On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 02:49:46PM -0400, Shawn wrote: > Yep, sure does. Thanks much. > > If selinux is disabled, why does it care? > It's an SSSD bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=914433 We didn't realize that SELinux disabled might mean that the directory is not there at all. Luckily there is a simple workaround.