[Fedora-xen] Xen Windows paravirtualized drivers in Fedora 7

[Jim Klein]

Oops! Sorry guys - this was my fault. I had read somewhere (I thought it was on this list) that there was compilable source for paravirt drivers in there, but hadn't actually checked it out before I mentioned it to Jack. I said that I hadn't had a chance to check them out, but I wasn't real clear in my email (was typing on a cell phone, so I wasn't real wordy.) My bad. 

--Jim 

>Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 14:20:32 +0100 
>From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange at redhat.com> 
>Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Xen Windows paravirtualized drivers in 
>Fedora 7? 
>To: "achan at jonathan360.com" <achan at jonathan360.com> 
>Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com 
>Message-ID: <20070913132031.GC23525 at redhat.com> 
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii 
> 
>On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 09:08:11AM -0400, achan at jonathan360.com wrote: 
>> It was my understanding that windows drivers in paravairtualization is 
>> not possible because of the windows kernel, not because of lack of 
>> drivers. For it to work properly the kernel would need altered which is 
>> against the EULA of Microsoft. At least that was my understanding. 
> 
>That is partially true. If you want to use the DDK, then it is not possible 
>to make your drivers GPL, but you could choose other open source licenses 
>I believe. You would end up with a situation where the source was technically 
>one license, but the binary became a different license. eg BSD source, but 
>Combined BSD / Microsoft DDK for the binary. In theory you don't have to 
>use the DDK, but not doing so would involve huge amounts of extra programming 
>work. It all rather sucks, but that's Windows for you. IANAL btw :-) 
> 
>Dan. 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/attachments/20070913/2d8ecb49/attachment.htm>