[Fedora-xen] FW: [IA64]We have successfully booted dom0/domU/domVTI (xen/ia64) on FC5
Zhang, Xiantao
xiantao.zhang at intel.com
Thu Jun 1 02:17:41 UTC 2006
Hi Aron,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Aron Griffis [mailto:aron at hp.com]
> Sent: 2006年6月1日 3:13
> To: Zhang, Xiantao
> Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] FW: [IA64]We have successfully booted
> dom0/domU/domVTI (xen/ia64) on FC5
>
> Zhang, Xiantao wrote: [Fri May 26 2006, 09:38:51AM EDT]
> > >> - The configuration files for dom0/domU seems a big difference
> > >> compared to xen-ia64-unstable.hg. (Why?) Currently the ext3 is
> > >> compiled as module, however initrd doesn't work for domU even
> > >> when we add "ramdisk=" in config file. So we change ext3 to be
> > >> kernel built-in, and then domU can boot up immediately.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll fix that in the rpm.
> >
> > OK.
>
> I added ext3 as 'y' instead of module, this is now in the
> fedora-kernel-ia64 repo.
>
> > >> - Xen-ia64-unstable.hg doesn't have IDE devices configured for
> > >> domU, however fedora-kernel-ia64 does, which wastes much time
> > >> for probe. If the configuration file can be kept consistence
> > >> with xen-ia64-unstable.hg, above issues are gone.
> > > That's my mistake too. I'll fix it.
> > OK too:)
>
> On investigation, I don't see IDE configured for the xenU kernel.
> Could you point out the specific problem, or send a patch to the
> config?
I saw the issue was fixed by CSet 33. Did you encounter it after Cset 33? :)
> Thanks,
> Aron
More information about the Fedora-xen
mailing list