[Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable

[Mark Schloesser]

Boris,

actually I used your config. The same config as I used for -rc6 build.
Works just fine for me - but I did not try booting with 3.4.1, only with
xen-unstable.

Mark


Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Mark,
> Could you share your .config for JF's 2.6.31-rc8 which loads under Xen Unstable.
> Looks like i miss some point tuning kernel.
> 
> Thanks.
> Boris.
> 
> --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable
> To: fedora-xen at redhat.com, "Mark Schloesser" <mark.schloesser at rwth-aachen.de>
> Cc: xen-devel at lists.xensource.com
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 2:02 PM
> 
> I did "git pull" , built 2.6.31-c8 kernel with Xen Dom0 support.
> However, attempt to load kernel under Xen 3.4.1 drops
> into stack trace and hangs on both F11 and Ubuntu 9.10. 
> Old 2.6.31-rc6's .config file has been used without any changes.
> I can't set up serial console in meantime.
> 
> Boris
> 
> --- On Fri, 9/4/09, Mark Schloesser <mark.schloesser at rwth-aachen.de> wrote:
> 
> From: Mark Schloesser <mark.schloesser at rwth-aachen.de>
> Subject: [Fedora-xen] Xorg on JF 2.6.31-rc8 with xen 3.5 unstable
> To: fedora-xen at redhat.com
> Date: Friday, September 4, 2009, 10:26 AM
> 
> Hey guys,
> 
> I sadly had no luck fixing my X problem. The system seems to run fine
> and as the subject says I moved
>  from 3.4.1-3 to xen-unstable. As I am
> already doing fairly bleeding-edge stuff here I thought this would
> probably make most sense.
> 
> As I only have an nvs290 gfx card available right now I can't check if
> this is the problem. But I'll try to get my hands on some other cards
> for next week.
> 
> Today I read through a lot of mailing list archives and PDFs trying to
> dig deeper into the IOMMU/PCI passthrough stuff and I want to give the
> graphics passthrough situation a shot myself. Sadly it is very confusing
> to read about the different setups and hardware environments with both
> positive and negative results. Also the patchsets and versions everybody
> is talking about do not make it any easier :)
> 
> My current questions would be:
> - is the combination of JF git kernel with xen-unstable the right way to
> go for this setup? Or should I perhaps use older xen version and apply
> some patchset? I think some of those
>  patches were applied in
> xen-unstable already but I am not quite sure...
> 
> - does anyone have hints or clarification regarding the Xorg problem on
> dom0? As I said there are no eye-catching log entries or errors except
> the Xorg backtrace at the end of the log file (posted to list before).
> This happens regardless of which driver I enable (vesa/nv/nouveau). The
> nvidia binary driver compiles without problems and seems to come up but
> only gives me a black screen and also locks the vtys.
> 
> 
> Thanks to the great help, reports and instructions Boris and others!
> 
> Mark
> 
> 
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> --
> Fedora-xen mailing list
> Fedora-xen at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-xen
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>       
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel at lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel at lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/fedora-xen/attachments/20090906/96cfd88f/attachment.sig>