[Freeipa-devel] timestamps
Simo Sorce
ssorce at redhat.com
Wed Jul 15 18:55:57 UTC 2009
On Wed, 2009-07-15 at 14:48 -0400, John Dennis wrote:
> On 07/15/2009 02:06 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>
> > In the limited case of log timestamps I agree with Simo UTC + *numeric*
> > displacement is fine.
>
> Or better yet, use 8601
>
> Here is another good link which is a quick read:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-datetime
Ah I was not implying a format when I said UTC, any format that is a
recognized standard is fine by me.
I can only note that "number of sencods since X" maybe a little easier
to parse from a text field that 8601, but I am in no way in love with
that way to represent a date in time. As long as the date format
represents UTC+offset I am fine.
Simo.
--
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list