[Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0052] Create server-dns sub-package

Jan Cholasta jcholast at redhat.com
Thu Jul 16 06:08:09 UTC 2015


Dne 15.7.2015 v 19:39 Simo Sorce napsal(a):
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Petr Spacek" <pspacek at redhat.com>
>> To: "Jan Cholasta" <jcholast at redhat.com>, freeipa-devel at redhat.com, "Alexander Bokovoy" <abokovoy at redhat.com>
>> Cc: "Simo Sorce" <simo at redhat.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 10:33:41 AM
>> Subject: Re: [Freeipa-devel] [PATCH 0052] Create server-dns sub-package
>>
>> On 14.7.2015 16:29, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>> Dne 14.7.2015 v 14:33 Petr Spacek napsal(a):
>>>> On 2.7.2015 09:56, Petr Spacek wrote:
>>>>> On 2.7.2015 09:36, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Jul 2015, Jan Cholasta wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Can this be done without adding server-core?
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not aware of such method (except of adding all DNS dependencies
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>> Requires straight into freeipa-server package).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Because it's not server core,
>>>>>>>>>>> it's the whole thing! Or maybe just rename it to server-common?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with 'common'. Ticket 4058 calls for sub-package for CA too
>>>>>>>>>> so my
>>>>>>>>>> idea was to create 'core' package which will be gradually reduced
>>>>>>>>>> more and more.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, I don't like the fact that in order to install IPA server
>>>>>>>>> without DNS you have to install freeipa-server-core instead of just
>>>>>>>>> freeipa-server. Fedora packaging guidelines [1] state that the
>>>>>>>>> metapackage should be named freeipa-server-compat, so I guess
>>>>>>>>> renaming
>>>>>>>>> freeipa-server to freeipa-server-compat and freeipa-server-core to
>>>>>>>>> freeipa-server is good enough.
>>>>>>>> I think you are misunderstanding what the guidelines say. -compat
>>>>>>>> subpackage is something that only contains Requires: and Obsoletes:,
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> help to pull the right packages. It is not supposed to be a
>>>>>>>> full-featured package with content.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> With Petr's patch, freeipa-server is exactly that - a metapackage with
>>>>>>> requires and obsoletes only - hence my suggestion to rename it
>>>>>>> according to
>>>>>>> the guidelines.
>>>>>> That's not good.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think we are good enough with freeipa-server-dns. We have the same
>>>>>>>> situation with freeipa-server-trust-ad -- it is not required by the
>>>>>>>> main
>>>>>>>> package and pulls in Samba-related bits. We also don't have any
>>>>>>>> -compat
>>>>>>>> or metapackage for it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> freeipa-server-dns is fine, what is IMO not fine is that it *is*
>>>>>>> required by
>>>>>>> the main freeipa-server package, *unlike* freeipa-server-trust-ad.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We don't have a compat metapackage for freeipa-server-trust-ad, because
>>>>>>> there are no upgrade issues with it, which is what Petr is trying to
>>>>>>> solve
>>>>>>> with his patch.
>>>>>> So, the issue is that for installed bind+bind-dyndb-ldap combination we
>>>>>> need to switch to bind-pkcs11+bind-dyndb-ldap. Maybe instead of
>>>>>> modifying main freeipa package we could modify bind-dyndb-ldap package
>>>>>> to require bind-pkcs11 and corresponding bits of freeipa packages?
>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately, no.
>>>>> - bind-dyndb-ldap itself is used & supported even without FreeIPA.
>>>>> - bind-pkcs11 depends on properly configured SoftHSM (or other PKCS#11
>>>>> provider)
>>>>> => upgrade could break non-FreeIPA installations.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm attempting to rework the patch now, stay tuned.
>>>>
>>>> Apparently this thread was abandoned during my PTO so I'm sending new
>>>> patch
>>>> here. It includes the -compat package and works with YUM and DNF.
>>>
>>> I don't like that freeipa-server got renamed to freeipa-server-core, but I
>>> won't push against it if Alexander and others (CCing Simo) are OK with it.
>>
>> For the record, I was not able to make it work without the rename.
>
> My opinion is that if we run dnf install freeipa-server, then we need to get freeipa server packages.
> If this is what happens I am ok with patches, otherwise I am not.

Without the patch, "dnf install freeipa-server" installs freeipa server 
without DNS dependencies.

With the first version of the patch, "dnf install freeipa-server" 
installs freeipa server with all DNS dependencies. To install freeipa 
server without DNS dependencies, you need to run "dnf install 
freeipa-server-core". (Note that with this patch freeipa-server is a 
meta-package with no files.)

With the second version of the patch, "dnf install freeipa-server" 
fails, because there is no freeipa-server anymore. To install freeipa 
server without DNS dependencies, you need to run "dnf install 
freeipa-server-core".

-- 
Jan Cholasta




More information about the Freeipa-devel mailing list