[Fedora-xen] New kernel-xen in rawhide
Mark McLoughlin
markmc at redhat.com
Thu Jul 24 10:53:01 UTC 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 13:32 +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> I still think it might be a good idea to keep separate kernel-xen until
> upstream has "all" the needed features..
>
> Like said, adding dom0 patches should be easier to separate rpm?
Yeah, it's a trade-off.
But consider:
a) davej is rebasing the stock kernel up to twice daily; it would be a
huge time sync to try and keep kernel-xen in sync with that pace;
b) There's relatively little Dom0 work going on a the moment, so
there's little chance of having usable Dom0 patches for Fedora 10
c) It's not inconceivable that we could add work-in-progress Dom0
patches to kernel/devel; the bar would be higher than for
kernel-xen, though
I sent a bunch of patches to fedora-kernel-list yesterday:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-kernel-list/2008-July/thread.html#00062
Cheers,
Mark.
More information about the Fedora-xen
mailing list