[Freeipa-devel] [RFC] Serving legacy systems cliens for trusts
Dmitri Pal
dpal at redhat.com
Tue May 28 23:37:04 UTC 2013
On 05/28/2013 04:29 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Tue, 28 May 2013, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> On 05/28/2013 03:48 PM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>> On Tue, 28 May 2013, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>>> On 05/28/2013 07:50 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.freeipa.org/page/V3/Serving_legacy_clients_for_trusts
>>>>>
>>>>> = Overview =
>>>>>
>>>>> Since version 3.0 FreeIPA supports cross-realm trusts with Active
>>>>> Directory. In order to allow AD users to utilize services on IPA
>>>>> clients, up to date version of SSSD should be configured at the IPA
>>>>> client. In case it is not possible to install and configure SSSD >
>>>>> 1.09,
>>>>> Active Directory users cannot access services on IPA clients.
>>>>>
>>>>> This feature is designed to bridge the gap and provide minimal
>>>>> compatibility level that allows to log-in to IPA clients for AD
>>>>> users.
>>>>> IPA clients will be able to use any reasonable nss_ldap/pam_ldap/sssd
>>>>> version.
>>>>> = Use Cases =
>>>>>
>>>>> Access to IPA client machine resources for AD users in case IPA
>>>>> client
>>>>> cannot utilize up to date version of SSSD with native support for IPA
>>>>> cross-realm trusts.
>>>>>
>>>>> = Design=
>>>>> Since IPA client is configured with the use of older SSSD or
>>>>> nss_ldap/pam_ldap, all work should be performed at the IPA master.
>>>>> Primary design decision is to provide a separate LDAP tree,
>>>>> similar to
>>>>> compat tree, that has following features:
>>>>>
>>>>> * information about both IPA and AD users can be queried;
>>>>> * it ispossible to enumerate members of IPA and AD groups;
>>>>> * authentication bind to IPA LDAP as AD users should automatically
>>>>> * trigger obtaining ticket from AD DC; in case TGT is obtained,
>>>>> * authentication bind should be treated as successful.
>>>>>
>>>>> From a client perspective, use of the separate LDAP tree is viewed as
>>>>> traditional nss_ldap/pam_ldap configuration.
>>>>>
>>>>> Proposed base for the LDAP tree:
>>>>> '''cn=users,cn=trust-accounts,dc=example,dc=com'''
>>>>>
>>>>> = Implementation =
>>>>>
>>>>> # IPA server sets SSSD configuration to 'ipa_server_mode = true' on
>>>>> install or upgrade
>>>>> # ipa-adtrust-install configures additional directory server
>>>>> plugin to
>>>>> serve trusted domains tree
>>>>> # Directory server plugin uses getpwnam_r(), getgrnam_r() and
>>>>> related
>>>>> calls to obtain information about AD user. For IPA users the
>>>>> information is fetched directly from the LDAP.
>>>>> # IPA KDC database driver adds MS-PAC information into ticket
>>>>> granting
>>>>> ticket for host/fqdn at REALM principal of IPA master. This is required
>>>>> to allow SSSD on IPA master to authenticate against AD using
>>>>> host/fqdn at REALM principal.
>>>>>
>>>>> For SSSD design see
>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/IPAServerMode
>>>>>
>>>>> = Feature Management =
>>>>>
>>>>> === UI ===
>>>>>
>>>>> The feature is transparent and not exposed in UI
>>>>>
>>>>> === CLI ===
>>>>>
>>>>> The feature is not directly exposed in CLI.
>>>>> IPA idrange management is expanded to specify idrange type (IPA
>>>>> local,
>>>>> AD trust, AD with winsync, IPA trust, ..) to affect the way how AD
>>>>> users
>>>>> SIDs are mapped to POSIX IDs.
>>>>>
>>>>> = Major configuration options and enablement =
>>>>>
>>>>> sssd.conf will have 'ipa_server_mode = true' set for IPA master.
>>>>>
>>>>> = Replication =
>>>>>
>>>>> No effect on replication. Since directory server plugin is only
>>>>> configured when ipa-adtrust-install is run, IPA masters may opt out
>>>>> from
>>>>> serving AD clients.
>>>>>
>>>>> = Updates and Upgrades =
>>>>>
>>>>> During upgrade of IPA master, sssd.conf should be updated to set
>>>>> 'ipa_server_mode = true'.
>>>>>
>>>>> = Dependencies =
>>>>>
>>>>> Depends on SSSD implementing IPA server mode (sssd 1.10.x)
>>>>>
>>>>> = External Impact =
>>>>>
>>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/IPAServerMode
>>>>>
>>>>> = Backup and Restore =
>>>>>
>>>>> No external configuration files are affected
>>>>>
>>>>> = Test Plan =
>>>>>
>>>>> Testing the feature will require following:
>>>>>
>>>>> # Configure IPA to serve AD trusts
>>>>> # Establish trust with AD domain
>>>>> # Configure a client to use nss_ldap/pam_ldap against AD-compatible
>>>>> tree
>>>>> # Attempt to log-in to the client as AD user
>>>>>
>>>>> = RFE Author =
>>>>>
>>>>> [[User:Ab|ab]] ([[User talk:Ab|talk]])
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Can you please explain how the older SSSD or other UNIX versions would
>>>> use Kerberos for authentication?
>>> pam_krb5 should work as it is, as well as older SSSD, since any AD user
>>> attempting to connect using GSSAPI to IPA services will have
>>> cross-realm
>>> TGT issued for us by the trusting AD DC prior to that attempt.
>>>
>>> The whole idea was to make sure for old clients these users will look
>>> like normal users, via nss_ldap/SSSD.
>>>
>>> We still will need to configure principal mapping in /etc/krb5.conf
>>> like
>>> we do for AD users with trusts.
>>>
>>>> I thought we would have to issue some patch for client to switch the
>>>> clients from using Kerberos for authentication to using LDAP.
>>> No need to. pam_ldap would go through LDAP bind automatically, that's
>>> why the proposal talks about attempting to obtain TGT in place of a
>>> user
>>> instead of proxying such LDAP bind back to AD DC. This would require us
>>> enforcing clear password bind over TLS/SSL but it is simpler to
>>> achieve.
>>>
>> I am missing something. How a simple kinit would work?
>> Can you please describe the sequence and workflow?
> I'm talking about the case when AD user logs in into IPA client using
> PuTTY from Windows machine. In such case there is already service ticket
> and cross-realm TGT available.
>
> For kinit on IPA client all what is needed is /etc/krb5.conf
> configuration that forces to talk to AD DC for principals in AD realm.
>
> It can be done via SRV records in DNS or manually in /etc/krb5.conf.
>
> For example, on the machine I'm writing this email I added manual
> routing to my VMs with AD and IPA to /etc/krb5.conf and I'm able to do
> following:
>
> # klist
> klist: No credentials cache found (ticket cache
> DIR::/run/user/0/krb5cc/tkt)
> # kinit Administrator at AD.LAN
> Password for Administrator at AD.LAN: Warning: Your password will expire
> in 2 days on Пт. 31 мая 2013 07:29:10
> # klist
> Ticket cache: DIR::/run/user/0/krb5cc/tktP0IiKO
> Default principal: Administrator at AD.LAN
>
> Valid starting Expires Service principal
> 28.05.2013 23:24:44 29.05.2013 09:24:44 krbtgt/AD.LAN at AD.LAN
> renew until 04.06.2013 23:24:44
> # kvno HTTP/red.bird.clone at BIRD.CLONE
> HTTP/red.bird.clone at BIRD.CLONE: kvno = 2
> # klist
> Ticket cache: DIR::/run/user/0/krb5cc/tktP0IiKO
> Default principal: Administrator at AD.LAN
>
> Valid starting Expires Service principal
> 28.05.2013 23:24:44 29.05.2013 09:24:44 krbtgt/AD.LAN at AD.LAN
> renew until 04.06.2013 23:24:44
> 28.05.2013 23:25:45 29.05.2013 09:24:44 krbtgt/BIRD.CLONE at AD.LAN
> renew until 04.06.2013 23:24:44
> 28.05.2013 23:26:42 29.05.2013 09:24:44 HTTP/red.bird.clone at BIRD.CLONE
> renew until 04.06.2013 23:24:44
>
This is exactly the problem I am try to get to.
Let us take CentOS 6.3 machine and configure SSSD against IPA. It has
absolutely no knowledge about AD. This is the whole point.
But AD users should be able to walk to the console and authenticate. The
flow will be:
User -> SSSD -> kerberos library -> KDC -> ???? -> SSSD on IPA -> AD
But there is no design for such flow. And IMO it is too much.
What you are suggesting here is a sort of "split brain solution" that we
did not recommend in the past are we going to change out assessment of
this approach?
But even if we say that we allow older SSSD to talk to AD directly how
we configure SSSD to know about AD. The changes that you suggest need to
be done on the older clients so do we need to issue patches for them? Is
so that should be covered in the design.
I was thinking that since we can't really do
User -> SSSD -> kerberos library -> KDC -> ???? -> SSSD on IPA -> AD
because it is too much we would patch the client to configure LDAP +
LDAP instead of Kerberos + LDAP. In this case the LDAP server on IPA
would talk to SSSD as we designed. Same would work for other UNIXes. Yes
this is a limitation but also a reason to adopt latest client.
But I am open to alternatives.
But they need to be clearly spelled out.
So to summarize we are talking about the case:
a) Legacy/UNIX systems are configured to authenticate/joined to IPA and
do not know about AD
b) User from AD walks to the console and uses his name and password
He needs to be authenticated. How?
--
Thank you,
Dmitri Pal
Sr. Engineering Manager for IdM portfolio
Red Hat Inc.
-------------------------------
Looking to carve out IT costs?
www.redhat.com/carveoutcosts/
More information about the Freeipa-devel
mailing list