor!! Message-ID: We've got a new sponsor, bodhost.com! I've attached their logo, they are awesome for providing us a presence in the UK and canada. Also can we add them to the new site specific sponsors that we've been working on? Should I send requests like this to webmaster at fp.o or should I be using the new websites ticketing system? -Mike -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: bodhost.jpg Type: image/jpeg Size: 7190 bytes Desc: URL: From onekopaka at gmail.com Thu Nov 26 21:45:38 2009 From: onekopaka at gmail.com (Darren VanBuren) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 13:45:38 -0800 Subject: New sponsor!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <407b25020911261345ob8f7855p726f60f4e42ff591@mail.gmail.com> Change requests typically do get put in things like Trac and Bugzilla. In short, yes please. Darren L. VanBuren ===================== http://theoks.net/ On Thu, Nov 26, 2009 at 13:43, Mike McGrath wrote: > We've got a new sponsor, bodhost.com! > > I've attached their logo, they are awesome for providing us a presence in > the UK and canada. > > Also can we add them to the new site specific sponsors that we've been > working on? ? Should I send requests like this to webmaster at fp.o or should > I be using the new websites ticketing system? > > ? ? ? ?-Mike > -- > Fedora-websites-list mailing list > Fedora-websites-list at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-websites-list > > From tmz at pobox.com Fri Nov 27 00:29:36 2009 From: tmz at pobox.com (Todd Zullinger) Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 19:29:36 -0500 Subject: New sponsor!! In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20091127002936.GH4509@inocybe.localdomain> Mike McGrath wrote: > We've got a new sponsor, bodhost.com! Cool! > Also can we add them to the new site specific sponsors that we've > been working on? Should I send requests like this to > webmaster at fp.o or should I be using the new websites ticketing > system? IMO, it doesn't hurt to send a request here (or ping us on IRC). Then if no one picks it up quickly, file a ticket. I've added the bodhost.com sponsor stuff for fp.o already. I think they just need an entry in puppet now so they'll show up in the sidebar sponsor listing. :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The beatings will continue until morale improves. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 542 bytes Desc: not available URL: From khilesh.c at gmail.com Fri Nov 27 08:21:04 2009 From: khilesh.c at gmail.com (KHILESH CHAUHAN) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:21:04 -0800 Subject: fedora project Message-ID: <8fb108e00911270021u2c33f850p904202fcfc4095c0@mail.gmail.com> Best wishes sir, My self khilesh chauhan from bhilai (chhattisgarh) India.Currently doing B.E. in I.T. 3rd semester from RSR Rungta College of Engg. & Tech. bhilai..Want to become a fedora project member as a website developer. My qualifications undes this field :- 1. Completed redhat RHCE cource. 2. Having a good knowledge of HTML , CSS , JAVASCRIPT , PHP & MYSQL. I want to contribute fedora by utilising my knowledge to the best of it. i hane already created an account in fedora website and added my self in w in 2nd of november 2009 but still not aproved as a member. May you please help me. Thank you. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mgonzalez at tubaloo.net Fri Nov 27 12:10:18 2009 From: mgonzalez at tubaloo.net (Mario =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Gonz=E1lez?= T) Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2009 09:10:18 -0300 Subject: Fedora's wiki Message-ID: <1259323818.2241.4.camel@mario-desktop> Dear webmaster, Thanks to give this chance to talk with you guys, you've been doing a great job. I'm writing you because I was wondering if the fedora's wiki theme is released in somewhere. We have been dealing with mediawiki and my boss was delighted when he saw https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Project_Wiki We would like to know if you could share it with us? Many thanks, Kind regards from Chile. -- http://twitter.com/gonzalemario From linuxguy16 at gmail.com Sun Nov 29 01:14:34 2009 From: linuxguy16 at gmail.com (Brad) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 19:14:34 -0600 Subject: joining Message-ID: <4B11CAFA.4020304@gmail.com> I am a great website coder and I am willing to join. I know HTML, PHP, MYSQL, and CSS. I chat with James Gardner on msn who recently joined this group. He pointed out that I would be great for the job. Ask him if you need info about me :D From jcrout at softhome.net Sun Nov 29 06:48:47 2009 From: jcrout at softhome.net (jcrout at softhome.net) Date: Sat, 28 Nov 2009 23:48:47 -0700 Subject: Ambassadors versus others with a Fedoraproject wiki Message-ID: <20091128234847.0845541b@lighthouse2> Hello, I followed a thread that brought me to info about Fedora Ambassadors. Part of my Redhat/Fedora re-acquaintance has me considering an Ambassador role. So I used Google to search the fedoraproject.org site using this search: "Navy site:fedoraproject.org wiki". Then I followed a link that served a wiki page from Sonarguy (Scott Glaser). I also followed links that allegedly allow me to verify an Ambassador and ended up on an obsolete (not maintained) page but is has a link to current Ambassadors. You probably know that recommendations for becoming an Ambassador include finding a mentor. The search I used was intended to help me identify someone with a background that might help me on both ends -- FedoraProject.org, and where I intend to promote Fedora. The trouble is that neither SonarGuy nor Scott Glaser is listed as an Ambassador. He has an email address on the wiki, I realize, but want to first verify him. Especially now, since I can't find either name on the list. Is he an Ambassador? Thank-you for your time. -John