[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH] 130 ipa-client assumes a single namingcontext

[Martin Kosek]

On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 10:32 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 16:30 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 09:24 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 16:45 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 22:09 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 15:48 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > > > > On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 15:20 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> > > > > > > How to test:
> > > > > > > 1) Add new naming context (suffix) to your LDAP database with installed
> > > > > > > IPA (see attached LDIF).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Btw I see no attached ldif ...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > I know, I forgot to attach it to the first patch so I sent a second
> > > > > mail:
> > > > > 
> > > > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-devel/2011-September/msg00434.html
> > > > > 
> > > > > Attaching the LDIF to this mail too.
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > tested and ACK
> > > > 
> > > > Seem both patches work together just fine even with multiple database
> > > > backends now.
> > > > 
> > > > Simo.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > This worked fine only when LDAP allowed anonymous access. The
> > > installation crashed otherwise. Please check attached patch, it should
> > > work in both anonymous and non-anonymous scenario.
> > > 
> > > Martin
> > > 
> > 
> > Simo found that I changed default values of realm/kdc from his None back
> > to "". This is not necessary so I changed it back to None. The
> > functionality is still the same.
> 
> ACK
> 
> Simo.
> 

Pushed to ipa-2-1, master.

Martin