[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] jderose 053 XML-RPC signature change

[John Dennis]

On 03/26/2010 07:24 AM, Jason Gerard DeRose wrote:
> This quick patch changes the XML-RPC signature to match the
> complementary change being made in certmonger.
>
> The signature is now:
>
>      [args, options]
>
> This doesn't yet include the [args, options, extra] change... that is
> coming in my rpcserver patch once it's done.  But this provides what
> needed for current IPA<=>  certmonger compatibility.

NAK

Is there a reason for the type inconsistency? Why is it a list in one 
case and a tuple in the other? I realize they'll both operate the same 
way but the inconsistency is confusing especially if there is no reason 
to use different type objects (e.g. no need for a mutable sequence).

-- 
John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com>

Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/