From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 10 17:09:47 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:09:47 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released Message-ID: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> ----- Forwarded message from Keir Fraser ----- From: Keir Fraser To: "xen-devel at lists.xensource.com" , xen-users at lists.xensource.com Cc: Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:35:08 +0100 Subject: [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released Folks, New releases in the 3.3 and 3.4 stable branches are now tagged and released. You can pick up the source repositories here: http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.3-testing.hg (tagged RELEASE-3.3.2) http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg (tagged RELEASE-3.4.1) Or you can pick up tarballs from the following webpages: 3.3.2: http://www.xen.org/download/index_3.3.2.html 3.4.1: http://www.xen.org/download/ -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel at lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel ----- End forwarded message ----- From orion at cora.nwra.com Mon Aug 10 18:37:09 2009 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:37:09 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Possible to install Fedora Rawhide (F12) on RHEL5? Message-ID: <4A8068D5.0@cora.nwra.com> I'm trying to install current Fedora Rawhide on my RHEL5 box - Starting install... Retrieving file .treeinfo... | 1.2 kB 00:00 Retrieving file .treeinfo... | 1.2 kB 00:00 Retrieving file vmlinuz... | 2.9 MB 00:09 Retrieving file initrd.img... | 22 MB 01:17 virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST operation failed: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") Domain installation may not have been successful. If it was, you can restart your domain by running 'virsh start xenfdev64'; otherwise, please restart your installation. Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:22:28 ERROR virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST operation failed: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") domain-builder-ng.log shows: xc_dom_kernel_file: filename="/var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.jWnwEV" xc_dom_malloc_filemap : 2921 kB xc_dom_ramdisk_file: filename="/var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.ZWLIiQ" xc_dom_malloc_filemap : 22491 kB xc_dom_boot_xen_init: ver 3.1, caps xen-3.0-x86_64 xen-3.0-x86_32p xc_dom_parse_image: called xc_dom_find_loader: trying ELF-generic loader ... failed xc_dom_find_loader: trying Linux bzImage loader ... failed xc_dom_find_loader: trying multiboot-binary loader ... failed xc_dom_core.c:495: panic: xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found xc_dom_release: called Any hope? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion at cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com From kraxel at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 08:24:29 2009 From: kraxel at redhat.com (Gerd Hoffmann) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:24:29 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released In-Reply-To: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> Hi, > 3.4.1: http://www.xen.org/download/ Great timing. They managed to do the release just one day after the alpha freeze. Packages are built, but they will not hit the repos until the alpha is done. You can grab them from koji though: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ enjoy, Gerd From markmc at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:00:49 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:00:49 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released In-Reply-To: <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> Message-ID: <1249981249.3494.28.camel@blaa> Hi Gerd, On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:24 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > 3.4.1: http://www.xen.org/download/ > > Great timing. They managed to do the release just one day after the > alpha freeze. Packages are built, but they will not hit the repos until > the alpha is done. You can grab them from koji though: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/DevelFreezePolicy You can file a tag request to have it tagged into f12-alpha. I've done a number of these: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2051 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2052 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2053 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2060 https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/2088 The alpha has been delayed a week now and since problems in the xen package are only going to affect a small number of bleeding edge testers, I don't see why rel-eng would refuse the request. Cheers, Mark. From markmc at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:02:44 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:02:44 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Possible to install Fedora Rawhide (F12) on RHEL5? In-Reply-To: <4A8068D5.0@cora.nwra.com> References: <4A8068D5.0@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <1249981364.3494.30.camel@blaa> Hi Orion, On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:37 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:22:28 ERROR virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST > operation failed: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid > kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") ... > xc_dom_parse_image: called > xc_dom_find_loader: trying ELF-generic loader ... failed > xc_dom_find_loader: trying Linux bzImage loader ... failed > xc_dom_find_loader: trying multiboot-binary loader ... failed > xc_dom_core.c:495: panic: xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found Also reported here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/515831 Maybe you could take a look Chris? Cheers, Mark. From clalance at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 09:18:32 2009 From: clalance at redhat.com (Chris Lalancette) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:18:32 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Possible to install Fedora Rawhide (F12) on RHEL5? In-Reply-To: <1249981364.3494.30.camel@blaa> References: <4A8068D5.0@cora.nwra.com> <1249981364.3494.30.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <4A813768.503@redhat.com> Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi Orion, > > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:37 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:22:28 ERROR virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST >> operation failed: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid >> kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") > ... >> xc_dom_parse_image: called >> xc_dom_find_loader: trying ELF-generic loader ... failed >> xc_dom_find_loader: trying Linux bzImage loader ... failed >> xc_dom_find_loader: trying multiboot-binary loader ... failed >> xc_dom_core.c:495: panic: xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found > > Also reported here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/515831 > > Maybe you could take a look Chris? Yes, I'll take a look today. -- Chris Lalancette From markmc at redhat.com Tue Aug 11 10:51:39 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 11:51:39 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Possible to install Fedora Rawhide (F12) on RHEL5? In-Reply-To: <1249981364.3494.30.camel@blaa> References: <4A8068D5.0@cora.nwra.com> <1249981364.3494.30.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <1249987899.3494.36.camel@blaa> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 10:02 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > Hi Orion, > > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 12:37 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > > Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:22:28 ERROR virDomainCreateLinux() failed POST > > operation failed: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid > > kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") > ... > > xc_dom_parse_image: called > > xc_dom_find_loader: trying ELF-generic loader ... failed > > xc_dom_find_loader: trying Linux bzImage loader ... failed > > xc_dom_find_loader: trying multiboot-binary loader ... failed > > xc_dom_core.c:495: panic: xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found > > Also reported here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/515831 > For anyone interested: Okay, so it turns out the problem is # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y the change was introduced by: * Mon Jul 06 2009 Chuck Ebbert - Use LZMA for kernel compression on X86. Xen's bzImage loaded can only handle compressed gzip, not compressed LZMA Switching to LZMA means that Fedora kernels cannot be booted by any deployed or upstream versions of Xen; we really should switch this back to gzip Cheers, Mark. From m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca Wed Aug 12 15:28:25 2009 From: m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca (Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:28:25 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Using virt-manager for managing KVM VMs running on CentOS 5 Message-ID: <1250090905.19472.34.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> Hi Everyone, Can I use virt-manager from a Fedora 11 box to manage KVM VMs running on a CentOS 5.3 host? The CentOS 5.3 machine is running KVM and related RPMs from a third party repo (http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/) . I'm using TLS for the encryption. I followed the TLS guide on the libvirt.org website to create and install all the necessary certs and keys. I have libvirtd listening on the CentOS 5 box. When I try to connect to libvirtd with virt-manager from my Fedora 11 desktop, I see the following error on the server: error : qemudClientReadBuf:1554 : gnutls_record_recv: A TLS packet with unexpected length was received. So, that has me wondering if I can even connect to libvirtd on the CentOS 5 box from Fedora 11 in the first place. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 10:54:02 up 5 days, 9:54, 5 users, load average: 2.36, 2.38, 1.27 From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Aug 12 15:57:02 2009 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 09:57:02 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Still can't boot Fedora rawhide xen with EL5 Message-ID: <4A82E64E.2050205@cora.nwra.com> Getting different error now without LZMA: Starting install... Retrieving file .treeinfo... | 1.2 kB 00:00 Retrieving file .treeinfo... | 1.2 kB 00:00 Retrieving file vmlinuz... | 3.5 MB 00:00 Retrieving file initrd.img... | 22 MB 00:01 Creating domain... | 0 B 00:01 ERROR: It appears that your installation has crashed. You should be able to find more information in the logs [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:200) XendDomainInfo.create(['vm', ['name', 'xenfdev64'], ['memory', '512'], ['maxmem', '512'], ['vcpus', '1'], ['uuid', '7579b650-65c7-5baa-0bc0-3502da28df6c'], ['on_poweroff', 'destroy'], ['on_reboot', 'destroy'], ['on_crash', 'destroy'], ['image', ['linux', ['kernel', '/var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.h8bkQS'], ['ramdisk', '/var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.yoWzKP'], ['args', 'ks=http://sw.cora.nwra.com/ks/rawhide-nox64.cfg method=http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os']]], ['device', ['vbd', ['dev', 'xvda'], ['uname', 'phy:/dev/rootvg/xenfdev64'], ['mode', 'w']]], ['device', ['vif', ['mac', '40:00:00:00:00:03'], ['bridge', 'xenbr0']]], ['device', ['vkbd']], ['device', ['vfb', ['type', 'vnc'], ['vncunused', '1']]]]) [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:312) parseConfig: config is ['vm', ['name', 'xenfdev64'], ['memory', '512'], ['maxmem', '512'], ['vcpus', '1'], ['uuid', '7579b650-65c7-5baa-0bc0-3502da28df6c'], ['on_poweroff', 'destroy'], ['on_reboot', 'destroy'], ['on_crash', 'destroy'], ['image', ['linux', ['kernel', '/var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.h8bkQS'], ['ramdisk', '/var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.yoWzKP'], ['args', 'ks=http://sw.cora.nwra.com/ks/rawhide-nox64.cfg method=http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os']]], ['device', ['vbd', ['dev', 'xvda'], ['uname', 'phy:/dev/rootvg/xenfdev64'], ['mode', 'w']]], ['device', ['vif', ['mac', '40:00:00:00:00:03'], ['bridge', 'xenbr0']]], ['device', ['vkbd']], ['device', ['vfb', ['type', 'vnc'], ['vncunused', '1']]]] [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:417) parseConfig: result is {'shadow_memory': None, 'start_time': None, 'uuid': '7579b650-65c7-5baa-0bc0-3502da28df6c', 'on_crash': 'destroy', 'on_reboot': 'destroy', 'localtime': None, 'image': ['linux', ['kernel', '/var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.h8bkQS'], ['ramdisk', '/var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.yoWzKP'], ['args', 'ks=http://sw.cora.nwra.com/ks/rawhide-nox64.cfg method=http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os']], 'on_poweroff': 'destroy', 'bootloader_args': None, 'cpus': None, 'name': 'xenfdev64', 'backend': [], 'vcpus': 1, 'cpu_weight': None, 'features': None, 'vcpu_avail': None, 'memory': 512, 'device': [('vbd', ['vbd', ['dev', 'xvda'], ['uname', 'phy:/dev/rootvg/xenfdev64'], ['mode', 'w']]), ('vif', ['vif', ['mac', '40:00:00:00:00:03'], ['bridge', 'xenbr0']]), ('vkbd', ['vkbd']), ('vfb', ['vfb', ['type', 'vnc'], ['vncunused', '1']])], 'bootloader': None, 'cpu': None, 'maxmem': 512} [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1427) XendDomainInfo.construct: None [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (balloon:143) Balloon: 525032 KiB free; need 2048; done. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1475) XendDomainInfo.initDomain: 20 1.0 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1514) _initDomain:shadow_memory=0x0, maxmem=0x200, memory=0x200. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (balloon:143) Balloon: 525024 KiB free; need 524288; done. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] INFO (image:137) buildDomain os=linux dom=20 vcpus=1 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:206) domid = 20 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:207) memsize = 512 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:208) image = /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.h8bkQS [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:209) store_evtchn = 1 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:210) console_evtchn = 2 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:211) cmdline = ks=http://sw.cora.nwra.com/ks/rawhide-nox64.cfg method=http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:212) ramdisk = /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.yoWzKP [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:213) vcpus = 1 [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (image:214) features = [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:110) DevController: writing {'protocol': 'x86_64-abi', 'state': '1', 'backend-id': '0', 'backend': '/local/domain/0/backend/vkbd/20/0'} to /local/domain/20/device/vkbd/0. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:112) DevController: writing {'frontend-id': '20', 'domain': 'xenfdev64', 'frontend': '/local/domain/20/device/vkbd/0', 'state': '1', 'online': '1'} to /local/domain/0/backend/vkbd/20/0. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (blkif:27) exception looking up device number for xvda: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/dev/xvda' [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:110) DevController: writing {'virtual-device': '51712', 'device-type': 'disk', 'protocol': 'x86_64-abi', 'backend-id': '0', 'state': '1', 'backend': '/local/domain/0/backend/vbd/20/51712'} to /local/domain/20/device/vbd/51712. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:112) DevController: writing {'domain': 'xenfdev64', 'frontend': '/local/domain/20/device/vbd/51712', 'format': 'raw', 'dev': 'xvda', 'state': '1', 'params': '/dev/rootvg/xenfdev64', 'mode': 'w', 'online': '1', 'frontend-id': '20', 'type': 'phy'} to /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/20/51712. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:110) DevController: writing {'mac': '40:00:00:00:00:03', 'handle': '0', 'protocol': 'x86_64-abi', 'backend-id': '0', 'state': '1', 'backend': '/local/domain/0/backend/vif/20/0'} to /local/domain/20/device/vif/0. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:112) DevController: writing {'bridge': 'xenbr0', 'domain': 'xenfdev64', 'handle': '0', 'script': '/etc/xen/scripts/vif-bridge', 'state': '1', 'frontend': '/local/domain/20/device/vif/0', 'mac': '40:00:00:00:00:03', 'online': '1', 'frontend-id': '20'} to /local/domain/0/backend/vif/20/0. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:110) DevController: writing {'protocol': 'x86_64-abi', 'state': '1', 'backend-id': '0', 'backend': '/local/domain/0/backend/vfb/20/0'} to /local/domain/20/device/vfb/0. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:112) DevController: writing {'vncunused': '1', 'domain': 'xenfdev64', 'frontend': '/local/domain/20/device/vfb/0', 'online': '1', 'frontend-id': '20', 'type': 'vnc', 'state': '1'} to /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/20/0. [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (vfbif:70) No VNC passwd configured for vfb access [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend 3214] DEBUG (vfbif:11) Spawn: ['/usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm', '-M', 'xenpv', '-d', '20', '-domain-name', 'xenfdev64', '-vnc', '127.0.0.1:0', '-vncunused'] [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:797) Storing VM details: {'shadow_memory': '0', 'uuid': '7579b650-65c7-5baa-0bc0-3502da28df6c', 'on_reboot': 'destroy', 'start_time': '1250092350.98', 'on_poweroff': 'destroy', 'name': 'xenfdev64', 'xend/restart_count': '0', 'vcpus': '1', 'vcpu_avail': '1', 'memory': '512', 'on_crash': 'destroy', 'image': "(linux (kernel /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.h8bkQS) (ramdisk /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.yoWzKP) (args 'ks=http://sw.cora.nwra.com/ks/rawhide-nox64.cfg method=http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os'))", 'maxmem': '512'} [2009-08-12 09:52:30 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:832) Storing domain details: {'console/ring-ref': '676374', 'console/port': '2', 'name': 'xenfdev64', 'console/limit': '1048576', 'vm': '/vm/7579b650-65c7-5baa-0bc0-3502da28df6c', 'domid': '20', 'cpu/0/availability': 'online', 'memory/target': '524288', 'store/ring-ref': '676375', 'store/port': '1'} [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1036) XendDomainInfo.handleShutdownWatch [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices vif. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:160) Waiting for 0. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:496) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vif/20/0/hotplug-status. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:496) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vif/20/0/hotplug-status. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:510) hotplugStatusCallback 1. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices usb. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices vbd. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:160) Waiting for 51712. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:496) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/20/51712/hotplug-status. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:496) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vbd/20/51712/hotplug-status. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:510) hotplugStatusCallback 1. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices irq. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices vkbd. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:160) Waiting for 0. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:496) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vkbd/20/0/hotplug-status. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:510) hotplugStatusCallback 1. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices vfb. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:160) Waiting for 0. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:496) hotplugStatusCallback /local/domain/0/backend/vfb/20/0/hotplug-status. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:510) hotplugStatusCallback 1. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices pci. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices ioports. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices tap. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] DEBUG (DevController:154) Waiting for devices vtpm. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend 3214] INFO (XendDomain:380) Domain xenfdev64 (20) unpaused. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:965) Domain has crashed: name=xenfdev64 id=20. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1637) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=20 [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:965) Domain has crashed: name=xenfdev64 id=20. [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] DEBUG (XendDomainInfo:1637) XendDomainInfo.destroy: domid=20 [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:1645) XendDomainInfo.destroy: xc.domain_destroy failed. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib64/python2.4/site-packages/xen/xend/XendDomainInfo.py", line 1643, in destroy xc.domain_destroy(self.domid) Error: (3, 'No such process') -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion at cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com From markmc at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 16:13:20 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 17:13:20 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Still can't boot Fedora rawhide xen with EL5 In-Reply-To: <4A82E64E.2050205@cora.nwra.com> References: <4A82E64E.2050205@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <1250093600.3424.55.camel@blaa> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:57 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] WARNING > (XendDomainInfo:965) Domain has crashed: name=xenfdev64 id=20. Looks like the guest crashed. If you set "on_crash=preserve" in your domain config and then once the crash has happened you should be able to use something like: $> /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map-2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64 to get a stack trace. Cheers, Mark. From orion at cora.nwra.com Wed Aug 12 17:24:13 2009 From: orion at cora.nwra.com (Orion Poplawski) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 11:24:13 -0600 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Still can't boot Fedora rawhide xen with EL5 In-Reply-To: <1250093600.3424.55.camel@blaa> References: <4A82E64E.2050205@cora.nwra.com> <1250093600.3424.55.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <4A82FABD.5040608@cora.nwra.com> On 08/12/2009 10:13 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:57 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] WARNING >> (XendDomainInfo:965) Domain has crashed: name=xenfdev64 id=20. > > Looks like the guest crashed. > > If you set "on_crash=preserve" in your domain config and then once the > crash has happened you should be able to use something like: > > $> /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map-2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64 > > to get a stack trace. I really have no idea how to do this. Is this something I can pass to virt-install? After virt-install fails, I don't have a config file for the domain. My current install command: virt-install -n xenfdev64 -r 512 --vcpus=1 -m 40:00:00:00:00:03 --arch=x86_64 -p -f /dev/rootvg/xenfdev64 -l http://fedora.cora.nwra.com/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os -x 'ks=http://sw.cora.nwra.com/ks/rawhide-nox64.cfg' --vnc Thanks! -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion at cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com From markmc at redhat.com Wed Aug 12 17:47:17 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 18:47:17 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Still can't boot Fedora rawhide xen with EL5 In-Reply-To: <4A82FABD.5040608@cora.nwra.com> References: <4A82E64E.2050205@cora.nwra.com> <1250093600.3424.55.camel@blaa> <4A82FABD.5040608@cora.nwra.com> Message-ID: <1250099237.3424.69.camel@blaa> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:24 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 08/12/2009 10:13 AM, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:57 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] WARNING > >> (XendDomainInfo:965) Domain has crashed: name=xenfdev64 id=20. > > > > Looks like the guest crashed. > > > > If you set "on_crash=preserve" in your domain config and then once the > > crash has happened you should be able to use something like: > > > > $> /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map-2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64 > > > > to get a stack trace. > > I really have no idea how to do this. Is this something I can pass to > virt-install? After virt-install fails, I don't have a config file for > the domain. Ah, right. Do you have an existing (e.g. F-11) guest that you could try use the rawhide kernel with? Cheers, Mark. From m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca Wed Aug 12 19:59:48 2009 From: m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca (Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu) Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 15:59:48 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Using virt-manager for managing KVM VMs running on CentOS 5 In-Reply-To: <1250090905.19472.34.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> References: <1250090905.19472.34.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> Message-ID: <1250107188.19472.36.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 11:28 -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > So, that has me wondering if I can even connect to libvirtd on the > CentOS 5 box from Fedora 11 in the first place. Well, an ssh connection from virt-manager on F11 to libvirtd on CentOS 5 works (just tried it). So, at least I know that's good. I still don't know why the TLS connection is failing. Regards, Ranbir -- Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu Linux 2.6.27.29-170.2.78.fc10.x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 15:58:07 up 5 days, 14:58, 5 users, load average: 0.60, 0.24, 0.18 From berrange at redhat.com Thu Aug 13 08:35:06 2009 From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:35:06 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Using virt-manager for managing KVM VMs running on CentOS 5 In-Reply-To: <1250090905.19472.34.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> References: <1250090905.19472.34.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> Message-ID: <20090813083506.GD10257@redhat.com> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:28:25AM -0400, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu wrote: > Hi Everyone, > > Can I use virt-manager from a Fedora 11 box to manage KVM VMs running on > a CentOS 5.3 host? The CentOS 5.3 machine is running KVM and related > RPMs from a third party repo > (http://www.lfarkas.org/linux/packages/centos/5/x86_64/virt/RPMS/) . > > I'm using TLS for the encryption. I followed the TLS guide on the > libvirt.org website to create and install all the necessary certs and > keys. I have libvirtd listening on the CentOS 5 box. When I try to > connect to libvirtd with virt-manager from my Fedora 11 desktop, I see > the following error on the server: > > error : qemudClientReadBuf:1554 : gnutls_record_recv: A TLS packet with > unexpected length was received. This is a sign of a authentication problem - you'll typically see that error when the server rejects the client's certificates, or if there is a cert prblem in genreal. > So, that has me wondering if I can even connect to libvirtd on the > CentOS 5 box from Fedora 11 in the first place. Yes, libvirt is ABI stable for its wire protocol across all releases. You will, however, be restricted to the functionality available in the libvirt version you have. Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| From m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca Thu Aug 13 14:47:42 2009 From: m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca (m3freak at thesandhufamily.ca) Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:47:42 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Using virt-manager for managing KVM VMs running on CentOS 5 In-Reply-To: <20090813083506.GD10257@redhat.com> References: <1250090905.19472.34.camel@ranbir.thesandhufamily.local> <20090813083506.GD10257@redhat.com> Message-ID: <7f838bc53248d75d3440a9a7da7bcf50@mailman01.systemsaligned.com> I hope this doesn't break the thread. I'm sending this email from a client that doesn't understand threading/mail lists. On Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:35:06 +0100, "Daniel P. Berrange" wrote: > This is a sign of a authentication problem - you'll typically see that > error when the server rejects the client's certificates, or if there is > a cert prblem in genreal. I followed the instructions on the libvirt.org site (http://libvirt.org/remote.html) to the letter. I've even used the pki_check.sh script to check the certs/keys - no problems. So, I'm not sure where to turn next. I'm not saying there isn't a problem with my generated certs. It's just that since I don't have any experience with managing KVM hosts remotely, I've just followed the instructions blindly. Unfortunately, it be not worky! :p >> So, that has me wondering if I can even connect to libvirtd on the >> CentOS 5 box from Fedora 11 in the first place. > > Yes, libvirt is ABI stable for its wire protocol across all releases. > You will, however, be restricted to the functionality available in the > libvirt version you have. Great, that's what I want to hear! So, can I create a VM on the remote KVM host by installing from an ISO image? I've tried, but virt-manager complains it can't find the ISO. I've been specifying the ISO location on the remote box. Regards, Kanwar Ranbir Sandhu From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Fri Aug 14 21:32:34 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:32:34 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: References: <20090328163545.GM31725@salstar.sk> <20090414143618.GH351@redhat.com> Message-ID: Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . I have had trouble getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this one does work. I haven't tried i686. Michael Young From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 17 15:09:19 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:09:19 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . I have had trouble > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this > one does work. I haven't tried i686. > Finally the 32bit PAE (i686) dom0 kernel crash problem has been fixed. Patch: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=02ef83d1ed382d898bbb4a8ade9888e21fe33d1d I verified that patch fixes the problem. I'll try these RPMs soon. -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 17 15:23:15 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:23:15 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:09:19PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . I have had trouble > > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this > > one does work. I haven't tried i686. > > > > Finally the 32bit PAE (i686) dom0 kernel crash problem has been fixed. > > Patch: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=02ef83d1ed382d898bbb4a8ade9888e21fe33d1d > > I verified that patch fixes the problem. > > I'll try these RPMs soon. > Hmm, it seems these RPMs cannot be installed on F11 system, so I'm not really able to test atm. My custom built 2.6.31-rc5 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works just fine (rebase/master git commit 9f450689ccef15881a6a9901164e2a307562a958) -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 17 15:27:40 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:27:40 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090817152740.GG24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:23:15PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:09:19PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > > > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . I have had trouble > > > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this > > > one does work. I haven't tried i686. > > > > > > > Finally the 32bit PAE (i686) dom0 kernel crash problem has been fixed. > > > > Patch: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=02ef83d1ed382d898bbb4a8ade9888e21fe33d1d > > > > I verified that patch fixes the problem. > > > > I'll try these RPMs soon. > > > > Hmm, it seems these RPMs cannot be installed on F11 system, so I'm not really able > to test atm. > > My custom built 2.6.31-rc5 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works just fine > (rebase/master git commit 9f450689ccef15881a6a9901164e2a307562a958) > Oh, and I'm still using CONFIG_HIGHPTE=n in kernel .config because I believe that's still broken on 32bit. -- Pasi From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Mon Aug 17 17:03:52 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:03:52 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hmm, it seems these RPMs cannot be installed on F11 system, so I'm not really able > to test atm. > > My custom built 2.6.31-rc5 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works just fine > (rebase/master git commit 9f450689ccef15881a6a9901164e2a307562a958) How recent is your rpm? Or is it grubby that is the problem? However I think your problems might be different to mine, because my latest kernel includes that patch but it still doesn't boot for me. Michael Young From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 17 17:19:33 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:19:33 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090817171933.GJ24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:03:52PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > >Hmm, it seems these RPMs cannot be installed on F11 system, so I'm not > >really able > >to test atm. > > > >My custom built 2.6.31-rc5 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works just fine > >(rebase/master git commit 9f450689ccef15881a6a9901164e2a307562a958) > > How recent is your rpm? Or is it grubby that is the problem? > However I think your problems might be different to mine, because my > latest kernel includes that patch but it still doesn't boot for me. > # rpm -i kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm error: Failed dependencies: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 -- Pasi From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Mon Aug 17 18:13:19 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 19:13:19 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817171933.GJ24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090817171933.GJ24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > # rpm -i kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 That is easy, there is an appropriate kernel-firmware package in the repository. On the other hand firmware doesn't change much so you are probably safe overriding this dependency. > grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 It should be safe to use --force to override this. 7.0.2-1 is needed for dracut, but I disabled it in that build because it doesn't work with livecd-tools yet. Michael Young From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 17 19:14:48 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:14:48 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090817191448.GM24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:21:09AM -0700, Caz Yokoyama wrote: > Hello Michael, > --force does not allow installation. Try --nodeps -- Pasi > -caz > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com] > On Behalf Of M A Young > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 11:13 AM > To: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com; fedora-xen at redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works > now > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > # rpm -i kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12 is needed by > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > That is easy, there is an appropriate kernel-firmware package in the > repository. On the other hand firmware doesn't change much so you are > probably safe overriding this dependency. > > grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > It should be safe to use --force to override this. 7.0.2-1 is needed for > dracut, but I disabled it in that build because it doesn't work with > livecd-tools yet. > > Michael Young > From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 06:29:18 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:29:18 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <439D9741AFD6433DA584FCBB10BAB8AA@xpjpn> References: <20090817191448.GM24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <439D9741AFD6433DA584FCBB10BAB8AA@xpjpn> Message-ID: <20090818062918.GN24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 01:24:25PM -0700, Caz Yokoyama wrote: > Hello Michael, > The installation is fine with --nodeps and booting > kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 without Xen work fine. > However, when it is booted upon Xen does not work. The characters in login > screen are garbled as before without nomodeset. With nomodeset, screen > becomes blank when X window is started, even Ctl+Alt+F2 does not work. X might not work at this point, depending on your hardware. What kind of display adapter do you have? -- Pasi > -caz > > -----Original Message----- > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen [mailto:pasik at iki.fi] > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 12:15 PM > To: Caz Yokoyama > Cc: 'M A Young'; fedora-virt at redhat.com; fedora-xen at redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works > now > > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:21:09AM -0700, Caz Yokoyama wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > --force does not allow installation. > > Try --nodeps > > -- Pasi > > > -caz > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com] > > On Behalf Of M A Young > > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 11:13 AM > > To: Pasi K?rkk?inen > > Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com; fedora-xen at redhat.com > > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel > works > > now > > > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > # rpm -i kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > > > error: Failed dependencies: > > > kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12 is needed by > > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > > That is easy, there is an appropriate kernel-firmware package in the > > repository. On the other hand firmware doesn't change much so you are > > probably safe overriding this dependency. > > > grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by > > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > > It should be safe to use --force to override this. 7.0.2-1 is needed for > > dracut, but I disabled it in that build because it doesn't work with > > livecd-tools yet. > > > > Michael Young > > > From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 08:42:00 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:42:00 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 Message-ID: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Hello. While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able to complete the installation with vncviewer. http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). Any tips? -- Pasi From berrange at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 09:25:28 2009 From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:25:28 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hello. > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 10:18:23 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 13:18:23 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > Hello. > > > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). > > strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and > capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace > Yeah, I was going to try gdb next.. just didn't have time yet. Thanks. -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 18:54:27 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:54:27 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] pvops dom0 work roadmap Message-ID: <20090818185427.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> ----- Forwarded message from Jeremy Fitzhardinge ----- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge To: Xen-devel Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:43:38 -0700 Subject: [Xen-devel] pvops dom0 work roadmap Hi all, I know I've been a bit quiet lately; I've been working through a number of relatively small but time-consuming bugs while trying to stabilize rebase/master. The plan is: * make sure rebase/master is fairly functional and somewhat stable * rename rebase/* to xen/* * use it as the baseline dom0 and domU kernel in xen-unstable rebase/mster is currently up to 2.6.31-rc6, and I intend to track mainline fairly closely (probably no more closely than the -rc level). It also has some new features: * better acpi power management (ported from 2.6.18) * MCE (also from 2.6.18) * microcode updater (I forget whether that's in xen-tip/master) rebase/master is mostly working for me now, but I would be interested in getting some more testing (both success and bug reports welcomed). Once it seems to work, I'll do the rename and we'll work from there. What does this mean for you? * If you're itching to test something, test rebase/master * If you're doing some new development, base it on rebase/master (or if you don't have any strong dependencies on other Xen pieces, base it on mainline) o also, tell me if you're working on something, even if it isn't ready yet, so I know who's doing what It would also useful to do regression testing on plain, unpatched, mainline, to make sure that any real bugfixes get merged promptly. Thanks, J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel at lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel ----- End forwarded message ----- From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 20:18:24 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:18:24 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090818201824.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > Hello. > > > > > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > > > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > > > > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > > > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > > > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > > > > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). > > > > strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and > > capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace > > > > Yeah, I was going to try gdb next.. just didn't have time yet. Thanks. > (gdb) run test2vm Starting program: /usr/bin/virt-viewer test2vm [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb7c64b70 (LWP 2802)] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 40 ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S: No such file or directory. in ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S Current language: auto; currently asm (gdb) bt #0 strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 #1 0xb7f237d2 in virEnumFromString (types=0xb7fb7074, ntypes=2, type=0x0) at util.c:1481 #2 0xb7f3ce4f in virDomainGraphicsTypeFromString (type=0x0) at domain_conf.c:150 #3 0xb7f77490 in xenDaemonParseSxprGraphicsNew (conn=, def=, root=0x8089278) at xend_internal.c:2085 #4 0xb7f79c44 in xenDaemonParseSxpr (conn=, root=, xendConfigVersion=4, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:2452 #5 0xb7f7d079 in xenDaemonDomainFetch (conn=0x8079ca0, domid=1, name=0x808b190 "test2vm", cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:3372 #6 0xb7f7d180 in xenDaemonDomainDumpXML (domain=0x808b168, flags=0, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:3416 #7 0xb7f74394 in xenUnifiedDomainDumpXML (dom=0x808b168, flags=0) at xen_unified.c:1034 #8 0xb7f357cf in virDomainGetXMLDesc (domain=0x808b168, flags=0) at libvirt.c:2621 #9 0x0804c116 in viewer_extract_vnc_graphics (port=, dom=) at main.c:709 #10 viewer_start (port=, dom=) at main.c:906 #11 0x0804ca07 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff1d4) at main.c:1037 (gdb) So something has changed in Xen 3.4.x and now virEnumFromString() fails? -- Pasi From berrange at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:21:22 2009 From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:21:22 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818201824.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818201824.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090818202122.GB6202@redhat.com> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18:24PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > > > > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > > > > > > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > > > > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > > > > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > > > > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > > > > > > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). > > > > > > strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and > > > capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace > > > > > > > Yeah, I was going to try gdb next.. just didn't have time yet. Thanks. > > > > (gdb) run test2vm > Starting program: /usr/bin/virt-viewer test2vm > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > [New Thread 0xb7c64b70 (LWP 2802)] > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > 40 ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S: No such file or directory. > in ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S > Current language: auto; currently asm > (gdb) bt > #0 strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > #1 0xb7f237d2 in virEnumFromString (types=0xb7fb7074, ntypes=2, type=0x0) at util.c:1481 > #2 0xb7f3ce4f in virDomainGraphicsTypeFromString (type=0x0) at domain_conf.c:150 > #3 0xb7f77490 in xenDaemonParseSxprGraphicsNew (conn=, def=, > root=0x8089278) at xend_internal.c:2085 > #4 0xb7f79c44 in xenDaemonParseSxpr (conn=, root=, > xendConfigVersion=4, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:2452 > #5 0xb7f7d079 in xenDaemonDomainFetch (conn=0x8079ca0, domid=1, name=0x808b190 "test2vm", cpus=0x0) > at xend_internal.c:3372 > #6 0xb7f7d180 in xenDaemonDomainDumpXML (domain=0x808b168, flags=0, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:3416 > #7 0xb7f74394 in xenUnifiedDomainDumpXML (dom=0x808b168, flags=0) at xen_unified.c:1034 > #8 0xb7f357cf in virDomainGetXMLDesc (domain=0x808b168, flags=0) at libvirt.c:2621 > #9 0x0804c116 in viewer_extract_vnc_graphics (port=, dom=) > at main.c:709 > #10 viewer_start (port=, dom=) at main.c:906 > #11 0x0804ca07 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff1d4) at main.c:1037 > (gdb) > > So something has changed in Xen 3.4.x and now virEnumFromString() fails? Yeah there will be something unexpected in the SEXPR from Xen, which then triggers a latent bug in libvirt code not doing proper sanity checking, resulting in the crash. Can you file a bug against libvirt, and include the output of 'xm list --long $GUESTNAME' and xenstore-ls as attachments. It ought to be trivial to fix. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| From berrange at redhat.com Tue Aug 18 20:26:30 2009 From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 21:26:30 +0100 Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090818202630.GC6202@redhat.com> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 06:09:19PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . I have had trouble > > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this > > one does work. I haven't tried i686. > > > > Finally the 32bit PAE (i686) dom0 kernel crash problem has been fixed. > > Patch: > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=02ef83d1ed382d898bbb4a8ade9888e21fe33d1d > > I verified that patch fixes the problem. > > I'll try these RPMs soon. FYI, I have just installed a Fedora 12 x86_64 guest on a Fedora 11 x86_64 KVM host using virt-install --hvm \ --location http://download.fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/ \ --name f12x86_64xen --ram 800 --accelerate --noautoconsole \ --file /dev/HostVG/f12x86_64xen --vnc Once installed, I installed the Xen dom0 kernel from fp.org/~myoung/dom0/ re-configured grub, and successfully rebooted into a Xen Dom0, and was able to create paravirt guests successfully. Most of the libvirt-TCK test suite passed, and the only bugs look trivial to solve in libvirt's Xen driver. So for that environment at least, the Dom0 kernels are looking pretty good when used with F12 and the libvirt Xen driver is still functioning reasonably well. Regards, Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 20:26:13 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:26:13 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818202122.GB6202@redhat.com> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818201824.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818202122.GB6202@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090818202613.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:21:22PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18:24PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > > > > > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > > > > > > > > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > > > > > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > > > > > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > > > > > > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > > > > > > > > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). > > > > > > > > strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and > > > > capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I was going to try gdb next.. just didn't have time yet. Thanks. > > > > > > > (gdb) run test2vm > > Starting program: /usr/bin/virt-viewer test2vm > > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > > [New Thread 0xb7c64b70 (LWP 2802)] > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > > 40 ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S: No such file or directory. > > in ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S > > Current language: auto; currently asm > > (gdb) bt > > #0 strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > > #1 0xb7f237d2 in virEnumFromString (types=0xb7fb7074, ntypes=2, type=0x0) at util.c:1481 > > #2 0xb7f3ce4f in virDomainGraphicsTypeFromString (type=0x0) at domain_conf.c:150 > > #3 0xb7f77490 in xenDaemonParseSxprGraphicsNew (conn=, def=, > > root=0x8089278) at xend_internal.c:2085 > > #4 0xb7f79c44 in xenDaemonParseSxpr (conn=, root=, > > xendConfigVersion=4, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:2452 > > #5 0xb7f7d079 in xenDaemonDomainFetch (conn=0x8079ca0, domid=1, name=0x808b190 "test2vm", cpus=0x0) > > at xend_internal.c:3372 > > #6 0xb7f7d180 in xenDaemonDomainDumpXML (domain=0x808b168, flags=0, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:3416 > > #7 0xb7f74394 in xenUnifiedDomainDumpXML (dom=0x808b168, flags=0) at xen_unified.c:1034 > > #8 0xb7f357cf in virDomainGetXMLDesc (domain=0x808b168, flags=0) at libvirt.c:2621 > > #9 0x0804c116 in viewer_extract_vnc_graphics (port=, dom=) > > at main.c:709 > > #10 viewer_start (port=, dom=) at main.c:906 > > #11 0x0804ca07 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff1d4) at main.c:1037 > > (gdb) > > > > So something has changed in Xen 3.4.x and now virEnumFromString() fails? > > Yeah there will be something unexpected in the SEXPR from Xen, which > then triggers a latent bug in libvirt code not doing proper sanity > checking, resulting in the crash. Can you file a bug against libvirt, > and include the output of 'xm list --long $GUESTNAME' and xenstore-ls > as attachments. It ought to be trivial to fix. > Yeah I can do that. Wondering if it's this bug: http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list at redhat.com/msg14082.html At least that patch adds check for type == 0, and that's what I have here.. -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 20:48:33 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:48:33 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818202613.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818201824.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818202122.GB6202@redhat.com> <20090818202613.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090818204833.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:26:13PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:21:22PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18:24PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > > > > > > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > > > > > > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > > > > > > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). > > > > > > > > > > strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and > > > > > capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I was going to try gdb next.. just didn't have time yet. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) run test2vm > > > Starting program: /usr/bin/virt-viewer test2vm > > > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > > > [New Thread 0xb7c64b70 (LWP 2802)] > > > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > > > 40 ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S: No such file or directory. > > > in ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S > > > Current language: auto; currently asm > > > (gdb) bt > > > #0 strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > > > #1 0xb7f237d2 in virEnumFromString (types=0xb7fb7074, ntypes=2, type=0x0) at util.c:1481 > > > #2 0xb7f3ce4f in virDomainGraphicsTypeFromString (type=0x0) at domain_conf.c:150 > > > #3 0xb7f77490 in xenDaemonParseSxprGraphicsNew (conn=, def=, > > > root=0x8089278) at xend_internal.c:2085 > > > #4 0xb7f79c44 in xenDaemonParseSxpr (conn=, root=, > > > xendConfigVersion=4, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:2452 > > > #5 0xb7f7d079 in xenDaemonDomainFetch (conn=0x8079ca0, domid=1, name=0x808b190 "test2vm", cpus=0x0) > > > at xend_internal.c:3372 > > > #6 0xb7f7d180 in xenDaemonDomainDumpXML (domain=0x808b168, flags=0, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:3416 > > > #7 0xb7f74394 in xenUnifiedDomainDumpXML (dom=0x808b168, flags=0) at xen_unified.c:1034 > > > #8 0xb7f357cf in virDomainGetXMLDesc (domain=0x808b168, flags=0) at libvirt.c:2621 > > > #9 0x0804c116 in viewer_extract_vnc_graphics (port=, dom=) > > > at main.c:709 > > > #10 viewer_start (port=, dom=) at main.c:906 > > > #11 0x0804ca07 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff1d4) at main.c:1037 > > > (gdb) > > > > > > So something has changed in Xen 3.4.x and now virEnumFromString() fails? > > > > Yeah there will be something unexpected in the SEXPR from Xen, which > > then triggers a latent bug in libvirt code not doing proper sanity > > checking, resulting in the crash. Can you file a bug against libvirt, > > and include the output of 'xm list --long $GUESTNAME' and xenstore-ls > > as attachments. It ought to be trivial to fix. > > > > Yeah I can do that. > > Wondering if it's this bug: > http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list at redhat.com/msg14082.html > > At least that patch adds check for type == 0, and that's what I have here.. > Bug submitted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518091 -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 21:36:56 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 00:36:56 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] virt-viewer crashing on F11 with Xen 3.4.1 In-Reply-To: <20090818204833.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818084200.GR24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818092528.GA8276@redhat.com> <20090818101823.GT24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818201824.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818202122.GB6202@redhat.com> <20090818202613.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090818204833.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090818213656.GH19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:48:33PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:26:13PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 09:21:22PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:18:24PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:18:23PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:25:28AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 11:42:00AM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > Hello. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While continuing to test pv_ops dom0 kernels I also rebuilt > > > > > > > xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm on F11. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm able to virt-install new centos 5.3 domU, but it seems virt-viewer > > > > > > > doesn't work. It segfaults on startup. vncviewer works though, and I'm able > > > > > > > to complete the installation with vncviewer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-viewer-crash.txt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > virt-viewer works when used with the default xen-3.3.1 (which is included in F11). > > > > > > > > > > > > strace logs aren't much help with crashes. Try to run it under valgrind and > > > > > > capture the errors, or GDB and get a stack trace > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yeah, I was going to try gdb next.. just didn't have time yet. Thanks. > > > > > > > > > > > > > (gdb) run test2vm > > > > Starting program: /usr/bin/virt-viewer test2vm > > > > [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] > > > > [New Thread 0xb7c64b70 (LWP 2802)] > > > > > > > > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > > > > strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > > > > 40 ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S: No such file or directory. > > > > in ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S > > > > Current language: auto; currently asm > > > > (gdb) bt > > > > #0 strcmp () at ../sysdeps/i386/i686/strcmp.S:40 > > > > #1 0xb7f237d2 in virEnumFromString (types=0xb7fb7074, ntypes=2, type=0x0) at util.c:1481 > > > > #2 0xb7f3ce4f in virDomainGraphicsTypeFromString (type=0x0) at domain_conf.c:150 > > > > #3 0xb7f77490 in xenDaemonParseSxprGraphicsNew (conn=, def=, > > > > root=0x8089278) at xend_internal.c:2085 > > > > #4 0xb7f79c44 in xenDaemonParseSxpr (conn=, root=, > > > > xendConfigVersion=4, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:2452 > > > > #5 0xb7f7d079 in xenDaemonDomainFetch (conn=0x8079ca0, domid=1, name=0x808b190 "test2vm", cpus=0x0) > > > > at xend_internal.c:3372 > > > > #6 0xb7f7d180 in xenDaemonDomainDumpXML (domain=0x808b168, flags=0, cpus=0x0) at xend_internal.c:3416 > > > > #7 0xb7f74394 in xenUnifiedDomainDumpXML (dom=0x808b168, flags=0) at xen_unified.c:1034 > > > > #8 0xb7f357cf in virDomainGetXMLDesc (domain=0x808b168, flags=0) at libvirt.c:2621 > > > > #9 0x0804c116 in viewer_extract_vnc_graphics (port=, dom=) > > > > at main.c:709 > > > > #10 viewer_start (port=, dom=) at main.c:906 > > > > #11 0x0804ca07 in main (argc=2, argv=0xbffff1d4) at main.c:1037 > > > > (gdb) > > > > > > > > So something has changed in Xen 3.4.x and now virEnumFromString() fails? > > > > > > Yeah there will be something unexpected in the SEXPR from Xen, which > > > then triggers a latent bug in libvirt code not doing proper sanity > > > checking, resulting in the crash. Can you file a bug against libvirt, > > > and include the output of 'xm list --long $GUESTNAME' and xenstore-ls > > > as attachments. It ought to be trivial to fix. > > > > > > > Yeah I can do that. > > > > Wondering if it's this bug: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/libvir-list at redhat.com/msg14082.html > > > > At least that patch adds check for type == 0, and that's what I have here.. > > > > Bug submitted: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518091 > And already solved; This libvirt patch fixes the problem: http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=commit;h=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0 Thanks a lot for fast response! -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Tue Aug 18 22:34:24 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 01:34:24 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Fedora 11 Xen domU grub.conf timeout=0 problem with pygrub Message-ID: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Hello, I just installed Fedora 11 Xen PV domU on Fedora 11 Xen dom0, using virt-install like this: virt-install -n testvm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/testvm --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/releases/11/Fedora/i386/os" Installation goes fine, but after the installation is complete, and the domU gets rebooted, it will never come up again. I tried multiple times, and it's always the same. Installation starts and works fine, but after installation domU doesn't start anymore - not even after "xm destroy" and "xm start". I started investigating the problem, and from "xm log" I noticed the last line of output is about starting pygrub and nothing after that. I checked "ps aux" and noticed pygrub is there, waiting for something. "strace -p" shows it's waiting for something, and checking the status all the time. I tried running the same pygrub command from cmdline, and noticed I have to press enter before the kernel gets chosen by pygrub. After pressing enter pygrub copies the kernel/initrd/configuration and exists OK. I echoed the config from manual pygrub run to /var/run/xend/boot/xenbl.pid file, killed pygrub, and after that the after-installation-reboot continued normally.. When the domU got up I checked grub.conf from it: # grub.conf generated by anaconda # # Note that you do not have to rerun grub after making changes to this file # NOTICE: You have a /boot partition. This means that # all kernel and initrd paths are relative to /boot/, eg. # root (hd0,0) # kernel /vmlinuz-version ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root # initrd /initrd-version.img #boot=/dev/xvda default=0 timeout=0 splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz hiddenmenu title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE) root (hd0,0) kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root rhgb quiet initrd /initrd-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE.img timeout=0 looks suspicious.. so I changed it to 5. After that domU comes up OK on its own.. I changed timeout back to 0, and pygrub gets stuck again. Is this a bug of pygrub, or a broken default grub.conf timeout value of F11? -- Pasi From markmc at redhat.com Wed Aug 19 10:09:15 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:09:15 +0000 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Fedora 11 Xen domU grub.conf timeout=0 problem with pygrub In-Reply-To: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <1250676555.4659.12.camel@blaa> On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:34 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > #boot=/dev/xvda > default=0 > timeout=0 > splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz > hiddenmenu > title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE) > root (hd0,0) > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE ro > root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root rhgb quiet > initrd /initrd-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE.img > > > timeout=0 looks suspicious.. so I changed it to 5. > After that domU comes up OK on its own.. > > I changed timeout back to 0, and pygrub gets stuck again. > > Is this a bug of pygrub, or a broken default grub.conf timeout value of F11? timeout=0 should be fine, it sounds like a pygrub bug Cheers, Mark. From cazyokoyama at gmail.com Mon Aug 17 18:21:09 2009 From: cazyokoyama at gmail.com (Caz Yokoyama) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:21:09 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi><20090817152315.GE24960@edu.joroinen.fi><20090817171933.GJ24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: Hello Michael, --force does not allow installation. -caz -----Original Message----- From: fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com] On Behalf Of M A Young Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 11:13 AM To: Pasi K?rkk?inen Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com; fedora-xen at redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > # rpm -i kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > error: Failed dependencies: > kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 That is easy, there is an appropriate kernel-firmware package in the repository. On the other hand firmware doesn't change much so you are probably safe overriding this dependency. > grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 It should be safe to use --force to override this. 7.0.2-1 is needed for dracut, but I disabled it in that build because it doesn't work with livecd-tools yet. Michael Young From cazyokoyama at gmail.com Mon Aug 17 20:24:25 2009 From: cazyokoyama at gmail.com (Caz Yokoyama) Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:24:25 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817191448.GM24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817191448.GM24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <439D9741AFD6433DA584FCBB10BAB8AA@xpjpn> Hello Michael, The installation is fine with --nodeps and booting kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 without Xen work fine. However, when it is booted upon Xen does not work. The characters in login screen are garbled as before without nomodeset. With nomodeset, screen becomes blank when X window is started, even Ctl+Alt+F2 does not work. -caz -----Original Message----- From: Pasi K?rkk?inen [mailto:pasik at iki.fi] Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 12:15 PM To: Caz Yokoyama Cc: 'M A Young'; fedora-virt at redhat.com; fedora-xen at redhat.com Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:21:09AM -0700, Caz Yokoyama wrote: > Hello Michael, > --force does not allow installation. Try --nodeps -- Pasi > -caz > > -----Original Message----- > From: fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:fedora-xen-bounces at redhat.com] > On Behalf Of M A Young > Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 11:13 AM > To: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com; fedora-xen at redhat.com > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works > now > > On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > # rpm -i kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > > error: Failed dependencies: > > kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12 is needed by > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > That is easy, there is an appropriate kernel-firmware package in the > repository. On the other hand firmware doesn't change much so you are > probably safe overriding this dependency. > > grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > It should be safe to use --force to override this. 7.0.2-1 is needed for > dracut, but I disabled it in that build because it doesn't work with > livecd-tools yet. > > Michael Young > From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 19 15:20:28 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 Message-ID: <542276.6347.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ rebuilt that for F11 and installed. libvirt src.rpm downloaded from ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d Installed libvirt :- yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ virt-manager virt-viewer Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName Traceback (most recent call last): ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. Boris. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 15:30:06 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:30:06 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Fedora 11 Xen domU grub.conf timeout=0 problem with pygrub In-Reply-To: <1250676555.4659.12.camel@blaa> References: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250676555.4659.12.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <20090819153006.GY19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:09:15AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:34 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > #boot=/dev/xvda > > default=0 > > timeout=0 > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > hiddenmenu > > title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE) > > root (hd0,0) > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE ro > > root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root rhgb quiet > > initrd /initrd-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE.img > > > > > > timeout=0 looks suspicious.. so I changed it to 5. > > After that domU comes up OK on its own.. > > > > I changed timeout back to 0, and pygrub gets stuck again. > > > > Is this a bug of pygrub, or a broken default grub.conf timeout value of F11? > > timeout=0 should be fine, it sounds like a pygrub bug > Indeed. RHEL5.3 version of pygrub seems to work with F11 domU, but the upstream Xen 3.4.1 pygrub doesn't. The version numbers are the same (both are 0.6). I'll make a diff and try to figure out the fix for this.. Are you guys planning to post the RHEL5 pygrub fixes upstream? -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 16:46:26 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 19:46:26 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Fedora 11 Xen domU grub.conf timeout=0 problem with pygrub / patch In-Reply-To: <20090819153006.GY19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250676555.4659.12.camel@blaa> <20090819153006.GY19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090819164626.GA19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:30:06PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:09:15AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:34 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > #boot=/dev/xvda > > > default=0 > > > timeout=0 > > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > > hiddenmenu > > > title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE) > > > root (hd0,0) > > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE ro > > > root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root rhgb quiet > > > initrd /initrd-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE.img > > > > > > > > > timeout=0 looks suspicious.. so I changed it to 5. > > > After that domU comes up OK on its own.. > > > > > > I changed timeout back to 0, and pygrub gets stuck again. > > > > > > Is this a bug of pygrub, or a broken default grub.conf timeout value of F11? > > > > timeout=0 should be fine, it sounds like a pygrub bug > > > > Indeed. > > RHEL5.3 version of pygrub seems to work with F11 domU, but the upstream Xen > 3.4.1 pygrub doesn't. The version numbers are the same (both are 0.6). > > I'll make a diff and try to figure out the fix for this.. > Attached is a patch to make upstream Xen 3.4.1 pygrub work with F11 domU grub.conf timeout=0 default setting. Works for me. Change is taken from the RHEL5.3 version of pygrub. -- Pasi > Are you guys planning to post the RHEL5 pygrub fixes upstream? > > -- Pasi > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: pygrub-fix-zero-timeout.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 505 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 17:24:56 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:24:56 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Fedora 11 Xen domU grub.conf timeout=0 problem with pygrub / patch In-Reply-To: <20090819164626.GA19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250676555.4659.12.camel@blaa> <20090819153006.GY19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090819164626.GA19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090819172456.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 07:46:26PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:30:06PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:09:15AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:34 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > #boot=/dev/xvda > > > > default=0 > > > > timeout=0 > > > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > > > hiddenmenu > > > > title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE) > > > > root (hd0,0) > > > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE ro > > > > root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root rhgb quiet > > > > initrd /initrd-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE.img > > > > > > > > > > > > timeout=0 looks suspicious.. so I changed it to 5. > > > > After that domU comes up OK on its own.. > > > > > > > > I changed timeout back to 0, and pygrub gets stuck again. > > > > > > > > Is this a bug of pygrub, or a broken default grub.conf timeout value of F11? > > > > > > timeout=0 should be fine, it sounds like a pygrub bug > > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > RHEL5.3 version of pygrub seems to work with F11 domU, but the upstream Xen > > 3.4.1 pygrub doesn't. The version numbers are the same (both are 0.6). > > > > I'll make a diff and try to figure out the fix for this.. > > > > Attached is a patch to make upstream Xen 3.4.1 pygrub work with F11 domU grub.conf timeout=0 > default setting. Works for me. Change is taken from the RHEL5.3 version of pygrub. > I just noticed that with the default version of pygrub of Xen 3.4.1 you need to go to "xm console " to choose the kernel, and after that it boots up normally.. The patch I sent takes care of auto-selecting the kernel when timeout=0. -- Pasi > > > Are you guys planning to post the RHEL5 pygrub fixes upstream? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > -- > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > --- pygrub-xen341 2009-08-17 22:22:29.000000000 +0300 > +++ pygrub 2009-08-19 18:39:17.000000000 +0300 > @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ > # So we may come here even after a key has been pressed. > # Check both timeout and mytime to avoid exiting > # when we shouldn't. > - if timeout != -1 and mytime >= int(timeout): > + if mytime >= int(timeout): > self.isdone = True > break > else: > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 17:41:16 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 20:41:16 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <542276.6347.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <542276.6347.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090819174116.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > Installed libvirt :- > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > > Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > Traceback (most recent call last): > ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? -- Pasi > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > Boris. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 19 17:49:49 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 10:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <20090819174116.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <108244.97745.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. Boris. P.S. Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. It's client's requirement. --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > Installed libvirt :- > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- >? >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName >? Traceback (most recent call last): >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? -- Pasi > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > Boris. > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 18:04:15 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:04:15 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <108244.97745.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20090819174116.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <108244.97745.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090819180415.GJ19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > Boris. > P.S. > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > It's client's requirement. > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. -- Pasi > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > >? > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > -- Pasi > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > Boris. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > > From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 18:08:54 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:08:54 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <20090819180415.GJ19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819174116.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <108244.97745.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> <20090819180415.GJ19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090819180854.GK19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:04:15PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > > > Boris. > > P.S. > > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > > It's client's requirement. > > > > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell > us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. > Actually, it would be helpful to try these: 1) Try creating HVM guest with only Xen tools, no virt* stuff. 2) Try installing HVM guest with virt-install (not with virt-manager), giving it the "--debug" option. -- Pasi > -- Pasi > > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > > >? > > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > > > Boris. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 19 18:21:37 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:21:37 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <20090819180854.GK19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <227313.69466.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> >Try installing HVM guest with virt-install (not with virt-manager), giving it the "--debug" >option. I will. Thanks Boris. --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com, fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 2:08 PM On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 09:04:15PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > > > Boris. > > P.S. > > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > > It's client's requirement. > > > > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell > us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. > Actually, it would be helpful to try these: 1) Try creating HVM guest with only Xen tools, no virt* stuff. 2) Try installing HVM guest with virt-install (not with virt-manager), giving it the "--debug" option. -- Pasi > -- Pasi > > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > > >? > > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > > > Boris. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > > > > > > >? ? ??? > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 19 19:04:50 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:04:50 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <20090819180415.GJ19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <382982.41249.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Yes. it works with Xen-tools. http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ Boris. --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 2:04 PM On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > Boris. > P.S. > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > It's client's requirement. > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. -- Pasi > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > >? > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > -- Pasi > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > Boris. > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > -- > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > >? ? ??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 20:31:56 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:31:56 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <382982.41249.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20090819180415.GJ19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <382982.41249.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090819203156.GL19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04:50PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Yes. it works with Xen-tools. > > http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ > Just to be sure: You are able to install _HVM_ guests using Xen tools? -- Pasi > Boris. > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 2:04 PM > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > > > Boris. > > P.S. > > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > > It's client's requirement. > > > > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell > us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. > > -- Pasi > > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > > >? > > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > > > Boris. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > > > > > > >? ? ??? > > > > From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 19 20:48:54 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:48:54 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide Message-ID: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Hello again! I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with virt-install. I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the installation fails. # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" Log of the virt-install output available here: http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: # xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 test3vm 512 1 0.0 and virt-install gives these errors: libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the installation with ctrl+c. Any ideas how to debug that? Some more debug info ("xm list --long test3vm" and "xenstore-ls") available from here: http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo.txt -- Pasi From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Thu Aug 20 05:30:51 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:30:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <20090819203156.GL19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <463779.81406.qm@web56105.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Yes, Pasi . I've changed Xen Host setup as follows ( new clean install):- Download xen-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm # wget http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/src/xen-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm # rpm -iv xen-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm # cd /root/rpmbuild/SPECS # rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec To install hypervisor and tools # cd ../RPMS/x86_64 # yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ******************************************************************* Apply patch from Pasi to handle DomUs with timeout=0 in menu.lst ******************************************************************* --- pygrub-xen341??? 2009-08-17 22:22:29.000000000 +0300 +++ pygrub??? 2009-08-19 18:39:17.000000000 +0300 @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ ???????????????????? # So we may come here even after a key has been pressed. ???????????????????? # Check both timeout and mytime to avoid exiting ???????????????????? # when we shouldn't. -??????????????????? if timeout != -1 and mytime >= int(timeout): +??? ??? ??? if mytime >= int(timeout): ???????????????????????? self.isdone = True ???????????????????????? break ???????????? else: To install new libvirt-0.7.0-6 ? # cat > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo << EOF ? [virt-preview] ? name=Virtualization Rawhide for Fedora 11 ? baseurl=http://markmc.fedorapeople.org/virt-preview/f11/\$basearch/ ? enabled=1 ? gpgcheck=0 ? EOF Install Preview version of libvirt :- ? # yum install libvirt libvirt-python python-virtinst \ ??? virt-manager virt-viewer [root at ServerXen341 ~]# rpm -qa|grep virt libvirt-client-0.7.0-6.fc11.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.7.0-6.fc11.x86_64 virt-viewer-0.2.0-1.fc11.x86_64 virt-manager-0.7.0-5.fc11.x86_64 libvirt-0.7.0-6.fc11.x86_64 python-virtinst-0.500.0-1.fc11.noarch It works fine with PV DomUs.? Attempt to install HVM via virt-manager gives a new error :- Unable to complete install ' POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: Traceback (most recent call last): ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 628, in start_install ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 726, in _do_install ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1077, in createLinux ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) libvirtError: POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: ' Boris. --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 4:31 PM On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04:50PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Yes. it works with Xen-tools. > > http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ > Just to be sure: You are able to install _HVM_ guests using Xen tools? -- Pasi > Boris. > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 2:04 PM > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > > > Boris. > > P.S. > > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > > It's client's requirement. > > > > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell > us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. > > -- Pasi > > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > > >? > > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > > > Boris. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > > > > > > >? ? ??? > > > >? ? ??? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Thu Aug 20 05:44:06 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 In-Reply-To: <463779.81406.qm@web56105.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <935920.72450.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> However , virt-install just started creating OSOL0906 HVM :- [root at ServerXen341 boris]# virt-install --debug -n OSOLHVM --hvm -r 1024 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/sdb6 --vnc -c /home/boris/osol-0906-x86.iso Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Launched with command line: /usr/sbin/virt-install --debug -n OSOLHVM --hvm -r 1024 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/sdb6 --vnc -c /home/boris/osol-0906-x86.iso Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting libvirt URI default Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Received libvirt URI xen:/// Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting virt method 'hvm', hv type 'default'. Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Received virt method 'hvm' Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Hypervisor name is 'xen' Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? DistroInstaller location is a local file/path: /home/boris/osol-0906-x86.iso Starting install... Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Creating guest from: ? OSOLHVM ? 1048576 ? 1048576 ? f27d7d9e-3845-aa5a-fb9b-5cb16e8e639b ? ??? hvm ??? /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader ??? ? ? ??? ? ? ? destroy ? destroy ? destroy ? 1 ? ??? /usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ? Creating domain...??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |??? 0 B???? 00:00???? Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Created guest, looking to see if it is running Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Launching console callback Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:36:36 DEBUG??? Saving XML boot config: ? OSOLHVM ? 1048576 ? 1048576 ? f27d7d9e-3845-aa5a-fb9b-5cb16e8e639b ? ??? hvm ??? /usr/lib/xen/boot/hvmloader ??? ? ? ??? ? ? ? destroy ? restart ? restart ? 1 ? ??? /usr/lib64/xen/bin/qemu-dm ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ??? ? VNC console comes up and installer is running in meantime. Boris. --- On Thu, 8/20/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 To: "Pasi K?rkk?inen" Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com, fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Thursday, August 20, 2009, 1:30 AM Yes, Pasi . I've changed Xen Host setup as follows ( new clean install):- Download xen-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm # wget http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/src/xen-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm # rpm -iv xen-3.4.1-1.fc12.src.rpm # cd /root/rpmbuild/SPECS # rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec To install hypervisor and tools # cd ../RPMS/x86_64 # yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm ******************************************************************* Apply patch from Pasi to handle DomUs with timeout=0 in menu.lst ******************************************************************* --- pygrub-xen341??? 2009-08-17 22:22:29.000000000 +0300 +++ pygrub??? 2009-08-19 18:39:17.000000000 +0300 @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ ???????????????????? # So we may come here even after a key has been pressed. ???????????????????? # Check both timeout and mytime to avoid exiting ???????????????????? # when we shouldn't. -??????????????????? if timeout != -1 and mytime >= int(timeout): +??? ??? ??? if mytime >= int(timeout): ???????????????????????? self.isdone = True ???????????????????????? break ???????????? else: To install new libvirt-0.7.0-6 ? # cat > /etc/yum.repos.d/fedora-virt-preview.repo << EOF ? [virt-preview] ? name=Virtualization Rawhide for Fedora 11 ? baseurl=http://markmc.fedorapeople.org/virt-preview/f11/\$basearch/ ? enabled=1 ? gpgcheck=0 ? EOF Install Preview version of libvirt :- ? # yum install libvirt libvirt-python python-virtinst \ ??? virt-manager virt-viewer [root at ServerXen341 ~]# rpm -qa|grep virt libvirt-client-0.7.0-6.fc11.x86_64 libvirt-python-0.7.0-6.fc11.x86_64 virt-viewer-0.2.0-1.fc11.x86_64 virt-manager-0.7.0-5.fc11.x86_64 libvirt-0.7.0-6.fc11.x86_64 python-virtinst-0.500.0-1.fc11.noarch It works fine with PV DomUs.? Attempt to install HVM via virt-manager gives a new error :- Unable to complete install ' POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: Traceback (most recent call last): ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 628, in start_install ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 726, in _do_install ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 1077, in createLinux ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) libvirtError: POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: ' Boris. --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 4:31 PM On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 12:04:50PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Yes. it works with Xen-tools. > > http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/06/10/setup-fedora-11-pv-domu-at-xen-3-4-1-dom0-kernel-2-6-30-rc6-tip-on-top-of-fedora-11/ > Just to be sure: You are able to install _HVM_ guests using Xen tools? -- Pasi > Boris. > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 2:04 PM > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:49:49AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > My primary concern is creating HVM guest via virt-manager at Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on F11. > > > > Boris. > > P.S. > > Personally, i don't need libvirt at all to create PV and HVM DomUs at any Xen Dom0. > > It's client's requirement. > > > > Yeah I just wanted to know if it worked with Xen tools. That would tell > us if this is purely a libvirt problem, or problem with something else. > > -- Pasi > > > --- On Wed, 8/19/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Setting up libvirt to work with Xen 3.4.1 on F11 > > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com > > Date: Wednesday, August 19, 2009, 1:41 PM > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:20:28AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > > xen 3.4.1-1 src.rpm downloaded from > > >? http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > > >? rebuilt that for F11 and installed. > > > > > > libvirt src.rpm downloaded from > > >? ? ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/updates/11/SRPMS/libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm > > > and installed? : "rpm -i libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.src.rpm" > > > > > > Rebuilt libvirt packages applying patch :- > > > > > >? http://libvirt.org/git/?p=libvirt.git;a=blobdiff;f=src/xend_internal.c;h=55ffd3f9a5004e681c8ffb2279d27965eb42e956;hp=b211bb6293355bf68e33f56f947021bd7bb8e675;hb=14435163a086c0bcdff04308077fa46a5fa08bb0;hpb=fd90b67afe59265327dde7e447ea847687bd4e8d > > > > > > Installed libvirt :- > > > yum install libvirt-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-debuginfo-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-devel-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > libvirt-python-0.6.2-14.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > > > virt-manager virt-viewer > > > > > > > > > Attempt to create any HVM via virt-manager aborts with message:- > > >? > > >? Unable to complete install ' Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > >? Traceback (most recent call last): > > >? ? File "/usr/share/virt-manager/virtManager/create.py", line 1501, in do_install > > >? ??? dom = guest.start_install(False, meter = meter) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 541, in start_install > > >? ??? return self._do_install(consolecb, meter, removeOld, wait) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/virtinst/Guest.py", line 633, in _do_install > > >? ??? self.domain = self.conn.createLinux(install_xml, 0) > > >? ? File "/usr/lib64/python2.6/site-packages/libvirt.py", line 974, in createLinux > > >? ??? if ret is None:raise libvirtError('virDomainCreateLinux() failed', conn=self) > > >? libvirtError: Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > Looks like something wrong/missing in libvirt.. > > > > Did you try with the default Xen 3.3.1 version, that is included in F11? > > Maybe something was changed in Xen 3.4 and it causes that problem. > > > > Also, can you create HVM guests using just the Xen tools, not virt* stuff? > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > PV DomUs for F11 and CentOS 5.3 created and tested OK. > > > > > > Boris. > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > > Do You Yahoo!? > > > Tired of spam?? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > -- > > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > > > > > > >? ? ??? > > > >? ? ??? -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-virt mailing list Fedora-virt at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 08:15:45 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:15:45 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Fedora 11 Xen domU grub.conf timeout=0 problem with pygrub / patch In-Reply-To: <20090819172456.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090818223424.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250676555.4659.12.camel@blaa> <20090819153006.GY19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090819164626.GA19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090819172456.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090820081545.GQ19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 08:24:56PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 07:46:26PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 06:30:06PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:09:15AM +0000, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 01:34 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > > > #boot=/dev/xvda > > > > > default=0 > > > > > timeout=0 > > > > > splashimage=(hd0,0)/grub/splash.xpm.gz > > > > > hiddenmenu > > > > > title Fedora (2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE) > > > > > root (hd0,0) > > > > > kernel /vmlinuz-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE ro > > > > > root=/dev/mapper/vg_f11domu-lv_root rhgb quiet > > > > > initrd /initrd-2.6.29.4-167.fc11.i686.PAE.img > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > timeout=0 looks suspicious.. so I changed it to 5. > > > > > After that domU comes up OK on its own.. > > > > > > > > > > I changed timeout back to 0, and pygrub gets stuck again. > > > > > > > > > > Is this a bug of pygrub, or a broken default grub.conf timeout value of F11? > > > > > > > > timeout=0 should be fine, it sounds like a pygrub bug > > > > > > > > > > Indeed. > > > > > > RHEL5.3 version of pygrub seems to work with F11 domU, but the upstream Xen > > > 3.4.1 pygrub doesn't. The version numbers are the same (both are 0.6). > > > > > > I'll make a diff and try to figure out the fix for this.. > > > > > > > Attached is a patch to make upstream Xen 3.4.1 pygrub work with F11 domU grub.conf timeout=0 > > default setting. Works for me. Change is taken from the RHEL5.3 version of pygrub. > > > > I just noticed that with the default version of pygrub of Xen 3.4.1 you need to > go to "xm console " to choose the kernel, and after that it boots up normally.. > > The patch I sent takes care of auto-selecting the kernel when timeout=0. > This is now fixed in xen-unstable and xen-3.4-testing: http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/3509276d8ad6 http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-3.4-testing.hg?rev/7a57911ff09e -- Pasi > -- Pasi > > > > > > Are you guys planning to post the RHEL5 pygrub fixes upstream? > > > > > > -- Pasi > > > > > > -- > > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > --- pygrub-xen341 2009-08-17 22:22:29.000000000 +0300 > > +++ pygrub 2009-08-19 18:39:17.000000000 +0300 > > @@ -447,7 +447,7 @@ > > # So we may come here even after a key has been pressed. > > # Check both timeout and mytime to avoid exiting > > # when we shouldn't. > > - if timeout != -1 and mytime >= int(timeout): > > + if mytime >= int(timeout): > > self.isdone = True > > break > > else: > > > -- > > Fedora-xen mailing list > > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen From berrange at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 08:58:25 2009 From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:58:25 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48:54PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Hello again! > > I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. > I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with > virt-install. > > I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the > installation fails. > > # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm > --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" > > Log of the virt-install output available here: > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt > > Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: > > # xm list > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 > test3vm 512 1 0.0 > > and virt-install gives these errors: > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the > installation with ctrl+c. This message Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:40 DEBUG Launching console callback shows that virt-install things it is working, and so spawned virt-viewer. libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID are coming from virt-viewer program. > > Any ideas how to debug that? > > Some more debug info ("xm list --long test3vm" and "xenstore-ls") available from here: > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo.txt Can you file a bug about this - even though Dom0 kernels aren't in F12, we have the Xen userspace & libvirt driver present & should make sure those do actually work. Include the data from the 2 URLs you have here, and also the xend.log file Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 09:47:50 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:47:50 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48:54PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > Hello again! > > > > I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. > > I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with > > virt-install. > > > > I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the > > installation fails. > > > > # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm > > --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" > > > > Log of the virt-install output available here: > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt > > > > Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: > > > > # xm list > > > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > > Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 > > test3vm 512 1 0.0 > > > > and virt-install gives these errors: > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the > > installation with ctrl+c. > > This message > > Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:40 DEBUG Launching console callback > > > shows that virt-install things it is working, and so spawned virt-viewer. > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > are coming from virt-viewer program. OK. That's good to know. I'll play with it a bit more today. Maybe I should try updating to newer libvirt/virt-viewer first. >From virt-preview repo? > > > > > Any ideas how to debug that? > > > > Some more debug info ("xm list --long test3vm" and "xenstore-ls") available from here: > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo.txt > > Can you file a bug about this - even though Dom0 kernels aren't in F12, > we have the Xen userspace & libvirt driver present & should make sure > those do actually work. > Sure. > Include the data from the 2 URLs you have here, and also the xend.log > file > Should I file it against virt-viewer or virt-install/libvirt ? -- Pasi From berrange at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 09:51:47 2009 From: berrange at redhat.com (Daniel P. Berrange) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 10:51:47 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:47:50PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48:54PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > Hello again! > > > > > > I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. > > > I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with > > > virt-install. > > > > > > I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the > > > installation fails. > > > > > > # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm > > > --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" > > > > > > Log of the virt-install output available here: > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt > > > > > > Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: > > > > > > # xm list > > > > > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > > > Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 > > > test3vm 512 1 0.0 > > > > > > and virt-install gives these errors: > > > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the > > > installation with ctrl+c. > > > > This message > > > > Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:40 DEBUG Launching console callback > > > > > > shows that virt-install things it is working, and so spawned virt-viewer. > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > > are coming from virt-viewer program. > > OK. That's good to know. I'll play with it a bit more today. > > Maybe I should try updating to newer libvirt/virt-viewer first. > From virt-preview repo? That'd be a useful data point if you wish to try it. > > > Any ideas how to debug that? > > > > > > Some more debug info ("xm list --long test3vm" and "xenstore-ls") available from here: > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo.txt > > > > Can you file a bug about this - even though Dom0 kernels aren't in F12, > > we have the Xen userspace & libvirt driver present & should make sure > > those do actually work. > > > > Sure. > > > Include the data from the 2 URLs you have here, and also the xend.log > > file > > > > Should I file it against virt-viewer or virt-install/libvirt ? Either will do - its not clear yet just which is at fault Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 14:45:15 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:45:15 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released / 3.4.1-2 patches In-Reply-To: <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:24:29AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > >3.4.1: http://www.xen.org/download/ > > Great timing. They managed to do the release just one day after the > alpha freeze. Packages are built, but they will not hit the repos until > the alpha is done. You can grab them from koji though: > > http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/ > Gerd: Would you like to apply some bugfix patches for 3.4.1-2 ? List of important fixes: - fix pygrub timeout=0 handling, enable Fedora 11 PV domUs to boot: http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-3.4-testing.hg?rev/7a57911ff09e - fix qemu-dm memory leak on block/disk IO http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-08/msg00335.html Nice to have: - fix qemu problem when stdvga=1 and videoram=16 are specified, starting hvm domain fails http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-08/msg00281.html - fix stubdoms bridge info parsing, use correct bridge http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2009-08/msg00393.html -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 15:08:28 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:08:28 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:51:47AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:47:50PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48:54PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > Hello again! > > > > > > > > I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. > > > > I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with > > > > virt-install. > > > > > > > > I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the > > > > installation fails. > > > > > > > > # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm > > > > --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" > > > > > > > > Log of the virt-install output available here: > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt > > > > > > > > Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: > > > > > > > > # xm list > > > > > > > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > > > > Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 > > > > test3vm 512 1 0.0 > > > > > > > > and virt-install gives these errors: > > > > > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > > Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the > > > > installation with ctrl+c. > > > > > > This message > > > > > > Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:40 DEBUG Launching console callback > > > > > > > > > shows that virt-install things it is working, and so spawned virt-viewer. > > > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > > > > are coming from virt-viewer program. > > > > OK. That's good to know. I'll play with it a bit more today. > > > > Maybe I should try updating to newer libvirt/virt-viewer first. > > From virt-preview repo? > > That'd be a useful data point if you wish to try it. > Hmm.. it seems today I'm getting different error: http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo2.txt http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo2-xm-log.txt virt-install output: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:02:47 ERROR POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") "xm log": [2009-08-20 18:02:47 2161] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:2202) Device model destroy failed X86_Linux_ImageHandler instance has no attribute \047sentinel_lock\047 Something changed in the latest rawhide kernel? # file vmlinuz-PAE vmlinuz-PAE: Linux kernel x86 boot executable bzImage, version 2.6.31-0.162.rc6.git2.fc12.i686, RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x902, swap_dev 0x2, Normal VGA Any ideas? -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 15:41:21 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:41:21 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 06:08:28PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:51:47AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:47:50PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48:54PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > Hello again! > > > > > > > > > > I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. > > > > > I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with > > > > > virt-install. > > > > > > > > > > I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the > > > > > installation fails. > > > > > > > > > > # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm > > > > > --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" > > > > > > > > > > Log of the virt-install output available here: > > > > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt > > > > > > > > > > Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: > > > > > > > > > > # xm list > > > > > > > > > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > > > > > Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 > > > > > test3vm 512 1 0.0 > > > > > > > > > > and virt-install gives these errors: > > > > > > > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > > > > > > > Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the > > > > > installation with ctrl+c. > > > > > > > > This message > > > > > > > > Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:40 DEBUG Launching console callback > > > > > > > > > > > > shows that virt-install things it is working, and so spawned virt-viewer. > > > > > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > > > > > > > are coming from virt-viewer program. > > > > > > OK. That's good to know. I'll play with it a bit more today. > > > > > > Maybe I should try updating to newer libvirt/virt-viewer first. > > > From virt-preview repo? > > > > That'd be a useful data point if you wish to try it. > > > > Hmm.. it seems today I'm getting different error: > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo2.txt > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-rawhide-on-f11-debuginfo2-xm-log.txt > > virt-install output: > Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:02:47 ERROR POST operation failed: xend_post: error from xen daemon: (xend.err "Error creating domain: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\\n')") > > "xm log": > [2009-08-20 18:02:47 2161] ERROR (XendDomainInfo:2202) Device model destroy failed X86_Linux_ImageHandler instance has no attribute \047sentinel_lock\047 > > > Something changed in the latest rawhide kernel? > > # file vmlinuz-PAE > vmlinuz-PAE: Linux kernel x86 boot executable bzImage, version 2.6.31-0.162.rc6.git2.fc12.i686, RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x902, swap_dev 0x2, Normal VGA > > > Any ideas? > I just tried without virt-install: # cat test3vm.cfg name = "test3vm" uuid = "9cf2267d-9513-b9b7-bcd9-29f2962c7bd6" maxmem = 512 memory = 512 vcpus = 1 kernel = "/tmp/vmlinuz-PAE" ramdisk = "/tmp/initrd-PAE.img" on_poweroff = "destroy" on_reboot = "preserve" on_crash = "preserve" vfb = [ "type=vnc,vncunused=1" ] disk = [ "phy:vg_dom0test/test3vm,xvda,w" ] vif = [ "mac=00:16:4e:1b:ef:56,bridge=virbr0" ] # xm create -f test3vm.cfg -c Using config file "./test3vm.cfg". Error: (2, 'Invalid kernel', 'xc_dom_find_loader: no loader found\n') So same error. # file /tmp/vmlinuz-PAE /tmp/vmlinuz-PAE: Linux kernel x86 boot executable bzImage, version 2.6.31-0.162.rc6.git2.fc12.i686, RO-rootFS, root_dev 0x902, swap_dev 0x2, Normal VGA # grep CONFIG_KERNEL config-2.6.31-0.162.rc6.git2.fc12.i686.PAE # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this changed back to GZIP earlier? -- Pasi From markmc at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 16:05:17 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:05:17 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <1250784317.3080.55.camel@blaa> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > changed back to GZIP earlier? Thanks for pointing that out, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. Cheers, Mark. From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 16:44:40 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:44:40 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <1250784317.3080.55.camel@blaa> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250784317.3080.55.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <20090820164440.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). -- Pasi From markmc at redhat.com Thu Aug 20 18:02:12 2009 From: markmc at redhat.com (Mark McLoughlin) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:02:12 +0100 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820164440.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250784317.3080.55.camel@blaa> <20090820164440.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <1250791332.3080.131.camel@blaa> On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in good shape by then Cheers, Mark. From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 20 19:04:09 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:04:09 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <1250791332.3080.131.camel@blaa> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250784317.3080.55.camel@blaa> <20090820164440.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250791332.3080.131.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <20090820190409.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). > > Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come > back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in > good shape by then > I actually already 'ported' the patch to Xen 3.4.1 and made sure it compiles OK. I've included it (and extra gcc 4.4.0 compilefix) to this email, and also sent them to xen-devel. atm I'm trying to make the patch work/apply with Fedora xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm .. and sorting out some fedora/rpm specific compilation failure.. -- Pasi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xen-loader-bzip2-lzma-xen34-fixed.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 10145 bytes Desc: not available URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xen-loader-bzip2-lzma-xen34-fixed-compilefix-gcc440.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 845 bytes Desc: not available URL: From tom.horsley at att.net Thu Aug 20 19:20:04 2009 From: tom.horsley at att.net (Tom Horsley) Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 15:20:04 -0400 Subject: [Fedora-xen] qemu-kvm glibc memory corruption? Message-ID: <20090820152004.5e40638f@tomh> I added this bugzilla earlier today: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=518476 Just curious if anyone else has ever seen qemu-kvm get a glibc memory corruption error? Seems to be related to the ubuntu virtual machine specifically - my theory is ubuntu does some kind of weird video mode twddling that affects it. From kraxel at redhat.com Fri Aug 21 10:35:17 2009 From: kraxel at redhat.com (Gerd Hoffmann) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:35:17 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released / 3.4.1-2 patches In-Reply-To: <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <4A8E7865.7090001@redhat.com> On 08/20/09 16:45, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > Gerd: Would you like to apply some bugfix patches for 3.4.1-2 ? I'll have a look next week. Having bzip2+lzma sorted until then would be great, so I can put that in as well. cheers, Gerd From pasik at iki.fi Fri Aug 21 14:16:04 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 17:16:04 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released / 3.4.1-2 patches In-Reply-To: <4A8E7865.7090001@redhat.com> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A8E7865.7090001@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090821141604.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 08/20/09 16:45, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > >Gerd: Would you like to apply some bugfix patches for 3.4.1-2 ? > > I'll have a look next week. > Thanks. > Having bzip2+lzma sorted until then would be great, > so I can put that in as well. > Working on it now.. -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Sun Aug 23 16:45:23 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:45:23 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <20090820190409.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> <20090820094750.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820095147.GA27710@redhat.com> <20090820150828.GC19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820154120.GE19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250784317.3080.55.camel@blaa> <20090820164440.GG19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <1250791332.3080.131.camel@blaa> <20090820190409.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090823164522.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:04:09PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > > > > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). > > > > Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come > > back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in > > good shape by then > > > > I actually already 'ported' the patch to Xen 3.4.1 and made sure it > compiles OK. I've included it (and extra gcc 4.4.0 compilefix) to this > email, and also sent them to xen-devel. > > atm I'm trying to make the patch work/apply with Fedora xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm .. > and sorting out some fedora/rpm specific compilation failure.. > Here's updated patch that actually works. I added it to xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm and verified the resulting rpms are able to boot lzma compressed kernels. It's still not final patch, since the stubdom/pvgrub bzip2/lzma support is not yet included in this patch (until the proper method for Makefile hacks is determined upstream). -- Pasi -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xen-341-add-bzip2-lzma-pv-bootloader-support-no-stubdom-pvgrub.patch Type: text/x-diff Size: 14702 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pasik at iki.fi Sun Aug 23 17:30:41 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:30:41 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID while virt-installing rawhide In-Reply-To: <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> References: <20090819204854.GM19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090820085825.GB4506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090823173041.GH19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 09:58:25AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 11:48:54PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > Hello again! > > > > I'm running Fedora 11 with 2.6.31-rc6 pv_ops Xen dom0 kernel and Xen 3.4.1. > > I'm able to succesfully install Fedora 11 and CentOS 5.3 PV guests with > > virt-install. > > > > I just tried installing Fedora rawhide (F12) guest with virt-install, and the > > installation fails. > > > > # virt-install --debug -n test3vm -r 512 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/vg_dom0test/test3vm > > --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os" > > > > Log of the virt-install output available here: > > http://pasik.reaktio.net/fedora/virt-install-log-rawhide-on-f11.txt > > > > Basicly it creates the domain, but it fails to start: > > > > # xm list > > > > Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) > > Domain-0 0 986 2 r----- 595.1 > > test3vm 512 1 0.0 > > > > and virt-install gives these errors: > > > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > > > > Those are printed repeatedly over and over again.. until I cancel the > > installation with ctrl+c. > > This message > > Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:20:40 DEBUG Launching console callback > > > shows that virt-install things it is working, and so spawned virt-viewer. > > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName > libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByID > > are coming from virt-viewer program. > Back to this issue after the LZMA stuff was sorted out :) You're right.. those errors are coming from virt-viewer: # virt-viewer foo-bar-non-existing-domain libvir: Xen error : Domain not found: xenUnifiedDomainLookupByName Btw there's a typo in the error msg;) The actual problem seems to be this: [2009-08-23 20:26:51 1046] INFO (XendDomain:1180) Domain test3vm (9) unpaused. [2009-08-23 20:26:51 1046] WARNING (XendDomainInfo:1878) Domain has crashed: name=test3vm id=9. So the rawhide/F12 kernel crashes immediately.. nothing on the console(s). Any ideas? I guess this is related to the other known problems with the 2.6.31 kernel as PV domU? -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Sun Aug 23 17:55:14 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:55:14 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Still can't boot Fedora rawhide xen with EL5 In-Reply-To: <1250093600.3424.55.camel@blaa> References: <4A82E64E.2050205@cora.nwra.com> <1250093600.3424.55.camel@blaa> Message-ID: <20090823175514.GI19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:13:20PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 09:57 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > [2009-08-12 09:52:31 xend.XendDomainInfo 3214] WARNING > > (XendDomainInfo:965) Domain has crashed: name=xenfdev64 id=20. > > Looks like the guest crashed. > > If you set "on_crash=preserve" in your domain config and then once the > crash has happened you should be able to use something like: > > $> /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map-2.6.31-0.125.4.2.rc5.git2.fc12.x86_64 > > to get a stack trace. > I'm seeing the same issue on my testbox. # /usr/lib/xen/bin/xenctx -s System.map-2.6.31-0.162.rc6.git2.fc12.i686.PAE 10 cs:eip: e019:c0aa14d1 xen_start_kernel+0x9 flags: 00000292 i s nz a ss:esp: e021:c0a99fcc eax: 00000000 ebx: 00000000 ecx: 00000000 edx: 00000000 esi: c1489000 edi: 00000000 ebp: c0a99ffc ds: e021 es: e021 fs: e021 gs: e021 Code (instr addr c0aa14d1) 00 00 74 05 e8 15 be 9a ff c9 c3 00 55 89 e5 57 56 53 83 ec 14 <65> a1 14 00 00 00 89 45 f0 31 c0 Stack: 00000000 c0aa14d1 0001e019 00010092 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 c1489000 00000000 00000000 Call Trace: [] xen_start_kernel+0x9 <-- [] xen_start_kernel+0x9 Do you need something more? -- Pasi From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Mon Aug 24 04:58:18 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:58:18 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <20090823164522.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <847614.87808.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Could you remind F12 rawhide location on the Net for --location key for virt-install command line to test on 64-bit . Thanks. Boris. --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader To: "Mark McLoughlin" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 12:45 PM On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:04:09PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > > > > >???https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > > > > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). > > > > Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come > > back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in > > good shape by then > > > > I actually already 'ported' the patch to Xen 3.4.1 and made sure it > compiles OK. I've included it (and extra gcc 4.4.0 compilefix) to this > email, and also sent them to xen-devel. > > atm I'm trying to make the patch work/apply with Fedora xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm .. > and sorting out some fedora/rpm specific compilation failure.. > Here's updated patch that actually works. I added it to xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm and verified the resulting rpms are able to boot lzma compressed kernels. It's still not final patch, since the stubdom/pvgrub bzip2/lzma support is not yet included in this patch (until the proper method for Makefile hacks is determined upstream). -- Pasi -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 24 06:52:05 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:52:05 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] F11 rawhide install url In-Reply-To: <847614.87808.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20090823164522.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <847614.87808.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090824065205.GK19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 09:58:18PM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Could you remind F12 rawhide location on the Net for --location key for virt-install command line to test on 64-bit . > For example: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/i386/os -- Pasi > Thanks. > Boris. > > --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader > To: "Mark McLoughlin" > Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com > Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 12:45 PM > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:04:09PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > > > > > > >???https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > > > > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > > > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > > > > > > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). > > > > > > Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come > > > back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in > > > good shape by then > > > > > > > I actually already 'ported' the patch to Xen 3.4.1 and made sure it > > compiles OK. I've included it (and extra gcc 4.4.0 compilefix) to this > > email, and also sent them to xen-devel. > > > > atm I'm trying to make the patch work/apply with Fedora xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm .. > > and sorting out some fedora/rpm specific compilation failure.. > > > > Here's updated patch that actually works. I added it to xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm > and verified the resulting rpms are able to boot lzma compressed kernels. > > It's still not final patch, since the stubdom/pvgrub bzip2/lzma support is > not yet included in this patch (until the proper method for Makefile hacks > is determined upstream). > > -- Pasi > > -----Inline Attachment Follows----- > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > > > From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Mon Aug 24 11:42:02 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:42:02 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader Message-ID: <923420.76678.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Virt-install F12 PV hangs on 64-bit. Report attached. Boris. --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader To: "Mark McLoughlin" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 12:45 PM On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:04:09PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > > > > >???https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > > > > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). > > > > Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come > > back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in > > good shape by then > > > > I actually already 'ported' the patch to Xen 3.4.1 and made sure it > compiles OK. I've included it (and extra gcc 4.4.0 compilefix) to this > email, and also sent them to xen-devel. > > atm I'm trying to make the patch work/apply with Fedora xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm .. > and sorting out some fedora/rpm specific compilation failure.. > Here's updated patch that actually works. I added it to xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm and verified the resulting rpms are able to boot lzma compressed kernels. It's still not final patch, since the stubdom/pvgrub bzip2/lzma support is not yet included in this patch (until the proper method for Makefile hacks is determined upstream). -- Pasi -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: ErrorVirtInstallF12.tar.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1405 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 24 12:26:45 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:26:45 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <270939.75549.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20090823164522.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <270939.75549.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090824122645.GO19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:22:30AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Fresh install Xen 3.4.1 via xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm with LZMA support patch + libvirt 0.7.0-6 (preview) tested OK with F11 PV DomU install. Kernel (supporting Dom0 ) - 2.6.30.2 xenified aka Suse > > Attempt to install F12 PV DomU ( Core2Duo E8400, 8 GB RAM ,SATA ) :- > > [root at ServerXenSRC ~]# virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1? \ > -f /dev/sda12? --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os" > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Launched with command line:???????????????????????????????????????? > /usr/sbin/virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/sda12 --vnc -p -l ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting libvirt URI default???????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received libvirt URI xen:///?????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting virt method 'xen', hv type 'default'.?????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received virt method 'xen'???????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Hypervisor name is 'xen'?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? DistroInstaller location is a network source.????????????????????????????????? > > > Starting install... > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Attempting to detect distro: > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:37 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/.treeinfo????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-.treeinfo.WVH7xk?????????????????????????? > Retrieving file .treeinfo...?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 1.2 kB???? 00:00???? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE kB/s | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? > Retrieving file vmlinuz...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/initrd.img????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn/s |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? > Retrieving file initrd.img...????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS type as: linux??????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS variant as: fedora12????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Creating guest from:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? f12pv????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 1048576????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 1048576??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? linux????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? method=ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? destroy??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 1????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ????? > ????? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ? > > > Creating domain...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |??? 0 B???? 00:01 > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Created guest, looking to see if it is running > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Launching console callback > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Saving XML boot config: > > ? f12pv > ? 1048576 > ? 1048576 > ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b > ? /usr/bin/pygrub > ? destroy > ? restart > ? restart > ? 1 > ? > ??? > ????? > ????? > ??? > ??? > ????? > ????? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ? > > > Virt-viewer hangs with message "Waiting for guest domain to be created" > Check "xm log" - for me the guest crashes immediately. This is a known bug in F12/rawhide kernel. -- Pasi From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 24 13:14:42 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:14:42 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <439496.76883.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <20090824122645.GO19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <439496.76883.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20090824131442.GP19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 05:41:03AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Do you mean, that you experiencing same issue on 32-bit and patch is supposed > to handle only just startup phase ? > Yes, I'm seeing the same problem. My patch (for lzma support) doesn't help with this kernel bug. -- Pasi > Boris. > > > --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > From: Pasi K?rkk?inen > Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader > To: "Boris Derzhavets" > Cc: "Mark McLoughlin" , fedora-xen at redhat.com > Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 8:26 AM > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:22:30AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > > Fresh install Xen 3.4.1 via xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm with LZMA support patch + libvirt 0.7.0-6 (preview) tested OK with F11 PV DomU install. Kernel (supporting Dom0 ) - 2.6.30.2 xenified aka Suse > > > > Attempt to install F12 PV DomU ( Core2Duo E8400, 8 GB RAM ,SATA ) :- > > > > [root at ServerXenSRC ~]# virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1? \ > > -f /dev/sda12? --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os" > > > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Launched with command line:???????????????????????????????????????? > > /usr/sbin/virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/sda12 --vnc -p -l ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting libvirt URI default???????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received libvirt URI xen:///?????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting virt method 'xen', hv type 'default'.?????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received virt method 'xen'???????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Hypervisor name is 'xen'?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? DistroInstaller location is a network source.????????????????????????????????? > > > > > > Starting install... > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Attempting to detect distro: > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:37 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/.treeinfo????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-.treeinfo.WVH7xk?????????????????????????? > > Retrieving file .treeinfo...?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 1.2 kB???? 00:00???? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE kB/s | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? > > Retrieving file vmlinuz...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/initrd.img????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn/s |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? > > Retrieving file initrd.img...????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS type as: linux??????????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS variant as: fedora12????????????????????????????????????????? > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Creating guest from:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? f12pv????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? 1048576????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? 1048576??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? linux????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? method=ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? destroy??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? 1????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > > ????? > > ????? > > ??? > > ??? > > ??? > > ? > > > > > > Creating domain...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |??? 0 B???? 00:01 > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Created guest, looking to see if it is running > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Launching console callback > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Saving XML boot config: > > > > ? f12pv > > ? 1048576 > > ? 1048576 > > ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b > > ? /usr/bin/pygrub > > ? destroy > > ? restart > > ? restart > > ? 1 > > ? > > ??? > > ????? > > ????? > > ??? > > ??? > > ????? > > ????? > > ??? > > ??? > > ??? > > ? > > > > > > Virt-viewer hangs with message "Waiting for guest domain to be created" > > > > Check "xm log" - for me the guest crashes immediately. > > This is a known bug in F12/rawhide kernel. > > -- Pasi > > > > From needwork at gmail.com Mon Aug 24 19:25:40 2009 From: needwork at gmail.com (Lester M.) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:25:40 -0400 Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/. I have had trouble > > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this > > one does work. I haven't tried i686. > > > > Finally the 32bit PAE (i686) dom0 kernel crash problem has been fixed. > > Patch: > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=02ef83d1ed382d898bbb4a8ade9888e21fe33d1d > > I verified that patch fixes the problem. > > I'll try these RPMs soon. > > -- Pasi > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-virt mailing list > Fedora-virt at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt Pasi / M.A. Young, Can these new rpms be used directly on a fedora 11 system? Or do I have to upgrade to rawhide to use these? I ask this because I tried to install and test these rpms, and I got depsolving errors having to do with the version of rpmlib, and a few other packages. Here is the exact output: $ rpm -Uvh kernel-* error: Failed dependencies: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.noarch rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 kernel-drm-nouveau = 12 is needed by (installed) xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1:0.0.12-40.20090528git0c17b87.fc11.i586 kernel-uname-r = 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i686.PAE is needed by (installed) kmod-iscsitarget-2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i686.PAE-1:0.4.17-2.fc11.15.i686 kernel-uname-r = 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE is needed by (installed) kmod-iscsitarget-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE-1:0.4.17-2.fc11.16.i686 Please advise. I am not really ready to go 100% rawhide at this time. :-( -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Mon Aug 24 19:53:08 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:53:08 +0300 Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090824195308.GX19938@edu.joroinen.fi> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 03:25:40PM -0400, Lester M. wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 10:32:34PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > > > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > > > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/. I have had trouble > > > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this > > > one does work. I haven't tried i686. > > > > > > > Finally the 32bit PAE (i686) dom0 kernel crash problem has been fixed. > > > > Patch: > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git;a=commit;h=02ef83d1ed382d898bbb4a8ade9888e21fe33d1d > > > > I verified that patch fixes the problem. > > > > I'll try these RPMs soon. > > > > -- Pasi > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fedora-virt mailing list > > Fedora-virt at redhat.com > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt > > > > Pasi / M.A. Young, > > Can these new rpms be used directly on a fedora 11 system? Or do I have to > upgrade to rawhide to use these? > > I ask this because I tried to install and test these rpms, and I got > depsolving errors having to do with the version of rpmlib, and a few other > packages. Here is the exact output: > > $ rpm -Uvh kernel-* > error: Failed dependencies: > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by > kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.noarch > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by > kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > grubby >= 7.0.2-1 is needed by > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by > kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12.i686 > kernel-drm-nouveau = 12 is needed by (installed) > xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1:0.0.12-40.20090528git0c17b87.fc11.i586 > kernel-uname-r = 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i686.PAE is needed by (installed) > kmod-iscsitarget-2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i686.PAE-1:0.4.17-2.fc11.15.i686 > kernel-uname-r = 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE is needed by (installed) > kmod-iscsitarget-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE-1:0.4.17-2.fc11.16.i686 > > > Please advise. I am not really ready to go 100% rawhide at this time. :-( Use the force! rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps kernel-* Should work.. afaik. You also need newer libvirt from updates-testing, at least if you run Xen 3.4.1 (from rawhide). -- Pasi From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Mon Aug 24 20:13:42 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 21:13:42 +0100 (BST) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <20090824195308.GX19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090824195308.GX19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps kernel-* I would go for rpm -ivh --nodeps kernel-* as update will probably uninstall your existing kernels including the one you are running, so I wouldn't recommend it. I should shortly have a kernel that will install on Fedora 11 which doesn't need the --nodeps flag. Michael Young From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Tue Aug 25 21:26:49 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:26:49 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: References: <20090328163545.GM31725@salstar.sk> <20090414143618.GH351@redhat.com> Message-ID: This update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12) should install cleanly on Fedora 11 (dracut is turned off, so we don't need the grubby dependency). It is available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1630646 or at the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . x86_64 works for me, Michael Young From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 26 05:59:15 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 22:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <249267.18840.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> I believe to miss something here. 1.First? added [root at ServerXenSRC yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-myoung-dom0.repo [myoung-dom0] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - $basearch baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/$basearch/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 [myoung-dom0-source] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - Source baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 2. Downloaded # wget? http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm # rpm -iv kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm # cd /root/rpmbuild/SPECS # rpmbuild -ba ./kernel.spec # cd ../RPMS/x*[root at ServerXenSRC x86_64]# ls kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-debuginfo-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ?--> Missing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11 is needed by package kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11 is needed by package kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm) ?You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ?You could try running: package-cleanup --problems ??????????????????????? package-cleanup --dupes ??????????????????????? rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ************** Downloaded ************** ?? kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm ****************************** Attempt yum install? again :- ****************************** Dependencies Resolved ================================================================ ?Package????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? Arch??? Version??????????????????????????????? Repository??????????????????????????????????????????????? Size ================================================================ Installing:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?kernel ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm?? 78 M ?kernel-debuginfo ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-debuginfo-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.0 G ?kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64 ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 157 M ?kernel-devel ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 21 M Updating: ?kernel-firmware ??? noarch? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12? kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.7 M ?kernel-headers ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2.3 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================================================== Install????? 4 Package(s) Update?????? 2 Package(s) Remove?????? 0 Package(s) Total size: 1.3 G Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by kernel-firmware-.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch Complete! (1, [u'Please report this error in http://yum.baseurl.org/report']) Please, advise. Boris. --- On Tue, 8/25/09, M A Young wrote: From: M A Young Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:26 PM This update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12) should install cleanly on Fedora 11 (dracut is turned off, so we don't need the grubby dependency). It is available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1630646 or at the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . x86_64 works for me, ??? Michael Young -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 26 06:13:27 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:13:27 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: <249267.18840.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <738108.15664.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Trying after yum upgrade rpm Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 1:59 AM I believe to miss something here. 1.First? added [root at ServerXenSRC yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-myoung-dom0.repo [myoung-dom0] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - $basearch baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/$basearch/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 [myoung-dom0-source] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - Source baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/ enabled=0 gpgcheck=0 2. Downloaded # wget? http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm # rpm -iv kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.src.rpm # cd /root/rpmbuild/SPECS # rpmbuild -ba ./kernel.spec # cd ../RPMS/x*[root at ServerXenSRC x86_64]# ls kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-debuginfo-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ?--> Missing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11 is needed by package kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm) Error: Missing Dependency: kernel-firmware >= 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11 is needed by package kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm) ?You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem ?You could try running: package-cleanup --problems ??????????????????????? package-cleanup --dupes ??????????????????????? rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest ************** Downloaded ************** ?? kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm ****************************** Attempt yum install? again :- ****************************** Dependencies Resolved ================================================================ ?Package????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? Arch??? Version??????????????????????????????? Repository??????????????????????????????????????????????? Size ================================================================ Installing:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?kernel ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm?? 78 M ?kernel-debuginfo ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-debuginfo-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.0 G ?kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64 ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-debuginfo-common-x86_64-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 157 M ?kernel-devel ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 21 M Updating: ?kernel-firmware ??? noarch? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12? kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 1.7 M ?kernel-headers ??? x86_64? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11? kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64.rpm ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? 2.3 M Transaction Summary ================================================================================================================== Install????? 4 Package(s) Update?????? 2 Package(s) Remove?????? 0 Package(s) Total size: 1.3 G Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running rpm_check_debug ERROR with rpm_check_debug vs depsolve: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) is needed by kernel-firmware-.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch Complete! (1, [u'Please report this error in http://yum.baseurl.org/report']) Please, advise. Boris. --- On Tue, 8/25/09, M A Young wrote: From: M A Young Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Tuesday, August 25, 2009, 5:26 PM This update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12) should install cleanly on Fedora 11 (dracut is turned off, so we don't need the grubby dependency). It is available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1630646 or at the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . x86_64 works for me, ??? Michael Young -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- _______________________________________________ Fedora-virt mailing list Fedora-virt at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-virt -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 26 06:50:47 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:50:47 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels Message-ID: <494282.31131.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> With rpm upgraded can load Dom0. However, dmesg report contains :- Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Linux version 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (root at ServerXenSRC) (gcc version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 26 08:14:58 MSD 2009 Command line: root=/dev/mapper/vg_serverxensrc-LogVol00? ro console=tty0 KERNEL supported cpus: ? Intel GenuineIntel ? AMD AuthenticAMD ? Centaur CentaurHauls BIOS-provided physical RAM map: ?Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009ec00 (usable) ?Xen: 000000000009ec00 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cff80000 (usable) ?Xen: 00000000cff80000 - 00000000cff8e000 (ACPI data) ?Xen: 00000000cff8e000 - 00000000cffe0000 (ACPI NVS) ?Xen: 00000000cffe0000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000100000000 - 00000001f1a6b000 (usable) DMI 2.4 present. AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. e820 update range: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (usable) ==> (reserved) last_pfn = 0x1f1a6b max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 last_pfn = 0xcff80 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 initial memory mapped : 0 - 20000000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000cff80000 ?0000000000 - 00cff80000 page 4k kernel direct mapping tables up to cff80000 @ 100000-785000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-00000001f1a6b000 ?0100000000 - 01f1a6b000 page 4k . . . . . . . ====================================================== [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 #1 ------------------------------------------------------ khubd/28 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ?(&retval->lock){......}, at: [] dma_pool_alloc+0x45/0x321 and this task is already holding: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c which would create a new lock dependency: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} -> (&retval->lock){......} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: ? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 ? [] handle_irq+0x9a/0xba ? [] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x10c/0x1bd ? [] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: ?(purge_lock){+.+...} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ...? [] __lock_acquire+0x2c8/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x63/0x198 ? [] vm_unmap_aliases+0x18f/0x1b2 ? [] xen_alloc_ptpage+0x5a/0xa0 ? [] xen_alloc_pte+0x26/0x3c ? [] __pte_alloc_kernel+0x6f/0xdd ? [] vmap_page_range_noflush+0x1c5/0x315 ? [] map_vm_area+0x41/0x6b ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x12f/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x6c/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc+0x28/0x3e ? [] alloc_large_system_hash+0x12f/0x1fb ? [] vfs_caches_init+0xb8/0x140 ? [] start_kernel+0x3ef/0x44c ? [] x86_64_start_reservations+0xbb/0xd6 ? [] xen_start_kernel+0x5ab/0x5b2 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by khubd/28: ?#0:? (usb_address0_mutex){+.+...}, at: [] hub_port_init+0x8c/0x7ee ?#1:? (&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c the HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock's dependencies: -> (&ehci->lock){-.....} ops: 0 { ?? IN-HARDIRQ-W at: ??????????????????????? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ??????????????????????? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ??????????????????????? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ??????????????????????? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ??????????????????????? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ??????????????????????? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ??????????????????????? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 .? .? .? .? .? . Jeremy's current version is rc6.? I believe this issue has been noticed at xen-devel. Boris -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: dmesg.log.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 16480 bytes Desc: not available URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 26 07:58:40 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 00:58:40 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: <494282.31131.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <977983.24987.qm@web56107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Not sure how 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64? has been built. There are pretty recent ongoing issues with 2.6.31-rc7 in upstream :- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/25/347 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43791/ I was able to load Xen guest under?? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 followed by kernel error with sky2 (?) and loosing vnc connection to Xen Host 3.4.1 on top of F11.? I'll do some more testing. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 2:50 AM With rpm upgraded can load Dom0. However, dmesg report contains :- Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Linux version 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (root at ServerXenSRC) (gcc version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 26 08:14:58 MSD 2009 Command line: root=/dev/mapper/vg_serverxensrc-LogVol00? ro console=tty0 KERNEL supported cpus: ? Intel GenuineIntel ? AMD AuthenticAMD ? Centaur CentaurHauls BIOS-provided physical RAM map: ?Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009ec00 (usable) ?Xen: 000000000009ec00 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cff80000 (usable) ?Xen: 00000000cff80000 - 00000000cff8e000 (ACPI data) ?Xen: 00000000cff8e000 - 00000000cffe0000 (ACPI NVS) ?Xen: 00000000cffe0000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000100000000 - 00000001f1a6b000 (usable) DMI 2.4 present. AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. e820 update range: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (usable) ==> (reserved) last_pfn = 0x1f1a6b max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 last_pfn = 0xcff80 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 initial memory mapped : 0 - 20000000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000cff80000 ?0000000000 - 00cff80000 page 4k kernel direct mapping tables up to cff80000 @ 100000-785000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-00000001f1a6b000 ?0100000000 - 01f1a6b000 page 4k . . . . . . . ====================================================== [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 #1 ------------------------------------------------------ khubd/28 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ?(&retval->lock){......}, at: [] dma_pool_alloc+0x45/0x321 and this task is already holding: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c which would create a new lock dependency: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} -> (&retval->lock){......} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: ? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 ? [] handle_irq+0x9a/0xba ? [] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x10c/0x1bd ? [] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: ?(purge_lock){+.+...} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ...? [] __lock_acquire+0x2c8/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x63/0x198 ? [] vm_unmap_aliases+0x18f/0x1b2 ? [] xen_alloc_ptpage+0x5a/0xa0 ? [] xen_alloc_pte+0x26/0x3c ? [] __pte_alloc_kernel+0x6f/0xdd ? [] vmap_page_range_noflush+0x1c5/0x315 ? [] map_vm_area+0x41/0x6b ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x12f/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x6c/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc+0x28/0x3e ? [] alloc_large_system_hash+0x12f/0x1fb ? [] vfs_caches_init+0xb8/0x140 ? [] start_kernel+0x3ef/0x44c ? [] x86_64_start_reservations+0xbb/0xd6 ? [] xen_start_kernel+0x5ab/0x5b2 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by khubd/28: ?#0:? (usb_address0_mutex){+.+...}, at: [] hub_port_init+0x8c/0x7ee ?#1:? (&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c the HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock's dependencies: -> (&ehci->lock){-.....} ops: 0 { ?? IN-HARDIRQ-W at: ??????????????????????? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ??????????????????????? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ??????????????????????? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ??????????????????????? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ??????????????????????? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ??????????????????????? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ??????????????????????? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 .? .? .? .? .? . Jeremy's current version is rc6.? I believe this issue has been noticed at xen-devel. Boris -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 26 11:26:23 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 04:26:23 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: <977983.24987.qm@web56107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <675594.25020.qm@web56107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Upstream issues looks DomU related. Kernel 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 works stable at runtime. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 3:58 AM Not sure how 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64? has been built. There are pretty recent ongoing issues with 2.6.31-rc7 in upstream :- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/25/347 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43791/ I was able to load Xen guest under?? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 followed by kernel error with sky2 (?) and loosing vnc connection to Xen Host 3.4.1 on top of F11.? I'll do some more testing. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 2:50 AM With rpm upgraded can load Dom0. However, dmesg report contains :- Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Linux version 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (root at ServerXenSRC) (gcc version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 26 08:14:58 MSD 2009 Command line: root=/dev/mapper/vg_serverxensrc-LogVol00? ro console=tty0 KERNEL supported cpus: ? Intel GenuineIntel ? AMD AuthenticAMD ? Centaur CentaurHauls BIOS-provided physical RAM map: ?Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009ec00 (usable) ?Xen: 000000000009ec00 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cff80000 (usable) ?Xen: 00000000cff80000 - 00000000cff8e000 (ACPI data) ?Xen: 00000000cff8e000 - 00000000cffe0000 (ACPI NVS) ?Xen: 00000000cffe0000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000100000000 - 00000001f1a6b000 (usable) DMI 2.4 present. AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. e820 update range: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (usable) ==> (reserved) last_pfn = 0x1f1a6b max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 last_pfn = 0xcff80 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 initial memory mapped : 0 - 20000000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000cff80000 ?0000000000 - 00cff80000 page 4k kernel direct mapping tables up to cff80000 @ 100000-785000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-00000001f1a6b000 ?0100000000 - 01f1a6b000 page 4k . . . . . . . ====================================================== [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 #1 ------------------------------------------------------ khubd/28 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ?(&retval->lock){......}, at: [] dma_pool_alloc+0x45/0x321 and this task is already holding: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c which would create a new lock dependency: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} -> (&retval->lock){......} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: ? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 ? [] handle_irq+0x9a/0xba ? [] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x10c/0x1bd ? [] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: ?(purge_lock){+.+...} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ...? [] __lock_acquire+0x2c8/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x63/0x198 ? [] vm_unmap_aliases+0x18f/0x1b2 ? [] xen_alloc_ptpage+0x5a/0xa0 ? [] xen_alloc_pte+0x26/0x3c ? [] __pte_alloc_kernel+0x6f/0xdd ? [] vmap_page_range_noflush+0x1c5/0x315 ? [] map_vm_area+0x41/0x6b ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x12f/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x6c/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc+0x28/0x3e ? [] alloc_large_system_hash+0x12f/0x1fb ? [] vfs_caches_init+0xb8/0x140 ? [] start_kernel+0x3ef/0x44c ? [] x86_64_start_reservations+0xbb/0xd6 ? [] xen_start_kernel+0x5ab/0x5b2 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by khubd/28: ?#0:? (usb_address0_mutex){+.+...}, at: [] hub_port_init+0x8c/0x7ee ?#1:? (&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c the HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock's dependencies: -> (&ehci->lock){-.....} ops: 0 { ?? IN-HARDIRQ-W at: ??????????????????????? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ??????????????????????? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ??????????????????????? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ??????????????????????? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ??????????????????????? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ??????????????????????? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ??????????????????????? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 .? .? .? .? .? . Jeremy's current version is rc6.? I believe this issue has been noticed at xen-devel. Boris -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Wed Aug 26 13:58:31 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 06:58:31 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels Message-ID: <928414.30176.qm@web56104.mail.re3.yahoo.com> I've made one more clean install with repo file :- [root at ServerXen341 yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-myoung-dom0.repo [myoung-dom0] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - $basearch baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [myoung-dom0-source] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - Source baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 ? Then tried to load kernel been built as vanilla. Console dropped into stack trace and hanged. ?? However, kernel loads fine and works under Xen. Dmesg report under Xen stays the same ( stack trace entries ). Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:26 AM Upstream issues looks DomU related. Kernel 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 works stable at runtime. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 3:58 AM Not sure how 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64? has been built. There are pretty recent ongoing issues with 2.6.31-rc7 in upstream :- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/25/347 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43791/ I was able to load Xen guest under?? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 followed by kernel error with sky2 (?) and loosing vnc connection to Xen Host 3.4.1 on top of F11.? I'll do some more testing. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 2:50 AM With rpm upgraded can load Dom0. However, dmesg report contains :- Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Linux version 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (root at ServerXenSRC) (gcc version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 26 08:14:58 MSD 2009 Command line: root=/dev/mapper/vg_serverxensrc-LogVol00? ro console=tty0 KERNEL supported cpus: ? Intel GenuineIntel ? AMD AuthenticAMD ? Centaur CentaurHauls BIOS-provided physical RAM map: ?Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009ec00 (usable) ?Xen: 000000000009ec00 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cff80000 (usable) ?Xen: 00000000cff80000 - 00000000cff8e000 (ACPI data) ?Xen: 00000000cff8e000 - 00000000cffe0000 (ACPI NVS) ?Xen: 00000000cffe0000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000100000000 - 00000001f1a6b000 (usable) DMI 2.4 present. AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. e820 update range: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (usable) ==> (reserved) last_pfn = 0x1f1a6b max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 last_pfn = 0xcff80 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 initial memory mapped : 0 - 20000000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000cff80000 ?0000000000 - 00cff80000 page 4k kernel direct mapping tables up to cff80000 @ 100000-785000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-00000001f1a6b000 ?0100000000 - 01f1a6b000 page 4k . . . . . . . ====================================================== [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 #1 ------------------------------------------------------ khubd/28 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ?(&retval->lock){......}, at: [] dma_pool_alloc+0x45/0x321 and this task is already holding: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c which would create a new lock dependency: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} -> (&retval->lock){......} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: ? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 ? [] handle_irq+0x9a/0xba ? [] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x10c/0x1bd ? [] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: ?(purge_lock){+.+...} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ...? [] __lock_acquire+0x2c8/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x63/0x198 ? [] vm_unmap_aliases+0x18f/0x1b2 ? [] xen_alloc_ptpage+0x5a/0xa0 ? [] xen_alloc_pte+0x26/0x3c ? [] __pte_alloc_kernel+0x6f/0xdd ? [] vmap_page_range_noflush+0x1c5/0x315 ? [] map_vm_area+0x41/0x6b ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x12f/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x6c/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc+0x28/0x3e ? [] alloc_large_system_hash+0x12f/0x1fb ? [] vfs_caches_init+0xb8/0x140 ? [] start_kernel+0x3ef/0x44c ? [] x86_64_start_reservations+0xbb/0xd6 ? [] xen_start_kernel+0x5ab/0x5b2 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by khubd/28: ?#0:? (usb_address0_mutex){+.+...}, at: [] hub_port_init+0x8c/0x7ee ?#1:? (&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c the HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock's dependencies: -> (&ehci->lock){-.....} ops: 0 { ?? IN-HARDIRQ-W at: ??????????????????????? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ??????????????????????? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ??????????????????????? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ??????????????????????? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ??????????????????????? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ??????????????????????? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ??????????????????????? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 .? .? .? .? .? . Jeremy's current version is rc6.? I believe this issue has been noticed at xen-devel. Boris -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: F11PVOPS.install.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1052 bytes Desc: not available URL: From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Wed Aug 26 18:57:59 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:57:59 +0100 (BST) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <2cc75dd80908261104v7f7288a4l94895f326fc01ad8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090824195308.GX19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908261104v7f7288a4l94895f326fc01ad8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Lester M. wrote: > # rpm -Uvh kernel-* > error: Failed dependencies: > ??? rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by > kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch > ... That looks like you need to update rpm. rpm-4.7.1-1.fc11 should work. > # ls kernel-* > kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm > kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm > > > Then, I proceeded to heed Michael's advisory: > > > rpm -ivh --nodeps kernel-* rpm -ivh kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm should work. As you have discovered you can only have one kernel-headers package at a time. Note though that I haven't got the i686 version of the kernel to boot recently. Michael Young From pasik at iki.fi Wed Aug 26 20:28:28 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:28:28 +0300 Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: <2cc75dd80908261104v7f7288a4l94895f326fc01ad8@mail.gmail.com> References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090824195308.GX19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908261104v7f7288a4l94895f326fc01ad8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <20090826202828.GD21121@reaktio.net> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 02:04:03PM -0400, Lester M. wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:13 PM, M A Young wrote: > > > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps kernel-* > >> > > > > I would go for rpm -ivh --nodeps kernel-* > > as update will probably uninstall your existing kernels including the one > > you are running, so I wouldn't recommend it. I should shortly have a kernel > > that will install on Fedora 11 which doesn't need the --nodeps flag. > > > > Michael Young > > > > > Michael / Pasi, > > I do not think these rpms will work with a stock or very up to date Fedora > 11: > I am trying to avoid having to rebuild this system from the F12 (rawhide) > repo. Could you try to build them on a system that has not been updated from > rawhide? (if possible) > > First, just for kicks, I tried to install via rpm -Uvh: > You shouldn't really use -Uvh, as was pointed out earlier.. > > Then, I proceeded to heed Michael's advisory: > > > rpm -ivh --nodeps kernel-* > rpm -ivh --force --nodeps kernel-* -- Pasi From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Thu Aug 27 03:31:51 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:31:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels Message-ID: <796024.77835.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Thanks for keeping vanilla kernel alive. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 9:58 AM I've made one more clean install with repo file :- [root at ServerXen341 yum.repos.d]# cat fedora-myoung-dom0.repo [myoung-dom0] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - $basearch baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/$basearch/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 [myoung-dom0-source] name=myoung's repository of Fedora based dom0 kernels - Source baseurl=http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/src/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 ? Then tried to load kernel been built as vanilla. Console dropped into stack trace and hanged. ?? However, kernel loads fine and works under Xen. Dmesg report under Xen stays the same ( stack trace entries ). Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 7:26 AM Upstream issues looks DomU related. Kernel 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 works stable at runtime. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 3:58 AM Not sure how 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64? has been built. There are pretty recent ongoing issues with 2.6.31-rc7 in upstream :- http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/8/25/347 http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/43791/ I was able to load Xen guest under?? 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 followed by kernel error with sky2 (?) and loosing vnc connection to Xen Host 3.4.1 on top of F11.? I'll do some more testing. Boris. --- On Wed, 8/26/09, Boris Derzhavets wrote: From: Boris Derzhavets Subject: Re: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com, "M A Young" Cc: xen-devel at xensource.com Date: Wednesday, August 26, 2009, 2:50 AM With rpm upgraded can load Dom0. However, dmesg report contains :- Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Initializing cgroup subsys cpu Linux version 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 (root at ServerXenSRC) (gcc version 4.4.0 20090506 (Red Hat 4.4.0-4) (GCC) ) #1 SMP Wed Aug 26 08:14:58 MSD 2009 Command line: root=/dev/mapper/vg_serverxensrc-LogVol00? ro console=tty0 KERNEL supported cpus: ? Intel GenuineIntel ? AMD AuthenticAMD ? Centaur CentaurHauls BIOS-provided physical RAM map: ?Xen: 0000000000000000 - 000000000009ec00 (usable) ?Xen: 000000000009ec00 - 0000000000100000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000000100000 - 00000000cff80000 (usable) ?Xen: 00000000cff80000 - 00000000cff8e000 (ACPI data) ?Xen: 00000000cff8e000 - 00000000cffe0000 (ACPI NVS) ?Xen: 00000000cffe0000 - 00000000d0000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000fee00000 - 00000000fee01000 (reserved) ?Xen: 00000000ffe00000 - 0000000100000000 (reserved) ?Xen: 0000000100000000 - 00000001f1a6b000 (usable) DMI 2.4 present. AMI BIOS detected: BIOS may corrupt low RAM, working around it. e820 update range: 0000000000000000 - 0000000000010000 (usable) ==> (reserved) last_pfn = 0x1f1a6b max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 last_pfn = 0xcff80 max_arch_pfn = 0x400000000 initial memory mapped : 0 - 20000000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000000000000-00000000cff80000 ?0000000000 - 00cff80000 page 4k kernel direct mapping tables up to cff80000 @ 100000-785000 init_memory_mapping: 0000000100000000-00000001f1a6b000 ?0100000000 - 01f1a6b000 page 4k . . . . . . . ====================================================== [ INFO: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected ] 2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc11.x86_64 #1 ------------------------------------------------------ khubd/28 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire: ?(&retval->lock){......}, at: [] dma_pool_alloc+0x45/0x321 and this task is already holding: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c which would create a new lock dependency: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} -> (&retval->lock){......} but this new dependency connects a HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock: ?(&ehci->lock){-.....} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-safe at: ? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 ? [] handle_irq+0x9a/0xba ? [] xen_evtchn_do_upcall+0x10c/0x1bd ? [] xen_do_hypervisor_callback+0x1e/0x30 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff to a HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe lock: ?(purge_lock){+.+...} ... which became HARDIRQ-irq-unsafe at: ...? [] __lock_acquire+0x2c8/0xc0e ? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ? [] __purge_vmap_area_lazy+0x63/0x198 ? [] vm_unmap_aliases+0x18f/0x1b2 ? [] xen_alloc_ptpage+0x5a/0xa0 ? [] xen_alloc_pte+0x26/0x3c ? [] __pte_alloc_kernel+0x6f/0xdd ? [] vmap_page_range_noflush+0x1c5/0x315 ? [] map_vm_area+0x41/0x6b ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x12f/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc_area_node+0x6c/0x167 ? [] __vmalloc_node+0x90/0xb5 ? [] __vmalloc+0x28/0x3e ? [] alloc_large_system_hash+0x12f/0x1fb ? [] vfs_caches_init+0xb8/0x140 ? [] start_kernel+0x3ef/0x44c ? [] x86_64_start_reservations+0xbb/0xd6 ? [] xen_start_kernel+0x5ab/0x5b2 ? [] 0xffffffffffffffff other info that might help us debug this: 2 locks held by khubd/28: ?#0:? (usb_address0_mutex){+.+...}, at: [] hub_port_init+0x8c/0x7ee ?#1:? (&ehci->lock){-.....}, at: [] ehci_urb_enqueue+0xb4/0xd5c the HARDIRQ-irq-safe lock's dependencies: -> (&ehci->lock){-.....} ops: 0 { ?? IN-HARDIRQ-W at: ??????????????????????? [] __lock_acquire+0x254/0xc0e ??????????????????????? [] lock_acquire+0xee/0x12e ??????????????????????? [] _spin_lock+0x45/0x8e ??????????????????????? [] ehci_irq+0x41/0x441 ??????????????????????? [] usb_hcd_irq+0x59/0xcc ??????????????????????? [] handle_IRQ_event+0x62/0x148 ??????????????????????? [] handle_level_irq+0x90/0xf9 .? .? .? .? .? . Jeremy's current version is rc6.? I believe this issue has been noticed at xen-devel. Boris -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: Yum-install-Dom0F11.gz Type: application/x-gzip Size: 1844 bytes Desc: not available URL: From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 27 14:38:00 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 17:38:00 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released / 3.4.1-2 patches In-Reply-To: <20090821141604.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A8E7865.7090001@redhat.com> <20090821141604.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <20090827143800.GD31123@reaktio.net> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > On 08/20/09 16:45, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > >Gerd: Would you like to apply some bugfix patches for 3.4.1-2 ? > > > > I'll have a look next week. > > > Did you have time to take a look at those? > > > Having bzip2+lzma sorted until then would be great, > > so I can put that in as well. > > > > Working on it now.. > I haven't had time to get done with the stubdom makefile voodoo yet.. -- Pasi From kraxel at redhat.com Thu Aug 27 14:44:45 2009 From: kraxel at redhat.com (Gerd Hoffmann) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 16:44:45 +0200 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released / 3.4.1-2 patches In-Reply-To: <20090827143800.GD31123@reaktio.net> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A8E7865.7090001@redhat.com> <20090821141604.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090827143800.GD31123@reaktio.net> Message-ID: <4A969BDD.8040506@redhat.com> On 08/27/09 16:38, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: >>> On 08/20/09 16:45, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: >>>> Gerd: Would you like to apply some bugfix patches for 3.4.1-2 ? >>> >>> I'll have a look next week. >>> >> > > Did you have time to take a look at those? Didn't look, was waiting for the stubdom stuff ... >>> Having bzip2+lzma sorted until then would be great, >>> so I can put that in as well. >>> >> >> Working on it now.. >> > > I haven't had time to get done with the stubdom makefile voodoo yet.. Ok, I'll try to update the package today or tomorrow then and make a one more update once the stubdom bits are finally sorted. cheers, Gerd From pasik at iki.fi Thu Aug 27 15:19:32 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 18:19:32 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Xen 3.3.2 and 3.4.1 released / 3.4.1-2 patches In-Reply-To: <4A969BDD.8040506@redhat.com> References: <20090810170947.GC24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A812ABD.9050402@redhat.com> <20090820144514.GB19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <4A8E7865.7090001@redhat.com> <20090821141604.GR19938@edu.joroinen.fi> <20090827143800.GD31123@reaktio.net> <4A969BDD.8040506@redhat.com> Message-ID: <20090827151932.GE31123@reaktio.net> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 04:44:45PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On 08/27/09 16:38, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > >On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:16:04PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > >>On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:35:17PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > >>>On 08/20/09 16:45, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > >>>>Gerd: Would you like to apply some bugfix patches for 3.4.1-2 ? > >>> > >>>I'll have a look next week. > >>> > >> > > > >Did you have time to take a look at those? > > Didn't look, was waiting for the stubdom stuff ... > > >>>Having bzip2+lzma sorted until then would be great, > >>>so I can put that in as well. > >>> > >> > >>Working on it now.. > >> > > > >I haven't had time to get done with the stubdom makefile voodoo yet.. > > Ok, I'll try to update the package today or tomorrow then and make a one > more update once the stubdom bits are finally sorted. > OK. You can include the userspace pv bootloader bits already. http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/a687c4d35fdd http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/7dad2e23bf89 http://xenbits.xen.org/staging/xen-unstable.hg?rev/c5125c0ea051 I believe those are the needed changesets from xen-unstable. xen.spec needs to have xz-devel and bzip2-devel in the builddeps. -- Pasi From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Thu Aug 27 21:40:40 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2009 22:40:40 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: References: <20090328163545.GM31725@salstar.sk> <20090414143618.GH351@redhat.com> Message-ID: Another update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.60.rc7.git4.xendom0.fc12) is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636489 and on the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . This one actually boots for me on i686 as well as x86_64. Michael Young From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Fri Aug 28 07:03:19 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:03:19 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <880105.92576.qm@web56103.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Kernel been built (on F11) via the most recent check out rebase/master from Jetemy's Git Repo doesn't generate a stack trace and warnings your's version still does. (x86_64). Boris --- On Thu, 8/27/09, M A Young wrote: From: M A Young Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, fedora-virt at redhat.com Date: Thursday, August 27, 2009, 5:40 PM Another update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.60.rc7.git4.xendom0.fc12) is at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636489 and on the repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . This one actually boots for me on i686 as well as x86_64. ??? Michael Young -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From pasik at iki.fi Fri Aug 28 07:14:24 2009 From: pasik at iki.fi (Pasi =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=E4rkk=E4inen?=) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:14:24 +0300 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20090828071424.GN31123@reaktio.net> On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:40:40PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > Another update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.60.rc7.git4.xendom0.fc12) is at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636489 and on the > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . This one actually boots > for me on i686 as well as x86_64. > Congrats! Finally working pv_ops dom0 kernels as rpms, for both architectures. -- Pasi From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Fri Aug 28 07:37:34 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 00:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: <20090828071424.GN31123@reaktio.net> Message-ID: <270362.34604.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Pasi, Could you post dmesg output ? Boris. --- On Fri, 8/28/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels To: "M A Young" Cc: fedora-virt at redhat.com, fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 3:14 AM On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 10:40:40PM +0100, M A Young wrote: > Another update (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.60.rc7.git4.xendom0.fc12) is at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1636489 and on the > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . This one actually boots > for me on i686 as well as x86_64. > Congrats! Finally working pv_ops dom0 kernels as rpms, for both architectures. -- Pasi -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jonr at destar.net Sun Aug 30 00:16:25 2009 From: jonr at destar.net (Jon) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:16:25 -0800 Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm Message-ID: <1251591385.30536.6.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> I am following Boris guide at: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ And after I issue the "rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec" command and then issue the yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm command, I always am missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm. Is there a certain package that needs to be installed to get this rpm and can I get by without it? Thanks for any help....again :) Jon AMD64 fc11 4core proc [root at localhost x86_64]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : AuthenticAMD cpu family : 16 model : 2 model name : AMD Phenom(tm) 9500 Quad-Core Processor stepping : 2 cpu MHz : 2210.236 cache size : 512 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 apicid : 0 initial apicid : 0 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 5 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc pni monitor cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs bogomips : 4420.46 TLB size : 1024 4K pages clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate From jonr at destar.net Sun Aug 30 00:21:34 2009 From: jonr at destar.net (Jon) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:21:34 -0800 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setup Libvirt 0.7.0-6 & Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on top of Fedora 11 (64-bit) Message-ID: <1251591694.30536.11.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> When getting the pvops kernel do I still use: # git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-xen # cd linux-2.6-xen # git checkout origin/rebase/master -b rebase/master And after that, do I still need Pasi's patch for pygrub? Jon From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Sun Aug 30 04:04:05 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:04:05 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setup Libvirt 0.7.0-6 & Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on top of Fedora 11 (64-bit) In-Reply-To: <1251591694.30536.11.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> Message-ID: <712973.51960.qm@web56102.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Pasi's patch is http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-3.4-testing.hg?rev/7a57911ff09e it's not related to pvops checkout. Yes,? you need backport CS 19740 to extract of official tarball 3.4.1 or just edit line 477 in /usr/bin/pygrub. I believe xen-3.4.1-2.src.rpm (Gerd Hoffman)? would have LZMA and CS 19740 as patches included.? I am not aware of it's current status. Boris --- On Sat, 8/29/09, Jon wrote: From: Jon Subject: [Fedora-xen] Setup Libvirt 0.7.0-6 & Xen 3.4.1 Dom0 on top of Fedora 11 (64-bit) To: fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:21 PM When getting the pvops kernel do I still use: # git clone git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jeremy/xen.git linux-2.6-xen # cd linux-2.6-xen # git checkout origin/rebase/master -b rebase/master And after that, do I still need Pasi's patch for pygrub? Jon -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Sun Aug 30 04:09:55 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 21:09:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm In-Reply-To: <1251591385.30536.6.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> Message-ID: <817277.95415.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> I believe that with Libvirt Preview Repo enabled it should be picked up from there to resolve dependencies during yum install. Boris. --- On Sat, 8/29/09, Jon wrote: From: Jon Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm To: fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:16 PM I am following Boris guide at: http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ And after I issue the "rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec" command and then issue the yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm command, I always am missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm. Is there a certain package that needs to be installed to get this rpm and can I get by without it? Thanks for any help....again :) Jon AMD64 fc11 4core proc [root at localhost x86_64]# cat /proc/cpuinfo processor??? : 0 vendor_id??? : AuthenticAMD cpu family??? : 16 model??? ??? : 2 model name??? : AMD Phenom(tm) 9500 Quad-Core Processor stepping??? : 2 cpu MHz??? ??? : 2210.236 cache size??? : 512 KB physical id??? : 0 siblings??? : 4 core id??? ??? : 0 cpu cores??? : 4 apicid??? ??? : 0 initial apicid??? : 0 fpu??? ??? : yes fpu_exception??? : yes cpuid level??? : 5 wp??? ??? : yes flags??? ??? : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc pni monitor cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs bogomips??? : 4420.46 TLB size??? : 1024 4K pages clflush size??? : 64 cache_alignment??? : 64 address sizes??? : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From jonr at destar.net Sun Aug 30 04:47:35 2009 From: jonr at destar.net (Jon) Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:47:35 -0800 Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm In-Reply-To: <817277.95415.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> References: <817277.95415.qm@web56106.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <1251607655.30536.13.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> It's not there, the only one I could find was located here: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/x86_64/ The filename is xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm It is for fc12 and not fc11. Would this work or is it OK to leave it out? Jon On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 21:09 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > I believe that with Libvirt Preview Repo enabled it should be picked > up from there to resolve dependencies during yum install. > > Boris. > > --- On Sat, 8/29/09, Jon wrote: > > From: Jon > Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing > xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > To: fedora-xen at redhat.com > Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:16 PM > > I am following Boris guide at: > > http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ > > And after I issue the "rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec" command and > then issue > the yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > > command, I always am missing > xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm. > > Is there a certain package that needs to be installed to get > this rpm > and can I get by without it? > > Thanks for any help....again :) > > Jon > > AMD64 fc11 4core proc > > [root at localhost x86_64]# cat /proc/cpuinfo > processor : 0 > vendor_id : AuthenticAMD > cpu family : 16 > model : 2 > model name : AMD Phenom(tm) 9500 Quad-Core Processor > stepping : 2 > cpu MHz : 2210.236 > cache size : 512 KB > physical id : 0 > siblings : 4 > core id : 0 > cpu cores : 4 > apicid : 0 > initial apicid : 0 > fpu : yes > fpu_exception : yes > cpuid level : 5 > wp : yes > flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr > pge mca cmov pat > pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt > pdpe1gb > rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc pni > monitor > cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a > misalignsse > 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs > bogomips : 4420.46 > TLB size : 1024 4K pages > clflush size : 64 > cache_alignment : 64 > address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual > power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > > From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Sun Aug 30 07:00:11 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm In-Reply-To: <1251607655.30536.13.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> Message-ID: <564854.43618.qm@web56107.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Jon, You are right.? I would expect this one repo to be hepfull. Otherwise , just download fc12.rpm (f12 shouldn't be matter) Boris. --- On Sun, 8/30/09, Jon wrote: From: Jon Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm To: "fedora-xen" Date: Sunday, August 30, 2009, 12:47 AM It's not there, the only one I could find was located here: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/xen/3.4.1/1.fc12/x86_64/ The filename is xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc12.x86_64.rpm It is for fc12 and not fc11. Would this work or is it OK to leave it out? Jon On Sat, 2009-08-29 at 21:09 -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > I believe that with Libvirt Preview Repo enabled it should be picked > up from there to resolve dependencies during yum install. > > Boris. > > --- On Sat, 8/29/09, Jon wrote: >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???From: Jon >? ? ? ???Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing >? ? ? ???xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm >? ? ? ???To: fedora-xen at redhat.com >? ? ? ???Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 8:16 PM >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???I am following Boris guide at: >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???And after I issue the "rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec" command and >? ? ? ???then issue >? ? ? ???the yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ >? ? ? ???xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ >? ? ? ???xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ >? ? ? ???xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ >? ? ? ???xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ >? ? ? ???xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ >? ? ? ???xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???command, I always am missing >? ? ? ???xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm. >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???Is there a certain package that needs to be installed to get >? ? ? ???this rpm >? ? ? ???and can I get by without it? >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???Thanks for any help....again :) >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???Jon >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???AMD64 fc11 4core proc >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???[root at localhost x86_64]# cat /proc/cpuinfo >? ? ? ???processor? ? : 0 >? ? ? ???vendor_id? ? : AuthenticAMD >? ? ? ???cpu family? ? : 16 >? ? ? ???model? ? ? ? : 2 >? ? ? ???model name? ? : AMD Phenom(tm) 9500 Quad-Core Processor >? ? ? ???stepping? ? : 2 >? ? ? ???cpu MHz? ? ? ? : 2210.236 >? ? ? ???cache size? ? : 512 KB >? ? ? ???physical id? ? : 0 >? ? ? ???siblings? ? : 4 >? ? ? ???core id? ? ? ? : 0 >? ? ? ???cpu cores? ? : 4 >? ? ? ???apicid? ? ? ? : 0 >? ? ? ???initial apicid? ? : 0 >? ? ? ???fpu? ? ? ? : yes >? ? ? ???fpu_exception? ? : yes >? ? ? ???cpuid level? ? : 5 >? ? ? ???wp? ? ? ? : yes >? ? ? ???flags? ? ? ? : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic mtrr >? ? ? ???pge mca cmov pat >? ? ? ???pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt >? ? ? ???pdpe1gb >? ? ? ???rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3dnow constant_tsc rep_good nonstop_tsc pni >? ? ? ???monitor >? ? ? ???cx16 lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a >? ? ? ???misalignsse >? ? ? ???3dnowprefetch osvw ibs >? ? ? ???bogomips? ? : 4420.46 >? ? ? ???TLB size? ? : 1024 4K pages >? ? ? ???clflush size? ? : 64 >? ? ? ???cache_alignment? ? : 64 >? ? ? ???address sizes? ? : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual >? ? ? ???power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate >? ? ? ??? >? ? ? ???-- >? ? ? ???Fedora-xen mailing list >? ? ? ???Fedora-xen at redhat.com >? ? ? ???https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen >? ? ? ??? > -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From m.a.young at durham.ac.uk Sun Aug 30 11:28:13 2009 From: m.a.young at durham.ac.uk (M A Young) Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 12:28:13 +0100 (BST) Subject: [Fedora-xen] missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm In-Reply-To: <1251591385.30536.6.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> References: <1251591385.30536.6.camel@laptop-jr.destar.net> Message-ID: On Sat, 29 Aug 2009, Jon wrote: > I am following Boris guide at: > > http://bderzhavets.wordpress.com/2009/08/20/setup-libvirt-0-7-0-6-xen-3-4-1-dom0-on-to-fedora-11-64-bit/ > > And after I issue the "rpmbuild -ba ./xen.spec" command and then issue > the yum install xen-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-devel-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-doc-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-hypervisor-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-libs-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm \ > xen-runtime-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm > > command, I always am missing xen-debuginfo-3.4.1-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm. > > Is there a certain package that needs to be installed to get this rpm > and can I get by without it? If you are building your own packages I would have thought you wanted yum localinstall ... otherwise you are likely to get packages from the main fedora or rawhide repositories (and the debuginfo repository for these is generally disabled by default). Michael Young From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Mon Aug 24 11:22:30 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 04:22:30 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <20090823164522.GF19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <270939.75549.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Fresh install Xen 3.4.1 via xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm with LZMA support patch + libvirt 0.7.0-6 (preview) tested OK with F11 PV DomU install. Kernel (supporting Dom0 ) - 2.6.30.2 xenified aka Suse Attempt to install F12 PV DomU ( Core2Duo E8400, 8 GB RAM ,SATA ) :- [root at ServerXenSRC ~]# virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1? \ -f /dev/sda12? --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os" Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Launched with command line:???????????????????????????????????????? /usr/sbin/virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/sda12 --vnc -p -l ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting libvirt URI default???????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received libvirt URI xen:///?????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting virt method 'xen', hv type 'default'.?????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received virt method 'xen'???????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Hypervisor name is 'xen'?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? DistroInstaller location is a network source.????????????????????????????????? Starting install... Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Attempting to detect distro: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:37 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/.treeinfo????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-.treeinfo.WVH7xk?????????????????????????? Retrieving file .treeinfo...?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 1.2 kB???? 00:00???? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE kB/s | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? Retrieving file vmlinuz...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/initrd.img????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn/s |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? Retrieving file initrd.img...????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS type as: linux??????????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS variant as: fedora12????????????????????????????????????????? Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Creating guest from:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? f12pv????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? 1048576????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? 1048576??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? linux????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? method=ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? destroy??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? 1????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ? Creating domain...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |??? 0 B???? 00:01 Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Created guest, looking to see if it is running Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Launching console callback Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Saving XML boot config: ? f12pv ? 1048576 ? 1048576 ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b ? /usr/bin/pygrub ? destroy ? restart ? restart ? 1 ? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ????? ????? ??? ??? ??? ? Virt-viewer hangs with message "Waiting for guest domain to be created" Boris --- On Sun, 8/23/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader To: "Mark McLoughlin" Cc: fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Sunday, August 23, 2009, 12:45 PM On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 10:04:09PM +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 19:44 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 05:05:17PM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 18:41 +0300, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > > > > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_GZIP is not set > > > > > # CONFIG_KERNEL_BZIP2 is not set > > > > > CONFIG_KERNEL_LZMA=y > > > > > > > > > > OK, so the problem is the rawhide kernel is LZMA compressed. Wasn't this > > > > > changed back to GZIP earlier? > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing that out, see: > > > > > > > >???https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=515831 > > > > > > > > It got disabled on a branch for the F12 Alpha release, but never got > > > > disabled on the devel/ branch. Should be fixed now. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks. Now I'll just wait for the next kernel build.. :) > > > > > > (or try applying the patch Chris sent to support BZIP2 and LZMA for Xen PV bootloader). > > > > Testing Chris's patch would certainly be a good idea. LZMA will come > > back again in Fedora 13, so we should make sure to have the patch in > > good shape by then > > > > I actually already 'ported' the patch to Xen 3.4.1 and made sure it > compiles OK. I've included it (and extra gcc 4.4.0 compilefix) to this > email, and also sent them to xen-devel. > > atm I'm trying to make the patch work/apply with Fedora xen-3.4.1-1 src.rpm .. > and sorting out some fedora/rpm specific compilation failure.. > Here's updated patch that actually works. I added it to xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm and verified the resulting rpms are able to boot lzma compressed kernels. It's still not final patch, since the stubdom/pvgrub bzip2/lzma support is not yet included in this patch (until the proper method for Makefile hacks is determined upstream). -- Pasi -----Inline Attachment Follows----- -- Fedora-xen mailing list Fedora-xen at redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From bderzhavets at yahoo.com Mon Aug 24 12:41:03 2009 From: bderzhavets at yahoo.com (Boris Derzhavets) Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 05:41:03 -0700 (PDT) Subject: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader In-Reply-To: <20090824122645.GO19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <439496.76883.qm@web56101.mail.re3.yahoo.com> Do you mean, that you experiencing same issue on 32-bit and patch is supposed to handle only just startup phase ? Boris. --- On Mon, 8/24/09, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: From: Pasi K?rkk?inen Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] BZIP2 and LZMA support patch for Xen PV domU bootloader To: "Boris Derzhavets" Cc: "Mark McLoughlin" , fedora-xen at redhat.com Date: Monday, August 24, 2009, 8:26 AM On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 04:22:30AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote: > Fresh install Xen 3.4.1 via xen-3.4.1-1.src.rpm with LZMA support patch + libvirt 0.7.0-6 (preview) tested OK with F11 PV DomU install. Kernel (supporting Dom0 ) - 2.6.30.2 xenified aka Suse > > Attempt to install F12 PV DomU ( Core2Duo E8400, 8 GB RAM ,SATA ) :- > > [root at ServerXenSRC ~]# virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1? \ > -f /dev/sda12? --vnc -p -l "ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os" > > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Launched with command line:???????????????????????????????????????? > /usr/sbin/virt-install --debug -n f12pv -r 1024 --vcpus=1 -f /dev/sda12 --vnc -p -l ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting libvirt URI default???????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received libvirt URI xen:///?????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Requesting virt method 'xen', hv type 'default'.?????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Received virt method 'xen'???????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Hypervisor name is 'xen'?????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? DistroInstaller location is a network source.????????????????????????????????? > > > Starting install... > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:36 DEBUG??? Attempting to detect distro: > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:37 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/.treeinfo????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-.treeinfo.WVH7xk?????????????????????????? > Retrieving file .treeinfo...?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 1.2 kB???? 00:00???? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:36:39 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE kB/s | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? > Retrieving file vmlinuz...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? | 3.5 MB???? 00:30???? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:37:11 DEBUG??? Fetching URI: ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os/images/pxeboot/initrd.img????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Saved file to /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn/s |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? > Retrieving file initrd.img...????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |? 22 MB???? 03:10???? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS type as: linux??????????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Auto detected OS variant as: fedora12????????????????????????????????????????? > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:23 DEBUG??? Creating guest from:?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? f12pv????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 1048576????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 1048576??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? linux????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-vmlinuz.gFkrVE???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? /var/lib/xen/virtinst-initrd.img.IFk0Bn????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? method=ftp://ftp.funet.fi/pub/mirrors/fedora.redhat.com/pub/fedora/linux/development/x86_64/os?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? destroy????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? destroy??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? 1????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ????? ????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ??? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? > ????? > ????? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ? > > > Creating domain...???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? |??? 0 B???? 00:01 > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Created guest, looking to see if it is running > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Launching console callback > Mon, 24 Aug 2009 14:40:24 DEBUG??? Saving XML boot config: > > ? f12pv > ? 1048576 > ? 1048576 > ? 3279f520-308c-127c-c7e6-be66fb36fa7b > ? /usr/bin/pygrub > ? destroy > ? restart > ? restart > ? 1 > ? > ??? > ????? > ????? > ??? > ??? > ????? > ????? > ??? > ??? > ??? > ? > > > Virt-viewer hangs with message "Waiting for guest domain to be created" > Check "xm log" - for me the guest crashes immediately. This is a known bug in F12/rawhide kernel. -- Pasi -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cazyokoyama at gmail.com Tue Aug 25 21:47:10 2009 From: cazyokoyama at gmail.com (caz yokoyama) Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 14:47:10 -0700 Subject: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <535d47e30908251447u3a409ea7kf93de61f344d9172@mail.gmail.com> rc7? BTW, rc7 does not fix the problem I have been encountering which is that characters in xdm login screen are garbled. On rc3, with nomodeset, it was fine. However, on both rc6 and rc7, screen becomes blank with nomodeset and the characters are garbled without nomodeset. My MB is Intel DQ965GF. I tested on rc3. The characters are garbled when intel_modeset_init() is called. -caz On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM, M A Young wrote: > Here is another update. (kernel-2.6.31-0.1.2.52.rc6.xendom0.fc12) at > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1605651 and the > repository http://fedorapeople.org/~myoung/dom0/ . I have had trouble > getting x86_64 kernels built over the last week or so to boot, but this one > does work. I haven't tried i686. > > Michael Young > > -- > Fedora-xen mailing list > Fedora-xen at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From needwork at gmail.com Wed Aug 26 18:04:03 2009 From: needwork at gmail.com (Lester M.) Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:04:03 -0400 Subject: [fedora-virt] Re: [Fedora-xen] Dom0 kernels / 32bit PAE pv_ops dom0 kernel works now In-Reply-To: References: <20090817150919.GD24960@edu.joroinen.fi> <2cc75dd80908241225o56454f13lc03b51203a3433a9@mail.gmail.com> <20090824195308.GX19938@edu.joroinen.fi> Message-ID: <2cc75dd80908261104v7f7288a4l94895f326fc01ad8@mail.gmail.com> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:13 PM, M A Young wrote: > On Mon, 24 Aug 2009, Pasi K?rkk?inen wrote: > > rpm -Uvh --force --nodeps kernel-* >> > > I would go for rpm -ivh --nodeps kernel-* > as update will probably uninstall your existing kernels including the one > you are running, so I wouldn't recommend it. I should shortly have a kernel > that will install on Fedora 11 which doesn't need the --nodeps flag. > > Michael Young Michael / Pasi, I do not think these rpms will work with a stock or very up to date Fedora 11: I am trying to avoid having to rebuild this system from the F12 (rawhide) repo. Could you try to build them on a system that has not been updated from rawhide? (if possible) First, just for kicks, I tried to install via rpm -Uvh: # rpm -Uvh kernel-* error: Failed dependencies: rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 is needed by kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 kernel-drm-nouveau = 12 is needed by (installed) xorg-x11-drv-nouveau-1:0.0.12-40.20090528git0c17b87.fc11.i586 kernel-uname-r = 2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i686.PAE is needed by (installed) kmod-iscsitarget-2.6.29.5-191.fc11.i686.PAE-1:0.4.17-2.fc11.15.i686 kernel-uname-r = 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE is needed by (installed) kmod-iscsitarget-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE-1:0.4.17-2.fc11.16.i686 # uname -a Linux fail.c0m 2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i686.PAE #1 SMP Tue Jul 7 20:59:29 EDT 2009 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux # ls kernel-* kernel-firmware-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.noarch.rpm kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm kernel-PAE-devel-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686.rpm Then, I proceeded to heed Michael's advisory: rpm -ivh --nodeps kernel-* Preparing... ################################################## file /usr/include/asm-generic/errno.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/fcntl.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/int-l64.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/int-ll64.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/mman.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/mman.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/setup.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/siginfo.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/signal.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/signal.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/socket.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/socket.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/sockios.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm-generic/statfs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/types.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/boot.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/bootparam.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/kvm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/kvm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/mce.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/msr-index.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/msr.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/prctl.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/prctl.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/ptrace-abi.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/ptrace.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/sigcontext.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/unistd_32.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/asm/unistd_64.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/drm/drm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/drm/drm_mode.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/drm/i915_drm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/drm/nouveau_drm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/drm/radeon_drm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/acct.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/agpgart.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/atmlec.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/atmmpc.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/audit.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/auto_fs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/blktrace_api.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/bsg.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netlink.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/cm4000_cs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/cn_proc.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/coda_psdev.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/connector.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/cramfs_fs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/cyclades.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/dlm_netlink.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/dm-ioctl.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/usb/audio.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/version.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/dvb/video.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/errqueue.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ethtool.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/falloc.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/fb.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/fiemap.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/firewire-cdev.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/fs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/fuse.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/futex.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/gen_stats.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/hdreg.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/hid.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_arcnet.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_arp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_ether.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_packet.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_pppol2tp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_pppox.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_tun.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/if_tunnel.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/in.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/in6.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/input.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ip_vs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ipmi.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ipmi_msgdefs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ivtvfb.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/jffs2.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/keyboard.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/loop.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/magic.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/major.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/matroxfb.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/mroute6.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ncp_no.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/neighbour.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/net_dropmon.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netdevice.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_common.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_compat.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_conntrack.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_log.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/nfnetlink_queue.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/x_tables.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_CLASSIFY.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_CONNMARK.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_CONNSECMARK.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_DSCP.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_MARK.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_NFLOG.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_NFQUEUE.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_RATEEST.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_SECMARK.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_connbytes.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_connmark.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_conntrack.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_dccp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_dscp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_esp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_hashlimit.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_iprange.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_length.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_limit.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_mark.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_multiport.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_owner.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_physdev.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_policy.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_rateest.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_realm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_recent.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_sctp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_statistic.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_string.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_tcpmss.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter/xt_tcpudp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ipt_owner.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6t_owner.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfs2.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfs3.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfs4.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfs_fs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfsd/export.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nfsd/stats.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nl80211.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/nubus.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/pci_regs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/personality.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/pfkeyv2.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ppp_defs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/qnx4_fs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/raid/md_p.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/raid/md_u.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/reiserfs_fs.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/reiserfs_xattr.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/rtnetlink.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/sched.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/selinux_netlink.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/serial.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/serial_core.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/serial_reg.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/snmp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/soundcard.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/spi/spidev.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/suspend_ioctls.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/synclink.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/sysctl.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/tcp.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/time.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/times.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/uio.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/ultrasound.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/usb/cdc.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/usb/ch9.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/utime.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/utsname.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/videodev.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/videodev2.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/virtio_blk.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/virtio_net.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/virtio_pci.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/virtio_ring.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/wimax.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/wimax/i2400m.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/wireless.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/linux/xfrm.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/mtd/inftl-user.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/mtd/mtd-abi.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/mtd/nftl-user.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/mtd/ubi-user.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/sound/asound.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/sound/emu10k1.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/sound/sfnt_info.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 file /usr/include/video/edid.h from install of kernel-headers-2.6.31-0.1.2.58.rc7.git1.xendom0.fc12.i686 conflicts with file from package kernel-headers-2.6.29.6-213.fc11.i586 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: