[Feedhenry-raincatcher] Renaming Raincatcher packages

Summers Pittman supittma at redhat.com
Wed Feb 8 21:49:52 UTC 2017


On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 4:44 PM, Wojciech Trocki <wtrocki at redhat.com> wrote:

> I was talking about this today with the team. Reducing number of
> repositories would clash with current development model where
> Raincacher developers should fork each module and make changes directly on
> the fork.
>

By developers do you mean the rmad team or do you mean our end users?



> We can merge some repos together, but only after we propose some
> alternative way to extend "modules". Team already started some small with
> refactoring to typescript, so we are on the good path.
> For now we can just pin the most important repositories to the page
> header. Making sure that repositories hare Readme would be a bonus.
> See bellow:
> https://github.com/feedhenry-raincatcher
>
> Wojciech Trocki
> Software Engineer, Red Hat Mobile
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2017 at 6:39 PM, Peter Darrow <pdarrow at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> What do you guys think about reducing the number of repositories we're
>> dealing with? We could still publish individual RainCatcher modules to NPM
>> but it might help with visibility / overhead issue of having tons of small
>> repos. Just a thought!
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 3:02 PM, David Martin <davmarti at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I'm a big fan of conventions.
>>>> This sounds like a good move.
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ha! There's already a JIRA https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RAINCATCH-1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 7 Feb 2017 19:06, "Summers Pittman" <supittma at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> The Raincatcher packages are currently fh-wfm-$moduleName.  There are
>>>>> pull requests (ex https://github.com/feedhen
>>>>> ry-raincatcher/raincatcher-mediator/pull/8) to rename them to
>>>>> raincatcher-$moduleName.  This puts them inline with the project naming
>>>>> scheme.
>>>>>
>>>>> The linked pull request has some context around the name change.
>>>>>
>>>>> Should we pull the trigger on this rename as part of our refactoring?
>>>>>
>>>>> Summers
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
>>>>> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
>>> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
>> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-raincatcher/attachments/20170208/e922c435/attachment.htm>


More information about the Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list