[Freeipa-devel] Update: Re: Fedora 20 Release

[Petr Spacek]

On 17.12.2013 17:40, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Dec 2013, Rich Megginson wrote:
>> On 12/16/2013 08:07 AM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> we have to decide what we will do with 389-ds-base package in Fedora 20.
>>>
>>> Currently, we know about following problems:
>>>
>>> Schema problems:
>>>   https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47631 (regression)
>>
>> Fixed.
>>
>>>
>>> Referential Integrity:
>>>   https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47621 (new functionality)
>>>   https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47624 (regression)
>> Fixed.
>>>
>>> Replication:
>>>   https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47632 (?)
>>
>> Cannot reproduce.  Closed as WORKSFORME.
>>
>>>
>>> Stability:
>>>   https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1041732
>> Fixed.
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47629 (we are not sure if the syncrepl
>>> really plays some role or not)
>>
>> We are still trying to determine the cause, and if this is related to the
>> use of syncrepl.  If it turns out to be related to syncrepl, I would like to
>> release 1.3.2.9 in F20, and just disable the use of syncrepl in 389 clients.
>>
>> Is everyone ok with this?
It works for me.

> Fine for me. Once you get update out, we can issue FreeIPA update that
> requires new 389-ds-base and slapi-nis (slapi-nis was already released
> so we cannot combine all three packages in the same update).

I'm not sure that we need/want to release a freeipa package with new requires. 
Users just need to upgrade all packages as usual.
(Note that users will not get the new freeipa package with new "requires" 
until they run yum upgrade anyway, so I don't see a big value in new release.)

-- 
Petr^2 Spacek