<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 14.04.2016 10:43, Lenka Doudova
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:570F582A.109@redhat.com" type="cite">
      <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
        http-equiv="Content-Type">
      <br>
      <br>
      <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 04/04/2016 06:54 PM, Martin Basti
        wrote:<br>
      </div>
      <blockquote cite="mid:57029C43.7000309@redhat.com" type="cite">
        <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
          http-equiv="Content-Type">
        <br>
        <br>
        <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 01.04.2016 14:34, Pavel Vomacka
          wrote:<br>
        </div>
        <blockquote cite="mid:56FE6ACE.1050705@redhat.com" type="cite">
          <meta content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"
            http-equiv="Content-Type">
          <br>
          <br>
          <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/31/2016 04:16 PM, Lenka
            Doudova wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote cite="mid:56FD314C.4080809@redhat.com" type="cite">
            <br>
            <br>
            On 03/31/2016 12:42 PM, Pavel Vomacka wrote: <br>
            <blockquote type="cite"> <br>
              <br>
              On 03/18/2016 11:24 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote: <br>
              <blockquote type="cite"> <br>
                <br>
                On 03/10/2016 06:58 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote: <br>
                <blockquote type="cite">On 03/08/2016 01:17 PM, Lenka
                  Doudova wrote: <br>
                  <blockquote type="cite"> <br>
                    <br>
                    On 03/08/2016 12:59 PM, Petr Vobornik wrote: <br>
                    <blockquote type="cite">On 03/07/2016 04:29 PM,
                      Pavel Vomacka wrote: <br>
                      <blockquote type="cite"> <br>
                        <br>
                        On 02/25/2016 03:08 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote: <br>
                        <blockquote type="cite">Hi, <br>
                          <br>
                          here's a patch for webUI tests that provides
                          test for creating user <br>
                          without private group. <br>
                          Related to ticket <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                            href="https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4986">https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4986</a>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                          Since the option to specify GID when creating
                          a user is not available <br>
                          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                            class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
                            href="https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5505">https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5505</a>
                          the test creates a new <br>
                          posix group, makes it a default user group
                          instead of 'ipausers' and <br>
                          then attemps to create the user without
                          private group. Returning <br>
                          default user group value to 'ipausers' is
                          provided even for cases when <br>
                          the test fails so it would not block other
                          tests from performing <br>
                          properly. <br>
                          <br>
                          Lenka <br>
                          <br>
                          <br>
                        </blockquote>
                        Hi, <br>
                        <br>
                        ACK, works well. <br>
                        <br>
                        Pavel^3 Vomacka <br>
                        <br>
                      </blockquote>
                      <br>
                      NACK, don't use naked except, specify at least
                      'Exception' <br>
                        +        except: <br>
                      <br>
                    </blockquote>
                    <br>
                    Thanks, patch fixed according to Petr's review
                    attached. <br>
                    <br>
                    Lenka <br>
                  </blockquote>
                  <br>
                  Ticket 5505 was pushed. So the workaround can be
                  removed. Do you prefer to do it in this patch? <br>
                  <br>
                  Also, maybe it would be good to test both cases and
                  check if the error is actually the right one. <br>
                </blockquote>
                <br>
                Hi, <br>
                <br>
                attaching patch fixed according to recently pushed
                changes. <br>
                <br>
                Lenka <br>
              </blockquote>
              Hi, <br>
              <br>
              NACK, <br>
              <br>
              1) The data definition for user3 (user.DATA3) is not used
              anywhere. And the definition is actually the same as
              definition of user4. So, I think that it could be removed.
              <br>
              <br>
              2) This is just a detail, but I would rather use
              'combobox_input' or 'combobox_textbox' as parameter name
              because the parameter actually doesn't represent the value
              of combobox. <br>
              <br>
              Otherwise it works as expected. <br>
              <br>
              -- <br>
              Pavel^3 Vomacka <br>
              <br>
            </blockquote>
            Hi, <br>
            <br>
            thanks for comments, updated patch attached. <br>
            <br>
            Lenka <br>
            <br>
            <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
            <br>
          </blockquote>
          Thank you, ACK. <br>
          <br>
          --<br>
          Pavel^3 Vomacka<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
          <br>
        </blockquote>
        Ticket is in closed milestone, this patch cannot be attached to
        closed milestone, please create a new ticket/or post the proper
        ticket.<br>
        <br>
        <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
        <br>
      </blockquote>
      Hi,<br>
      <br>
      new ticket has been created for this issue. Patch with modified
      commit message to refer to the new ticket attached.<br>
      Lenka <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
    </blockquote>
    Pushed to:<br>
    master: 6468a398504d8e4aae94488047f2dafe5b895e1d<br>
    ipa-4-3: bd0ab0a8ec175ebbe619b32451b3371a86e8a96a<br>
    <br>
  </body>
</html>