[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH][DOC] Sometimes users set bad uid ranges

Petr Viktorin pviktori at redhat.com
Fri May 16 13:12:43 UTC 2014


On 05/14/2014 06:42 PM, Gabe Alford wrote:
> MINUID and MINSSSUID sound fine.
>
> Gabe

Thanks!
Pushed to docs master: 4978945ab168b471a15a6d5536ca397e934fe8fc

> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Petr Spacek <pspacek at redhat.com
> <mailto:pspacek at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>     On 14.5.2014 16:55, Gabe Alford wrote:
>
>         What are your thoughts on this? Added UID and SSSUID entities
>         and cleaned
>         up the original patch down to a regular paragraph.
>
>
>     The text itself seems good. Can we think of a better names than UID
>     and SSSUID?
>
>     Maybe something like MINUID and MINSSSUID? I don't know.
>
>     Conditional ACK: The patch can be pushed if we can find better names
>     for entities.
>
>     Thank you for your contribution!
>
>     Petr^2 Spacek
>
>
>         Gabe
>
>
>         On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 2:32 AM, Petr Spacek <pspacek at redhat.com
>         <mailto:pspacek at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>             On 14.5.2014 01:05, Gabe Alford wrote:
>
>                 I had a typo with the one of the UIDs which is fixed
>                 with this patch.
>
>                 The difference is that Fedora/SSSD treats UIDs of 1000
>                 and below as local
>                 system accounts whereas RHEL treats local system
>                 accounts at 500 and SSSD
>                 local system accounts at 1000. That's why there are
>                 conditional paragraphs
>                 based on if it is Fedora or RHEL.
>
>
>             I think we should define entity (similar to &OS) for this
>             purpose.
>
>             Please look at FreeIPA_Guide.ent and
>             Identity_Management_Guide.ent.
>
>             Petr^2 Spacek
>
>
>                On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:55 AM, Petr Viktorin
>             <pviktori at redhat.com <mailto:pviktori at redhat.com>>
>
>                 wrote:
>
>                    On 05/09/2014 04:14 AM, Gabe Alford wrote:
>
>
>                        Hello,
>
>
>                                   Just wondering if there are any takers
>                         in reviewing this patch.
>
>
>                     Sorry, looks like it fell through the cracks :(
>
>                     AFAIK the &OS; entity should work for both Fedora
>                     and RHEL, so it should
>                     be possible to only have one copy of the paragraph.
>                     Or is there
>                     something I
>                     missed?
>
>
>                        Gabe
>
>
>
>
>                         On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 5:48 PM, Gabe Alford
>                         <redhatrises at gmail.com
>                         <mailto:redhatrises at gmail.com>
>                         <mailto:redhatrises at gmail.com
>                         <mailto:redhatrises at gmail.com>>__> wrote:
>
>                                Hello,
>
>                                Patch for the following ticket to add
>                         note in documentation about
>                                bad uid ranges:
>                         https://fedorahosted.org/__freeipa/ticket/2090
>                         <https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/2090>
>
>                                Thanks,
>
>                                Gabe
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Freeipa-devel mailing list
> Freeipa-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
>


-- 
Petr³




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list