[Feedhenry-raincatcher] What is your development environment

Paolo Haji phaji at redhat.com
Mon Jan 16 17:12:46 UTC 2017


I personally use sublime wiht some plugins, most impactful ones being lint
runners and es6 syntax.

Typescript would be nice, we have the practice of adding jsdoc annotations
at least for the new stuff, but we don't use any tooling around it, so
there's probably a lot of wrong links if we were to use them to generate
HTML docs.
I think it's similar to what happens on some of the modules on the core
platform.

Due to the extensive use of the mediator, typescript bindings would be a
little hard to use though, we might need a schema-style validation on
mediator topics (subscribers would add them to the topics) and try to make
something discoverable off them.

Comprehensive unit tests are also a way for us to try to display the
intended usage of our code, it's something I strived to do for
https://github.com/feedhenry-raincatcher/raincatcher-simple-store as a new
module.

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:16 PM, Summers Pittman <supittma at redhat.com>
wrote:

> So I'm not really a JavaScript developer, but I play one on TV.  I've been
> using VS Code, typings, and a couple of monitoring tools  whenever I have
> to write/modify something in Node.  What does the Raincatcher team prefer?
>
> Also, do we have typescript bindings for Raincatcher?  It really makes
> learning a new frame work easier.
>
> Summers
>
> _______________________________________________
> Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list
> Feedhenry-raincatcher at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/feedhenry-raincatcher
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/feedhenry-raincatcher/attachments/20170116/98ddb29a/attachment.htm>


More information about the Feedhenry-raincatcher mailing list