[Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64

[Zhang, Xiantao]

Very clear now! Thank you very much.
-Xiantao

OTC,Intel Corporation

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio at jp.fujitsu.com]
> Sent: 2006年7月27日 17:36
> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen at redhat.com; Chris Wright;
> fedora-ia64-list at redhat.com; xen-ia64-devel at lists.xensource.com; Akio
> Takebe
> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
> 
> Hi, Xiantao
> 
> Yes, you are right.
> And I think you must use the following patch.
> 
> Now I cannot boot by using xen-ia64-unstable
> (not linux-2.6-xen-fedora) on FC6.
> I'm debuging it.
> Then I'll try to boot by using xen-ia64-unstable/xen and linux-2.6-xen-
> fedora.
> 
> diff -r 61b945565398 drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Jul 26 17:22:38 2006 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h	Wed Aug 02 00:30:00 2006 +0900
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline void tpm_write_index(int b
> 
>  static inline u32 get_chip_buffersize(struct tpm_chip *chip)
>  {
> -	return chip->vendor->buffersize;
> +	return chip->vendor.buffersize;
>  }
> 
>  extern void tpm_get_timeouts(struct tpm_chip *);
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Akio Takebe
> 
> >Hi Akio,
> >	Thank you for your information. I am using the CSet34705 which should
> be
> >latest, and do you mean I should apply Aron's patches on it. right?  In
> >addition, what's status about it?
> >BTW,
> >
> >Thanks & Best Regards
> >-Xiantao
> >
> >OTC,Intel Corporation
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio at jp.fujitsu.com]
> >> Sent: 2006年7月27日 16:47
> >> To: Zhang, Xiantao; Aron Griffis; Juan Quintela
> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen at redhat.com; Chris Wright;
> >> fedora-ia64-list at redhat.com; xen-ia64-devel at lists.xensource.com
> >> Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5]
> >> fixlinux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
> >>
> >> Hi, Xiantao
> >>
> >> BZ's patch is old.
> >> Today 139 cset is added to linux-2.6-xen-fedora tree.
> >> So I think we should use Aron's patches.
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >>
> >> Akio Takebe
> >>
> >> >Hi Aron,
> >> >	Could you share me the current status for fedora-xen-ia64? Through your
> 
> >>
> >> >mails, I see we should focus our efforts on linux-2.6-xen-fedora. But when
> >> >I applied the patch 199684 on it, conflicts occurs. Do you have any
> >> >suggestion for contributing to Fedora ?
> >> >Thanks & Best Regards
> >> >-Xiantao
> >> >
> >> >OTC,Intel Corporation
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com
> >> [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com]
> >> >> On Behalf Of Aron Griffis
> >> >> Sent: 2006ト・ヤツ27ネユ 12:11
> >> >> To: Juan Quintela
> >> >> Cc: Prarit Bhargava; fedora-xen at redhat.com; Chris Wright;
> >> >> fedora-ia64-list at redhat.com; Alex Williamson;
> >> >> xen-ia64-devel at lists.xensource.com
> >> >> Subject: [Fedora-xen] [PATCH 0 of 5] fix linux-2.6-xen-fedora on ia64
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Juan,
> >> >>
> >> >> These patches are the result of Akio, Prarit, Alex and me working on
> >> >> fixing
> >> >> the
> >> >> ia64 build of your tree.  At this point the bare-metal Linux kernel
> >> >> builds and
> >> >> boots.  The xen kernel builds but doesn't complete booting.
> >> >> Nonetheless,
> >> >> since
> >> >> these patches seem to take us most of the way there, we'd like to
> >> >> request
> >> >>  them
> >> >> to be applied to your tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks,
> >> >> Aron
> >> >
> >> >_______________________________________________
> >> >Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> >> >Xen-ia64-devel at lists.xensource.com
> >> >http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel