<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/21/2015 10:53 AM, Martin Basti
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:555D9D17.7020503@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 21/05/15 10:14, thierry bordaz
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:555D93CD.6030403@redhat.com" type="cite">
<meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 05/20/2015 03:03 PM, Martin
Basti wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:555C8633.6090508@redhat.com" type="cite">Enforcing
uniqueness for uid attribute prevent to move users to delete
users subtree. <br>
<br>
Patch attached. <br>
<br>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
</blockquote>
<font face="Times New Roman, Times, serif">Hello Martin,<br>
<br>
The fix looks good. Don't we need to do the same in
install/share/unique-attributes.ldif for fresh install ?<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
thierry<br>
</font> </blockquote>
Thanks for review.<br>
<br>
I don think so.<br>
<br>
In 10-uniqueness.update files, there are specified default values,
which will be used for new installations.<br>
I would like to keep configuration of plugin just at one place.<br>
</blockquote>
Yes that is a good idea. Does that mean that eventually files like
unique-attributes.ldif will disappear ?<br>
<br>
thanks<br>
thierry<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:555D9D17.7020503@redhat.com" type="cite"> <br>
Martin^2<br>
<br>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
Martin Basti</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>