[Feedhenry-raincatcher] Renaming Raincatcher packages

[Peter Darrow]

What do you guys think about reducing the number of repositories we're
dealing with? We could still publish individual RainCatcher modules to NPM
but it might help with visibility / overhead issue of having tons of small
repos. Just a thought!

On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:02 PM, David Martin <davmarti at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm a big fan of conventions.
>> This sounds like a good move.
>> +1
>>
>
> Ha! There's already a JIRA https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RAINCATCH-1
>
>
>
>> On 7 Feb 2017 19:06, "Summers Pittman" <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The Raincatcher packages are currently fh-wfm-$moduleName.  There are
>>> pull requests (ex https://github.com/feedhen
>>> ry-raincatcher/raincatcher-mediator/pull/8) to rename them to
>>> raincatcher-$moduleName.  This puts them inline with the project naming
>>> scheme.
>>>
>>> The linked pull request has some context around the name change.
>>>
>>> Should we pull the trigger on this rename as part of our refactoring?
>>>
>>> Summers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
>>> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>>>
>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-raincatcher/attachments/20170208/38d1ae99/attachment.htm>