<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dmitri, is this solution acceptable? <br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-------- Original Message --------
<table class="moz-email-headers-table" border="0" cellpadding="0"
cellspacing="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap">Subject: </th>
<td>Re: User Groups</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap">Date: </th>
<td>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:39:46 -0400 (EDT)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap">From: </th>
<td>Kyle Baker <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:kybaker@redhat.com"><kybaker@redhat.com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap">To: </th>
<td>Adam Young <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ayoung@redhat.com"><ayoung@redhat.com></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<th align="RIGHT" valign="BASELINE" nowrap="nowrap">CC: </th>
<td>Endi Sukma Dewata <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:edewata@redhat.com"><edewata@redhat.com></a></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<br>
<br>
<pre>Attached the image.
Kyle Baker
Visual Designer
Desk - 978 392 3116
IRC - kylebaker
----- Original Message -----
> On 06/13/2011 09:55 AM, Kyle Baker wrote:
> >
> > Kyle Baker
> > Visual Designer
> > Desk - 978 392 3116
> > IRC - kylebaker
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >>>>>> I don't think it is at the right level of the heirarchy.
> >>>>>> Probably
> >>>>>> better
> >>>>>> for us to find a way to munge direct and indirect into the same
> >>>>>> facet.
> >>>>> Maybe a checkbox in the facet content to show the indirect
> >>>>> items?
> >>> I like this solution the best. I think it is the simplest and
> >>> clearest way to digest the information. Could we have a checkbox
> >>> for
> >>> direct also, if the user just wants to see indirect enrollment?
> >> So we would show both in the same table, but only if the
> >> appropriate
> >> checkbox is selected?
> > Right. I will send a mock up.
>
> No need, I get the concept. Thing is , I am not sure that it makes
> sense overall. It munges together two concepts that the CLI keeps
> separate, and I don't think we want to do that. I'd be ok with
> "either/or".
>
> >>>> Can we just show them both? maybe two tables on the page, left to
> >>>> right, with direct on the left and indirect on the right?
</pre>
</body>
</html>