[Freeipa-users] LDAP/SSSD/IPA performance

Bret Wortman bret.wortman at damascusgrp.com
Tue May 27 13:24:59 UTC 2014


I'll get with my network guys and start troubleshooting.

Thanks!

On 05/27/2014 09:20 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> On 05/27/2014 08:41 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
>> Bret Wortman wrote:
>>> Crud. That was supposed to have a second comparison log too:
>>>
>>> I found something in the slapd-FOO-NET/access log. I figured out which
>>> conn ID related to a sudo -i that I performed which took longer than
>>> expected and grepped for that conn ID:
>>>
>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:56 -0400] conn=183751 fd=111 slot=111 connection 
>>> from
>>> 192.168.208.129 to 192.168.10.111
>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:57 -0400] conn=183751 op=0 EXT
>>> oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:57 -0400] conn=183751 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:59 -0400] conn=183751 SSL 128-bit AES
>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:59 -0400] conn=183751 op=1 BIND
>>> dn="uid=sudo,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=foo,dc=net" method=128 version=3
>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:59 -0400] conn=183751 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=97
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=2 SRCH
>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=foo,dc=net" scope=2 filter="(cn=deraults)" 
>>> attrs=ALL
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=3 SRCH
>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=foo,dc=net" scope=2
>>> filter="(|(sudoUser=bretw)(sudoUser=%users)(sudoUser=%#100)(sudoUser=%admins)(sudoUser=%nonexp)(sudoUser=%sudoers)(sudoUser=$unrestricted)(sudoUser=%#1855200000)(sudoUser=%#18552000004) 
>>>
>>> (sudoUser=%#1855200006)(sudoUser=%#1855200007)(sudoUser=ALL))" 
>>> attrs=ALL
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=3 RESULT erro=0 tag=101
>>> nentries=2 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:01 -0400] conn=183751 op=4 SRCH
>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=foo,dc=net" scope=2 filter="(sudoUser=+*)" 
>>> attrs=ALL
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:01 -0400] conn=183751op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:03 -0400] conn=183751 op=5 UNBIND
>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:03 -0400] conn=183751 op=5 fd=111 closed = U1
>>>
>>> I think this shows, roughly, a 7 second elapsed time from start to
>>> finish, right? Granted, there were other request being serficed during
>>> this interval as well, but nothing that looked like outrageous volume.
>> I don't see anything unusual here. The directory server retrieved the
>> data just as fast on both systems, the difference appears to be the
>> network, in connection and shutdown times.
>>
> +1, however the TLS handshake took longer. That probably required 
> several DNS lookups so I wonder if DNS lookups might be slowing things 
> down.
> I wonder if putting server records manually into the hosts file would 
> make a difference. If yes then may be you need to take a look at your 
> DNS setup for the slow network.
>
>
>>> On our faster network, this same exchange went much faster:
>>>
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:55 -0400] conn=12896 fd=100 slot=100 connection from
>>> 192.168.2.13 to 192.168.2.61
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:55 -0400] conn=12896 op=0 EXT
>>> oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:55 -0400] conn=12896 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 SSL 128-bit AES
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=1 BIND
>>> dn="uid=sudo,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=wedgeofli,dc=me" method=128 
>>> version=3
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=97
>>> nentries=0 etime=0 
>>> dn="uid=sudo,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=wedgeofli,dc=me"
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=2 SRCH
>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=wedgeofli,dc=me" scope=2 filter="(cn=defaults)"
>>> attrs=ALL
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=3 SRCH
>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=wedgeofli,dc=me" scope=2
>>> filter="(|(sudoUser=bretw)(sudoUser=%bretw)(sudoUser=%#10042)(sudoUser=%admins)(sudoUser=%#388800000)(sudoUser=ALL))" 
>>>
>>> attrs=ALL
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> nentries=1 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=4 SRCH
>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=wedgeofli,dc=me" scope=2 filter="(sudoUser=+*)"
>>> attrs=ALL
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=5 UNBIND
>>> [26/May/2014:09:22:56 -0400] conn=12896 op=5 fd=100 closed - U1
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Bret
>>>
>>> On 05/26/2014 09:51 AM, Bret Wortman wrote:
>>>> Okay, I found something in the slapd-FOO-NET/access log. I figured out
>>>> which conn ID related to a sudo -i that I performed which took longer
>>>> than expected and grepped for that conn ID:
>>>>
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:56 -0400] conn=183751 fd=111 slot=111 connection
>>>> from 192.168.208.129 to 192.168.10.111
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:57 -0400] conn=183751 op=0 EXT
>>>> oid="1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.20037" name="startTLS"
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:57 -0400] conn=183751 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=120
>>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:59 -0400] conn=183751 SSL 128-bit AES
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:59 -0400] conn=183751 op=1 BIND
>>>> dn="uid=sudo,cn=sysaccounts,cn=etc,dc=foo,dc=net" method=128 version=3
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:08:59 -0400] conn=183751 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=97
>>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=2 SRCH
>>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=foo,dc=net" scope=2 filter="(cn=deraults)" 
>>>> attrs=ALL
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=3 SRCH
>>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=foo,dc=net" scope=2
>>>> filter="(|(sudoUser=bretw)(sudoUser=%users)(sudoUser=%#100)(sudoUser=%admins)(sudoUser=%nonexp)(sudoUser=%sudoers)(sudoUser=$unrestricted)(sudoUser=%#1855200000)(sudoUser=%#18552000004) 
>>>>
>>>> (sudoUser=%#1855200006)(sudoUser=%#1855200007)(sudoUser=ALL))" 
>>>> attrs=ALL
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:00 -0400] conn=183751 op=3 RESULT erro=0 tag=101
>>>> nentries=2 etime=0
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:01 -0400] conn=183751 op=4 SRCH
>>>> base="ou=SUDOers,dc=foo,dc=net" scope=2 filter="(sudoUser=+*)" 
>>>> attrs=ALL
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:01 -0400] conn=183751 op=4 RESULT err=0 tag=101
>>>> nentries=0 etime=0
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:03 -0400] conn=183751 op=5 UNBIND
>>>> [26/May/2014:09:09:03 -0400] conn=183751 op=5 fd=111 closed = U1
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Freeipa-users mailing list
>>> Freeipa-users at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Freeipa-users mailing list
>> Freeipa-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-users
>
>


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3766 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/freeipa-users/attachments/20140527/1c9935c0/attachment.p7s>


More information about the Freeipa-users mailing list