<html> <head> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 06:39 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:562A0E44.1020307@redhat.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 11:24 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:5629FCE7.9070709@redhat.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/23/2015 11:00 AM, thierry bordaz wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:5629F72D.9020807@redhat.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2015 01:17 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:561B96CE.9060404@redhat.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/12/2015 12:44 PM, Martin Basti wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:561B8F0B.4070907@redhat.com" type="cite"> <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252" http-equiv="Content-Type"> <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 23.07.2015 10:46, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: </div> <blockquote cite="mid:55B0A9F0.4010602@redhat.com" type="cite">The attached patch moves the cleaning of the RUV into the topology plugin. I encountered a problem when removing a replica, which disconnects the topology, but it was fixed with my WIP for #5072. I want to keep these issues separate, so please review and test the patch and let me know about issues found Ludwig <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> Is this patch still valid and pending review? </blockquote> it should be still valid, waiting for review, wanted to rebase after topology/promotion patches have been checked in and resend <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> Hello Ludwig, The patch looks good. I have few minor remarks: <ul> <li>Are the hostname in ruv always fqdn ? to retrieve the RUV element of a given host you use 'strstr'. If you have host vm-11 and vm-112, I wonder if it could pickup the wrong RUV element</li> <li>In ipa_topo_util_cleanruv_element you need a pblock_done/free (or destroy) </li> <li>In it fails to add the clearn-ruv task, you should log a message so that the admin knows what to do.</li> </ul> thanks thierry <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> Hi Ludwig, </blockquote> I will adress the points raised, thank you <blockquote cite="mid:5629FCE7.9070709@redhat.com" type="cite"> Additional question. cleanruv is done with 'replica-force-cleaning: yes'. Currently ipa-replica-manage does not implement this flag. Why do you use it in topology plugin. </blockquote> there are two potential problems with the cleanallruv task: 1] the rid could come back if not all servers were in sync, but with cleaning the changelog as part of cleanallruv I think the ris is low now 2] the cleanallruv is stuck on waiting for the task to complete on other servers even if they cannot be reached </blockquote> The fix/rfe to cleanallruv that allows the force option to skip the online replica checks(<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48218">https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48218</a>) has not been pushed yet. Currently its set for 1.3.5. FYI, Mark <blockquote cite="mid:562A0E44.1020307@redhat.com" type="cite"> I want to avoid 2] therefore I choose this setting <blockquote cite="mid:5629FCE7.9070709@redhat.com" type="cite"> My concern is that if we delete a host before all the updates from that host has been received, could we receive a late update that will recreate the ruv element ? thanks thierry </blockquote> <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset> </blockquote> </body> </html>