[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]
Re: [Fedora-xen] Goodbye Xen on RH/Fedora?
- From: "Jan ONDREJ (SAL)" <ondrejj salstar sk>
- To: Evan Lavelle <sa212+fcxen cyconix com>
- Cc: Fedora Xen <fedora-xen redhat com>
- Subject: Re: [Fedora-xen] Goodbye Xen on RH/Fedora?
- Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:20:48 +0100
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 08:15:00AM +0000, Evan Lavelle wrote:
> It seems I've been a bit thick. It's been pretty obvious recently that
> Xen isn't flavour of the month around here, but I assumed there were
> good reasons for that. Now, rather belatedly, I've found
>
> http://www.redhat.com/about/news/prarchive/2008/qumranet.html
>
> In short, RedHat paid $107 million for Qumranet in September 2008. The
> acquisition includes KVM.
>
> I've got 2 years invested in Xen, on FC8, and I can't help feeling that
> I've been shafted. Am I alone?
Not alone, same situation for me.
I am using Xen aprox 2 years too on our university, but with end of F8 there
is not a fully functional Xen Dom0 and also DomU kernel for any stable
Fedora.
KVM is still not a replacement for paravirtualized machines and I think
fully virtualized KVM will be slower like a paravirtualized XEN.
Also I am missing some howtos for migration to KVM/xenner.
Jan ONDREJ (SAL)
[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Thread Index]
[Date Index]
[Author Index]