[Freeipa-users] HBAC rule refreshes and read-only slaves

[Steven Jones]

Hi,

1) HBAC update, Ive never seen a delay.....so seems to be a few seconds.....so Im not sure why you ned to restart sssd.

2) I also I think have asked on that.....not sure what you are aiming to achieve/mean....with having no kdc / ldap stores. I'd like a read only slave capability for out in the dmz...and possibly only export certain groups from the read/write out to the slave....but maybe Im being overly paranoid....but I think AD2008r2? can do that.


regards

Steven Jones

Technical Specialist - Linux RHCE

Victoria University, Wellington, NZ

0064 4 463 6272

________________________________
From: freeipa-users-bounces at redhat.com [freeipa-users-bounces at redhat.com] on behalf of Cam McK [tomoyo at cam34.endjunk.com]
Sent: Friday, 8 June 2012 1:22 p.m.
To: freeipa-users at redhat.com
Subject: [Freeipa-users] HBAC rule refreshes and read-only slaves

Hello

Thanks for an awesome product! I have two questions that I can't seem to find answers for...

1). How long is the delay between changing a HBAC rule and it coming into affect on the host machine?
Currently this information only seems to be updated on the host after an 'service sssd reload/restart' also are the HBAC access rules are stored within LDAP Directory?

2). We would also like to use FreeIPA in a trusted network but then have perhaps a read-only slave sitting in DMZ with the possibility of not containing the KDC or LDAP password stores on it, is this possible?
 (Basically authentication being done by a different PAM module, but pam_sss.so still allowing HBAC via the PAM 'account' directive.)
Is it possible to have a 'regular' LDAP directory (in the DMZ) just slurping down the required LDAP info?

Many Thanks
Campbell

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/attachments/20120608/bfdfb4a4/attachment.htm>